These drills match the order of processes set up for Level II in BTB 9 January 1972R Issue II Grade 4 Processes.

These drills match the order of processes set up for Level II in BTB 8 January 1972 Issue III Grade 3 Processes.

Most of the auditing actions on this Level fall within one of 3 types of process:

Most of the auditing actions on this Level fall within one of 3 types of process:

A. Repetitive Process

A. Repetitive Process

B. Alternate/Repetitive Process

B. Alternate/Repetitive Process

C. Bracket Process – with 3 or more commands run consecutively, in sequence.

C. Bracket Process – with 3 or more commands run consecutively, in sequence.

In Section I of this bulletin, there is a simple drill pattern for each type of process. (When an action does not fall within one of these types of process, a separate drill is provided.) There is also a Dynamic Assessment Drill in Section I. There is also a drill covering Listing and Nulling procedure which was taken from BTB 15 Dec 74 Auditor Expertise Drills Series 2, Basic Session Actions Drill.

In Section I of this bulletin, there is a simple drill pattern for each type of process. (When an action does not fall within one of these types of process, a separate drill is provided.) There is also a Dynamic Assessment Drill in Section I. There is also a drill covering Listing and Nulling procedure which was taken from BTB 15 Dec 74 Auditor Expertise Drills Series 2, Basic Session Actions Drill.

Section II of this bulletin lists the auditing drills for Level II. Every drill gives the LRH materials that describe the process, the commands used, and states how each process is drilled. The procedure is:

Section II of this bulletin lists the auditing drills for Level II. Every drill gives the LRH materials that describe the process, the commands used, and states how each process is drilled. The procedure is:

1. Study and understand the LRH data on the process.

1. Study and understand the LRH data on the process.

2. With this understanding, drill the action using the drill indicated.

2. With this understanding, drill the action using the drill indicated.

3. Drill each process with the auditing style that applies – see HCOB 6 Nov 64 Styles of Auditing.

3. Drill each process with the auditing style that applies – see HCOB 6 Nov 64 Styles of Auditing.

• TR 400-11 Electing Cause Unbullbaited

• TR 300-3 Changing Minds Unbullbaited

LRH Ref: Book – Creation of Human Ability R2-66, Electing Cause

LRH Ref: Book – Creation of Human Ability R2-50 p. 128, 129

Commands:

Commands:

• "Point out some things which are causing things. "

• “Walk over to this spot.”

Drill using the Repetitive Process Drill.

If a student has trouble on a drill, find out whether the student has a misunderstood, has skipped a gradient, etc., and handle with Standard Study Tech. This can lead back to outnesses on such basics as TRs, Codes or Scales. Whatever it is, find and handle it.

Note: To avoid coach upset or restimulation, fruit words should be inserted in the place of the process Key Words – on bullbaited drills only.

Drill per LRH instructions given in Creation of Human Ability R2-50. Use the Bracket Drill.

If a student has trouble on a drill, find out whether the student has a misunderstood, has skipped a gradient etc., and handle with Standard Study Tech. This can lead back to outnesses on basics such as TRs, Codes or Scales. Whatever it is, find and handle it.

Name: Auditing on a doll unbullbaited.

Note:To avoid coach upset or restimulation, fruit words should be inserted in the place of the process Key Words – on bullbaited drills only.

Command: As for each separate process.

Purpose: To train the student to be able to co-ordinate and apply the commands and procedures of each separate auditing action with the actual doingness of auditing.

Name: Auditing on a doll unbullbaited.

Position: Student seated at a table with E-Meter, worksheets and auditing forms as needed. In the chair opposite the student is a doll occupying the position of the pc. (During the drill the coach is seated or standing beside the Auditor. He does not take the position of the doll.)

Command: As for each separate process.

Training Stress: This drill is coached. The student sets up the E-Meter and worksheets as in a session – as follows:

Purpose: To train the student to be able to co-ordinate and apply the commands and procedures of each separate auditing action with the actual doingness of auditing.

1. Set up E-Meter as for E-Meter drills.

Position: Student seated at a table with E-Meter, worksheets and auditing forms as needed. In the chair opposite the student is a doll occupying the position of the pc. (During the drill the coach is seated or standing beside the Auditor. He does not take the position of the doll.)

2. Set up shield (to prevent TA and admin from being seen by pc (doll)).

Training Stress: This drill is coached. The student sets up the E-Meter and worksheets as in a session – as follows:

3. Have extra pens under the E-Meter.

1. Set up E-Meter as for E-Meter drills.

4. Have C/S face down between the bottom of the E-Meter and the table.

2. Set up shield (to prevent TA and admin from being seen by pc (doll)).

5. Have W/S and Lists readily available in sequence required for the session.

3. Have extra pens under the E-Meter.

Auditor starts the session and runs a standard session with the particular auditing action being taken up on the doll, keeping full session admin and using all standard procedures of the auditing action. Coach watches drill and points out any outnesses noted giving a "That’s it” and a re-start. Outnesses should be handled one at a time until none exist.

4. Have C/S face down between the bottom of the E-Meter and the table.

The drill is done on a steeper and steeper gradient until the student can very quickly do the action correctly.

5. Have W/S and Lists readily available in sequence required for the session.

The drill is passed when the student can do the drill flawlessly with excellent TRs 0-4, correct’ procedure and commands without comm lags or confusion; i.e. flublessly!

Auditor starts the session and runs a standard session with the particular auditing action being taken up on the doll, keeping full session admin and using all standard procedures of the auditing action. Coach watches drill and points out any outnesses noted giving a „That’s it” and a re-start. Outnesses should be handled one at a time until none exist.

The drill is done on a steeper and steeper gradient until the student can very quickly do the action correctly.

Name: Auditing __________ Bullbaited.

The drill is passed when the student can do the drill flawlessly with excellent TRs 0-4, correct’ procedure and commands without comm lags or confusion; i.e. flublessly!

Commands: As for each separate auditing action.

Purpose: To train the student to be able to co-ordinate and apply the commands and procedures of each separate auditing action in a drill similar to a real auditing session and thereby become flawless in applying it.

Name: Auditing __________ Bullbaited.

Position: Student seated at a table with E-Meter and Auditor forms, as needed. In the chair opposite the Auditor is a doll as pc. Coach sits beside doll and is the bullbaiter and gives answers as pc, not about his own case.

Commands: As for each separate auditing action.

Training Stress: The drill is the same as for auditing on a doll except that the "pc” coach bullbaits the student Auditor using "fruit”, answers during the session in an attempt to throw the student off session. On any list, the coach squeezes the cans to simulate reads. He still uses "fruit” answers (six apples, blue pears) when asked to speak, but as the student Auditor reads off the list items he squeezes the cans for reads.

Purpose: To train the student to be able to co-ordinate and apply the commands and procedures of each separate auditing action in a drill similar to a real auditing session and thereby become flawless in applying it.

When bullbaiting an auditing action the coach should throw in various signs of pc out of sessionness. (Per HCOB 29 July 64 Good Indicators at Lower Levels and BTB 26 April 69 Bad Indicators.) The student. Auditor must:

Position: Student seated at a table with E-Meter and Auditor forms, as needed. In the chair opposite the Auditor is a doll as pc. Coach sits beside doll and is the bullbaiter and gives answers as pc, not about his own case.

1. Obnose the out of sessionness,

Training Stress: The drill is the same as for auditing on a doll except that the „pc” coach bullbaits the student Auditor using „fruit”, answers during the session in an attempt to throw the student off session. On any list, the coach squeezes the cans to simulate reads. He still uses „fruit” answers (six apples, blue pears) when asked to speak, but as the student Auditor reads off the list items he squeezes the cans for reads.

2. Align this to the process run,

When bullbaiting an auditing action the coach should throw in various signs of pc out of sessionness. (Per HCOB 29 July 64 Good Indicators at Lower Levels and BTB 26 April 69 Bad Indicators.) The student. Auditor must:

3. Handle.

1. Obnose the out of sessionness,

An example is, on Listing and Nulling procedure an out of sessionness is observed, the Auditor queries and follows through with an L4BR at once, (L4BR is a Repair List.)

2. Align this to the process run,

The pc bullbaiter can throw in situations, originate troubles or gains, be tricky, etc. But he must never lose sight of HCOB 24 May 1968 "Coaching", especially the second paragraph – "Coach with reality".

3. Handle.

Once the coach throws out a situation, etc., he must allow the student Auditor to carry it out, and handle the situation before the coach calls a new situation.

An example is, on Listing and Nulling procedure an out of sessionness is observed, the Auditor queries and follows through with an L4BR at once, (L4BR is a Repair List.)

Stress is on training the student Auditor to have his TRs 0-4 in on the bullbaiter.

The pc bullbaiter can throw in situations, originate troubles or gains, be tricky, etc. But he must never lose sight of HCOB 24 May 1968 „Coaching“, especially the second paragraph – „Coach with reality“.

The coach (bullbaiter) does the "Start", flunking or "That’s it". Flunks are given for any improper commands, procedure, comm lags, break in TRs or improper session admin.

Once the coach throws out a situation, etc., he must allow the student Auditor to carry it out, and handle the situation before the coach calls a new situation.

Each drill is to be done thoroughly, building up the speed of Auditor commands and actions. (It’s the number of auditing commands per unit of auditing time which makes gains in a session. " LRH)

Stress is on training the student Auditor to have his TRs 0-4 in on the bullbaiter.

The drill is passed when the student can do the drill flawlessly, with excellent TRs 0-4, correct procedure and commands, without comm lags or confusion.

The coach (bullbaiter) does the „Start“, flunking or „That’s it“. Flunks are given for any improper commands, procedure, comm lags, break in TRs or improper session admin.

These are the drills that train the student Auditor to handle all the elements in a session, so coach with reality and purpose per HCOB 24 May 68 "Coaching".

Each drill is to be done thoroughly, building up the speed of Auditor commands and actions. (It’s the number of auditing commands per unit of auditing time which makes gains in a session. “ LRH)

The drill is passed when the student can do the drill flawlessly, with excellent TRs 0-4, correct procedure and commands, without comm lags or confusion.

These are the drills that train the student Auditor to handle all the elements in a session, so coach with reality and purpose per HCOB 24 May 68 „Coaching“.

1. Study and understand the LRH data referenced for the process you will be running.

2. Tell the pc you are going to run (name of process).

3. (The first time a pc runs this type of process, explain how a Repetitive Process is run.)

1. Study and understand the LRH data referenced for the process you will be running.

R-Factor that this is a Repetitive Process.

2. Tell the pc you are going to run (name of process).

4. Clear the words of the process command in backwards sequence; then clear the command. (Ref: BTB 2 May 72R Clearing Commands)

3. (The first time a pc runs this type of process, explain how a Repetitive Process is run.)

5. Say: "Start of Process. " or "This is the Process. ".

R-Factor that this is a Repetitive Process.

6. Using full TRs 0-4:

4. Clear the words of the process command in backwards sequence; then clear the command. (Ref: BTB 2 May 72R Clearing Commands)

a. Give the command to the "pc".

5. Say: „Start of Process. “ or „This is the Process. “.

b. Get the "pc’s" answer.

6. Using full TRs 0-4:

c. Acknowledge.

a. Give the command to the „pc“.

7. Continue a, b, c to EP of the process.

b. Get the „pc’s“ answer.

8. Indicate the F/N to the "pc".

c. Acknowledge.

7. Continue a, b, c to EP of the process.

1. Study and understand the LRH data referenced for the process you will be running.

8. Indicate the F/N to the „pc“.

2. Tell the pc you are going to run (name of process).

3. (The first time a pc runs this type of process, explain how an Alternate/Repetitive Process is run.)

1. Study and understand the LRH data referenced for the process you will be running.

R-Factor that this is an Alternate/Repetitive Process.

2. Tell the pc you are going to run (name of process).

4. Clear each command of the process. Clear the words of the command in backwards sequence, then clear the command itself. (Ref: BTB 2 May 72R Clearing Commands)

3. (The first time a pc runs this type of process, explain how an Alternate/Repetitive Process is run.)

5. Say: "Start of Process," or "This is the Process. "

R-Factor that this is an Alternate/Repetitive Process.

6. Using full TRs 0-4, run the 2 commands alternately, 1,2, 1,2,1,2 to EP of the process.

4. Clear each command of the process. Clear the words of the command in backwards sequence, then clear the command itself. (Ref: BTB 2 May 72R Clearing Commands)

7. Indicate the F/N to the pc.

5. Say: „Start of Process,“ or „This is the Process. “

6. Using full TRs 0-4, run the 2 commands alternately, 1,2, 1,2,1,2 to EP of the process.

for processes with 3 or more commands run consecutively, in sequence.

7. Indicate the F/N to the pc.

1. Study and understand the LRH data referenced for the process you will be running.

2. Tell the "pc" you are going to run (name of process).

for processes with 3 or more commands run consecutively, in sequence.

3. (The first time a pc runs this type of process, explain how it is run.)

1. Study and understand the LRH data referenced for the process you will be running.

R-Factor that this process has several commands that will be run 1,2,3,4, 1,2,3,4 etc.

2. Tell the „pc“ you are going to run (name of process).

4. Clear each command in the series. Clear the words of the command in backwards sequence) then clear the command. (Ref: BTB 2 May 72R Clearing Commands)

3. (The first time a pc runs this type of process, explain how it is run.)

5. Say: "Start of Process. " or "This is the Process. ".

R-Factor that this process has several commands that will be run 1,2,3,4, 1,2,3,4 etc.

6. Run the commands consecutively – 1,2,3,4 etc. to EP for the process.

4. Clear each command in the series. Clear the words of the command in backwards sequence) then clear the command. (Ref: BTB 2 May 72R Clearing Commands)

7. Indicate the F/N to the pc.

5. Say: „Start of Process. “ or „This is the Process. “.

6. Run the commands consecutively – 1,2,3,4 etc. to EP for the process.

(Taken from BTB 15 Dec 74 Auditor Expertise Drills Series 2)

7. Indicate the F/N to the pc.

LRH Ref:

• HCOB 14 Aug 64 Scn Two – Prepcheck Buttons

Ref:

• HCOB 1 Aug 68, „The Laws of Listing and Nulling“

Ref:

• BTB 10 Apr 72 Prepchecks (Rev. 17 Nov. 74)

Steps: (Use Basic Drill Format and Procedure.)

Steps:

1. R-factor to the pc that you’ll be running an L&N process.

1. The coach makes a list of fruit items and gives it to the student auditor.

2. Clear the procedure of L&N with the pc and make sure he understands that he is to give you all his answers to the question.

2. The student auditor gives the pc an R-Factor that he will do an assessment. Clear the action with the pc if he has never had an assessment.

3. Clear words as necessary. Write pc’s definitions on the worksheets.

3. Auditor does an assessment on the list and gets an item. Coach simulates or indicates reads.

4. Clear the question watching the meter response and noting any read.

4. Clear what a Prepcheck is. Clear all words and commands.

5. If no read on clearing the question, call the question out to the pc. Note any read on the listing sheet.

5. Take the largest reading item (from your assessment) and ask pc: "On ______ (item) has anything been ______ (Prepcheck button)?" If a time limiter is used, the command is: "Since ______(Date or time) on ______ (item) has anything been (Prepcheck button)?"

6. If still no read, put in Suppress and Invalidate on the question until you get a read.

6. Run step 5 repetitively until pc has no more answers.

Example: „On the question: ‘What change has another caused in your life?’ has anything been suppressed?“

7. Then say: "I’ll check the question. " Check it and observe the needle. If it reads, look at the pc expectantly; if he doesn’t speak up, ask him the question directly.

Example: „On the question: ‘What change has another caused in your life?’ has anything been invalidated?“

8. Run the question repetitively until the pc has no more answers. Then follow steps 7, 8, & 9 until the button F/Ns. Go on to the next button on the Prepcheck and repeat steps 7-9.

7. If no read on checking the question with Suppress and Invalidate, do not list the question.

9. If indicators of an ARC Break appear during the Prepcheck, handle the ARC Break per ARC Break drill (BTB 15 Dec 74 Auditor Expertise Drill Series 2). When the ARC Break F/Ns, end off on that Prepcheck button. You may run further Prepcheck buttons on the same item if no major cog with F/N VGIs on the subject being Prepchecked.

Note:You can also check „Not-ised“ and „Abandoned“ as buttons if there is no read using Suppress and Invalidate.

10. When the item you’re handling has gone to EP, take the next largest reading item and handle as in steps 5-9.

8. If the question or button reads, list it by asking the Listing question.

11. Repeat as in step 10 on all reading items.

9. Coach uses fruit words for answers.

12. The drill is passed when the student auditor can Prepcheck confidently and flublessly.

10. Write each item verbatim, with its reads.

11. List to a BD F/N item and indicate the item to the pc; then indicate the F/N.

12. If pc runs out of items while listing (without a BD F/N item), check the Listing question. If it reads, extend the List. If it is clean, null the list and give the pc his item. (Ref: HCOB 1 Aug 68, „The Laws of Listing and Nulling“)

LRH Ref:

13. If you cannot get the item, do an L4BR Method 5, handling what you find by following each instruction for each line exactly.

• HCOB 1 Aug 68, "The Laws of Listing and Nulling"

14. The drill is passed when the student Auditor can do Listing and Nulling confi­dently and flublessly.

Ref:

• BTB 7 Nov 72R, Issue III, "L&N Lists"

LRH Ref: Ability Major 6, 1955

Steps: (Use Basic Drill Format and Procedure.)

Commands:

1. R-factor to the pc that you’ll be running an L&N process.

F1. „What do you want changed?“

2. Clear the procedure of L&N with the pc and make sure he understands that he is to give you all his answers to the question.

„What do you want unchanged?“

3. Clear words as necessary. Write pc’s definitions on the worksheets.

F2. „What does another want changed?“

4. Clear the question watching the meter response and noting any read.

„What does another want unchanged?“

5. If no read on clearing the question, call the question out to the pc. Note any read on the listing sheet.

F3. „What do others want changed?“

6. If still no read, put in Suppress and Invalidate on the question until you get a read.

„What do others want unchanged?“

Example: "On the question: ‘What change has another caused in your life?’ has anything been suppressed?"

Drill each flow using the Alternate/Repetitive Process. Drill.

Example: "On the question: ‘What change has another caused in your life?’ has anything been invalidated?"

7. If no read on checking the question with Suppress and Invalidate, do not list the question.

LRH Ref: Book – Creation of Human Ability R2-50 p. 128, 129

Note:You can also check "Not-ised" and "Abandoned" as buttons if there is no read using Suppress and Invalidate.

Commands:

8. If the question or button reads, list it by asking the Listing question.

• “Walk over to this spot.”

9. Coach uses fruit words for answers.

10. Write each item verbatim, with its reads.

11. List to a BD F/N item and indicate the item to the pc; then indicate the F/N.

12. If pc runs out of items while listing (without a BD F/N item), check the Listing question. If it reads, extend the List. If it is clean, null the list and give the pc his item. (Ref: HCOB 1 Aug 68, "The Laws of Listing and Nulling")

and so on.

13. If you cannot get the item, do an L4BR Method 5, handling what you find by following each instruction for each line exactly.

Drill per LRH instructions given in Creation of Human Ability R2-50. Use the Bracket Drill.

14. The drill is passed when the student Auditor can do Listing and Nulling confi­dently and flublessly.

LRH Ref: Book – Creation of Human Ability R2-63 p. 157, 158

Commands:

LRH Ref: Book: Creation of Human Ability R2-44 p. 120

• „Find something about yourself which you can accept. “

Commands:

F1: "Tell me some things you wouldn’t want to have happen again. "

"Tell me some things you would like to have happen again. "

F2: "Tell me some things another wouldn’t want to have happen again. "

"Tell me some things another would like to have happen again. "

F3: "Tell me some things others wouldn’t want to have happen again. "

Drill each command to EP per LRH instructions given in Creation of Human Ability R2-63, using the Repetitive Process Drill.

"Tell me some things others would like to have happen again. "

Drill per LRH instructions in Creation of Human Ability R2-44 – using the Alternate/Repetitive Process Drill on each flow.

LRH Ref: Book – Creation of Human Ability R2-65 p. 159

Commands :

LRH Ref: HCOB 7 July 64 Scientology III & IV Justifications

1. Clear the flow 1 commands.

F1: „Can you recall a time when you failed to change some energy in this Universe?“

2. Give the pc a brief R-Factor on how this process is run.

F2: „Can you recall a time when another failed – to change some energy in this Universe?“

3. Say: "Start of Process. " or "This is the Process. "

F2: „Can you recall a time when others failed to change some energy in this Universe?“

4. Commands:

Flow 1: 1. "In this life-time what overt has another committed?”

F1: „Can you recall a time when you failed to change some space?“

2. "How has he/she justified it?"

F2: „Can you recall a time when another failed to change some space?“

"(2) is run flat until the overt given in (1) is knocked out. Then a new overt is found and (2) is done thoroughly and repetitively on it.

F3: „Can you recall a time when others failed to change some space?“

"Note it is not an alternate command. Note that a cycle of action is completed with question (2) or (1) before you leave off processing this particular overt. Only when you have all the justifications and cognitions possible on (1) do you ask for a new overt from the pc. " LRH HCOB 7 64 Scn III & IV Justifications

5. Repeat these steps with flows 2 and 3.

F1: „Can you recall a time when you failed to change a Body?“

Flow 2 Commands:

F2: „Can you recall a time when another failed to change a Body?“

1. "In this lifetime what overt have you committed?"

F3: „Can you recall a time when others failed to change a Body?“

2. "How have you justified it?"

Note: „He may get nothing on space at all but such incidents are in his recall or space would not exist for him at all. “ LRH

Flow 3 Commands:

1. "In this lifetime what overt have others committed?"

F1: „Can you recall a time when you failed to change a memory?“

2. "How have they justified it?"

F2:. „Can you recall a time when another failed to change a memory?“

F3: „Can you recall a time when others failed to change memories?“

LRH Ref: Book: Scientology 8-8008, Chapter on Certainty Processing

F1: ”Can you recall a time when you successfully changed something?“

Commands: "I have a solution. "

F2: „Can you recall a time when another successfully changed something?“

"I have no solution. "

F3: „Can you recall a time when others successfully changed something?“

Drill using the Alternate/Repetitive Process Drill.

Drill each flow in each part A-E using the repetitive process drill.

Commands: "There is something. "

LRH Ref: Book – Creation of Human Ability R2-68 p. 161, 162

"There is nothing. "

Commands :

Drill using the Alternate/Repetitive Process Drill.

„Spot something incomprehensible. “

Drill per LRH instructions given in Creation of Human Ability R2-68 – using the Repetitive Process Drill.

Ask the pc for the terms he uses to describe each Dynamic 1-8. Then run each Dynamic, in turn in the following commands:

"There is _____. "

LRH Ref: HCOB 19 Jan 61 Additional HAS Processes

"There is no _____. "

Commands :

(Example: on the 1st Dynamic – "There is myself. " "There is no self. ")

F1: „Get the idea of changing. “

Drill using the Alternate/Repetitive Process Drill.

„Get the idea of not changing. “

F2: „Get the idea of another changing. “

Using the same words the pc gave to describe the Dynamics in Part 3, run each Dynamic in the following commands:

„Get the idea of another not changing. “

F1: "(Any Dynamic) is preventing me from communicating. "

F3: „Get the idea of others changing. “

"(Any Dynamic) is not preventing me from communicating. "

„Get the idea of others not changing. “

F2: "I am preventing _____ from communicating. "

Drill each flow using the Alternate/Repetitive Process Drill.

"I am not preventing ____ from communicating.”

F3: "_____ is preventing others from communicating. "

LRH Ref: HCOB 30 Apr 61R Change Brackets and Commands Rev. 25 Nov 73 Reissued 19 Sep 74

"____ is not preventing others from communicating. "

Drill each flow using the Alternate/Repetitive Process Drill.

„Sort out ‘Think’ or ‘Get the idea’ by Meter’s reaction. Use one that produces the most fall. “. LRH HCOB 30 Apr 61R Change Brackets and Commands.

Commands :

Assess:

„Think (get the idea) of a change. “

• Communication ______

„Think of a no-change. “

„Think of a failed change,“

Drill using the Bracket Drill.

Commands :

„Recall a change. “

„Recall a no-change. “

„Recall a failed change. “

Drill using the Bracket Drill.

Commands :

F1: „What change have you avoided”

„What change have you sought?“

F2: „What change has another avoided?“

„What change has another sought?“

F3: „What change have others avoided?“

„What change have others sought?“

F1: „What no change have you avoided?“

„What no change have you sought?“

F2: „What no change has another avoided?“

„What no change has another sought?“

F3: „What no change have others avoided?“

„What no change have others sought?“

In order of largest read, run reading items in the following commands:

F1: „What failed change have you avoided?“

• "There is _____. "

„What failed change have you sought?“

F2: „What failed change has another avoided?

Drill using the Alternate/Repetitive Process Drill.

„What failed change has another sought?“

F3: „What failed change have others avoided?“

Draw up a list of reading allies or terminals the pc is fixated on – either by culling a list of such terminals from worksheets and session reports (list must be approved by the C/S) or by clearing and asking the pc directly: "Are there any terminals that you consider to be allies?" or "Are there any terminals that you think about/have constant trouble with/depend on/etc?"

„What failed change have others sought?“

In order of largest read, run all reading terminals in the following commands:

Drill each flow using the Alternate/Repetitive Process Drill.

F1: "_____ can produce an effect on me.”

"_____ cannot produce an effect on me. "

Commands :

F2. "I can produce an effect on _____”

1. „How have you changed _____?“ (something or somebody)

"I cannot produce an effect on ____. "

2. „How has _____ tried to change you?“

F3: "_____ can produce an effect on others. "

3. „How has _____ changed another?“

" ____ cannot produce an effect on others.”

4. „How has another changed _____?“

Drill each flow using the Alternate/Repetitive Process Drill.

5. “How has _____ changed (self)?

6. „What have you not changed?“

Draw up a list of terminals the pc is closely associated with – either by culling a list of such reading terminals from worksheets and session reports (list must be approved by the C/S) or by clearing and asking the pc directly: "Are there any terminals that you are closely associated with?"

7. „What has not changed you?“

In order of largest read, run all reading terminals in the following commands:

8. „What has not changed _____?“

F1: "I can have _____ ‘s viewpoint. "

9. „What has _____ not changed?“

"I cannot have _____ ‘s viewpoint. "

10. „What has not changed self?“

F2. " _____ can have my viewpoint. "

11. „What have you failed to change?“

" _____ cannot have my viewpoint. "

12. „What has failed to change you?“

F3: "Others can have _____ ‘s viewpoint. "

13. „What has _____ failed to change?“

"Others cannot have _____ ‘s viewpoint. "

14. „What has failed to change _____?“

Drill each flow using the Alternate/Repetitive Process Drill.

15. „What has failed to change self?“

Drill using the Bracket Drill.

Assess for creative abilities that the pc has lost or has wanted to have by clearing and asking 1. "Are there any abilities that you feel you’ve lost?" and 2. "Are there any abilities you’ve wanted to have?" In order of largest read, run reading items in the following commands:

1. "I can _____. "

LRH Ref:

2. "I cannot _____. "

• HCOB 6 Aug 68 R3H

Drill using the Alternate/Repetitive Process Drill.

Note: The commands of this process have been revised so they are „non-permissive“.

LRH Ref:

Flow 1:

• Book – Scientology 8-8008, Chapter on Differentiation, Association, Identifi­cation

1. Locate a change in life by listing to a BD F/H item „What change has another caused in your life?“ Use the L&N Drill earlier in this bulletin.

2. „Get some of the data of it (don’t run as an engram) so you know what the change was.

Ref:

3. „Find out by assessment if this was a Break in

• BTB 1 Dec 71 Issue III Rising Scale Processing

• Affinity

Commands:

1. "Get the idea of (bottom of scale, e.g. dead). "

2. "Do you have that idea?"

3. "All right. Now change that idea as nearly as you can to (top of scale, e.g. Survive)."

and have the PC examine that briefly.

4. "OK. How close did you come?”

4. „Taking the one found in (3) find out by assessment if it was:

5. "Thank you. "

• Curious about_____

These commands are run 1-5, 1-5, 1-5 on the same pair (e.g. dead – survive) until the end phenomena of F/N, Cog, VGIs on the pair being run is reached.

Use the Bracket Drill.

• Survives - Dead

LRH HCOB 6 Aug 68 R3H

E/S ARC Break etc. to EP.

Flow 2: Listing Question: „What change have you caused in another’s life?“

Follow the procedure given for Flow 1.

Flow 3: Listing Question! „What change has another caused in another’s life?“

Follow the procedure given for Flow 1.

Commands :

F1: „What is unknown about that (room object)?“

F2: „What doesn’t another know about that (room object)?“

F3: „What about that (room object) could someone make unknown to others?“

LRH Ref: Book – Advanced Procedures and Axioms

Drill each flow using the Repetitive Process Drill.

Ref: BTB 1 Dec 71 Issue IV Effort Processing

1. The Auditor asks the pc what physical disabilities he has. These are noted down with the read each disability gave when the pc said it. Physical disabilities is cleared with the pc before asking the question in this step.

2. Effort usually requires education in re-experiencing it. Have the pc shove against a wall. Then have him sit back and re-experience it.

3. Clear the word effort.

4. Take the largest reading disability. Any disability run must be one that reads.

5. Clear the command "Get the (disability) effort."

6. Clear the words counter-effort.

7. Clear the command "Get the (disability) counter-effort,"

6. These commands are run alternate-repetitively (effort, counter-effort, effort, counter-effort, effort, etc.) until a) the emotion concerning the disability is voiced by the pc, b) the consideration is voiced by the pc. The process is continued on the disability being run until both the emotion and the consideration are voiced by the pc. This is the EP of the item being run, it’s always accompanied by F/N and VGIs.

9. Then take the next largest reading disability and run the process on it to EP.

10. All reading disabilities are run. The pc can be asked for other disabilities when all reading ones already given by the pc are run. The process is run until the pc gives no more reading disabilities.

11. Care must be taken not to chop the pc when he mentions the emotion. Get the emotion and the consideration.

LRH Ref: Book – Creation of Human Ability R2-66 Electing Cause

Commands:

• "Point out some things which are causing things. "

Drill using the Repetitive Process Drill.

LRH Ref: HCOB 1 Sept 63 Routine 3SC

1. Clear and list the Flow 1 Listing Question: "In this lifetime what does another use to make you wrong?" (Use the Listing and Nulling drill given earlier in this bulletin.)

2. Give the pc a brief R-Factor on how this process is run.

3. Using the Service Facsimile found in 1, clear and run the first question "In this lifetime how would (Ser Fac) make another right?"

"Don’t keep repeating the question unless pc needs it. Just let pc answer and answer and answer. Let pc come to a cog­nition or run out of answers or try to answer the next question prematurely and switch question to second question (clear first) ‘In this lifetime how would (Ser Fac) make you wrong?’. Treat this the same way. Let the pc come to a cog, or run out of answers or accidently start to answer the first question. Go back to first question. Do the same with it. Then to second question. Then to first question again, then to second. …on any big cognition, end the process.

4. "Using the same method of auditing as in 3 above, use the third question: ‘In this lifetime how would (Ser Fac) help another escape domination?’ When this seems cooled off use fourth question ‘In this lifetime how would (Ser Fac) help another dominate you?’ Use third question and fourth question again until pc has it all cooled off or a big cognition.

5. "Using the same method as in 3 above use the fifth question ‘In this lifetime how would (Ser Fac) aid another’s survival?’ and then sixth question: ‘In this lifetime how would (Ser Fac) hinder your survival?’ Use five and six as long as is necessary to cool it all off or to produce a big cognition.

"The idea is not to beat the process to death… The pc will have automaticities (answers coming too fast to be said easily) early in the run. These must be gone and pc bright when you end. You are only trying to end the compulsive character of the Service Facsimile so found and get it off automatic and get pc to see it better, not to remove all TA action from the process. " LRH HCOB 1 Sept 63 R3SC

6. "That which doesn’t run on ‘Right-Wrong’ you prepcheck to EP." LRH Tape 6309C05 SH Spec 303 Service Facsimile Assessment.

Occasionally you may not get a cog and EP on running the brackets or it may not run at all in brackets, in this case, you would prepcheck the Service Facsimile. (Ref. Tape 6309C05 SH Spec 303 Service Facsimile Assessment.)

Drill the prepcheck per the Prepcheck Drill given earlier in this bulletin. The preface is: "In this lifetime on (Ser Fac) has anything been (Prepcheck button)?"

7. Handle Flows 2 and 3 as above.

"In this lifetime what do you use to make others wrong?"

1. "In this lifetime how would (Ser Fac) make you right?"

2. "In this lifetime how would (Ser Fac) make others wrong?”

3. "In this lifetime how would (Ser Fac) help you escape domination?"

4. "In this lifetime how would (Ser Fac) help you to dominate others?"

5. "In this lifetime how would (Ser Fac) aid your survival?”

6. "In this lifetime how would (Ser Fac) hinder the survival of others?"

"In this lifetime what does another use to make others wrong?"

1. "In t is lifetime how would (Ser Fac) make another right.”

2. "In this lifetime how would (Ser Fac) make others wrong?”

3. "In this lifetime how would (Ser Fac) help another escape domination?"

4. "In this lifetime how would (Ser Fac) help another dominate others?"

5. "In this lifetime how would (Ser Fac) aid another’s survival?”

6. "In this lifetime how would (Ser Fac) hinder the survival of others?"

Commands:

F1: "Tell me a flow you know something about.”

F2: "Tell me a flow another could know something about. "

F3: "Tell me a flow someone could get others to know about. "

Drill each flow using the Repetitive Process Drill.