Русская версия

Search document title:
Content search 2 (exact):
ENGLISH DOCS FOR THIS DATE- Cramming Actions (CRAM-02RB) - BTB750308-1 | Сравнить
- Cramming Expertise (CRAM-06RA) - BTB750308-5 | Сравнить
- Cramming Officer Statistic (CRAM-07RA) - BTB750308-6 | Сравнить
- High Crime Checkouts and Technical Oks (CRAM-04RB) - BTB750308-3 | Сравнить
- TRs in Cramming (CRAM-05RB) - BTB750308-4 | Сравнить
- Types of Cramming Admin Cramming (CRAM-03R) - BTB750308-2 | Сравнить

SCANS FOR THIS DATE- 750308 Issue 1 - Board Technical Bulletin - Cramming Actions [BTB06-018]
- 750308 Issue 2 - Board Technical Bulletin - Types of Cramming - Admin Cramming [BTB06-019]
- 750308 Issue 3 - Board Technical Bulletin - High Crime Checkouts and Technical OKs [BTB06-020]
- 750308 Issue 4 - Board Technical Bulletin - TRs in Cramming [BTB06-021]
- 750308 Issue 5 - Board Technical Bulletin - Cramming Expertise [BTB06-022]
- 750308 Issue 6 - Board Technical Bulletin - Cramming Officer Statistic [BTB06-023]
CONTENTS TRs IN CRAMMING Cохранить документ себе Скачать
BOARD TECHNICAL BULLETIN
8 MARCH 1975
Issue I
Revises, Combines & Cancels
BTB 21 Jan 72RA, Cramming Series 2RA,
BTB 10 June 73RA, Cramming Series 19RA,
BTB 10 June 73, Issue III, Reissued 19 July 74, Cramming Series 20.
BOARD TECHNICAL BULLETIN
8 MARCH 1975
Issue IV
Revises, Combines & Cancels
BTB 12 Dec 71RA, Issue XI, Cramming Series 5RA,
BTB 14 Sept 72R, Cramming Series 12R,
BTB 15 Nov 72R, Cramming Series 13R.
RemimeoRemimeo
Cramming Series 2RBCramming Series 5RB

Cramming Actions

TRs IN CRAMMING

The particular areas of expertise a Cramming Officer has to have, in addition to being a proven Auditor and Supervisor to the level of the Org are:

There is no restriction whatsoever on doing TRs in Cramming.

1. TRs 0-9 & Rapid TR 2

It is not rote and is done on each Cramming cycle.

2. Metering

All Technical Personnel are expected to continue to work on and improve their TRs throughout all Training and Interneships and service in an Org or Franchise.

3. Axioms & Codes

The LRH Model Auditing Tapes and materials are the only guide to perfect TRs.

4. Coaching

Any questions or queries or strange ideas about any TRs must be immediately handled with Word Clearing on the relevant material.

5. Mechanics of the Mind

Beware of quickie TRs or Auditors who do five minutes of TR 0 and then say that they have improved their TR 0 and confront. Watch out for Auditors who cannot or will not do two hours of confront or Auditors who cannot deliver 2½ hours of auditing and short session. Be on the lookout for Supervisors whose students blow or who have small classroom attendance.

6. Problems of Work

The Interne Supervisor is responsible for forcing in daily TRs on Auditors, Internes, C/Ses, Cramming Officer, Pc Examiner, Word Clearers, Basic Courses Supervisors, Success Officer, D of P and D of T.

7. Word Clearing – M2, 3, 4, 6, 7 & 9

Auditors and Internes get their TRs training done outside of production hours and time must be provided daily for this to be done. Each personnel may not be prevented from doing daily TRs. Technical reports show that some Auditors do not get in their minimum 25 WD hours showing the vital need for lots of TRs to be done. Poor scheduling keeps Auditors waiting, and unnecessarily lengthens their auditing day, leaving no time for daily TRs. Daily TRs and Auditor and Interne training times actually reduce time in Cramming. Auditors and Supervisors do not have cases and are expected to work on their TRs daily.

8. The Tech Materials to the level of the Org

Special TRs booklets and tapes have been compiled for Cramming Officers to assist them to get real correction of TRs done in Cramming.

9. 10 points of Keeping Scientology Working.

These materials comprise all materials on TRs 0 to 4, Upper Indocs and the Auditing Comm Cycle, issued as individual booklets on each TR.

THE CRAMMING OFFICER’S PROCEDURE

The only way to correct TRs is by taking each one individually and tackling it as a subject on its own. This is made possible through the individual booklets and tapes.

The general procedure in use in handling Auditors sent to Cramming is as follows:

The tapes also must be listened to from the viewpoint of the TR being corrected. The Auditor, Interne or Supervisor has the LRH Model Auditing tapes and special LRH TRs demonstration tapes to use. They must be taught to listen to a single TR in order to correct it.

A. Interview the Auditor with the folder and Cramming Order.

The Cramming Off must know these materials cold so that he can direct the person to the exact material every time to resolve the situation.

B. Go over the folder locating all errors in sequence, earliest to latest.

Revised by Msm John Eastment, A/CS-5
Approved by Guardian WW
FB Ad Council
FB Exec Council
LRH Comm FB
Commodore’s Staff Aides
Approved by the Board of Issues for the
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS of the CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY

C. Find the Why for the goof on a meter.

BDCS:CH:JK:JE:nt.jh

D. Ensure the Cramming Order handles the Why, is short and written in sequence of gradient handling, including basics.

E. See that the misunderstoods are cleaned up back to the Basics (e.g. errors handling out Ruds traced back through Basic Auditing Series to the Auditor’s Code). Always use WC 1, 2, 4, 6, 7 and 9 in addition to starrates and clay.

F. Have the Auditor drill the procedure flubbed until flawless.

G. Have the Auditor do TRs 0-4 (6-9 if necessary), debugging individual TRs on a gradient of perfection.

H. If a chronic error, metering error or low hours, check over his meter position, eyes and his handling of the meter, and OT TR 0 and TR 0 particularly.

I. Now, with the error corrected and basics in, interview the Auditor and verify that the Why is handled and send to the Pc Examiner as a VGIs F/Ning student.

J. If no F/N, check him over on the meter for by-passed why or misunderstoods, isolate the area and get it corrected and Word Cleared M2 & 9 and starrated and drilled.

K. Write up the “Why” and key actions of the handling for the C/S, attach the F/N Exam form and route to the C/S logged as complete.

Steps A & B have several parts:

a. Show me.

b. Tell me.

c. Obnosis.

d. What happened just before that?

SHOW ME

In many instances, if a person is asked what was done, he will not report exactly what was done, so a Cramming Off should get a person to show him what he did.

A Cramming Off has to hand a Cramming Order. His first action is to get the person to demonstrate by going through the motions. In many cases, he won’t have to go any further because the demonstration will immediately show what was wrong and requiring correction.

For example, an Interne is having trouble with assessment, but a simple demonstration shows that he does not know how to set up for a session. He has his Meter way over to the left, the worksheets in the center and the assessment sheet way over to his right, and thus cannot see the list, the Meter and the Pc all in one field of vision. Such a demo can take one minute and save a Cramming Off 20 minutes of digging.

In Admin Cramming, Show Me can take the Cramming Off into the Staff Member’s area.

TELL ME

When Show Me is not possible, have the person tell what happened. “Exactly what did you do?” is a stable datum. Get the exact sequence of events not a lot of ramble. If very confused have the person use a Demo Kit. Don’t get caught up in reasons or explanations.

OBNOSIS

The Cramming Officer must be able to pick out the outnesses in what is being said or shown. One doesn’t have to be an expert to recognize and follow down something that doesn’t make sense.

WHAT HAPPENED JUST BEFORE THAT?

In some cases, particularly in the Tech Cramming area, the Cramming Off will have to find out what happened just before the goof.

When checking for what happened just before a goof, the Cramming Off will find A. something he didn’t understand, and/or B. something he couldn’t control.

A new Interne flubs the commands of R3R. Now, if the Cramming Off doesn’t ask what happened just before that, he may miss out on his Why. He will probably find out that the Interne realized he was running out of paper, or some such common incidence, which caused him to become flustered, TRs to go out, and he flubbed the commands. In this case, through his own lack of planning and set-up actions, the Interne lost control of the session. So the Cramming Off will cram the Interne on session set-up actions and strengthen his TR 0 through the use of TRs booklets and tapes and see that he continues daily TRs Training on the Interneship.

When a look into a situation does not readily show up a Why, go earlier and find out what happened.

ETHICS

The only hidden barrier to real success in Cramming is non-participation, the indicator of Out Ethics. A Cramming Off must recognize Out Ethics and get it handled. He may be able to get the Staff Member to handle it on the spot, or he may have to send the person to Ethics or even to Integrity Processing. The point is to recognize the barrier to progress and get it removed.

SUPERVISOR CRAMMING

Unless Qual is also correcting Training where needful, Cramming will be overloaded with flubbed products who didn’t get the data in the first place and are now goofing on their Tech or Admin post.

The Qual Sec should inspect Course rooms daily. Does the Super have his E-Meter set up on his desk ready for an M2 or M4? Is the Super moving around the class constantly, handling students, keeping them moving and F/Ning? Actual Super two way comm with students should be listened to and TRs and Supervisor or study tech correction written up.

  • Does the Super have a Qual OK to do Word, Clearing M2 and 4 on his students?
  • Are there student graphs up and posted in PT? Are the Roll Books properly filled in and in PT?
  • Are all points of “What is a Course” in?
  • Are there any students on strange or irregular schedules?
  • Is the Supervisor at least a Mini Course Supervisor Course grad?
  • Are there other Supervisors training on HPCSC and postgraduate Supervisor training (HSCSC) or schedules to go for such training?
  • Are Supervisor TRs poor or choppy? Do they do daily TRs?
  • Are blown students immediately contacted, brought in and handled?
  • Can the Supervisor “see” what is happening in the Classroom? Can he handle what he sees?
  • Any Supervisor with down stats, drop-outs, blows or slow students must become bait for a continuing correction program until the standard is way up and into an acceptable level.

    The value of a good Academy or HSDC Supervisor, who runs snap and pop courses, gets his students through rapidly and thoroughly is extremely high. In this case, he is personally worth about two times that of a top HGC Auditor in terms of beans into the Org. HAS and HQS Course Supers prove their worth in future beans and re-sign-ups in the Org. They help to create future business in the Academy and the HGC. Therefore, proven top Supervisors should not be ignored as areas of facility differential.

    A Supervisor is handled in Cramming like any other person in for correction. The Situation is located, the Why found and the handling for that Why executed. There are many such Situations and Whys to be found on most to get them to a point of being flubless Supervisors. It is a no more lengthy cycle than getting an Interne through his Interneship.

    A good Supervisor produces the Org’s future Auditors.

    Revised by
    Msm John Eastment
    A/CS-5
    Approved by
    Guardian WW
    FB Ad Council
    FB Exec Council
    LRH Comm FB
    Commodore’s Staff Aides
    Approved by the Board of Issues
    for the
    BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
    of the
    CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY
    BDCS:CH:JK.JE.nt.jh