Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex HCO POLICY LETTER OF 17 JUNE 1970 Issue II | SAINT HILL MANOR, EAST GRINSTEAD, SUSSEX HCO POLICY LETTER OF 17 JUNE 1970RB ISSUE I REVISED 25 OCTOBER 1983 |
OIC CHANGE | |
first report 30 July 1970 and continuing thereafter.) (Cancels HCO PL 29 Mar 70, Tech and Qual Stats.) (Amends HCO PL Sept 30, 65, Statistics for Divisions.) | |
Tech and Qual Stats are revised as follows: | TECHNICAL DEGRADES |
TECHNICAL DIVISION | |
Tech Sec and GDS: | Any checksheet in use or in stock which carries on it any degrading statement must be destroyed and issued without qualifying statements. |
1. Total number of well done auditing hours in HGC. | Example: Level 0 to IV checksheets SH carry “A. Background Material — This section is included as an historical background but has much interest and value to the student. Most of the processes are no longer used, having been replaced by more modern technology. The student is only required to read this material and ensure he leaves no misunderstood.” This heading covers such vital things as TRs, Op Pro by Dup! The statement is a falsehood. |
2. Total points of all students in the Dept of Training for the week past based on the Flag Authorized point system. | These checksheets were not approved by myself; all the material of the Academy and SH courses IS in use. |
Dir of Tech Services: | Such actions as this gave us “quickie grades,” ARC broke the field and downgraded the Academy and SH courses. |
1. Total of new students and pcs scheduled and to whom service was being delivered in the past week, a newly purchased intensive or course if scheduled and being serviced, counting as one, a 5 hour intensive counting however only as 1/6th of a person. | A condition of TREASON or cancellation of certificates or dismissal and a full investigation of the background of any person found guilty will be activated in the case of anyone committing the following HIGH CRIMES: |
Director of Training: |
|
Combined points of all students on courses based on Flag Authorized point system. | |
Supervisors: | (Hat checksheets may be authorized locally per HCO PL 30 Sept. 70 I, CHECKSHEET FORMAT.) |
Combined points of all students on their particular courses. | |
Director of Processing: | |
Total number of auditing hours less 5 for each pc backlogged more than 3 days. | |
Auditors: | |
Total hours audited for each auditor + 1 point for every very well done session. | |
Tech C/S: | |
Total number of TA Divisions for the week less 25 points for every pc not making his grade at Examiner. | Acting in any way calculated to lose the technology of Dianetics and Scientology to use or impede its use or shorten its materials or its application. |
QUALIFICATIONS DIVISION | REASON: The effort to get students through courses and get pcs processed in orgs was considered best handled by reducing materials or deleting processes from grades. The pressure exerted to speed up student completions and auditing completions was mistakenly answered by just not delivering. |
Qual Sec and GDS: | The correct way to speed up a student’s progress is by using two-way comm and applying the study materials to students. |
1. The amount of money paid for student training into the org for a certificate course. (All solo excepted.) | The best way to really handle pcs is to ensure they make each level fully before going on to the next and repairing them when they do not. |
2. The number of creditable success stories turned in less 2 points for every no-story and less 2 more points for every ethics action taken on a student, pc or staff member. | The puzzle of the decline of the entire Scientology network in the late 60s is entirely answered by the actions taken to shorten time in study and in processing by deleting materials and actions. |
Dir Exams: | Reinstituting full use and delivery of Dianetics and Scientology is the answer to any recovery. |
1. 1 point for every non F/N Examiner Report. (It being understood that an Examining Report is done after every session.) | The product of an org is well-taught students and thoroughly audited pcs. When the product vanishes, so does the org. The orgs must survive for the sake of this planet. |
2. 10 points for every uncertain or flunked student. (It being understood that students are given meter checks by Examiner and spot Exams for every theory or practical completion.) | FOUNDER |
Note: Each of the 2 Examiner stats loses 100 points for each proven instance of evaluation, invalidation of students or pcs by expression or statement by the Examiner, instances of penalty to be decided by Qual Sec, Div 6 Sec and a third member agreed upon by the two. | |
Dir Review: | |
1. Errors discovered and corrected in pcs’ folders, 1 point for each plus 10 points for each student completed with VGIs. | |
2. Number of falsely signed off items on Div IV checksheets corrected in Cramming. | |
Cramming Officer: | |
See No. 2 Dir Review. | |
Staff Training Officer: | |
1. GI divided by the number of people. | |
2. Course completions by staff members. | |
Qual Consultant: | |
1. Number of staff, students and pcs spotted in the org during week with Bis. | |
2. Number of Bis routed or handled. | |
No Qual C/S Stat as there now isn’t one. | |
Review Auditor: | |
1. Errors discovered and corrected in pcs’ folders, 1 point for each. | |
2. 10 points for each pc completed with VGIs. | |
Dir C & A: | |
1. Number of classifications rejected by reason of inadequate case gain or false representations. | |
2. Number of awards refused by reason of inadequate hours or abilities for the level not attained. | |
It will be noted that these statistics reflect the original design of Tech and Qual and do not favor “Quickie Grades” for pcs, inabilities in auditors, unpaid staffs or an ARC Broken field. | |
Accuracy in compiling these stats, posting them weekly where they can be seen and managing on the basis of these is a survival factor in an org. | |
Founder | |