Ref: HCO B 23 Dec 72 Integrity Processing Series 20HCO B 21 Nov 73 The Cure of Q and A

Name: Anti-Q and A TR.

When an Auditor asks one question but F/Ns something else it is simply a version of Q and A.

Commands: Basically, “Put that (object) on my knee.” (A book, piece of paper, ashtray, etc can be used for object.)

Example:

Position: Student and Coach sitting facing each other at a comfortable distance and one at which the Coach can reach the Student’s knee with ease.

Auditor: Do you have a problem?

Purpose:

Pc: (ramble-ramble) I was thinking of last night’s dinner.

(a) To train Student in getting a Pc to carry out a command using formal communication not Tone 40.

Auditor: That F/Ns.

(b) To enable the Student to maintain his TRs while giving commands.

Every few folders you pick up, if you can find examples of this:

(c) To train the Student to not get upset with a Pc under formal auditing.

The Auditor is not trained not to Q and A.

Mechanics: Coach selects small object (book, ashtray, etc) and holds it in his hand.

He is not getting answers to his questions.

Training Stress: Student is to get the Coach to place the object that he has in his hand on the knee of the Student. The Student may vary his commands as long as he maintains the Basic Intention (not Tone 40) to get the Coach to place the object on the Student’s knee. The Student is not allowed to use any physical enforcement, only verbal commands. The Coach should try and get the Student to Q and A. He may say anything he wishes to try and get him off the track of getting the command executed. The Student may say what he wishes in order to get the command done, as long as it directly applies in getting the Coach to place the object on the Student’s knee.

When the Auditor starts something (such as a question or process) he must F/N what he started even though he did something else during it and got an F/N on something else. He must F/N the original action.

The Coach flunks for:

The result can be:

(a) Any communication not directly concerned with getting the command executed.

(a) Missed W/H phenomena.

(b) Previous TR.

(b) High or low TA an hour after the pc “F/Ned at Examiner”.

(c) Any upsetness demonstrated by Student.

(c) A stalled case.

(d) An undone program.

(e) An unhandled pc.

(f) Continual need for repair programs.

To get this disease out of an HGC requires that Auditors go through an Anti-Q and A handling.

C/Ses can also Q and A. They simply handle whatever the pc originates to the Examiner or Auditor, over and over and on and on.

The result is:

A. Incomplete Programs.

B. Tripled or quadrupled C/S effort as the case never seems to get solved.

C. Loads of repair programs.

Yet a C/S who does it will never look for it as the primary error being committed.

The remedy is to have the C/S do an Anti-Q and A program.