Goals Problem Masses may be handled in several ways. The only things that establish the best way are:
Immediately discounted then are those methods which put speed of finding RIs second, for it will be found that the slower you find RIs, the more the remaining factors above will suffer.
I have been over or through, as a pc, almost any method of auditing a GPM there could be, and the one factor that stands out to me, both as an auditor and a pc, as well as a Case Supervisor, is that idling about trying to get it all nowresults in the destruction of both auditor and pc morale and consumes unrewarding session time. Why? The law that covers this is:
A PC’S ABILITY TO CONFRONT IS DIRECTLY PROPORTIONAL TO THE AMOUNT OF CHARGE REMOVED FROM THE GPMs; THE PC’S ABILITY TO CONFRONT IS NOT PROPORTIONAL TO THE AMOUNT OF CONFRONTING DONE IN A GPM.
This is a very important rule. In practice it means, “Get all the RIs you can discharged as fast as you can.” It also could mean “Get all the GPMs discharged as fast as you can.” But if this last means discharging partially many GPMs it ceases to be true as the pc will go into hopeless confusion in the remaining charge.
It does mean:
You have a pattern. You will be able to follow it easily most of the time. But where you cannot get the pattern to go right, jump to another lower part of the pattern where it will go right and go on with it. You will find it isn’t the wrongness of the pattern that gives you trouble. It’s the inability of the pc to confront. Answer: remove charge.
Because the pc ARC breaks on missed RIs, tell the pc “We’re going to miss some items. Those already found are valid. We’re going to get some lower ones and get the charge off and then come back for what we’ve missed.” The pc won’t ARC break. On the contrary his morale will increase in most cases.
And then, of course, with the GPM shot full of holes, the pc can confront better.
And the second pass through the GPM will get some of the missing ones. And the third pass will assemble the lot.
The only things to avoid are getting the pc confused by too many shifts and dizzy through invalidation of existing RIs already found.
The rules for this method of handling are these:
You will almost never get the GPM that is nearest PT as the pc’s first goal found. This goal is usually the most offerable goal by its own wording. Very secret or very blatantly offerable type wordings are found first, forced into view by their top terminals or oppterms.
Therefore, do not assume ever that the pc’s first goal is the PT goal. It almost never is.
The actual PT area goal contains all the pc’s hidden standards and chronic present time problems. Therefore one must attain and run it eventually before getting earlier track goals.
Rule: A GPM which has its top oppterm and terminal is rarely the PT GPM. Thus these steps apply:
DO NOT CONTINUE to go earlier with GPMs until you have handled everything up to PT. Avoid even finding the goal of the earlier GPM (step 3 above) until you are ready to run that whole GPM.
The charge on early GPMs is fantastic and the more GPMs unhandled later on the track (nearer PT) the harder it is on the pc to go into earlier (further from PT) GPMs.
The pc drags the P.T GPM and others near it that have not been run through earlier GPMs if they are prematurely handled.
The method is summed by:
Violations of this method will account for any casualties suffered in running R3. Violations will occur as the whole pressure of the pc’s interest is on earlier track and pc’s sell hard to handle the earlier banks. But whatever the sales talk, it is very hard on the pc and auditor to go into GPMs earlier on the track than the first goal found before later GPMs are all handled and fully discharged.
The pc, finding himself with the earlier goal found in violation of Step 3 above of the 15 Steps will be so interested in it that he or she will try to move heaven and auditors to run it, not to go forward toward PT.
Auditors unable to find goals closer to PT will go back and run it. Well, if you do, do a good job of it and then try to get to PT. But you’ll wish you’d tried harder to get the banks upward toward PT, not back down toward the beginning of track.