Saint Hill Manor, East, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 11 SEPTEMBER 1970 | Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 11 SEPTEMBER 1970 |
SOLO ASSISTS | |
It is absolutely forbidden to assign 2-way comm actions as “Solo.” | |
Example: An out-point lists an assessment list, listing for items, 2WC on case etc. | |
PROGRESS AND ADVANCE ACTIONS may not be assigned by a Solo C/S to be done Solo. | CHRONIC SOMATIC, DIANETIC HANDLING OF |
A Solo auditor may not do these actions. Dianetics R3R may not be attempted in Solo auditing. | The full Dianetic handling of the pc who has a chronic somatic is given in the HCO B C/S Series No. 15, of 16 August 1970, ”Getting the F/N to Examiner”. |
The reasons for this are too obvious to be given stress. | This HCO B calls the fact to attention. It could get overlooked or be hard to find again as the title of HCO B 16 August does not indicate it directly. |
I have never seen a Solo auditor do anything but louse himself up on these actions. Here and there somebody might have gotten away with it. But I have seen too many cases loused up this way to condone it as anything but squirrel Solo. A Solo auditor can fly ruds and engage in a BPC L1 or L7 WHILE AUDITING PROPER SOLO ACTIONS, and he can of course do the standard Solo actions for the grade. | |
But doing L7, L1B etc. as general REPAIR actions is for the dickey birds. | |
There ARE NO SOLO REPAIR OR PROGRESS OR RETURN OR ADVANCE PROGRAMS. | |
Founder | |