The Routine Three Auditor (not the Prepcheck Auditor), as the first action in finding a goal and before listing (or before the auditor adds to list), is to prepcheck the following Zero questions in a regular prepcheck session.

Thereafter this same prepcheck is run on the pc about every fifth R3 session.

• On goals have you ever suggested anything?
• On goals have you ever had anything suggested?
• On goals have you ever suppressed?
• On goals have you ever had anything suppressed?
• On goals have you ever invalidated?
• On goals have you ever had anything invalidated?
• On goals have you ever failed to reveal anything?
• On goals have you ever been careful of anything?
• On goals have you ever told any half truths?
• On goals have you ever told any untruths?
• On goals have you ever influenced a meter?
• On goals have you ever tried not to influence a meter?

Now the same list endings with:

• On listing ditto above.
• On items ditto above.

The word “goal” and the word “listing” are also cleared.

The whole thing can be preceded with the whole list above after “on Auditing”. This whole scheme is known as “Prepchecking the Middle Ruds”.

The reason for this care and the use of Middle Ruds every time you check a goal or the pc stops listing, is because a goal can stay in with a tick when only invalidated, but would go out if the invalidation is listed. A goal then will go nul if the Middle Ruds are out, or a wrong goal will get active if the Middle Ruds are out.

I have seen so many bum findings on goals that I have finally worked out the above as a solution to being double sure.

I have seen no valid goals where the list was less than 850 goals. I think it takes 850 goals in most cases to get goals as a subject enough discharged to reveal a right one even though it appeared in the first hundred and fifty.

When a wrong goal is used for further auditing the pc gets dizzy and quite uncomfortable. When a right goal is listed it’s all very easy. So you can easily tell if you are listing a wrong one.