& Hurry up, hurry up, come on now. I have a couple of announcements to make, two announcements, one of them, I'm getting on with the show and everything's going along fine and all of a sudden somebody rushes up, puts slips of paper in my hand and says, „Announce this,“ you know, so I, so I'll announce this. Party, tickets are available from Mae Garrenger, who is up on the upper side up there at the back, and I think there's been some reduction in price, I'm not sure what it is. More important, on individual intensives, twenty-five hour intensives, all persons at the congress who are properly registered at the congress, may have individual auditing at the HGC here in Washington at professional rates, which is to say two hundred and fifty dollars for an intensive, immediately following the congress. I did that because I thought some of you might like a taste of this CCH and so forth, close up. Made it possible to do so.

Good evening. Good evening. How are you?

& Now, more germane to the situation, we will have a report on the validation committee tomorrow afternoon. They more or less have got their findings together now, but I will have them officially by tomorrow afternoon, then we'll know something about what we're doing about the validation program. But according to my first word on this, they have not covered a validation available at the academy. I suppose they felt diffident about covering this and so after a hurried consultation on this, we have decided that two weeks of validation are available, and we have before the congress been charging something like seventy-five dollars a week for the coaching and so forth. That's more or less just to cover its cost and certification and so forth. That's a validation on an old certificate is what we're talking about, and if someone cared to stay for a couple of weeks why we would give him a crack at it.

Audience: Fine.

& Now, that doesn't guarantee validation at the end of those two weeks, but it is the way we have been doing it. Now the fastest anybody has made it to date, and these were sharpies who have been with it for a long while anyway, is forty hours, forty hours of hard work to get through this. And these people were pretty well in the know already. So you see there is a possibility that it could be made in a couple of weeks because there'd theoretically be eighty or ninety hours of instruction possible in that period of time. So that is a local arrangement which was going forward which Nibs and John Fudge had been carrying on with before the congress, and if view of the fact the validation committee has not covered this particular ground, that arrangement I guess has just continued and I can announce, and make it official, that it is continued in case you want some of this coaching immediately after the congress.

Good. Oh, I'm fine.

& Of course the ACC starts at once after the congress and that is mainly devoted to that sort of thing. Of course what we're trying to make in the ACC are people who can instruct and bring up to validation level all auditor certificates throughout the United States. And we're trying to make validation instructors there in the ACC rather than to validate certificates. That would be rather uniform that an ACC attendee would get his certificate validated, that isn't what we're trying for. Now that's as far as they progressed as far as I know, and I get the rest of the information concerning field certificates, validation of, tomorrow afternoon. Now these are just announcements that have been shoved at me and I have a feeling, I have a feeling that you didn't expect entirely a lecture last time, that you would have rather seen a demonstration, however I had a few things to get off my mind and indulged myself by doing so, I hope you forgive me.

Audience: Good.

Thank you.

I understand that a congress is in progress.

Okay. Now, we're going to cover Tone 40 on a Person, right here and now. Tone 40 on a Person should not be confused with Tone 40 8-C. Because Tone 40 on a Person is a drill. It is a Training Drill; it is not a process.

Audience: Yes!

Don't confuse Training Drills with processes, by the way. Training Drills are Training Drills and processes are processes. And they are that because they don't work the same way; they're not on the same basis. There's a number of reasons why.

All right. What do you know!

Of course, you could consider a Training Drill a process. Anybody who is coach in one of these Training Drills does get some benefit out of it, for sure. He gets a chance to do all sorts of things that he ordinarily wouldn't. But that is not the purpose - that is not the purpose of it.

Now, I don't know whether you like these demonstrations or not.

For the auditor it's really not processing. It is simply a demand that he break through at once - not not-is and not alter-is anything - but just break straight through and ride right straight up on top and that's that, come on. And it has the answer to something I said in Wichita a number of years ago. I said, „There's no reason why a fellow just can't say, 'I'm Clear,' and be so.“ See? There is no reason. There's just a bank.

Audience: Yes.

But there's a theoretical possibility that a fellow can simply assume this point, you know, and go straight up. And actually a Training Drill permits you to do that. That is the mystery behind the Training Drill. They just say, „Go on, now. Do it!“ And the fellow - flub, flub, flub, pshew! „Do it!“

But one can have too much of that sort of thing, of course.

„Okay.“

Audience: No.

Lets him get kicked in the teeth and ignores the fact that he is being kicked in the teeth by his bank.

And if I was to continue on with these demonstrations this evening, you'd probably be very disappointed, wouldn't you? Probably wouldn't like that.

They are two distinctly different routes. Training Drills tell a person that he can succeed in spite of his bank. And auditing immediately addresses a problem of the bank and squares it up. They are not substitutes for each other either. It's quite remarkable.

I did, however, in view of the fact that evening - for some reason or other people are more dead in the evening so evenings have more dignity than afternoons. The sun goes down, you see, and the little algae floating on the face of the sea, you see, can't get quite as much energy from the sun. I don't know how they manage this, but they do. And so therefore, the body - remembering this - they're all deader. Well, that's beside the point. The first thing I... We'll continue on with some of these demonstrations then if you like.

Now, Tone 40 on a Person would look to you at first just like High School Indoc that we were doing this afternoon. That's what it would look like at first. But let me assure you it has no relationship to it beyond the fact that two people are walking around and one is giving orders to the other.

Good. Fine.

Now, the big difference here is that it is being done with total intention in the command and the acknowledgment. And actually it's much harder to coach. This doesn't at once become impossible to do. But you take somebody who is pretty good at this and you put him on a coach and have the coach try to act up and do something weird, and the next thing you know the coach goes into session. This is one of the wilder things that you'll observe here. All a sudden you'll see the coach, you'll say, „Well, this is no fun, the fellow is just doing 8-C.“ Believe me, the coach was trying! See, he was trying to revolt. But a good Tone 40 on a Person actually inhibits the revolt like mad.

All right. But there's something I'd like to mention with relationship to auditing. I would like to mention this; and it's just said to me that this can't be mentioned too often. And that is simply this: that there are various grades of auditing skill. The first of which is the skill of the Book Auditor. Now, the Book Auditor is a long-time mainstay of auditing. Every once in a while somebody who is auditing out of nothing but a book - he just reads it, he gets what he understands of it and applies it as he imagines it possibly should be applied - every once in a while somebody doing this gets the idea that he's looked down on in some fashion. No, he isn't looked down on; he's eight grades above most of Homo sapiens. He's actually doing something about it. And far from looking down on a Book Auditor we rather look up to them. They have a lot of nerve; they have a lot of guts.

Now, the auditing commands are the same as High School Indoc and 8-C. The auditing commands are just the same; there's no difference. Except there is intention and this slight difference: any coast off Tone 40 by the auditor in the session is a flunk. Which means too much pressure on the preclear, too strong a grip, too hard a push - those are all flunks. Too much grip on the wrist that hits the wall - that's a flunk. Falling off from Tone 40 with the auditing command; the intention is bad - that's a flunk. Getting complicated, isn't it?

And there's hardly an HDA or an HCA that wasn't a Book Auditor before he was a certified auditor. And if we start frowning on Book Auditors, why, we will be in an interesting state of affairs. We want everybody to start off in the high gear of HCA, Academy courses - not necessarily at all.

Now, you've watched this up here all the way through from Training 0 and you've experienced a lot of these lower ones yourself and each time we're using the last step combined into the new one, right? And now we're up to the point of where a slight smile, just a flicker of the fact that he knew the preclear spoke, is a flunk. Got that? You saw some of these people today; they kind of grin for a moment at the preclear... at the coach, you see. The auditor would kind of say, „That was a good try;” you know, or sort of give him a tiny little nod as he spoke, something like that. Those are all flunks on Tone 40 on a Person.

Now the question is, what can a Book Auditor audit?

It's got to be Tone 40 straight out. And that means the exact amount of effort necessary, the exact amount of intention necessary and a complete carry-out of the process, letter-perfect, from beginning to end. Otherwise it's a flunk. Now, that is Tone 40 on a Person. And a rough one it is.

I can get it now, there'll be a lot of old-timers that will just groan, if they haven't already groaned, over the list of things that a Book Auditor should be permitted to audit. These are rather ghastly. Book Auditor processes would include: engram running as described in the first edition, Book One, Dianetics: Modern Science of Mental Health; Fifteen Acts of Scientology, The Handbook for Preclears; Self Analysis in its entirety (and every once in a while a Book Auditor gets really stuck and we say, „Well, run Self Analysis on the preclear,“ and preclears snap out of it); the processing section of Scientology: The Fundamentals of Thought; the various assists which have been listed in many publications and the Co-auditor's Manual processes.

Now, I'm going to show you some people doing this. Okay? Audience: Okay. Fine.

Such books as these and such processes as these have been audited successfully over a great many years without very much kicking back.

All right. Now, it's a little hard for me to put together exactly how we would go about this. But I think Ken Barrett auditing Dick Halpern should finish up this hour.

The funniest thing I ever heard about a Book Auditor - he was absolutely sure that he had audited his brother into an insane asylum. He was sure of it. Because he started auditing his brother, his brother promptly went into the insane asylum - was committed. And the Book Auditor almost died in his tracks over the situation. Girded up his loins, so to speak, went into the asylum, finished running the engram, got his brother out. And his brother confessed that he had been feeling that crazy all his life but hadn't dare say anything about it.

& [Last names above were removed in the clearsound version.]

Well, now, that was a high level of emergency.

& Come on Mr. Barrett, where is you at? He didn't expect that, I gave him no warning at all, either of them. This is Dick Halpern, and Dr. Barrett.

And as a matter of fact, there is another level of action there, also having to do with insane asylums. Although why they have very much to do with the mind I don't know. An insane asylum is a perverted physics laboratory these days.

I would say it'd be best if you took off your coats. Also be best if I dragged this microphone back here out of the road. You'll notice here, at once, that this isn't anywhere near as rough or as athletic. The only thing that keeps it from being is simply the fact that the intention, willy-nilly, keeps getting through. Preclear goes on doing it. He doesn't want to but he does.

I wonder if you've heard the newest operation for schizophrenia. Schizophrenia means a split personality, according to Kraepelin's schedule. And this split personality has been giving people an awful lot of trouble. A fellow gets stuck half in and half out of two valences and therefore is a couple of personalities on the rampage, neither one of which are under control. All right. This schizophrenic condition is being answered up these days in the field of neuro-ha-ha-surgery just on this basis. They take a silver plate and they put it in, separating the two halves of the brain. I'm afraid that is the latest operation. It hasn't cured any schizophrenia yet, but it certainly keeps surgeons busy, which is, I suppose, what it's supposed to do.

All right. Now, coach, give your auditor his proper instructions.

But you talk about Q-and-Aing with the preclear! They figured out that the two halves of his brain are in argument and each one has a different personality. You see, there's nothing there but brain - that's the first mistake they make.

Coach: All right. You're going to run me on Tone 40 on a Person. The commands are „Look at that wall,“ plus an acknowledgment;

And, boy, I tried to audit a brain one time. Went down and got some calf's brains and tried to audit it. It didn't work! It's probably because it was calf's brains.

„Walk over to that wall,“ acknowledgment;

But auditing brains is not a paying proposition; doesn't accomplish very much. But Book Auditors auditing the reactive mind do accomplish quite a bit.

„With your right hand, touch that wall,“ acknowledgment; ''

Now there's only one set of processes that were missing in Book One that are not to some degree with us yet. There's one type of process missing in all these things enumerated except the last three.

„Turn around,“ ''and an acknowledgment.

If we'd had Havingness in 1950, we'd have had it made. Havingness: the possession of mass; the experience of mass. We'd have had it made. That was all that was missing.

Okay? You are to give me these commands with full intention, Tone 40. If you go off Tone 40, I'll give you a flunk. If you fail to use the proper amount of force, that is if you use too little so that I don't execute the command or if you use so much that it overwhelms me, and below 40, I'll flunk you. Understood? Okay I'll say only two things to you: „That's it,“ which will mean that's the end of the process you're running, and „Flunk.“ Okay

And just the other day I was running an engram and told the preclear to make it a little more solid when the preclear got stuck in the middle of the thing, and made it come loose, and kept on running the engram. I was just a few days ago running a Dianetic engram just like that.

Auditor: Start?

But we didn't have Havingness as such. And so this was a considerable missing tool. Now, we keep forgetting Havingness. And people doing CCH are liable to forget Havingness.

Coach: Start.

Now, I recently found out something of considerable interest to you, and that is that cases you cannot do anything for easily cannot make anything solid. Got that? The resistive case is simply that case which cannot make things more solid. And cases which can make things, even if a tiny bit, more solid, respond easily to processing. So the difference between a tough case and an easy case is solids. And that is the makebreak point of the cases. That's all there is to it. Behavior has nothing to do with it; IQ has nothing to do with it. Just the person has this ability or he doesn't have it.

Auditor: Look at that wall. Thank you. Walk over to that wall. Thank you. With your right hand, touch that wall. Thank you. Turn around. Thank you. Look at that wall.

Now, if he doesn't have it, we have Keep It from Going Away and Hold It Still as a gradient scale into solids. And they move a person straight into solids. You see that? But this is not a large proportion of cases.

Coach: Oh, sure!

Now, if a Book Auditor were to run into one of these can't-make-it-more-solid cases he might feel himself stopped. But there is a way for him to un-stop it. And that is given, oddly enough, in Scientology: Fundamentals of Thought, under „Havingness.“ And there's a Havingness Process in there which says „Objective Havingness.“ And it is run exactly in this fashion. It says „Look around the room and find something you can have.“ And when that's a bit flat you would have him „Look around the room and find something (blank) cannot have.“

Auditor: Thank you. Walk over to that wall. Thank you. With your right hand, touch that wall.

And here is the great oddity on Havingness. There are many preclears, particularly those preclears who cannot make things more solid, who also cannot actually run „can have.“ See, they can't look around and find something they can have. They can't do that; it's a stopper. But they can do this: They can look around and find something somebody can't have. So we talk it over with them, not talking too much because their havingness is down anyway, and find that person immediately adjacent to their present time existence who is a can't-have sort of fellow, a fellow who is hard on his possessions, a fellow who does not receive things graciously, an individual who is... specializes in old possessions, something like that. And we have this person look around the room and find something the can't-have person can't have.

Coach: I can't! You're pressing it too... against my side.

Now, let's suppose with a little conversation we found out that it was Aunt Emma. And Aunt Emma was a can't-have case. And this person's been around Aunt Emma for some time. Now, we don't much care whether we get the right person or not because „can't have“ will run when „can have“ won't. But we take one of these more or less can't-have cases - we don't have to be particularly certain that it is the valence which needs cracking on the case - and we simply tell this person, „Look around the room and find something that Aunt Emma can't have.“

Auditor: Thank you. Turn around.

Now, he's liable to start out very foolishly and say, „Well, Aunt Enima isn't here so she can't have anything.“

Coach: You're getting awfully mean about this.

And you say, „Well, just one thing, if you please - just one.“

Auditor: Thank you.

And you run that a bit flat and you will find out that your preclear will develop, ordinarily, some somatics on this.

Coach: It hurts.

Now, if the person developed no somatics on this and you were still in an argument about this, just pick another can't-have valence.

Auditor: Look at that wall. Thank you.

And if you got brutally savage about it - preclear still very resistive about the whole thing - we see that the preclear has some disability of some sort or another, like he has a bad leg. We tell him to look around the room and find something his leg can't have.

Coach: Think of all the people out there.

Now after you run this for a while, any of these „can't haves,“ with any success at all, he can then run „can have.“

Auditor: Walk over to that wall.

And if you knew nothing else than what I've just told you about the mind, you would be successful; more successful than medicine, and more successful than psychology and psychiatry, and certainly more successful than psychoanalysis. In other words, you could simply set up shop and say - you've got somebody in your vicinity and you don't like the way they're spinning, well, you could just use what I've just told you. Talk it over and ask them if they ever knew a person they couldn't have... that couldn't have anything. „That's fine. Well, look around here and find something that person cannot have.“ Make them give you one object. Maybe you have to change your mind about the person, but that won't damage it any. And after you've run this for a little while then you say, „Now look around the room and find something that you can have.“ And that would be the safe approach to any case.

Coach: Think of all the people out there. Don't be nervous.

And here is sort of a shotgun process that would always wind up with success. It's always successful. When in doubt, remedy havingness. When in doubt about what to run, if you can't make up your mind at all, run what I just told you. I would run it if I were confronted by a preclear of low reality.

Auditor: Thank you. With your right hand, touch that wall.

All this „can't have“ is, is a below solids. See, it's below solids. The individual cannot have that pillar. Why can't he have the pillar? Well, he can't have anything as solid as that pillar. That's all.

Coach: Much better. You're more relaxed now.

Well, you ask him bluntly and first off, „Look around the room and find something you can have,“ and he's below solids, then he may tell you he can have a few of these things, but he can't. So the alternate and the best approach to it when in... it would simply be isolate a can't-have personality that's been in his vicinity, ask him to look around and find something that that person can't have. The next thing you know, things start to appear more solid to the preclear.

Auditor: Thank you.

This is also a cure for psychosomatics. Quite interesting. I cured up some bad teeth on somebody one day just by asking him, look around the room and find something his teeth couldn't have. He found out that his teeth could tolerate nothing of any size. The door, he couldn't have the door because the door was too big. And at first we had nothing but conditions; there had to be conditions about the „can't have“ on the teeth. But after a while it simply... he could say, „Well, they can't have that and they can't have that and they can't have something or other - Ow! And they can't have something or other and they can't have - Ow! What are you doing to me? They can't have something or other, they can't have

Coach: Think I'm going to get away from you or something?

- Ow! They can't have something or other... Huh! Mouth feels different.“

Auditor: Look at that wall. Thank you. Walk over to that wall.

„All right. Now look around the room and find something you can have.“ You pick up „mouth feels different“ as the „cognition.“ Huh! Kind of a weak cognition, isn't it? Nevertheless, you could change the process at that point with no damage.

Coach: I'm going. Thu don't have to keep crowding me.

Well, this is a successful approach. And when you can take Dianetics and Scientology and in these very few minutes at the beginning of this evening's sessions give you just that much and say, „Well, that solves cases,“ well, you're fine.

Auditor: Thank you.

Now, a Book Auditor would not run into enough outright randomity, he wouldn't run into enough difficulty to change that too much.

Coach: All right.

You understand, though, that he is not going to go all the way south with all cases everywhere. As you walk up to a psycho and say, „Who was the most can't - have person that you knew?“

Auditor: With your right hand, touch that wall.

And the psycho says, „Goobley-gobblety-gooh. Drool. Drool.“ Well, that's beyond his reach.

Coach: Mm-hm.

He couldn't take a person all the way north. But he could certainly change the attitude and states of beingness of people quite markedly and remarkably simply with that.

Auditor: Thank you. Turn around. Thank you. Look at that wall. Thank you. Walk over to that wall.

Now, I don't say he should just abandon everything else he's doing and use only that. I'm just telling you that that itself all by itself will work.

Coach: Okay. You look.

Now recognize, if you please, that this isn't the same statement - such and such works uniformly - isn't the same statement as „all other things are now passé or bad.“ Because I can get as much progress on a case in a couple hours or three hours of Two-way Communication as you'd get with about a fifty-hour intensive on Havingness. You got the idea?

Auditor: Thank you. With your right hand...

So the question is, something is good and something is workable and something is uniformly successful, well, we've got another factor entering in here which is quite amazing and that is: How fast is it successful? See, there's a speed factor. Also the north and south factor. How high could this person be placed by reason of auditing? And how low a case could you audit successfully?

Coach: It's dusty up there.

Well, the Book Auditor certainly ought to be able to do those things. And I personally respect him for the auditing he has done. And remember that in the beginning, I was a Book Auditor!

Auditor: ... touch that wall.

I also want to mention in passing that every now and then we say validated certificates or something of that sort - we say upper processes - we aren't saying, everything you know is bad and false. We're not saying that. We're saying simply this: We've hit a new level of action. We've hit a new level of action. Well, that is not the same statement as: You mustn't practice all those successful things you have been doing up till now. And don't confuse those two statements.

Coach: Sure.

If you do confuse them thoroughly, you would just be barring a bit of progress. You would resent the progress which is being made. And that progress is, it is actual and so on.

Auditor: Thank you.

Now, we've been exploring all the way south. And if they go any further south than we can reach right now, they aren't. As far as we're concerned, they're totally, completely out of communication of all kinds. Because processing the dead is not unsuccessful today - and I don't wish to bring up this necromantic note, but necromancy is a solved science. They've been trying to solve it for a number of thousands of years and finally went into apathy on it and went into religion.

Coach: Awful dusty.

You're aware of the fact that more than one Scientologist have sat down alongside of the cadaver and said, „Hey boy, come back here and pick up this body“ - and the thetan has. You realize that? You know that this has happened. But it doesn't happen very publicly because everybody says, „Well, he must have still been alive.“ There was one case where the doctor actually had pronounced the person stone dead. However, a Scientologist says, „Come back here. Come on, pick up this body. What do you mean, running off like that? You can patch it up - come on.“ And all of a sudden, why, wham!

Auditor: Turn around.

It was a little girl, by the way, and she had run into a concrete wall or something and hit her head and she fell dead. And the doctor was called, applied the mist test with the mirror, you know, and stethoscope to the heart and all that - very, very, very dead. A Scientologist happened to be on the other side of the park and saw all this and went over and got the medico out of the road and got the doctor... got the cops out of the road and so forth and sat down alongside the little girl and took her hand and said, „Come on. Come on back here and pick up the mock-up - come on, pick up the body. Let's not have this now; come on.“ The little girl: „Da-da-da-da.“

Coach: All right.

The Scientologist had a conversation with her. She said, very clearly, „My mother does not care what happens to me; my father does not care what happens to me - why should I go on living?“

Auditor: Thank you.

And the Scientologist says, „Well, there's certainly some way to make them care!“ The little girl bought that and that was the end of the process.

Coach: Okay.

As a matter of fact, Mama and Daddy were so frightened over the incident, it subsequently worked out that they made the girl welcome.

Auditor: Look at that wall.

Now, the various levels are talked about here in this Ability magazine, Issue number

Coach: Look at that wall.

50. I have no intention of going over all of this. But we won't stop going north. We're just now starting - we're starting seven years from scratch. In other words, for about seven years we've been trying to explore what are Black Fives; we've solved that. All you have to do is make them mock up blacknesses and shove it into themselves. Even if they go anaten, just keep up the process. And they have a tendency to clear up.

Auditor: Thank you.

There are ways to solve the „Invisible Field“ case. We've solved one of those of long standing. Glass objects on a table, one after the other, make them keep the objects from going away with their hands.

Coach: Thank you.

These various far-south problems: the little baby, the comatose person, the people in spinbins - so what? We've processed them all by this time. As a matter of fact, the main surprise that I would get if I found that some auditor trained to do so had failed to get results on a case that was way down south, I would say offhand that what had happened there is the auditor had skidded in some fashion. And I would put my total attention on the auditor and patch him up so he wouldn't skid. There must have been something wrong with his training or skill. That's the way it's come about these days - it is no longer whether or not the technique works, it's whether or not the auditor can work the techniques.

Auditor: Walk over to that wall.

That's very true of CCH. CCH results are as variable as the auditor who does them. Hence this validation program. There are people around that are not trained in them that if just suddenly started doing CCH without any of the Training Drills at all would just lay the most colossal egg they ever laid. They better just sort out the valence of „can't have“ and run „can't have“ on it. Because they'll get no place with CCH, see? It's the intention. The preclear stays in-session just as long as the intention is there, and various other things.

Coach: Walk over to that wall.

Now, CCH itself is compounded, by the way, of practically every successful process that we have had since 1950. Or every item we have had since 1950 in a successful process that handles it. And that is basically what CCH is. It is not new. It is a new organization. What is new is this Tone 40 stuff. That is new. But CCH itself and its basic organization contain such things as the process I just gave you about havingness. That's one of the CCH processes. There's a whole rack of them on the subject of havingness. There's also Subjective Havingness, Remedy of Havingness - years old.

Auditor: Thank you.

This thing about Then and Now Solids, which is an upper CCH, is quite remarkable for being nothing more than Dianetics run Scientology-wise. You get the same phenomena. Except you run more confounded engrams in less time than you ever could have counted back in 1950. Whir-clank! There's speed on running them if they're run properly.

Coach: Thank you. Thank you!

But indoctrination on a Comm Course level is necessary really to any auditing that is going to be uniformly successful. And on an Upper Indoc level we have a necessity of drill there, if we're going to make any of these Tone 40 processes work. They don't work without Upper Indoctrination.

Auditor: Thank you.

Now, there's a process called Give Me Your Hand; Thank You. Now, we're going to take this up later on in this congress. And it possibly could be run ten thousand ways, but only one of them is right. And you could run Give Me Your Hand on somebody - Give me your hand, give me your hand, and so on - just get nowhere. And you would say, „Well, what's the necromancy here?“ Well, the necromancy is, is we stopped the idea that the process was going to do it all and entered the faint notion that the auditor had something to do with it. Because we know the results which can be obtained by CCH, because they've been broadly tested and broadly run by a great many auditors on a great many preclears. We know what CCH is capable of doing. Because every time we have found it falling down is by reason of the auditor. And we've taken the auditor and run him back through Upper Indoc and put him back in on the same preclear and had improvement on the preclear then, as expected. You got that?

Coach: You're welcome.

So it's auditor failure. But we knew in the past that we could have such things as such auditor failure, but there was no sense in hanging it around people's necks. I would much rather carry the yoke of responsibility and make the processes better. Which was the course which was taken. Processes anybody could run was the hope. But now we've gotten these training skills. Now these training skills exist. And as they exist and because they exist it is now possible to say to an auditor, „Your auditing requires improvement.“ And it's only possible to say that to him because his auditing by the training drills can be improved rather easily. In other words, we can say something about it because we can do something about it, don't you see? So it becomes very allowable.

Auditor: With your right hand...

Now, nobody would look to a Book Auditor to have a very smooth approach. As a matter of fact, do you remember the old canceler way back when? Well, I had an old Book Auditor give me an auditing session one day and I was doing... we were doing some experimental work. And he was maintaining something or other, something or other - she was, rather - maintaining something or other and something or other was the case; and she was going to show me this phenomena. So I thought that was fine. And she reached over and picked up a copy of Book One and opened it up to the „Beginning of session“ and read it to me, installed a canceler and went right straight through by reading the text at me that wrote it. And I obediently went into session and we investigated the phenomena. She brought me up to present time and cancelled the canceler - also out of the book. Pretty wild. Pretty wild.

Coach: All right.

We used to have such things as stenographic auditors - stenographic auditing. We haven't heard of these things for ages and ages. The auditor didn't do anything but sit there and write down whatever the preclear said - stenographic auditing, 100 %. Preclear would just run on and on in some kind of an auto-fashion. The auditor would put him vaguely into session, head him vaguely into the beginning of an engram someplace and then sit and write down everything the preclear said from there on; and every once in a while would look up and say, „Go over it again,“ obediently, see?

Auditor: ... touch that wall.

What we've conquered essentially is an earlier inability to reach that which is the motivator of the being. And we have conquered this disability. And we can communicate with that, we can change that, we can do something about that. We understand the innumerable phenomena which arise from these various things. And as such, why, we can afford to, one, oversimplify the whole thing. See, when you know all about it you can say, „Well this is what's important about it and the other things aren't.“ Don't you see? That's easy. And without at the same time invalidating the rest of the data-it's still there. And we can also do this thing: We can take somebody who is auditing over a long period of time, he's been auditing for a long time, and we can do remarkable things for his auditing - utterly fantastic things for his auditing.

Coach: Yeah. Just did.

You know how I know this?

Auditor: Thank you.

Well, I used to consider myself a pretty good auditor because they used to bring me in all the tough cases. Running a clinic, something like that, or some auditor that was working somewhere on some preclear. They'd come in; they'd brought the case to an unsolvable impasse. Maybe two or three other auditors, pretty good, had also drawn a blank, and they'd bring the case in to me and I'd do something with the case somehow or other. And most of them would work out and start running again and so forth, see. Well, I'd thought there was nothing but tough cases during the entire first year of Dianetics; I thought that was all there was. Up to that time I'd had nothing but easy cases and suddenly got nothing but tough cases. No wonder we kept on trying to crack tough cases - I got them all.

Coach: All right.

Well, there was a time when I considered it was a myth that I was a terrific auditor. I said, „Well, it must be just mythical. You know, a thing builds up, you... must be better auditors around.“ And in Phoenix we did... all the staff auditors did twenty-five-hour (over a long period of time they were doing this), they were doing twenty-five-hour intensives on preclears. And I was doing five-hour intensives on preclears and I got a little bit better results. Five hours to twenty-five.

Auditor: Turn around.

All right. Now, my auditing wasn't bad then. It wasn't terrible. It was quite workable. Cases would untangle, start running for various reasons, whatever they were - altitude or skill or knowing more about the subject. Who knows? But the point is, I went on auditing a long time like that. And then I coached the staff at the FC after I came back from England - I'd coached the auditors in England up a little bit and hadn't finished the job over there. Came back over here and did most of the coaching which... we called it coaching then, instructing now-coach became something particular. And I was running them through these Training Drills personally, just making sure that they came up to snuff. There wasn't much anything else to do it.

Coach: That wall means something.

But I was teaching these people Comm Course - you know, Dear Alice, Acknowledgment, Repetitive Question, Pc Origination, Hand Mimicry, simple 8-C, High School Indoc, Tone 40 on an Object and Tone 40 on a Person - I was teaching them those drills, just one right after the other. And I was in there almost every night. After a day at work, why, we'd pitch in and we would get some more of this validation out of the road. We were trying to get ahead and validate all of the staff certificates that were on deck at the FC. And we were trying to make it before this congress and we made it. And the auditors are validated through all of these coaching steps, which is a pretty good thing. They worked real hard to do this for you. You ought to give them a hand.

Auditor: Thank you.

Okay. Now, in view of the fact that I was pounding their ears in with this information, I was hammering and kicking them around... And by the way, there was... for 24 hours there was nobody at the FC would hardly speak to me. I mean they'd gotten up to the blow point. I mean it was just too whhff you know. Just one more time of putting that ashtray down on the table would have been enough! And all of a sudden they blew through it and it all blew away and we were all friends again. That's the way it works.

Coach: You're getting my shirt dirty. You're getting my shirt dirty!

All right. We were doing beautifully and I said to myself I said, „You know, I wonder if you audited exactly according to these Training Drills and no other way, totally in present time, doing nothing but audit the preclear exactly according to these drills, exactly according to CCH, if you wouldn't produce an interesting result. Now, I'm going to do this just to make sure there's nothing missing - I'm going to do this, see.“ And I sat down and wogwogged through my first two sessions of a couple of hours apiece with a duplicative-type process, using nothing but Tone 40, present time, using the Comm Course responses, not varying one iota off the line anywhere - did it just exactly the way I'm telling you here at this congress, you see? And I did it.

Auditor: Look at that wall. Thank you.

Now, I'd had a little earlier experience of driving a car in present time which almost removed me from this Earth. I just ignored all my driving machinery and did everything in present time. Well, this was auditing in present time.

Coach: All right.

I'd been auditing a lot of people for a very long time. And I started auditing right up there on top, right totally in present time, using nothing but Tone 40 intentions and acknowledgments, using nothing but the exact school solution. Knock me down with a feather. At about the fifth or sixth hour I was really grooving it, I was doing it well, and I thought, „Who was that lousy auditor I used to know? Who's that... What did I think I was doing in 1953?“

Auditor: Walk over to that wall.

In the first place, the results on the preclears were going up just like that, see? I was ending up sessions feeling fresher than I began. That was not too unusual for me, but I was feeling remarkably better! And I was riding right up on top all the way through, and the hours of the session were just going by swish. And I was doing nothing but what I am talking to you about here at this congress.

Coach: You're welcome. All right. Okay. Don't grab me so hard. I'm going. What's the matter with you?

Now, I'm not trying to tell you how good an auditor I am. I'm trying to tell you that there may be some things outside the perimeter of these Training Drills. And there are, because we have some additional little drills like Fishing a Cognition and that sort of thing, how to conduct two-way communication, how to begin sessions, end sessions and that sort of thing. But the point is that I didn't use any of these things. I merely used Training 0 right straight on up to Training 9, inclusive, and the exact process, and got better results on preclears than I'd ever gotten before in my life.

Auditor: Thank you.

Therefore, I can stand up and tell you very didactically that this is a workable set of drills.

Coach: You're welcome.

(applause). Thank you.

Auditor: With your right hand...

Now, it's quite amazing, it's quite amazing to see somebody auditing who himself is restimulatable in ordinary life. But after a fellow has audited this way for a very little while, he doesn't get restimulated anymore. That's for sure.

Coach: Thank you.

My existence as an auditor was made random because I would sometimes get preclears pitched at me, even in later days here, I didn't want anything to do with. And I finally found out why I didn't want anything to do with them. They would occasionally be so enturbulative in the auditing room that they'd sort of tire me out, you know? I'd get tired on the thing. I don't get tired anymore; it's sort of a state of „bring on your lions.“ I think that we've got this licked.

Auditor: ... touch that wall.

There hasn't been too much change, as I said, on the Comm Course for a year, and there hasn't been too much change for about four or five months here on Upper Indoc. And I don't see any reason to change it.

Coach: Thank you.

There's some other versions of Upper Indoc which are quite interesting. One of them we haven't shown you. It's a sort of an ACC variation. The auditor sits down and the coach sits across from him - this is a seated High School Indoc - and the coach simply carries on the most invalidative yak that he can possibly think up. Like, „Who taught you to audit? Boy, is that a comm lag! That's a communication break - you broke the Auditor's Code that time!“ Yak-yak-yak-yak-yak. And turns on misemotions - becomes very apathetic or becomes raging and so on. And the auditor is expected to go on calmly delivering the auditing command and acknowledging in spite of all this. That is another form of High School Indoc.

Auditor: Thank you.

We've found out, however, that this levels out to a marked degree on Tone 40 on an Object and on Tone 40 on a Person and is not terribly necessary; it's merely very good. And it's kind of fun. If you feel mad at the world someday, why, get somebody... hold somebody and tell him you're going to teach him how to audit and...

Coach: Thank you.

It's a wonderful feeling to give people advice about something with a totally clean conscience. And that's what I'm doing tonight, what I have done all along, but what I've done particularly with these Training Drills.

Auditor: Turn around.

Now, the reason I've been talking to you this long is I just wanted to make awfully sure that nobody here was under the misconception that, one, because we have found something new, that all old things were bad. That is not true. And the other thing is, is that the Training Drills form an artificiality which bypasses natural aptitude.

Coach: Thank you. Thank you.

I found a horrible case of auditor intuition the other day. Preclear hadn't gained for hours and hours of processing either. But the auditor had a feeling, he had a feeling that something or other ought to be run on that case; he just had a feeling. He couldn't account for it and no data on the case would corroborate the fact that this was on the case. I got hold of the auditor and I audited out the feeling. He knew what should be audited on that case.

Auditor: Thank you.

Did you ever see the experiment of the two E-Meters, by the way?

Coach: Good. Good!

You take a co-auditing team and you put the auditor on one E-Meter and the preclear on the other and then you call off the list of things which have been audited - not because they were restimulative or had been flattened on the preclear, Lord forbid; they had not even vaguely been flattened, they'd merely been restimulated on the preclear. The auditor's E-Meter responded to what had been run on the preclear. But the preclear's E-Meter didn't respond. In other words, what was being run was wrong with the auditor. Auditor was running his own case. Well, it's all right to do that, too. It's probably real good for you!

Auditor: Look at that wall.

However, even if you do that, why, Scientology still works. And even if you do that at Tone 40, you'll still produce results - something will happen.

Coach: Good.

Now, you had a Group Auditing session here yesterday afternoon. And I actually audited you straight on a Tone 40 Group Process, much as I would have audited you as an individual session in an auditing room. Now, I mentioned to you afterwards that there was some difference here, that there was a different type of Group Processing than I had done before. And those of you who had been group processed by me agreed with this very thoroughly. They said, „Yes, this was a different type of auditing than you have done on us before.“

Auditor: Thank you.

Well, it was nothing more nor less, what I did, than these Training Drills exactly combined into a production of a Group Auditing session. And that was exactly what happened. I think you would agree with me because I gave you the command and made sure the command hit all parts of the hall - each person in the hall - before I went on and gave the acknowledgment. I didn't give the acknowledgment until some execution had been performed. And then after I said the acknowledgment, got the intention of bringing that cycle to a full stop, at which time this occurred, and then let it off the full stop and slid on to the next auditing command for a new cycle. And that was exactly what was happening. We were running each cycle, each command, followed by an acknowledgment, making a full cycle of action which stopped with the acknowledgment. And then we went on to a new cycle, and then we went on and did a new cycle and a new cycle. In other words, we weren't doing one auditing session or two auditing sessions in the two hours. We did a great many auditing sessions. Each command was an auditing session, don't you see.

Coach: Good.

Now, I know those things got across because I've heard on the grapevine and so on, through messages passed through and so on, that there were a great many people present who got their first reality on processing - even some old-timers - on those two group sessions yesterday. Is that true? Or is this just rumor?

Auditor: Walk over to that wall.

Well, we had several exteriorizations, which hadn't happened before. That's right, isn't it? All right. In other words, here was an interesting thing. We ran a Tone 40 group session, and I will confess to you that it was nothing but calculated. It was totally calculated. It was a calculated process. First I gave you the realest havingness you could meet - pressure, remember? - and then blew you out of your heads, of course. I didn't try to do anything else but that. Now, if I didn't blow you out, I loosened you up. That's right, isn't it?

Coach: Okay Good! Good! All right!

Audience: Right.

Auditor: Thank you. With your right hand, touch that wall.

All right. Now, here's the interplay of Scientology is carried in just vignette in those two hours of Group Auditing. First hour was devoted to a havingness-type process which I knew very well people could do and from which they would get havingness. See, that was the first hour. And the second hour we had to assume that havingness had been increased to some degree. And in view of the fact that it had been increased, then there was a possibility of giving a few people a higher reality on exteriorization simply in the course of holding the body on Earth, because what else are they doing, you see?

Coach: Sure.

Furthermore, by pressing the floor down against the ground, you have a tendency to go up, see? And you found yourselves doing that, many of you. Didn't you?

Auditor: Thank you.

Audience: Yes.

Coach: You're welcome.

The least that would have happened to you is you would have felt lighter.

Auditor: Turn around. Thank you.

All right. Havingness versus separateness. And this is really the limit of action necessary in auditing. You can't run separateness very well; you have to continue to run put-togetherness. But you can run put-togetherness - Hold the floor against the Earth - in such a way as to make a Separateness Process out of it. Don't you see?

Coach: You're welcome. Good.

You make a fellow push hard enough against the wall and you're going to accomplish a considerable reaction as far as he's concerned, see. See how that would be? In other words, you're still running togetherness - you're making him push the walls together - but the action of pushing the walls together will push him out.

LRH: That's it!

Now, running separateness all by itself is a very difficult thing to do. It can be done. But it evidently requires terrifically smooth auditing. It requires a tremendous repair of havingness. It requires all sorts of things. Separateness is quite a lot of process. I can get away with separateness. A lot of auditors around can get away with separateness, but generally it can't be gotten away with.

Thank you. Thank you very much.

And yet, what do we have?

& Thank you very much Dr. Barrett, thank you very much Dick Halpern.

We have possession and separateness from the possession. And of course, the more vista the thetan has, the more havingness he has. The more he can see or experience, the more havingness he has. Isn't that right? So havingness is dependent upon communication and having a broad view. Now, a thetan becomes so anxious about things, he says, „Look, I'll stick in this head and at least I'll have that! At least I'll have that. And I'll just say, 'Well, I don't want those other things; at least I'll have this skull.“

There wasn't much chance of a flunk there. Both of these gentlemen are Instructors in the ACC. Both of them have this thing as cold as ice.

Well, the only reason he is doing that is because he is worried about having a head. He thinks if he no longer has the head, why, he won't have anything else either. In other words, he fixes his attention much too closely.

& And there probably isn't anybody around that can flunk Barrett on this. But if anybody could have flunked him it would have been Dick Halpern. I was thinking under the stress of all this why, we might have gotten a mess up of one kind or another, but apparently, apparently his poise is not to be destroyed that easily.

So what is life?

& Well now, who else are we going to get up here, huh? Who else are we going to get up here? It would have to be somebody that was pretty smooth on this, pretty smooth on this. Just to give you another example of this, only let's give you some randomness concerning this. Let's give you something here with a few more flunks. Let me see, let me see. Well, we had a good boy up here today with Richard Green, Richard Green, come on up here Richard. Now we're going to pull an awful dirty trick on John Farrell. Alright.

Life is getting into things and getting out of them. Isn't that right? About all there is to it. I mean, you get into something and then you get out of it.

& Student: I've never run this one.

To audit this it is necessary to run getting into things. Don't run getting out of them. Got that? It was getting into things that gave him havingness, he thought. So you're going to have to run more getting into things so that he has enough getting into things. And after a while he says, „You know, I'm into so many things I can drop one or two things.“ It's just more or less on the order of a business executive, something of the sort, and he's been awfully fixed on his job, let's say. He's been doing nothing but his job, nothing but his job. One day, why, he finds how to do his job a little bit better so he picks up a hobby and then he picks up another hobby and he picks up another hobby. And he finds out how to do these pretty well and he's still got these possessions and life goes on this way. And one day, why, his business picks up and requires more attention than he was giving it previously. „Well,“ he says, „well, I've got enough hobbies that I can drop stamp collecting.“ See, he could do that one thing: he could drop stamp collecting. But let me assure you that if he didn't have that many, why, he'd just fix down into the business. He doesn't let up somewhere, he just sort of mires in.

& Never run this, that's all right, come up here. He hasn't come up to this yet. That's fine, that's why you're here, take your coat off and put it up here, come on here Johnnie. OK. You betcha. Now, John I want you to audit Dick Green here, and

When a person has only one fixed interest, like their lumbago or sciatica or something, ask them to give this up is almost impossible. But you can certainly take somebody's interest off his sciatica by coming along and giving him a kick in the shins. He won't think sciatica for some minutes. Well now that's violently done, and it is not by power of choice and therefore he is upset about it.

Dick I want you to coach him through this. So, you just coach him straight through, give him his instructions right where he is so the audience can hear you, and it doesn't matter whether you do it right or wrong, that's not any possibility, but make sure you flunk him every time you get him off on anything, see?

So auditing is not good when done simply on the kick-in-the-shins basis. See, that's not good auditing, that's good coaching. All right. Therefore, kicking people in the shins takes their mind off... well, you by auditing can give them a number of possible kicks in the shins. And pretty soon they say, „Well you know, I've got twelve kicks in the shins now. You know, I think I could possibly get along with eleven.“ So you give him fifteen. And he says, „You know, I think I could get along with ten.“ So you give him twenty-five. And he says, „You know, I could get along with five of these.“ I'm talking about have to have them, you know. Finally, why, he's quite content; you give him eighty-five synthetic kicks in the shins, not actual ones, you see, and he says, „I don't have to have any kicks in the shins; I can make them up. It's okay.“ So he's willing to let go of this and he doesn't need a kick in the shins. And at that moment the bruise will heal. Do you see that?

& Coach: OK.

It's just getting into things. You give him the opportunity to get into a lot more things than he ever had before and he'll get out on a couple. Got it?

& Alright. Let's go.

So that's what auditing works as. It works on the basis of getting into things. Therefore, havingness; therefore, pressure. See this?

& Coach: The commands are first, „Look at that wall,“ and, „Walk over to that wall,“ both acknowledged when I look at them. Then I'm going to walk over to it and acknowledge it, then, „With your right hand, touch that wall,“ and acknowledge it, then, „Turn around,“ and acknowledge that, then, „Look at that wall,“ and so on.

Now, in the present level of CCH and in the Training Drills there is really - but you did it yesterday but in the school solution - there is no proviso for this one interesting factor. And I'd like to wind up this data lecture on the subject of these drills before we get on with more of them, which we will all ... entirely in the second hour. I just want to give you this one more piece of data that's of great interest, is: escape from pressure is the retreat into small-size degradation, mired down, blindness or anything else. It's the retreat from pressure. Now, that is an accurate, technical statement. A person is afraid of pressures; he doesn't want that much pressure; he feels that pressures are too much for him.

& Student

You can take somebody who's having a rough time and all you've got to do is pound your fist on the table once and he gets terribly upset - that was too much pressure.

Auditor: Good.

Now, the suddenness of pressure is as important as the amount of pressure. You got that? I mean, there are two different things. There's the suddenness of the pressure as in an automobile crash, bang! You see? And the amount of pressure is merely the foot-pounds in the thing. And it's quite a mechanical thing. People who are having trouble bodywise are escaping from an imagined pressure in that area of their body and they withdraw from that area. They say, „I can't stand that much impact. I can't stand that much pressure.“

& Coach: You're to run this Tone 40 and then ...

And an interesting field of research which is going on right now is the way north. And that is the research that's going on. I'm reporting to you on a fait accompli. I'm telling you, of all things, that I audit differently than I used to - that's quite an announcement all by itself - and more successfully, which is a confession, a confession that I couldn't have been auditing perfectly. I didn't know it. I thought I was auditing perfectly. I thought I was perfect, didn't you?

& Audience: Could you do that louder?

But this way north, the direction out, would lie along some facet of havingness. And the one which is being explored at this moment is pressure. Trying to get somebody after he's leveled out and he's under good subjective control - you know exactly what he's doing, he's got his mock-ups in good shape and so forth-mocking up pressures which do not depend upon the physical universe. That is one method of going out.

& Coach: OK. Tone 40 with full intention, and a smile or any recognition of what I'm saying or doing will be a flunk.

Now, a person becomes so dependent upon the physical universe to give him these pressures that he has a tendency to hang around and get stuck in various parts of the physical universe, you see?

& Student: OK.

So the area of auditing which is experimental today is, how do you get a thetan to overcome his fear of; his back up from, his need for and all the other things of pressures? Now, that is the primary field up.

& Coach: OK?

Now, by that we then hope to get a thetan to be willing to experience or let other things experience a very high level of impact. You know, a high enough level of impact so that an individual would have no dependency. He would think of two cars coming together as being a rather uninteresting brush on a powder puff with a feather. Two cars traveling 120 each hit head-on: that's a brush with a feather on a powder puff. You got it? This is changing somebody's reality on this.

& Student: Yup.

As far as I can tell at this moment this is the - many contributing factors - but this is the sole central factor of a trap. An individual cannot tolerate the pressure which he imagines to be outside the trap or which would be experienced if he tried to get out of the trap, see? A fellow stays in a jail simply because he can't tolerate the idea of ramming his body through the jail bars or wall, see. That would be too much pressure. See that? That's the only thing that would keep anybody in jail. The only thing that would keep a thetan trapped is this condensation-by-pressure mechanism, as far as I can tell.

& LRH: Fine.

All right. Now, that is apparently a major factor on the way north. And I'm not reporting to you on this anything except that it's just very experimental.

& Coach: OK. Start it.

Now, would this reach all the way south?

& Student: Look at that wall. Thank you. Go over to that wall. Thank you. Touch that wall.

Well, an acceptable pressure will reach pretty far south. But let me assure you, you have to be able to control to a marked degree people's thinkingness before you can run a thinkingness process on them. And the trouble with most people that are having a hard time is that their thinkingness is out of their control and everybody else's. You see? So this is not really a far-south process at all. It just appears to be. And all these thinkingness processes don't go far south.

& Coach: OK.

Just because you could run acceptable pressure and just because I could run acceptable pressures on you and you could get results from this is no reason that the process would work at all on the average Homo sap. Your expectancy on it shouldn't be that good. It's evidently something that would come after you had pretty well flattened something like CCH.

& Student: Thank you. Turn around. Thank you. Look at that wall.

So we're up to the level of Homo novis. And we're about to take off into the thetasphere. And this is possibly the most data - just theoretical data and discussion - which I care to give you at this congress. And I hope it's been acceptable to you.

& Coach: Which wall? Oh, thank you.

Thank you.

& Student: Thank you. Go over to that wall. Thank you. Touch that, touch that wall.

& LRH: Flunk him.

& Coach: Yeah, flunk. I should have flunked you on the 'Go over to that wall,' and I want to count that as one. And 'Walk over to that wall.'

& LRH: Yeah. He mucked the command.

& Coach: Yeah, on that one too. Yeah.

& LRH: Yeah.

& Coach: It should have been 'With the right hand,' ... Take it from here, that last command.

& OK, now do it again.

& Student: Touch that wall.

& Coach: Good.

& Student: Thank you. Turn around. Walk over to that wall.

& Coach: Look at that wall.

& Student: Thank you.

& Coach: OK.

& Student: Go over to that wall. Thank you. With your right hand, touch that wall.

Thank you. Turn around. Look at that wall.

& Coach: OK.

& Student: Thank you.

& Coach: You're welcome.

& Student: Go over to that wall.

& Coach: Look at all those people there.

& Student: Thank you. With your right hand, touch that wall. Thank you.

& Coach: With my left hand.

& Student: Thank you. Turn around.

& Coach: Look, this is my right hand.

& Student: Thank you. Look at that wall.

& Coach: OK.

& Student: Thank you. Go over to that wall. With your right, thank you.

& Coach: Flunk. You got that out before you...

& Student: Good. With your right hand, touch that wall. Thank you. Turn around.

& Coach: Turn around.

& Student: Thank you.

& Coach: Thank you.

& Student: Look at that wall.

& Coach: Look at that wall.

& Student: Thank you.

& Coach: I did look at that wall.

& Student: Good. Snap! You smiled at him. You acknowledged the fact that he's got one more coming. Alright. Look at that wall. Thank you. Go over to that wall.

& Coach: Go over to that wall, go on. That's walk over to that wall.

& Student: Walk over to that wall. Thank you. With your right hand, touch that wall.

& Coach: Touch that wall.

& Student: Thank you. Turn around.

& Coach: Turn around.

& Student: Thank you.

& Coach: Thank you.

& Student: Look at that wall.

& Coach: Look at that wall.

& Student: Thank you.

& Coach: Thank you.

& Student: Walk over to that wall.

& Coach: Walk over to that wall. Thank you.

& Student: With your right hand, touch that wall.

& LRH: Snap! OK, thank you very much Johnnie. Thank you. Just wanted to give you an idea.

I'm going to fish Bonnie [Barnie?] out from behind the curtain over here. I'm going to show you the exact steps by which this should be run. Because there are exact auditor positions. This is Bonnie.

& Bonnie Turner.

[clearsound transcript says Bonnie, might be Barnie, hard to tell and LRH says „him“ below - Ed.]

I'm just going to use him here just to show you the exact positions. We're not running Tone 40 on a Person. I just want to show you the positions. Okay, Bonnie?

Now, when I say, „Look at that wall,“ from this side of the preclear, I will then continue to walk on this side of the preclear, won't I?

And when he gets over to the wall - watch. With your right hand, touch that wall. Now, where do I go to get this right hand, see? See, so I'm on the wrong side of the preclear. So the auditor always walks and directs from the right side of the preclear. It's done in this fashion. There's a very interesting shift of feet in Tone 40 on a Person, which makes it very valid. All right.

With your right hand, touch that wall. Thank you. Turn around. Thank you. Look at that wall. Thank you. Walk over to that wall. Thank you. With your right hand, touch that wall. Thank you. Turn around. Thank you.

You see that?

Audience: Yeah.

Now, exactly what is happening here? I'll walk to this side and say, „Look at that wall.“

I'm on his right side. Right?

And when he comes over here he then touches - I tell him to put... „With your right hand, touch that wall.“ And he touches the wall.

Then I step behind him as I turn him. Now, get these as two simultaneous moves. You think this doesn't amount to much but, believe me, I'll show you the trick here in a minute.

We turn him.

Now where are you going to go, Bonnie?

You see that? Now, as a matter of fact here, we've got a shift which blocks the preclear from going anywhere. And in view of the fact that Tone 40 on a Person is not for high-toned preclears... Did you realize that? Tone 40 on a Person is about eight miles south of simple 8-C. Very, very low process or a medium-range process. It doesn't matter, it's one that goes a lot of all the way, see? But this is the one that you would run on somebody if you wanted very fast results just on an ordinary preclear, or one that you'd run on a psycho. Therefore, you have the same foot pattern as otherwise. When he turns around here and puts his right hand on the wall, we turn him always counterclockwise and step in front of him and pin him with our two hands lightly, then step off here and point to the other wall. See that? That is the proper way to do it.

Now, you missed the piece de resistance this afternoon when Nibsy and I were doing this and I was the coach, because I actually got out of this. He was doing this to me as the auditor. You remember when I suddenly moved out of it? I was only able to do that because he had relaxed the pressure of one hand. The second he relaxed it I simply went out from under. In other words, he had me by this shoulder very securely, but not by this one. And I just simply went that way.

So when you turn the fellow around - the preclear around - you take hold of both his shoulders, don't you see? There he is. Now, you step off this way still with this shoulder. But because you've appeared here and steadied him with the turn-around, any impulse to blow that he had evaporates. You see this?

Now, I might ask you what advantage there would be to being on the left-hand side. And there is none whatsoever. In the first place, the stronger side of most people is the right side. They tend to bolt to the right if they're going to.

Let me show you something else about this. I want to show you something quite incidental to this. We walk over here and put a hand on the wall. We have come up against a barrier, haven't we? And actually this process is running stops into the case, and the case lets go of backtrack stops. And that's one of the reasons 8-C works. Got that? Stops in engrams and things like this evaporate because he's getting plenty of stops in present time. Remember what I told you in that last hour about you give him enough kicks in the shins? Well, he thinks a lot of stops are necessary. You run him on this process and he finds a whole bunch of new stops and he says, „Well, I'll let the old ones go“ - and he does.

Okay. The proper way to run it then is very simple. Turn him around (here, over here).

Look at that wall. Thank you. Walk over to that wall. Thank you. With your right hand, touch that wall. Thank you. Turn around. Thank you.

Thank you, Bonnie. Thank you.

So we get this various phenomena of being able to carry on with this.

It's a very funny thing, you know, you'd think the army, or something must have been therapeutic if people were marched. Entirely different intention in it. But the funny part of it is that sometimes marching is more therapeutic for low-level cases than not marching. As I've already remarked to the 17th ACC during a lecture, Israel's total campaign of bringing sanity back to the various peoples who have come from beleaguered areas of Europe where they were persecuted by the Germans, and so on, by the Russians... They have come into Israel there, they have to be taken care of; there's no adequate psychotherapy available so they throw them in the army.

Well, now they don't know why this works. But actually somebody is controlling their time and motions. And after about a year these madmen turn sane, which is quite interesting. They have a much different purpose in their army than this - the US army has purpose, I'm sure.

Here though, we do see this technique as being - old 8-C was responsible for some very large percentage. By the way, we have a book back there called The ACC Preparatory Manual. It has quite a bit of data in it. The ACC Preparatory Manual is rather a misnomer. It's got a lot of data on assists which would be of interest to Book Auditors; it has some lists of books and tapes which are quite interesting. And in addition to that, it has the summary research project results. Some of the auditors remember a mimeograph sheet that I sent to them a long time ago and asked them to fill out. And when all of these were accumulated from auditors all over the world they were compiled into the summary research project report, and that is in the ACC Manual. You ought to get yourself a copy of that because you'd be interested in it.

But amongst the various things which are in this summary research project is the dominance of 8-C. It ranked right up there; it compared quite favorably with Havingness itself. In other words, just an older, less workable process than the one you are seeing right here at this moment was responsible in the majority for the releases from alcoholism and psychosomatic illnesses galore. All kinds of things it did for people - just this drill all by itself.

Now, Tone 40 8-C goes much lower and advances much higher than old simple 8-C. And all we've done is refine this old process. And this process is very old, clear back to Camden, ACC Number 1. Now, it wasn't practiced much until ACC Number 2, but it existed then. That was a long time ago, wasn't it?

So you'd think that marching somebody around like this might or might not do something for them, but you'd be surprised. You'd be surprised - the regularity of the command, the obedience of the command, the communication that goes in it, the exceeding amount of control that goes into it, the fact they're walking into barriers and getting stopped. It works on fairly low-level cases.

Don Breeding, monitoring the tape recorders back here, tells me of a session he ran of 8-C on a puppy. And he ran 8-C on a puppy. And he had a awful time. He was very glad when it flattened, because he himself was so exhausted he couldn't have gone on another motion.

But he actually took this puppy and walked the puppy, with all commands and everything, through 8-C, see? Put his puppy's paw on the wall and so on. He no more than started this than the dog started to scream. And continued to scream practically from there on out, nothing but the most ear-splitting, piercing screams. Sounds weird, doesn't it? And because Don Breeding got exhausted it didn't get through to a stage of clearing the dog. But I think it changed the behavior pattern of the dog from what I'm told.

Nobody has run this experiment because I wouldn't know what a dog thetan was unless a dog thetan was a thetan. And I don't see why a dog shouldn't respond to this as well as a psycho, as well as a normal person. See, I don't know that these things would respond any differently from one person to another. This is an experiment maybe some of you will try sometime.

It certainly works on a little child. A little child that can walk a bit and so on can be run on this with considerable success.

I'm going to give you a whole talk tomorrow on Child Scientology. That's not for now. Thank you. I'm merely trying to show you right now what this process is and how it is done.

All right. All right. We need two victims. We need two victims here. And as I look over the bright and smiling faces of people, it's very hard to find victims for Tone 40 on a Person for this excellent reason: the person really should be well drilled through all of the lower Indoc steps; should be pretty well drilled. Let me see. I think that Jack Horner should run Winkle.

[The last name Horner is omitted in the clearsound version.]

Hi, Jack.

Male voice: How are you? Senor Winkle.

Male voice: Tanto gusto.

All right. Now, I want you to coach him on Tone 40 on a Person. Have you been through that in school? All right, that's good. And just give him the regular coaching on it and, flunk him for the reasons that you would flunk him on that.

Coach: Okay. LRH: Good.

Coach: Well, the commands are „Look at that wall.“ „Walk over to that wall.“ „With your right hand, touch that wall.“ There's an acknowledgment each. „Turn around“ - acknowledgment, and the same thing again. And, well, I think almost everything will be a flunk.

LRH: That's encouraging him, of course!

Auditor: Is the „Flunk“ and the „That's it“ still consistent?

Coach: No. „Flunk“ is flunk. And „That's it“ is that's it.

Auditor: All right. Fine.

LRH: In other words, those are the only two statements he can make that are valid.

Auditor: Right.

Coach: If I say flunk, if - you go on and you don't stop because I say „Flunk.“ You just know you flunked.

Auditor: Right. Okay Look at that wall.

Coach: Yeah.

Auditor: All right. Walk over to it.

Coach: Hey, do you know the joke about three ants? Too bad.

Auditor: Good. With your right hand, touch that wall. Fine.

Coach: Flunk.

LRH: Flunk.

Auditor: All right. Turn around. Good. Look at that wall. Walk over to it. Audience: Flunk.

LRH: No acknowledgment.

Auditor: All right. With your right hand, touch that wall. Good. Okay. Turn around. Good.

Look at that wall. Good. Walk over to it.

Coach: Flunk. „Walk over to that wall.“

Auditor: Okay.

Coach: Flunk.

Auditor: Good. All right. Turn around.

Coach: You don't have to push me. I heard you.

Auditor: Good. Look at that wall. Good. Walk over to it... Walk over to that wall.

Coach: You don't have to get nervous. I'm doing this, I'm walking.

Auditor: With your right hand, touch that wall.

Coach: Flunk.

Auditor: Good.

Coach: Flunk.

Auditor: Good. Turn around.

Coach: Are you smiling?

Auditor: Good. Look at that wall.

Coach: Are you smiling?

Auditor: Good. Walk over to that wall.

Coach: Are you smiling?

Auditor: With your right hand, touch that wall. Good. Turn around.

Coach: Good.

Auditor: Good.

Coach: Okay.

Auditor: Look at that wall.

Coach: That wall?

Auditor: Good. Walk over to it.

Coach: The same wall?

Auditor: Walk over to that wall. LRH: Flunk.

Auditor: Good. With your right hand, touch that wall.

Coach: With your right hand, touch that wall.

Auditor: Good.

Coach: Okay.

Auditor: Turn around. Good. Look at that wall.

Coach: That wall.

Auditor: Good. Walk over to that wall.

Coach: That wall? The left one.

Auditor: Good. With your right hand, touch that wall.

Coach: I can do this with the same right hand?

Auditor: Good. Turn around.

Coach: You see... but your right... but your right...

Auditor: Good.

Coach: ... How do you know which is my right hand, see?

Auditor: Look at that wall.

Coach: That wall?

Auditor: Good. Walk over to that wall.

Coach: The same wall?

Auditor: Good. With your right hand, touch that wall.

Coach: This wall?

Auditor: Good.

Coach: Okay.

Auditor: Turn around. Good. Look at that wall.

Coach: That one?

Auditor: Good. Walk over to that wall.

Coach: That wall.

Auditor: Good. With your right hand, touch that wall.

Coach: Okay

Auditor: Good.

Coach: Are you married?

Auditor: Turn around.

Coach: Are you married?

Auditor: Good. With your right... Walk over to that wall. Good. With your right hand, touch that wall. Good. Turn around.

Coach: How long does this go on?

Auditor: Thank you. Look at that wall.

Coach: That wall? Okay.

Auditor: Good. Walk over to it.

Coach: Flunk. „Walk over to that wall.“

Auditor: Good. With your right hand, touch that wall.

Coach: You got to scratch your nose first?

Auditor: Thank you. Turn around. Good.

Coach: Are you nervous?

Auditor: Look at that wall. Thank you. Walk over to that wall. Good. With your right hand, touch that wall. Good.

Coach: Look at that wall.

Auditor: Turn around.

Coach: I turned around, but this way.

Auditor: Thank you.

Coach: You're welcome.

Auditor: Look at that wall. Good. Walk over to that wall.

Coach: Which wall? That wall?

Auditor: Good. With your right hand, touch that wall.

Coach: With the right hand, touch that wall.

Auditor: Thank you. Turn around. Thank you. Look at that wall. Good. Walk over to that wall.

Coach: That wall.

Auditor: Good. With your right hand, touch that wall.

Coach: This wall?

Auditor: Good. Turn around.

Coach: Turn around?

Auditor: Thank you. Look at that wall.

Coach: That wall?

Auditor: Good.

Coach: Okay. I will.

Auditor: Walk over to that wall.

Male voice: Act like you do down in the basement.

Auditor: Good. With your right hand, touch that wall. Good. Turn around. Thank you. Look at that wall. Thank you. Walk over to that wall.

Coach: Some people looking at me; I'm shaking. Male voice: Make him laugh.

Coach: Make him laugh?

Auditor: Good. With your right hand, touch that wall. Good. Turn around.

Coach: You flunked on that. Thu didn't have to use force on me to get.

Auditor: Thank you. Look at that wall.

Coach: Yeah.

Auditor: Good. Walk over to that wall.

Coach: The same wall? That's not a wall. That's a piece of wood down here.

Auditor: Fine. With your right hand, touch that wall.

Coach: You flunked on that, man. I didn't put my hand on there.

Auditor: Good. Turn around. Thank you.

Coach: You're welcome.

Auditor: Look at that wall. Good. Walk over to it.

Coach: I didn't put my hand up, so don't get rough. Okay? When you tell me to touch...

Auditor: Good.

Coach: Flunk. Flunk! Thu didn't give me the command to put my hand up there. I flunked you. Thu never told me to put my hand up there. You haven't told me to put my hand up there!

Auditor: With your right hand, touch that wall.

Coach: Okay. I touched it.

Auditor: Good.

Coach: Just tell me, I'll do it.

Auditor: With your right hand, touch that wall. LRH: Flunk.

Coach: You flunked.

Auditor: With your right hand, touch that wall.

Coach: Flunk. Flunk.

Auditor: With your right hand, touch that wall.

Coach: Flunk. We went over that already Turn around is coming. Flunk. Flunk. Flunk. Flunk. I did it already. You thanked me for it, remember? Are you an auditor? You know what you're doing? Hey! You gave me that command already. You gave me that command. You told me that already. Flunk!! I told you, „Turn around“ is coming. I touched the wall. I won't touch the wall. I touched the wall already. I touched the wall. I told you we weren't on that. The hand one is done.

LRH: (laughing) Okay. That's it.

Auditor: Thank you very much.

They shouldn't make me laugh that hard.

Ah, dear! Wow! Okay. Well, we won't have any candidates after that I'm sure.

So I think, though, we have a moment for Jan Halpern to run Margee McCormick.

& Hi ya, Margie. Somebody's briefing her back there. Hi ya Jan.

& Jan: Hi.

& Dr. Jan Halpern.

Okay now. Why don't you just run her; and you coach her with your inimitable style.

Female voice: Oh, you're going to be coach, Margee?

LRH: Hm-hm.

Female voice: You'll be so loud and clear.

Coach: Now, Jan, you're going to run me...

Female voice: Louder.

Coach: You 're going to run me on 8-C.

Auditor: Okay.

Coach: The commands are „Look at that wall.“ „Walk over to that wall.“ „With your right hand, touch that wall.“ And I'll acknowledge... I mean, you'll acknowledge that.

Auditor: Okay.

Coach: You'll acknowledge each one of these as I do them, too.

Auditor: Okay.

Coach: And it's to be run on... in Tone 40.

Auditor: Uh-huh.

Coach: With good intention.

Auditor: How about „Turn around“?

Coach: Yeah. Afterwards, you'll tell me to turn around.

Auditor: All right.

Coach: Then we'll run it on the other wall. Same way

Auditor: Okay.

Coach: Okay?

Auditor: Yes.

Coach: And the only things that I will say are „Flunk,“ see...

Auditor: Yeah.

Coach: ... if you've done something that doesn't fit with these requirements.

Auditor: Yes.

Coach: Or „That's it.“ And that will be the end of... end of the demonstration.

Auditor: Okay.

Coach: This is a demonstration.

Auditor: I understand.

Coach: Okay.

LRH: Oh, that's no fair. It isn't a demonstration. This is for blood.

Auditor: Look at that wall.

Coach: What wall? I don't see any wall.

Auditor: Thank you. Walk over to that wall. Thank you. With your right hand, touch that wall. Thank you.

Coach: I do.

Auditor: Turn around. Thank you. Look at that wall.

Coach: All right, listen to me, Jan. Honest, I do like using that. Please can't we use this? Please.

Auditor: Walk over to that wall. Thank you. With your right hand, touch that wall. Thank you.

Coach: You're welcome.

Auditor: Turn around. Thank you.

Coach: This is really sad. I've been wanting you to run 8-C...

Auditor: Look at that wall. Thank you. Walk over to that wall.

Coach: God, you're fast! How did you do that?

Auditor: Thank you. With your right hand, touch that wall. Thank you. Turn around.

Coach: Thank you.

Auditor: Thank you. Look at that wall. Thank you. Walk over to that wall.

Coach: Hello, Ron.

Auditor: Thank you. With your right hand, touch that wall.

Coach: Is this part of the wall? That would be...

Auditor: Thank you. Turn around. Thank you.

Coach: You're welcome.

Auditor: Look at that wall. Thank you. Walk over to that wall.

Coach: All right. Did you see how good I did it? And I've just had a three-weeks' intensive from your husband.

Auditor: Thank you. With your right hand, touch that wall. Thank you. Turn around.

Auditor: Thank you. Look at that wall.

Coach: I won't!

Auditor: Thank you.

Coach: I refuse! I will not look at that wall.

Auditor: Walk over to that wall. Thank you. With your right hand, touch that wall. Thank you. Turn around. Thank you.

Coach: You know, I really am nervous.

Auditor: Look at that wall. Thank you. Walk over to that wall.

Coach: I haven't been on the stage for centuries. I'm scared to death.

Auditor: Thank you. With your right hand, touch that wall. Thank you. Turn around. Thank you. Look at that wall. Thank you. Walk over to that wall. Thank you. With your right hand, touch that wall. Thank you. Turn around. Thank you.

Coach: I can't find a thing to tell you to be flunked about.

Auditor: Look at that wall. Thank you. Walk over to that wall. Thank you. With your right hand, touch that wall. Thank you. Turn around. Thank you. Look at that wall. Thank you. Walk over to that wall.

Coach: This isn't fair! You've had experience.

Auditor: Thank you. With your right hand, touch that wall. Thank you. Turn around. Thank you. Look at that wall. Thank you. Walk over to that wall. Thank you. With your right hand, touch that wall. Thank you. Turn around.

Coach: You're sure particular aren't you?

Auditor: Thank you. Look at that wall.

Coach: Hey, that's a cute dress.

Auditor: Thank you.

Coach: You know, that's a real cute dress.

Auditor: Walk over to that wall.

Coach: How many buttons you got on it? One, two, three, four, five, six.

Auditor: Thank you. With your right hand, touch that wall. Thank you.

Coach: Did you hear that?

Auditor: Thank you. Look at that wall. Thank you. Thank you. Walk over to that wall.

Coach: There's somebody in this auditing room. There's somebody standing here, Jan.

Auditor: Thank you.

Coach: Honest. Look. If you'd just look back there, you'd see there's somebody...

Auditor: With your right hand, touch that wall. Thank you. Turn around.

Coach: Hey, friend, look.

Auditor: Thank you. Look at that wall.

Coach: There's somebody standing here.

Auditor: Thank you. Walk over to that wall.

Coach: Right there. Can't you see him? If you'd just touch him.. too!

Auditor: Thank you. With your right hand, touch that wall. Thank you. Turn around. Thank you. Look at that wall. Thank you. Walk over...

LRH: That's it. That's it. Thank you, Margee. Thank you, Margee. Thank you, Jan. You betcha.

Well, that's really hardly fair; you've had two ACC Instructors up here...

& ... in ... three of them; you've had Ken Barrett and Dick Halpern and Jan Halpern up here on this.

That's just mostly because they can do it, you know.

Actually this is a very easy one to get a flunk on, as you'll notice there.

Now, it's quite remarkable that auditing at this level you actually don't get the same ability on the part of a coach to kick back. You understand that, don't you? And you noticed how wild High School Indoc was. You know? Well, Winkle was restraining himself just a little bit, but not very much.

As a result of the Tone 40 intention and so on, people have a tendency to stay pretty close to it and to more or less stay in session fairly well.

And in coaching it, why, you should realize that - that you're liable to go into session and simply make a rather extraordinary effort. Instead of taking it milder, try to take it wilder than High School Indoc. You got the idea?

Now, we have always known that bodies would simply walk around if we told them to. We've known that in many cases the auditor has simply been monitoring the other person's body. We've known this for some time that this was possible. But we didn't know how to do it rather invariably. You see? And that's what we have worked up to here with these Training Drills. We can do this rather easily.

It's quite interesting; after you've been at this for a while some old lady steps off the curb - she shouldn't step off the curb - you just simply throw the intention at her to step back up the curb and there's nothing she does about it at all - she steps back up on the curb.

Funny part of it was, is the reverse would not particularly work. Whereas you throw a clear-cut intention for her to throw herself under the nearest truck - nonfunctional. Why is it nonfunctional? Destruction is not Tone 40. Okay. Now, you've seen this Tone 40 on a Person. And with that you have seen all of these Training Drills. Now, the trick is simply to be able to do them smoothly, to do them every time, to do them invariably and to be able to get a complete win across the boards. That is the trick. Now, that's not much of a trick. About, maybe, oh, an HCA Course is about all that stands between you and being able to do it or an ACC or several weeks of coaching or something of this character. You understand that?

These things are doable. I have shown you all of them. And really there are no magic tricks in between. It is the ability to do it. And the beauty of it is the people know whether they can or not.

Well, I've had an awful lot of fun today. I don't know whether you have or not.

Tomorrow we're going to take up several things. And I will try to show you some of CCH all in a rush - a number of the steps - and give you some discussion of this. I'll try to give you some data on Child Scientology.

And we have finished, right now, the third day of the congress. I'm enjoying it. How about you?

Good night.