There are no additives permitted on the Auditing Comm Cycle.

Example: Getting the pc to state the problem after the pc has said what the problem is.

When you are sitting in an auditing session what are the three important communication lines and what is their order of importance?

Example: Asking a pc if that is the answer.

1. The first is the Pc's line to his bank. The Itsa Maker line.

Example: Telling pc “it didn’t react” on the meter.

2. The second is the Pc's line to the Auditor. The Itsa line.

Example: Querying the answer.

3. The third is the Auditor's line to the Pc. The What's-it line.

This is the worst kind of auditing.

Now the definition, "Willing to talk to the Auditor", is very easy to interpret as "Talking to the Auditor". So the Auditor cuts the line the Pc has to the bank in order to get the Pc to talk, because "It's the Itsa line that blows the charge," he says.

Processes run best muzzled. By muzzled is meant using only TR 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4 by the text. A pc’s results will go to hell on an additive comm cycle.

So the Auditor cuts the Pc's communication line with his bank in order to bring about an Itsa line – and then he wonders why he gets no TA action and why the Pc ARC Breaks.

There are a hundred thousand tricks that could be added to the Auditing Comm Cycle. every one of them is a goof. The only time you ever ask for a repeat is when you couldn’t hear it.

This cut communication line is not perceivable to the naked eye. It's hidden because it's from the Pc – a Thetan unseen by the Auditor – to the Pc's bank – unseen by the Auditor.

Since 1950, I’ve known that all auditors talk too much in a session. The maximum talk is the standard model session and the TR 0 to 4 Auditing Comm Cycle only.

The Auditor is simply there to use the What's-it line in order to get the Pc to confront his bank. The charge blows off it to the degree that it's confronted and this is represented by the Itsa line.

It is a serious matter to get a pc to “clarify his answer”. It is in fact an Ethics matter and if done habitually is a Suppressive Act, for it will wipe out all gains.

The Itsa line is a report on what has been as-ised, that gives it its flow.

There are mannerism additives also.

The sequence of use of these lines in an auditing cycle is 3, 1, and then 2.

Example: Waiting for the pc to look at you before you give the next command. (Pcs who won’t look at you are ARC Broken. You don’t then twist this to mean the pc has to look at you before you give the next command.)

Where the Auditor neglects this hidden line from the Pc to the Pc's bank, where he doesn't understand that hidden line and can't integrate it or do anything with it he is going to fail.

Example: A lifted eyebrow at an answer.

Example: A questioning sort of ack.

The Whole Message is good auditing occurs when the comm cycle alone is used and is muzzled.

Additives on the Auditing Comm Cycle are any action, statement, question or expression given in addition to TRs 0-4.

They are Gross Auditing Errors.

And should be regarded as such.

Auditors who add to the Auditing Comm Cycle never make Releases.

So, that’s Suppressive.

Don’t do it!