When you are sitting in an auditing session what are the three important communication lines and what is their order of importance?

One does not tell the pc anything about the meter or its reads ever, except to indicate an F/N.

1. The first is the Pc's line to his bank. The Itsa Maker line.

Steering a pc with "That – That – That" on something reading is allowable. But that isn’t putting attention on the meter but on his bank.

2. The second is the Pc's line to the Auditor. The Itsa line.

Definition of "In Session" is "Pc interested in own case and willing to talk to the auditor".

3. The third is the Auditor's line to the Pc. The What's-it line.

Saying "That reads", "That didn’t read", "That blew down" is illegal. It is no substitute for TR 2. It violates the In Session definition by putting pc’s attention on the meter and can make him very unwilling to talk to the auditor!

Now the definition, "Willing to talk to the Auditor", is very easy to interpret as "Talking to the Auditor". So the Auditor cuts the line the Pc has to the bank in order to get the Pc to talk, because "It's the Itsa line that blows the charge," he says.

So the Auditor cuts the Pc's communication line with his bank in order to bring about an Itsa line – and then he wonders why he gets no TA action and why the Pc ARC Breaks.

This cut communication line is not perceivable to the naked eye. It's hidden because it's from the Pc – a Thetan unseen by the Auditor – to the Pc's bank – unseen by the Auditor.

The Auditor is simply there to use the What's-it line in order to get the Pc to confront his bank. The charge blows off it to the degree that it's confronted and this is represented by the Itsa line.

The Itsa line is a report on what has been as-ised, that gives it its flow.

The sequence of use of these lines in an auditing cycle is 3, 1, and then 2.

Where the Auditor neglects this hidden line from the Pc to the Pc's bank, where he doesn't understand that hidden line and can't integrate it or do anything with it he is going to fail.