Expanded Dianetics when fully applied can work miracles on the toughest cases you would ever want to find, but like any piece of tech it does not handle areas which it was never addressed. And that is where auditors and C/Ses who know the difference between quickie and fully complete provide a vital ingredient to the success of Ex Dn.

Case Histories have been compiled for the Hubbard Expanded Dianetics Course.

Ex Dn does not consist of looking in a pc’s folder, pulling out the one R/S recorded and calling it completion. Rather it is a thorough workmanlike handling of the pc’s contra-survival intentions in all aspects of life and living, that truly accomplishes changes for the better in behavior, outlook, social presence and conduct. The top auditors and C/Ses can be counted on to put in the time and effort necessary to make a real product.

There are two categories of case history. First the Psychosis Research Case Histories which cover LRH research in 1970 to early 1972. Then the Expanded Dianetics Case Histories covering the cases LRH C/Sed in 1972 after giving the Expanded Dianetics Lectures.

While a thorough folder study and culling of all R/Ses Ev Purps, Ethics Whys and computations as well as areas of repeating overts and areas which BD heavily will give you a great deal of ammunition for handling a case, you have no guarantee that you have hit all the areas of aberration that may be hidden away and never touched or brought up in auditing.

The purpose of the case histories is fourfold

An example would be the case that is fixated on the 2D. The folders are full of R/Ses, Ev Purps, BDs on 2D. It’s all he wants handled. And so you handle it with full Ex Dn to some big cognitions and changes and he goes off happy about his 2D but still has trouble in life. Then you find out he’s had 5 jobs in the last year, spends more than he makes and breaks everything he owns. And none of this ever came up in his past auditing because his sessions were always about the 2D. Or it has been an area he has never wanted to bring up because it’s embarrassing or degrading or some such. The net result is a change for the better in one area but not a product.

1. To give the student the technical data contained in the LRH programs and C/Ses.

The handling is simple. Some broad assessments across the dynamics are needed to ensure charged areas do not get missed because they never came up in previous sessions.

2. To give the student an understanding of the development of the subject.

The original Ex Dn Case Histories contain examples of this. There are Left Side handlings which include assessment of buttons for various dynamics or areas that the pc should have charge on and then AEIs on the reading items. Even R1C was used to go across the dynamics. Ex Dn Tape 1 covers the idea of finding any and all areas of charge to bleed off the case with various assessments.

3. To give the student a better understanding of the psychotic case and psychosis.

Another way to do it would be by confessionals on each dynamic or on reading items from a broad assessment. It may even be possible to observe the pc’s behavior out of session compared to the columns of the Chart of Human Evaluation to pick up areas the pc may not even be aware of. In this way charged areas do not get missed.

4. To show some of the results obtainable with Expanded Dianetics.

The whole idea is to get a product who isn’t about to fall on his head because some major aberration was not addressed in his Ex Dn due to it never coming up in his pc folder in the past. There is no substitute for a thorough and well done job and that is all that is ever expected from Ex Dn C/Ses and auditors.

The session actions and procedures and the non-LRH C/Ses and programs are not to be used for technical reference or cramming. They are included to give a picture of what was done, how the pc ran and the case condition of the pc. When looking for how something is supposed to be run or when cramming an auditor use only the LRH C/Ses, notes or programs and other bulletins.

In some cases the LRH C/Sed actions may be different than a later C/S under similar circumstances or be in conflict with a later issue on how the action is done. Recognize that this was research and the later C/Ses and issues were advancements over the earlier ones.

The Psychosis Research Case Histories are classified as confidential and are to be treated as such. The statements and actions by the pcs in these histories at times could be quite enturbulating to someone not trained in the subject. Do not discuss the cases. Treat them as you would any pc’s case.

The Expanded Dianetics Case Histories began with the idea of applying, the newly developed tech to the handling of chronic sickies as covered on the lectures. The objective was to make a well person. As the research progressed the Ex Dn procedure quickly was adapted to handle more than just the chronic sickies as being chronically ill proved to be an indicator of something more basic and psychosis, neurosis and evil intentions entered the scope of Ex Dn. The Expanded Dianetics Case Histories show the progress of cases to being well and in some cases later handlings are included which brought the case to full Ex Dn Completion. These case histories are not classified as confidential however they too should be treated as one would treat any pc’s case.

“Expanded Dianetics is very specifically adjusted to the pc.” (HCOB 15 Apr 1972)

In studying these case histories note how LRH does this job as C/S. Demo how it applies to other cases. Plot where the cases would fall on the Hubbard Chart of Human Evaluation from the data at hand and note when a case changes regarding one or more of the columns or, the chart. Demo each of the new actions or rundowns not included on the Expanded Dianetics Lectures when they occur in Ex Dn case histories.

Ex Dn auditing, and C/Sing is quite simple when one has a full grasp of the data, an understanding of cases and is well drilled in the skills of auditing. Get these in and the wins of completed Ex Dn pcs will be yours.