Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 22 SEPTEMBER 1971 | Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO BULLETIN OF 22 SEPTEMBER 1971 |
THE THREE GOLDEN RULES OF THE C/S HANDLING AUDITORS | THE THREE GOLDEN RULES OF THE C/S HANDLING AUDITORS |
There are three firm rules in handling auditors which make the difference between good auditors and poor auditors or even having auditors or no auditors at all. | There are three firm rules in handling auditors which make the difference between good auditors and poor auditors or even having auditors or no auditors at all. |
1. Never fail to find and point out an actual goof and send the auditor to cramming. | 1. Never fail to find and point out an actual goof and send the auditor to cramming. |
2. Never invalidate or harass an auditor for a correct action or when no technical goof has occurred. | 2. Never invalidate or harass an auditor for a correct action or when no technical goof has occurred. |
3. Always recognize and acknowledge a technically perfect session. | 3. Always recognize and acknowledge a technically perfect session. |
By reversing these three things a C/S can wreck and blow every auditor in the place. | By reversing these three things a C/S can wreck and blow every auditor in the place. |
By always doing these three things correctly the C/S winds up with splendid auditors. | By always doing these three things correctly the C/S winds up with splendid auditors. |
An auditor who knows he goofed and yet gets a well done doesn’t think the C/S is a good fellow. He holds the C/S in contempt and his auditing worsens. | An auditor who knows he goofed and yet gets a well done doesn’t think the C/S is a good fellow. He holds the C/S in contempt and his auditing worsens. |
An auditor who didn’t goof and yet is told he did becomes bitter or hopeless and begins to hate the C/S. | An auditor who didn’t goof and yet is told he did becomes bitter or hopeless and begins to hate the C/S. |
The test of a C/S in the auditor’s eyes is “Is he spot on?” meaning is the C/S accurate in giving the right program, the right C/S, spotting the goof and ordering Cramming, and being well enough trained to see and commend a well done. | The test of a C/S in the auditor’s eyes is “Is he spot on?” meaning is the C/S accurate in giving the right program, the right C/S, spotting the goof and ordering Cramming, and being well enough trained to see and commend a well done. |
You never get Bad Indicators in an auditor or student when you state the truth. | You never get Bad Indicators in an auditor or student when you state the truth. |
You only get Bad Indicators when your statement is not true. | You only get Bad Indicators when your statement is not true. |
“PR” (Public Relations cheery falsehoods) has nothing to do with getting good indicators. | “PR” (Public Relations cheery falsehoods) has nothing to do with getting good indicators. |
Good indicators in auditors are made with truth. | Good indicators in auditors are made with truth. |
“You goofed, go to Cramming, do TRs 101 to 104 until you cease to alter commands.” | “You goofed, go to Cramming, do TRs 101 to 104 until you cease to alter commands.” |
“Well done by Exams. Practice Handwriting so I don’t take so long reading your worksheets.” | “Well done by Exams. Practice Handwriting so I don’t take so long reading your worksheets.” |
“This F/N VGIs at session end and the Bad Exam Report do not agree. Is there any way this report was falsified? Is there any goof you didn’t write down?” | “This F/N VGIs at session end and the Bad Exam Report do not agree. Is there any way this report was falsified? Is there any goof you didn’t write down?” |
or | or |
“Very well done” on a very well done totally ON Tech, ON Admin and Correct Auditor’s C/S session. | “Very well done” on a very well done totally ON Tech, ON Admin and Correct Auditor’s C/S session. |
Auditors work well even for a bad tempered C/S when that C/S is always “Spot on” with program, C/S, Auditor’s grade or censure of auditor and to cramming. | Auditors work well even for a bad tempered C/S when that C/S is always “Spot on” with program, C/S, Auditor’s grade or censure of auditor and to cramming. |
Auditors like a businesslike accurate C/S. | Auditors like a businesslike accurate C/S. |
A “good fellow” C/S who “lets it slide” and says nothing becomes a very bad fellow indeed in auditors’ eyes. | A “good fellow” C/S who “lets it slide” and says nothing becomes a very bad fellow indeed in auditors’ eyes. |
A C/S who doesn’t recognize and who invalidates good auditing is looked on as a suppressive even when it’s just ignorance. | A C/S who doesn’t recognize and who invalidates good auditing is looked on as a suppressive even when it’s just ignorance. |
The Golden Rules of C/Sing are | The Golden Rules of C/Sing are |
1. Never fail to find and point out an actual goof and send the auditor to Cramming. | 1. Never fail to find and point out an actual goof and send the auditor to Cramming. |
2. Never invalidate or harass an auditor for a correct action or when no technical goof has occurred. | 2. Never invalidate or harass an auditor for a correct action or when no technical goof has occurred. |
3. Always recognize and acknowledge a technically perfect session. | 3. Always recognize and acknowledge a technically perfect session. |
Only those C/Ses who follow these Golden Rules are truly loved by their auditors. | Only those C/Ses who follow these Golden Rules are truly loved by their auditors. |
Founder | Founder |