LRH: Okay, July 10, 1963. All right, honey. Okay. Your chair’s a little aslope – bring that arm up a little bit, would you? Thank you. Now, the room all right?

Thank you. Well, this is what?

PC: Mm-hm.

Audience: The 10th, the 9th.

LRH: Okay. Is it all right with you if I have a recorder running here?

The 10th?

PC: Yeah.

This is the 10th of July AD 13, Saint Hill Special Briefing Course. I have a lecture today on R3R and 3N.

LRH: Is it?

But before we get onto these – these technical matters, it’s a remarkable world we’re living in. Very remarkable world. How can anything be as idiotic at some lines and places as they can be is quite marvelous. I have a banker today who is arguing with me and the only thing I could make out of it – he’s just arguing with me vociferously not to reduce any loans I have with the bank or reduce overdrafts and he’s trying to make me realize that he’s – I don’t need any overdraft account, since he’s perfectly willing to extend me all the overdrafts that I possibly want anyplace, and not – please not reduce my loan account, you see. It was quite remarkable. This is – Scientology credit-wise apparently has arrived. Marvelous. Never had it happen to me before! „Please owe us money, Dr. Hubbard.“

PC: Mm.

It’s very funny, you know, at the times when you need this money, they’re never in that frame of mind. You know, never in that frame of mind. But when you get to a point where you don’t need any money, you see, you’ve got everything taped in all directions and so forth, they couldn’t be so liberal. Marvelous, isn’t it? It’s the law of supply and no demand – demand and no supply.

LRH: Doesn’t bother you?

Anyway, you are confronting some horrible facts today, talking about R3R, you’re confronting some horrible facts. I have some very bad news for you. Very difficult for me to impart this to you and so on, but we have the exact number of skills necessary to make an OT. That’s – I’m sorry to have to tell you that – this, because they are not simple skills. And that is the bad news. That is the bad news. They are not simple skills and they are numerous.

PC: No.

Now, I brought the bulletin out yesterday which is being run off today in order to talk to you from my notes. But following in my tradition of having no notes and so forth – I brought the bulletins I don’t need today, and the ones that I had yesterday which I should have today, you see – that’s being run off, so I don’t have it today.

LRH: Not making any electrical squeak or anything?

The number of skills – the number of skills which you have to master in order to make an OT are numerous. And I’m not going to go into a list of these because you’ll shortly have it in HCOB, I think, 8 July or 9 July. But these skills are going to make you gasp a little bit when you first look at them, unless I give you a good piece of news. And that is that they break down to about five skills which you have been taught for a long time and which unfortunately you have to have perfect. And those skills are: the ability to follow an auditing cycle – can you give an auditing cycle? That auditing cycle is quite important.

PC: No.

And the next one is: can you give it repetitively? Can you repeat yourself? That’s quite important, too. That’s a special skill. You see, you could sit down and give one auditing cycle, but can you give the next auditing cycle and the next auditing cycle and the next auditing cycle. Now, you say that isn’t very hard. Years ago we had to master that one, so we’ve got that one taped. Got that one taped.

LRH: You can hear it?

And the next one is: to read a meter. And I do mean read a meter. You have to be able to read a meter – and do very well with a meter.

PC: It’s making a hiss, but it isn’t squeaking.

Next one is: you have to be able to read, understand and follow the procedure of a bulletin. That is a training skill all by itself.

LRH: That upsetting to you?

The last one is somewhat debatable and I don’t know what I said in the bulletin on the last one, but it’s something on the order of: Keep a pc in-session. Handle a Model Session.

PC: No.

And those, actually, are the basic skills – those are the basic skills that we go down to. And any time – now hear me, hear me now – any time that you find an auditor unable to handle one of these upper procedures, you look back at those five I just gave you and there is something wrong with those five. This character just can’t seem to run something like R3R or 3N – just can’t seem to handle it. Can’t seem to handle 2H, can’t seem to cut it, you know? Just can’t seem to do anything with the pc in CCHs, just can’t seem to – and you look back at that small list I have just given you and you will find that the fault lies there. The fault does not lie in the complexity of the skill.

LRH: Sure?

Now I give you this with great – a great margin of warning on this because this is whether you can train people or not train people. This is whether you personally as an auditing supervisor can get auditing done or not get it done – completely aside from getting result on the case that you are doing.

PC: Yeah, it’s all right!

When you see an auditor who is getting no results and you’ve told him to run technique Z and he just can’t seem to cut it, you’re just going to break your heart if you then get ahold of technique Z and wrap it around his head and expostulate and scream and pound the desk and shove technique Z at him and technique Z at him and technique Z at him and then send him back into an auditing room to audit technique Z and you’re going to get hash. And then you’re going to conclude that technique Z doesn’t work. But you have followed the wrong procedure.

LRH: Huh?

I don’t say don’t teach him technique Z – but if you have to get very extreme in teaching him technique Z or if there’s anything hard about teaching him technique Z, it isn’t technique Z that you are up against. You are up against the five I just gave you. One or more of those is as wrong as Khrushchev. That’s awry! It is awry, man.

PC: It’s all right.

Now, do you understand what I mean when I tell you that no amount of persuasion is going to take an auditor who can’t do these basic skills and make him do a complicated skill?

LRH: All right. All right, put your hands in your lap. Squeeze the cans. Thank you. Havingness is up pretty good.

Now, no amount of persuasion on an upper level or complex technology – no amount of persuasion, is going to overcome these basic technologies. The difficulties which you’re up against are the difficulties of basic skills.

Tone arm’s here at 4.75.

Now, you like to think sometime that you’re up against case level. To some degree that is true. But all case level does is make it harder for you to teach the basic skills. It does not make it impossible for you to teach the basic skills. And if you ever proceed on the basis that case level makes it impossible for you to teach the basic skills, then you are going to lose. You’re not going to lose on just one person, you’re going to start losing on pc after pc after pc after pc.

Now, what we’re going to do in this session is the preliminary assessment, R3R, and we’re going to find a level here, if we can.

I’ve had the most remarkable people audit. My belief in their ability to audit amounted to more than their case level. I’ve had a girl who was mostly throbbing away at the lower lip as she gazed out the windowpane fixedly most of her life, headed at a pc, and, „Now, you can do this,“ see, and so on.

PC: Mm-hm.

„Oh, can I? Maybe I can.“

LRH: And start to list if we find a level. Okay?

And they go ahead, and I’ve had her go ahead and turn in a job. Oh, yeah, you had to keep your eye on it. That gives you a slightly different look at training.

PC: Mm. All right.

You see, you get so involved with a Q and A on training that you can’t train. And the Q and A is this: The guy is saying, „I can’t,“ and so you Q-and-A and say, „Okay, you can’t.“ That’s Q and A on the part of an Instructor.

LRH: Anything wrong with that?

Look, if he can’t, he’s awful wrong. If you make him do it, you make him right. And this is one of the few instances where that is the case. He becomes right if he can do this. And it’s only his aberration that you’re Qing-and-Aing with, if you say he can’t.

PC: No that’s all right. It’s all right!

I know this is a very extreme view. But I have recently begun to look on it, not as an extreme view of „just because we couldn’t do otherwise,“ which is what I’ve said before – I’ve become to look at it as fact. It’s a fact. I don’t care what the case level is. Discount it as far as the auditor is concerned. The lower the case level, the more horrible time he’ll have. All right. But he can get auditing done. The more brutal it’ll be to face up to a session, the more horrible it is to face up to the ARC breaks, the more worry there is between session – „Oh, my God, what am I doing? I’ve already ruined him. Look at there, he’s got a cold, and – and he’s all caved – oh, oh ho! And – oh oh!“

LRH: Not upsetting you in any way?

All right, that’s – aspect of auditing multiplies – but it doesn’t forbid it. Now, the moment you let the door open on „aberration forbids it,“ you’ve let the door open on „no auditing must occur.“ Oh, yes, because look at the reductio ad absurdum of all this. „Only OTs can audit.“ Where does that leave you? It leaves you with no OTs to audit. Every once in a while you get it going in an Academy. Do you know that you daren’t – you daren’t let a D of P or a D of T, either one – D of P of course can say, „We can’t audit this person because the person has an insane history, or is illegal“ or something like that. But we can’t let them get too extreme on who they accept for processing or training. But particularly the D of T. The D of T, honest, must never be permitted to refuse a student.

PC: No!

Aw, that lets some awful things occur in Academies. It makes the job an awful headache. But immediately that you say, „This student can’t be admitted to the Academy,“ then we upgrade our classification of who can study Scientology and then we upgrade our classification – casewise, see – and only this case level, and then only this case level can study, and wuuhh! And there’s all of a sudden nobody in the Academy and nobody learning how to do anything. And look, I’ve seen it happen. I’ve sat right there and watched it happen.

LRH: All right, very good. I have the listing ARC break sheet here, so forth.

And I’ve taken the very people that they said couldn’t audit – sometimes with malice aforethought – and made them turn in an auditing session. Oh, brother, it takes some doing! As your Instructors can sometimes tell you here; they probably could expound on this at some rate. But the truth of the matter is it’s a Q and A. This guy’s aberrations are saying, „You can’t.“ So the moment that the Instructor says, „All right, you can’t,“ the Instructor is then Qing-and-Aing with the reactive bank of the student. And the student’s ability deteriorates at a square the like of which I’d hate to see.

PC: All right.

It’s quite remarkable how fast this will occur. Now, one time I remember, one memorable ACC – in the last week and a half I decided that no results had taken place in this ACC to amount to anything, so I just went around and all the auditors sitting there and auditing pcs and so forth – each unit as they flip-flopped and so on – and I said do so-and-so and so-and-so and I said, „You can do it all right,“ and gave them a very complex technology to go ahead and do, but I told them they could do it. I didn’t tell them they couldn’t do it. And they brought off some remarkable results and all the auditing results that occurred in that ACC occurred in the last week and a half. It was on the basis of „You can do it.“ And the guy said, „Oh, I can’t do it, it worries me so much,“ and so forth.

LRH: All right, let’s hope we find an interesting level. Okay. Is it all right with you if I begin this session now?

„But you’re standing here, you’re not auditing. Now go on back and audit.“ It’s quite remarkable.

PC: Yes.

You see, I myself know all about your qualms and horrors and jitters on the subject of taking apart somebody’s head. I know all about these things. I’ve held my breath more often than you ever will. And I can sympathize with you. But it’s something you can get over. And I have seen auditors who couldn’t audit at all, couldn’t follow an auditing cycle, just had to Q-and-A and so forth – took a while, but they eventually got to a point, said, you know, „Hey! I mustn’t Q-and-A this way. Nearly all of my trouble is in this auditing cycle. Nearly all of my trouble is right here in this auditing cycle. Every time the pc opens his face, why, I do what he says in some particular fashion or I question his answer or something like this. And I’m just going from bad to worse. I never stick to procedure.“ You know, crash! A great big exclamation point occurs in the sky like they do over comic strip characters, you know? You know, „Hey!“ you know. „No, I shouldn’t do that.“ And he wakes up to it and he starts right on the situation.

LRH: Okay. Start of session. Has the session started for you?

Therefore, it takes some a little longer to get these basics down than others. Now, all the training that has been given in recent years is pointed toward those basics. So no training is lost. And it takes you a while to learn to shift gears with shifting technology and that sort of thing, but you will find good news in this. Nearly all of the things which you have learned how to do now have their place in Scientology. And if you’ve learned how to do these things – if under some different procedure name and so forth – well, you ‘re that much further ahead.

PC: Yes.

When we get down to a complex technology such as Routine 3R, it’s a complex technology. Now you join 3R up to 3N and run them all on the same team all with the same reins… And my God, a one-armed paperhanger with the hives – isn’t going to – couldn’t be in any worse shape than this.

LRH: Very good. What goals would you like to set for this session?

No, you’ll only get into bad shape if while you’re trying to do this complex technology you haven’t learned which side of you the E-Meter goes on. Don’t you see? While you’re doing this complex technology, all of your weaknesses in the other five show up. If you’re still busy Qing-and-Aing, 3R3 can get you into – I mean, R3R can get you into more difficulty in less time. A Q and A isn’t just an innocent accident that can be passed over and cleaned up in 3R; it can be a catastrophe! It won’t kill the pc, you can recover the session, but boy, it’s that whole session is gone.

PC: To have a good session.

Now, why? Because he’s particularly vulnerable? No, it’s what you Q-and-A on. You say, „All right…“ Let me give you an actual instance – actual instance. You say, „All right. Now we’re going to date this implant.“

LRH: All right.

Pc says, „Well, I’ve got the picture right here, why don’t you take the date of the picture.“

PC: To find an interesting level. To have the nulling go easily. Get over this ARC break uh – sore throat!

„All right, what is the date of the picture? Is it less than, greater than_______?”

LRH: To get over this ARC break?

An hour later the whole bank goes into a grouper, reality goes by the boards, the pc explodes and his skull flies in pieces through the ceiling. Well, that was an innocent Q and A, wasn’t it? The pc just offered up the engram in a muddy sort of a way and thought it was the implant. But the auditor said that he’d been looking for an implant there and he never dated the implant. And some four-thousand trillion-trillion years intervened between the picture the pc had and the implant the auditor wanted to date. So he was running the implant with a date error of four-thousand trillion-trillion years. Quite an interesting date error, isn’t it? Don’t you suppose that wouldn’t tend to group up some bank? Well, I think that’s very interesting.

PC: Yes, I just said it. I meant sore throat.

And yet that isn’t much of a Q and A, don’t you see? See, I’m not even berating that particular accident. You have to be very slippy about this sort of thing, you see. Well, the auditor just doesn’t make his own intention stick in the session, which is the basic reas… how things happen in Q and A. He’s trying to locate the date of an implant and the pc gives him an engram which is on an entirely different chain, but which he thinks, muddily, is the implant and then the auditor says, „Well, to make the pc happy, why, we’ll just say, ‘Well, that’s the engram.’ „ Pc says he has it, so we just Q-and-A about the whole thing.

LRH: You got a sore throat?

In other words, the auditor doesn’t carry out his intention originally of dating the implant he was looking for in the first place. All he had to do was simply carry out the intention he started with in the first place and he would have been all right. Don’t you see? But his tendency to become the effect of the pc slips his gears, see, and he just gets into a cross-eyed situation where he has no business being.

PC: Yes.

Now, carry out an auditing cycle – carry out a repetitive auditing cycle let’s look at how this influences it. The auditor says, „I’m going to date this implant.“ You see? This is carrying out an auditing cycle. You might not look at this as being an auditing cycle, but it is. „I’m going to date this implant now.“ And the pc says, „I have an engram here which I have been looking at which is the implant.“ And the auditor never gets his question answered, which understood, the question is, „When is this implant?“ No, no, he gets, „When is this engram?“ Do you see how that is?

LRH: I’m sorry – to get over this sore throat.

In other words, he intends something and he never gets it answered. He wants to know when is the implant, see. No matter if he has to go over the meter and do a lot of things in order to determine this thing, this is still his auditing question. And the pc says, „It’s a picture,“ so he dates the picture and he never finishes off his auditing cycle. And then a couple of hours later you’re still picking up the pieces scattered around the room and you wonder „What the hell happened?“ Well, frankly, nothing happened to R3R at all. The error was not R3R error. The error is that the auditor wanted, and knew he had to get, the date of a certain implant. And he didn’t get it. Ha! Elementary, my dear Watson, isn’t it? You want to know what happened to the auditing session.

PC: Mm-hm. It’s interesting. I don’t have an ARC break.

Well, whatever else might have occurred as an error in the auditing session – you could be very technical about all this – the auditor’s question, „When is this implant?“ is answered by „Here is an engram, get its date.“ And these things can slide by so innocently that you can’t even recognize them as a Q and A. Too delicate. You say, „Well, I’ve got to take the pc’s data,“ you can say, muttonheadedly. Well, you’ve got to take the pc’s data.

LRH: All right. All right, how is that?

All right, the pc says, „This was the engram in which the implant occurred.“ Well, he didn’t actually, in this case, say that. But even if the pc said that, the auditor has to choose between invalidating the pc and getting his data straight and all this sort of thing, you get into judgment, you get into an involvement of one kind or another. You say, „Well, all that’s very complicated.“ No, it is not very complicated because never at any time did the auditor ask if it was the date of the implant.

PC: That’s all right.

In other words, you just derail the whole procedure. He started running Routine 3R.

LRH: Okay. Now, we’ll put in our „since“ mid ruds.

Now, here’s what’s amusing about this anecdote: is the auditor wasn’t running R3R, but 3N. And mysteriously found himself running – or found it in progress – R3R. And did the ARC break assessment on 3N. But was in actual fact doing R3R. Now, look at that as a further complication.

PC: Mm-hm.

Now, you wonder where we are here. I notice you all looking very puzzled. Well, an implant is an engram. And the auditor in this case went to the lengths of getting the date and duration of an engram, which had nothing whatsoever to do with the implant. You don’t get durations of implants. Ninety percent of the time you don’t even have to bother getting their dates. And if the auditor had just omitted dating this implant, everything would have run off like a well-oiled dream. Because they knew what chain of implants they were looking for and the session – to be very factual with you – was actually a 3N session. And they found themselves doing R3R. Now, how involved do you think that can get?

LRH: All right. Now, when was the last time I audited you?

Well, how do you possibly differentiate between these two things? It’s horrible. Well, I might have added to the five, „To run the process they’re running.“ But I consider that inherent in the auditing cycle.

PC: Monday night.

You get the level of error? This is the only thing I’m trying to get across to you – the level of error is all very, very stupidly elementary. Always! You’re really not getting into errors which have anything whatsoever to do with R3R or 3N. This auditor apparently has difficulty running the process which is started on and has a tendency to weasel off into other processes. That tendency existing, then doesn’t hold the line on a very precise process. This is not meant in a spirit of criticism; I’m just showing you something, see. Start in running CCHs, see, and then just kind of weasel off into Reach and Withdraw. Be the same thing, wouldn’t it? All right, well, that’s a gross tendency that any of you could notice. But how about the tendency of – carried out – no matter how faint this tendency is – it still expresses itself in not adhering to a procedure. Not starting and finishing an auditing cycle. Because an auditing cycle also includes completing the process you are running. Part of the auditing cycle; that’s the major auditing cycle. You flatten the process you’re running.

LRH: All right. Since the last time I audited you, has anything been suppressed?

I want to make these points with you, not in a spirit of criticism or any derogation. And I want to make these points with you for just this reason: You’re colliding with something which on the surface looks very complicated. 3N and R3R look very complicated. Got all kinds of steps and has all about time track and… Have to list, assess, find right levels, watch the TA like a hawk. And you’re not going to have any trouble with those at all if you can do the basics of auditing. Actually, it really isn’t complicated. If anything is wrong with R3R, it’s too idiotically simple.

PC: Concern about um – Janie.

We have here a process which after all these years runs engrams by rote. Well, that’s fantastic! But you can’t run an engram by rote if you can’t read and execute a bulletin. You say, „Well, oh, yeah, yeah, well, that’s Book One and so forth, and I think there was something about implants in Book One. Aw, yeah, well, I understand implants all right, I – di – implants… And so forth. We had a technique one time, we had a pc sit down and he flowed the energy from the top of his head down around his shoulders and that must have been 3… Oh, yeah, I guess that’s 3N. Yeah. Very easy. All right. All right, sit there and have the energy flow from both of your temples down over your shoulders. Yes, well, all right. What’s the matter? You say there’s kind of – something going on? Well, it’s all right, just” – and so on.

LRH: Okay.

Pc says, „Well, it’s – this is absolutably terrible.“

PC: That’s about all – um, sore throat.

„Dear Ron, I was running 3N the other day, and it doesn’t work.“

LRH: All right.

Aw, your level of error – your level of error is fantastic. It’s never slight. I never find these gross audit – that’s why you call them „gross auditing errors,“ because they’re never slight – never slight.

PC: Um – that’s about all.

All right, so somebody comes along and he does 3R3 and he dates these engrams and he gets these engrams all dated and so forth and the pc keeps getting groups of engrams and thinks he’s running dub-in, and you say, „Well, study your 3R3 and do those steps better and learn how to move the pc on the time track better and don’t get things confused the way you’re confusing and moving the pc on the time track.“

LRH: All right. I’ll check that on the meter. Since the last time I audited you, has anything been suppressed? All right, I didn’t get a specific read there. All right. Since the last time I audited you, is there anything you’ve been careful of?

And the pc gets his engrams further grouped and he’s ARC breaking more often and you say, „Now, confound it, study that bulletin! Study that bulletin! Learn to say ‘move to the beginning of the incident,’ and ‘move through the incident to a point so forth years later.’ Learn how to do that!“ Pc is getting worse and worse. Eyes getting black, you see, getting to look haggard, crunched over, you know, starts withdrawing from life. And you say, „Well, this 3R3 is a pretty dangerous process. Look what it can do to somebody.“

PC: No.

Ah, but if – now here’s what I’m telling – telling you to do. This you might not do – is look into these basics with regard to this auditor. Look into the basics. You may find something like can’t read a meter; never has been able to read a meter. Well, let me tell you, the greatest crimes that you can pull and the only thing that’ll give you any real trouble in R3R, the only real trouble you will have, will come from wrong date and wrong duration. And that trouble is so far in advance and so high above any other trouble that you can have in doing R3R, that it looks like the sun looking down upon some space fragments. I mean, the order of magnitude is absolutely fantastic.

LRH: All right, I’ll check that on the meter. Since the last time I audited you, is there anything you’ve been careful of? All right. Doesn’t read. Since the last time I audited you, is there anything you’ve failed to reveal?

Meter reading. The guy wasn’t having any trouble with R3R, he was having trouble with his meter. He had some misconception with regard to a meter; his practice with regard to meters was bad. Or, better than that, he just didn’t understand dating. He couldn’t ever use a meter, really, on dating, and he couldn’t get his durations and so forth.

PC: No. I don’t think so.

Now look, it’s very difficult for an expert meter reader to get the dates and durations of engrams or incidents or anything else. You understand? That’s tough; that’s hard to do. Let’s now add to that difficulty an inability to read a meter! Now you see what I mean. Pc will never chop at you for moving him all over the time track unless you’ve already laid in the bypassed charge of a wrong date or a wrong duration, because time is the single source of aberration. Wrong date, wrong duration.

LRH: All right. I’ll check that on the meter. Since the last time I audited you, is there anything you’ve failed to reveal? I’ve got a disturbed needle here. Yeah, what’s that?

Now, when I say a wrong date, you’ve got this incident at 9.5 trillion years ago. And it’s actually 9.49 trillion years ago. That’s not a wrong date. Look for your gross errors – gross errors! Well, this incident is 900 years ago. And it’s really 9.45 trillion. Ah, boy! You start running errors in dates like that into R3R and boy, that time track looks like an accordion after a hot night in the – in the polka parlor. Zzzzzzzzzzz. You say, „What’s this?“ Used to be a time track. The bypassed charge is fantastic! You’ve missed the whole incident, put it in the wrong place; and then you’ll say, „Well, this pc is actually a dub-in pc because they – here he’s got this picture of going down to the growler – or rushing down to the – to the local corner saloon and getting a growler for his old man, see – this is – this is the – the whole incident. Next thing you know, halfway down to the saloon he meets this dragon and finds himself mounted on a horse and the pc will say, „Well, the old man must have had DTs, and I must have gotten some of his engrams and so forth.“ And you run a little bit further and you say, „Well – well, let’s see, what’s the scenery look like around there?“

PC: Well, I thought um – I failed to reveal that I didn’t want the children taking Cokes from the front refrigerator.

„Well, I don’t know, like the 1890s or something like that.“

LRH: Front? You mean Winter Garden?

And you say, „Well, 1890s. Let’s redate this thing. Oh, 1890, all right.“ Pc just said it so it ticks, see.

PC: Winter Garden refrigerator.

You ever notice that you can pick a date off the coach that the coach is thinking of? Well, a dating always will. It’ll always – all the guy has got to do is said the date and you’ll get some tick on it. He’ll say a date and it – for an instant it flicks. Or you can’t get a date. You don’t have to do anything about it, but he says, „1890“ and so on.

LRH: All right. Very good. All right. Since the last time I audited you, is there anything you’ve failed to reveal? All right, I didn’t get a specific read on that. Okay?

Now, this actually is true that a pc does have the date, and the right date does read. But then he told you the date of the incident, don’t you see? I’m saying, well, he just said the figure’s 1890. 1890 will get a faint, vesperish tick. It’ll only do one tick. It won’t do two ticks, three ticks.

PC: Mm-hm.

Say, „All right, it’s in 1890.“ Well, he gets – he doesn’t get the dragon anymore, but he gets going up in this airplane, you see, to deliver the beer in an airplane and so forth, but he says there’s something wrong about this because there were no airplanes in 1890. Orville and Wilbur didn’t commit their crime until a few years later, so therefore there’s something wrong with this – and the auditor’s in perfect agreement; he says, „Well, this pc’s running dub.“

LRH: All right. Put this on the meter now. Since the last time I audited you, has anything been invalidated? All right, I didn’t get a read. Since the last time I audited you, has anything been suggested? Yes, there’s a suggestion.

No, he’s not running dub. The auditor is running „can’t read a meter.“ That’s what’s the matter. Now, you eventually get this all tangled – untangled and you do an assessment and you find out you have a wrong date or something and you find that this is 9.45 trillion years, and he did go down to the saloon to get his old man some beer, but halfway there the atom bomb hit. And you get a complete incident and it all unrolls and it’s all fine, pc’s happy with it and it reduces and so forth.

PC: Well I suggested that – um, 3N, at – you know – an implant run, gets more gain and benefit to a pc than an engram run.

You might say that a dub-in case is only somebody that’s got his dates mixed up. You could probably cure a case of dub-in just by accurately dating. Start into this lifetime and keep going back and just date, date, date and you probably could close up a case that was doing dub, because the only time you get time track closure and other things happening and so forth is when you have wrong dates.

LRH: Hm – mm.

Now, that’s very important, then, isn’t it? Let’s take a look at this wrong duration. Nothing drives a pc battier than to have a wrong duration. You say, „All right, this incident is two days long.“ It’s actually a trillion years long. He tries in vain to find the beginning of the incident. He can’t. Because he’s looking at something that happens two days before. So it stays all black and gruesome and he can’t make sense out of it and he’s all anaten and that sort of thing.

PC: Hm.

Well, after a while – because whenever you get this phenomenon you re-duration – that is the rule – if you have any trouble and you can’t find the beginning of an incident – this is what made R3R. I haven’t released this, by the way, before this moment. But what made R3R workable is this datum: That a pc has perception on any incident that is properly dated and durationed. That’s the most important factor we’ve learned in many a year. There’s where perceptics lie.

LRH: All right. Since the last time I audited you, has anything been suggested? Seems to be still something here.

Now, there’s only three reasons why he doesn’t have perception on the incident that you’re trying to run. There are only three reasons. You have the wrong date or the wrong duration or it’s got a GPM in it. And those are the only three things that can close an engram out so the pc can’t run it.

PC: Oh, that we uh – put a new lineup in the X Unit. Yeah.

Now, you can add another thing to it – and actually that doesn’t close out his perceptions and it becomes very junior. But you can add this other thing to it, just for fun, and you could say it’s a wrong assessment, but all that does is give you TA action. Or the chain you’re running has vanished; you’ve flattened the chain you are running. Once more, you won’t be able to assess – pardon me, you’ve got a wrong assessment. And you’re now running him on the wrong chain. The chain he was running is flat.

LRH: All right. Don’t quite see how…

But that all represents itself in tone arm action and actually doesn’t really always express itself in nonperception. The whole secret of perception – the secret of perception in an engram is: right chain, right date, right duration equals perception. Period. Every time, man!

PC: Well, the new lineup of procedure – of auditing – in the X Unit. You sent it on through on a note for them, you know, saying this sounded good for X1. It was the suggestion that uh – that all the missed withholds be listed down and then cleaned up one by one. This was from – this was suggested by Pesco to you and you said this sounded like a good thing for X1, it was…

And the only thing that can get in the road of that thing is a GPM, and you pass the pc through it once – and because he resisted all the way through it – he had a lot of black energy in there, you see. The black energy goes up, bzzzz! – and of course obscures the incident.

LRH: Uh – huh.

I found the other day an engram that had a GPM in it. I didn’t know it had a GPM in it before I ran the pc through it a couple of times. It registered and then didn’t register that it had a GPM in it – so I said, „Well, we’ll just run the pc through it.“ And I didn’t really know that the thing had a GPM into it until the lights in a tunnel went out. A moment before there had been lights in this tunnel. But now this time through there’s no lights in the tunnel. So the old maestro knew at once that we had rekindled those items and made the black energy off of the items go bzzzzzt and of course it put out the lights. So I got the incidents – I got the – took the pc to the first pair of items, and it was a wildcat GPM and you’ve got to learn how to run those. That’s another skill you have to learn – ha-ha – sorry! But the basic ones and the real tough ones, we’ve got them clear back to the beginning of time. We know their patterns all the way back. I haven’t released them completely, but actually the April 17th bulletin covers some vast period of time. That’s the Gorilla Implants and the Bear Implants, and they cover a vast, vast period of time – trillions of trillions of years. And that only changed just once. They dropped a couple of items out of it in the middle of all of this.

PC: … you sent it on to Reg and then Reg sent it on to Herbie and then Herbie sent it on to me.

Otherwise we’ve got all that. We got the – an earlier implant, the Glade Implants, we’ve got those; we’ve got the earlier Fairgrounds or Circus Implants before that; we – we’ve got the lot, see. And that’s all very helpful. And you’ll say, „Thank God, Ron got these things.“ But every now and then you’ll be running an engram in R3R and one of the things which you have to watch out for is, does it have an implant in it? Before you scoot the pc through it, be a good thing to find this out about it. So, did it have an implant in it, see, while you’re durationing it.

LRH: Oh, I see! All right, very good. I remember now.

And heh-heh! It has an implant in it. Augghh. Well, the proper procedure is not to throw the pc through the incident, but to take him through the first pair of items in the implant, if there are any. And finally fool with it until you finally find out what it’s all about, discharge the items out of it. Sometimes there are only a half a dozen items. And get those, you’ll see them fire, rocket read, you clean it up and then just handle it as an engram and you’ll get the rest of it. You get motion and that sort of thing out of it, get some of the emotion out of it and so on. Pick up two more items that you missed and clean it up. It’s a wildcat implant, see, and they’re never very long – they are never very, very difficult. The pc, if it’s on his chain, can reach them for sure.

PC: Hm.

But there’s a point in running where 3N and R3R cross. And frankly, as far as programming is concerned, I would always start a case on R3R and pick up those implants which turned up in the normal progress of running R3R. I found myself going heigh-ho down the Helatrobus Implants, get the lot! Don’t just pick his chain up, you know, just get everything you can lay your paws on in that series of implants. Heigh-ho. Clean them up, man. Got your paws on them. Then go on and handle it as an engram. You’ve got it clean now.

LRH: Sorry. All right, since the last time I audited you, has anything been suggested. You protesting the question?

Now – then you’d always find the engrams that are on the pc’s chain that are obscuring the implants. Of course, we’re asking you to drive the 20-mule team Borax mules, you know, out there, with reins wrapped around both hands and you know, and around your shoulders and driving with your toes – because at any minute, you check up this thing, got an implant in it. Well yeah, it’s an implant, and what… You’ll have a table of dates eventually to tell you when all these implants occur. And you say, „What’s…“ And you – suddenly dawns on you, „43 trillion, 980 billion, 706 – that’s Helatrobus. Zzz! You know, I’ve been betrayed.“ We have the level „Failed to die,“ and you’ve got the goal „Failed“ in the Helatrobus Implants. You’re sitting right on it, see. Which is preceded slightly by „To die.“ Ha-ha.

PC: Hm!

Now, you have to know how to shift that transmission, that – with a smooth shifting of gears right over to 3N. And you just go ahead and handle the whole thing, right there. And forbear tracing back up the track and not handling any more engrams and scattering everything around. Just finish what you’re doing. It landed you there, you found the engram, you found the computation in the engram, you just got whatever you could get your hands on, cleaned up as much of it as you could and then you jolly well went back to running what you were running, of course, because you’ve never stopped running it. You have just used 3N as an adjunct to R3R, which is all it is anyway.

LRH: Hm?

That’s all 3N is; it’s just an adjunct to R3R. It gives you how to run implants – implant engrams the easy way, by pattern. And when you get onto a wildcat one, you’ve got a few more headaches but it’s just because you haven’t got a pattern; you’ve got to take the pattern.

PC: Yes.

Now, when we go into this and study this over, we find out that there are a lot of technical details you have to know. Such as, how do you assess for an ARC break. „We did a half-a-page list on the pc and the tone arm went from 3.0 to 5.5 to 4.0 – and the moment it got back to 4.0 we had a sort of a blowdown so we ended the list. And I – I null the list and pc just seems to be awfully ARC broke and we just don’t seem to get anyplace on R3R after this.“ Well, you have to know such things as pcs ARC break if you do not run the tone arm action out of the list the pc is doing.

LRH: All right. Since the last time I audited you, has anything been suggested? There seems to be another suggestion here.

You’re going to do a list, you got to do a list. A list is a list! I don’t care what it’s for – and if you leave a list half-finished you not only won’t find any item on it that is any good to the pc, but your pc’s going to ARC break. The most frequent source of ARC breaks in the old days was incomplete lists. The guy never finished the list. Or overcompleted lists. You know, the list was complete at fifteen pages and they’re just now passing page 75 and the – and the pc hasn’t been able to think of any new items since page 20. But they’ve still been grinding on, the auditor keeps getting in the mid ruds and asking him, „In this lifetime, what have you failed about?“ On and on and on and on until you get – list’s been complete forever.

PC: Oh, I’ve suggested that I would like to find an interesting level and I thought about different levels that I thought might be interesting.

Most frequent source of ARC breaks is – around any listing action – is simply an incomplete list, that’s all. You could take any arbitrary list and assess the pc on it. Because the pc didn’t do it, it is therefore not incomplete because he never started it. You know, it’s like your Prehav levels and the preliminary step list of items – I mean levels to be to run. Well, you can do all of those that you want to and you’re not going to ARC break the pc unless you get a completely incorrect level.

LRH: Oh!

And that can be very embarrassing to the pc. And I’ve given the source of this list so that if you ever run into it and you just can’t find anything on this list – or if you’re – the auditor doing it can’t find any level on this list at all, I’ve given you where these lists came from so you can get ahold of some of the old lines and put a „failed“ to it; put it and a „failed“ to it and a „not“ to it and you can go on and extend this list considerably. I’ve given you the sources for this list and you have all those. They’re about every thought or combination of anything that man and life has. But this is adequate for most pcs and it doesn’t matter whether the level list is complete or not, because it’s an arbitrary list. Pc didn’t do it, so therefore it doesn’t stand as an incomplete list. Ah, but the other list – now you – you’re up against all the rules of Listing. And that’s quite a skill; Listing and Nulling is quite a skill. And what does it do? It goes back to meter reading. Get your auditing cycle completed.

PC: Hm.

When you confront these complex processes, make sure that your nerviness does not stem from an inability to place the pc’s chair. You get the idea? See? You’re saying, „I’m having all kinds of trouble with R3R.“ Well, before you conclude anything about R3R – oh yeah, go on and study it and learn it and so forth – but you just can’t seem to make it work. Before you conclude anything catastrophic with regard to this whatsoever, let’s take a look at what you are doing that makes up R3R that makes you nervous. And you’ll probably find out that listing makes you very nervous, or something, and you find out, „Well, why does listing make me very nervous? Oh, well, I…“ It’ll be something like this: „I’ve just never mastered the art of writing things while I was looking at a meter to see if they read. Yeah, something like that.“ And you say, „Oh.“ „Oh well, no wonder we’re having such a hell of a time in this assessment.“

LRH: All right, thank you!

In other words, go back to basic things like your meter, your session, auditing the pc. Auditing cycle. Q and A. Pc keeps getting ARC broke – you can’t figure out why he’s getting ARC broke and every time you try to find it out – well, you didn’t accept something the pc said. You had better conclude sooner or later that you must be doing a Q and A of some kind or another. There must be something wrong with your auditing cycle. Otherwise your pc wouldn’t continue to get ARC broke. Look it over and patch it up.

PC: Hm.

Now, therefore, learn to play this game called auditing on its fundamentals. And when you feel very competent with its fundamentals, why, then I don’t think that you will have much awe of a procedure which is simply a complex application of these fundamentals. There really isn’t very much to R3R. Guy has got a time track and you’re going to run him through these things and you’re going to come a cropper sometimes – going to come a cropper sometimes with it. Why? Well, it isn’t because you didn’t tell him to move to the beginning of the incident – it isn’t anything elementary like that – or you didn’t follow your procedure – it isn’t anything involved. You’ll find out, well, you had something like a wrong duration. You just continued to get wrong durations. And eventually, running this pc, you finally get it through your knucklehead that this pc just won’t date on this chain that you are running.

LRH: All right! Okay. Since the last time I audited you, has anything been suggested?

And you finally say, „Well, trace this thing back. Well, let’s see. Let’s trace this thing back here. Now, what did I do? So-and-so and so on and so on and so on and so on. Oh, we must – he – he doesn’t have any tone arm action either. Oh, we must not have the right assessment. Something is wrong with the assessment. Well, how could there be anything wrong with the assessment?“ And it suddenly dawns on you that you have absolutely no confidence whatsoever in being able to clean up a pc’s needle so you can assess. Nothing wrong with R3R, see. You’re having trouble – you’re having trouble handling a session and handling a meter.

PC: I think I’m protesting the question. It never reads. I don’t know why it’s reading.

So on this pc, without going back and putting yourself through a course or something like that – on this pc right then, you decide, „Well, all right, to hell with it, this thing has got no tone arm action so I must have a wrong assessment. That’s it. So there’s something wrong with the item or there’s something wrong with the level. That’s all. All right, now what could be wrong with those? Well, I just must not have done what I was supposed to do to find the item – or to find the level from which I got the item. Now something is wrong in that department.

LRH: All right. Okay, very good. Since the last time I audited you, has anything been suggested? I’m afraid there is a suggestion here. There. There.

„Well, how come I could – would get a wrong assessment on this pc? Well, I’ve – let’s see. Let’s see, his needle was awful dirty. As a matter of fact, his needle is still dirty. As a matter of fact I’ve never seen a clean needle on this pc! Ahh! Hey, hey – I think I’ve got it. I think I got it. I think this pc – I’ve never had this pc in-session. Ha-ha-ha-ha-ha. Excuse me!“

PC: I just was wondering, is it something I suggested or something someone else suggested? You know?

„Ah,“ so you say, „Well, now let’s – let’s put this pc in-session. This pc has been roughed up a few times and so forth; let’s just run ‘in auditing,’ eighteen-button Prepcheck.“ Something elementary. Only in this particular case, why, we’re just going to run them until we’ve got a bit of a clean needle and we’re not going to bother the pc and so forth because that seems to be a weak spot, here. So let’s just kind of – let’s run a sort of an eighteen-button Prepcheck on auditing and let the pc answer it any way he wants to, and we’ll say it’s clean when it’s clean and we’ll just kind of ease this thing out and so forth.“ Boy, we find out all kinds of things. This pc has been withholding, and he’s been suppressing and he’s been upset with this and he’s been in disagreement with that and so forth, and you know? You thought you couldn’t run R3R. Well, no, you just didn’t have the pc in-session. See, elementary, my dear Watson. How can you do an assessment on somebody who isn’t in-session?

LRH: Hm! What’s that? That.

So you trace this – always trace this back to these stupid fundamentals. And your main danger as an auditor is – the main danger that you run into – is that you’re too complicated. You’re not – you’re insufficiently idiotable. See, if you would just – if you would just recognize that the simplicities of the game make it hang together and work – if you’ll just recognize that, why, you’ll have some fantastic wins here and there. Look it over. And eventually you’ll get very cocky about these things and it’ll all fall into line with you and so forth.

PC: I suggested that – um – that – um – that I get off that withhold to you prior to the session, because it didn’t sort of involve me, except my reaction to someone else.

But the reason you’re not achieving a result here or there on a complex technology goes back to these early ones. You either aren’t doing it, you aren’t doing it in an auditing session because you haven’t got a session, or you suddenly discover that there’s something wrong between you and the pc and this meter. This pc does not register well on this meter. Why? Well, I’ll let you in on something. The greatest errors that you can make in R3R – the greatest errors that you can make – are wrong date and wrong duration. Those outshine any other error. You can even make progress with a wrong assessment, you understand? Those are just enormous. They ride up there at the umpteen skillion light-year level, see? And way down below these things is wrong assessment.

LRH: All right, very good. That’s what had your TA high here. That’s what had this high. Okay. All right. Since the last time I audited you, has anything been suggested? And that’s smooth. Very good. And your needle cleaned up and you dropped half a tone on the tone arm. Okay?

Well, there’s two ways we can get a wrong assessment. We can have had a wrong assessment in the first place, and we could actually have run it out so that we are now running on a wrong assessment, because you see, we flattened the first assessment. In which case – both cases, the TA will remain without motion. You won’t have adequate motion in the TA.

PC: Good.

Now, the only other thing that can kill TA motion, as far as R3R is concerned, is this astronomic fact of wrong date, wrong duration – they’ll kill TA motion. Wrong date, wrong duration, bang! No TA motion; that’s it.

LRH: Since the last time I audited you, has a mistake been made? Did you think of a mistake?

I’ve been studying TA motion here, lately – what makes it and that sort of thing, and I finally found these facts out. And so there’s this enormously important fact – just cannot be overstressed. Wrong date, wrong duration. Those are crash. Anytime you’re really having any trouble with it you’ve got wrong dates and wrong durations. I mean, that’s all. You understand? I mean, that’s w-a-a-a-y up there.

PC: No.

The other point here, wrong assessment, well, the only thing that leads to is just no TA action and not much pc interest and you’re not getting much done on the case and so forth and so on. It’s not going to ruin the case, don’t you see?

LRH: Let me check that again. Since the last time I audited you, has a mistake been made? All right, that’s clean. Since the last time I audited you, has anything been protested? Did you think of something? It was a latent read.

And flatten the chain – you flatten the chain, and you said, „Well, a chain couldn’t flatten in one engram.“ Yet you did. You flattened it in one engram. What you found was basic on that chain. You know, it flattens in a hundred or it flattens in one or it’s no point – has nothing to do with where the engram is on the time track. The engram can be yesterday; just yesterday. And it’s basic. Well, you ran – run this engram that you date as yesterday. And you clean it all up and the pc’s fine, and the somatics reduce and everything’s gorgeous about the thing and you look for an earlier one, you can’t get any date, you can’t get any…

PC: No, I didn’t think of anything.

„Let’s see. Is the earlier incident we want gr-gr-greater-greater than 10 days ago? Less than – I don’t get any read. Just a minute, get some better light on this… Now is – is the engram – is the engram, the earlier engram which reduces to absurdium – that chain – is the earlier engram earlier than 20 days ago? Is it later than – I mean no, no. No. I mean is it more – more than 20 days ago? Le-le-less than 20 days ago? I don’t get any read here at all. Now, maybe it’s the wrong order of magnitude. Ah! Is the earlier engram we are looking for on the re – to re-fail to reduce to absurdity, is this more than a hundred trillion years ago? Is it less than a – that doesn’t read. More than a hundred? They’re both reading. Did you think of something? All right, let’s have another crack at this. Is it more than a hundred trillion years ago? Less – I got a dirty needle here. You thinking of something?“

LRH: All right, very good. Check it again. Since the last time I audited you, has anything been protested? And that is clean. Do you agree that’s clean?

Four sessions later: „Say, I wonder something.“ Lights dawn, you know? „To fail to reduce to absurdity… fail to reduce to absurdity – it doesn’t read. We flattened the chain. Oh, excuse me!“

PC: Mm-hm.

Pc says self-righteously, „Well, I told you I thought that was all there was to it.“ Pc didn’t say a word about it!

LRH: All right, very good. Since the last time I audited you, is there anything you’ve been anxious about? I got a bit of a slow.

Well, that’s some of the troubles you run into, when you get a wrong assessment. Man, the devil himself with telepathy! The Russians have heard that the Americans are now using telepathy to communicate to the atomic subs – so they now have a Professor of Telepathy who is studying telepathy and he wants to telepath to a group at Oxford University. Only he won’t do it because he doesn’t think telepathy works. I mean… Our scientific world marches on.

PC: We’ll about that – trying to get that date, last night, in the session.

But the point I’m making here is wrong assessment is contributive to wrong date and wrong duration. Because even if you have the right chain, getting a date to read and getting a duration to read is hell. It’s horrible! It’s very hard to do. With the pc in-session, needle clean, right level, right item, next engram coming up dead-easy, it’s difficult. It’s not easy to get the right date and the right duration.

LRH: All right.

Why? Because you’ve got the date, which is usually the last moment of the engram toward present time. So your duration extends that earlier, see? And if you don’t get – and the pc has no reality on how early this thing went because he’s only got the last tail of it, which is the part toward present time, so duration doesn’t read worth a nickel-dating is easier to do than duration. And brother, I have dated something twice and re-durationed it ten times trying to find the beginning of it. When I finally did find the beginning of it, zing! Of course, I had to redate it by that time. Because it had now become unreal.

PC: I gave you…

See, its end was so much further away that it made about a – well, it made about a hundred years of error in the date when we finally found the beginning of it. And it was dark and it was terrible and the pc couldn’t run it and nothing could be done about it and nobody could find anything in it and it was all a mess and all a mess and all a mess and all a mess, and re-duration, re-duration, re-duration – and then finally got a more proper date, and then duration, and then durationed it, and then all of a sudden had the right duration, and bang, pc got to the beginning of the thing, went through it zip-zip-zip, all of the somatics reduced, everything was fine, fine, fine, fine, fine. That pc was running all right, on the right chain. How many re-durationings? Ten.

LRH: All right. Since the last time I audited you, is there anything you’ve been anxious about? All right, that seemed okay. And since the last time I audited you, has anything been decided? Yes.

God help you someday, when you get somebody who has an engram fifteen-trillion-trillion years long. Try to find the beginning of that! Before you’ve gone halfway through, of course, your date is so wrong that it’s jamming the track anyway. And just time after time, you find the earlier part of it and you find the earlier part of it and you find an earlier part of it – and finally, you finally get it all worked out and you find out that this thing which first registered as one and one-half hours long was actually 15 trillion-trillion years in length. Somebody stuck in a mountain that long; couldn’t get out.

PC: Well, I decided to – um – get some of the paperwork done before the session tonight.

That’s rough. That’s hard to do. It’s hard to do when everything else is correct. So you’ve got to have everything else correct and then it can be done. But it is not easy to do when all signs and portents are favorable. Got that?

LRH: All right. Very good. Since the last time I audited you, has anything been decided? I’m – see another read here.

Now you get a wrong assessment and add it to this. Oh-ho, you’ve had it. Or you overrun a chain. You’ve run five engrams on this chain and they don’t – no TA action on the last two. The thing was sitting at 5.0 on the TA and you’re getting no TA action, so you just say, „Well, maybe the TA action will pick up. Maybe I’ve got wrong dates and durations on this thing, maybe the TA I…“ Actually pick it up and you say, „Now, is it more than…“ You know, „Is the next incident…“ You know, „What’s the date of the next earlier incident?“ See? Get your head back on. TA’s up there, hasn’t moved for two incidents; 3R3 says that you’re supposed to find the basic on the chain. Maybe you did. Maybe you’ve run two more incidents that you needed to run to flatten it. Maybe the thing’s been flat.

PC: I decided to get Janie and Mrs. Milchert some auditing.

But you can’t go into esoterics as to whether something is flattened or not flattened or anything else, if you can’t even put a pc in-session. How can you run an ARC break when all your sessioning on the pc is an ARC break? When you won’t answer anything the pc tells you, how can you do an ARC break assessment – because you’re laying in ARC breaks faster than, of course, you’re picking them up by assessment. That’s something like the frog that crawls up two inches and falls back three, and he never gets to the top of the well that way. What’s in error then? Just your auditing cycle – nothing more elementary than that.

LRH: All right. Since the last time I audited you, has anything been decided? All right, that didn’t read. Okay, very good. Do you agree that’s clean?

So I’m saying it’s not terribly good news that taking somebody all the way to OT requires a number of complicated procedures; this is not very good news. But it is good news that all the errors of these procedures, when they really get erroneous, fall immediately back down to just a very few basics. You can learn how to do those basics, get confidence in that line, recognize that your disabilities in handling other things fall back to those simple basics. Therefore you can always improve those basics so you’ll be able to do it, and you’ve got a clear road ahead of you.

PC: Mm-hm.

I’m not at all dismayed as far as you’re concerned in being able to do these procedures, but I’m looking at what difficulty you are having here or there, and I recognize they’re all elementary difficulties; they’re not complex difficulties at all. You can do these things – you can do them easily and you can bring off the show. Because, I’m telling you, you’re right – you’re right here within handshaking distance of making OTs. OT is on the sunny side of a thousand hours right this minute for any pc.

LRH: All right. Now let’s check something here. All right. Have I missed a withhold on you? What did you think of ?

The length of time it’ll take him to go OT has intimately to do, much more intimately to do with the auditor’s command of basics than it does the state of his case. Because I have made a new discovery which will hearten you a great deal. And that is that case levels VII, VI, V – all of them – have a channel which, if properly assessed, give them clear-running, TA-moving engrams, with no dub. There’s always a little channel lies through the bank which is straight, that the pc has a reality on. And that doesn’t matter if you’re running „brushing teeth.“ See? He’s still got that one. Win on that one, flatten that chain, reassess, get another chain, and he goes up, up, further, further, ability, better, better, better, better. The next thing you know, you’ve got it made.

PC: Well – uh – the only thing I thought of there is that it wasn’t the children taking Coca – Colas from the Winter Garden, it was the children taking Coca – Colas out to other people from the Winter Garden, you see, that I didn’t – that I was objecting to.

You’re not up against difficult cases. You’re up against rather difficult procedures. And all that your difficult procedures are up against are your ability to handle the basics I’ve been talking about.

LRH: Oh, I see. All right. Okay. Have I missed a withhold on you?

Okay? Thank you.

PC: Well, I’d like to – certainly like to get this head and throat cleaned up. You know? I don’t like the – um – aches around in my head and my sore throat, you know.

LRH: Hm.

PC: Fixed up. That’s about all I can think of.

LRH: All right, very good. Have I missed a withhold on you? I don’t get anything reading. Tone arm went up kind of high here. You upset about anything?

PC: No, just sort of waiting, till the body of the session.

LRH: Well, all right. Very good. Now, uh – okay. Now, we abandoned a chain on you. What about that chain? Is that what your sore throat is?

PC: I don’t know.

LRH: Any consequences here on this?

PC: I don’t think so.

LRH: You don’t think so? All right, we had a nice clean needle for a while and then it roughed up. Have I asked you questions that you protested?

PC: No, just was surprised that you asked a withhold question after the rudiments, you know. That’s understandable, but I just was a bit surprised.

LRH: Okay. All right, thank you. Anything else? Uh, your needle’s nice and clean now. Okay. Now, let’s carry on with the Routine R3R assessment, shall we?

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: Let’s see what we can do about this and see if we can get you a level.

This is an interjected note to whoever is listening to this tape. This, of course, was just an ordinary, run – of – the – mill session. This session is not done for demonstration purposes. A few small errors creep into it one way or the other. It’s a rather tough session. It’s pretty tough and go – touch – and – go, and the – you cannot, of course, see the pc’s meter, as you’re listening to this on just a tape. But the facts of the case are that you can follow this fairly closely, as to what the meter is doing.

The reads throughout this right down to the end, and just before the end, continue as very, very small reads – rather hard to follow, which you’ll see, that the rudiments are gotten in every time the thing dirtied up. Every time the needle dirtied up, why, it was cleaned up. In other words, the assessment was done on a thoroughly clean needle. The needle was throughout very nice, smooth, sweeping clean. And no attempt was made at any time here to do it on a dirty needle.

And occasionally you can hear paper rattle there, as the assessment sheet is handed over to the pc on two or three occasions, to see if she’s had any thoughts about these levels, as the sheet given to her, of course, might refresh her mind.

The breath which you hear in this is due to the quality of the microphone more than anything else. It just happens to be well tuned to breath and it’s a pretty breathy recording.

This note is interjected just for your interest. You can follow this assessment fairly closely. The TA was high most of the assessment, right up to the point where something interesting happened.

LRH: Have you mainly suppressed? That’s correct.

PC: Hm.

LRH: In this lifetime – in this lifetime, have you mainly failed to suppress? In this lifetime, have you mainly not suppressed? Okay. In this lifetime, have you mainly invalidated? All right. In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to invalidate? Okay. In this lifetime, have you mainly not invalidated? Okay.

In this lifetime, have you mainly been careful? You had a thought there, what was it?

PC: Not particularly, I thought.

LRH: All right, thank you.

In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to be careful? Okay. In this lifetime, have you mainly not been careful? All right. In this lifetime, have you mainly not been careful? What did you think there?

PC: Perhaps I could have been more cautious, I thought, or more careful, in this lifetime.

LRH: All right. Good. In this lifetime, have you mainly not been careful? All right.

In this lifetime, have you mainly suggested? All right, what thoughts did you have on that?

PC: No, I thought.

LRH: All right. In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to suggest? Okay. In this lifetime, have you mainly not suggested?

Okay. In this lifetime, have you mainly not – have you mainly withheld? Okay. Sorry for the stumble. In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to withhold? Okay. In this lifetime, have you mainly not withheld? Okay.

In this lifetime, have you mainly protested? All right, what was your thought there?

PC: I thought that that was someone else’s level. I always think of these levels as someone else’s, you know. That’s the first one you’ve hit that I’ve known was someone else’s level, you know. Like…

LRH: Oh!

PC: … that’s Joe’s level or Pete’s level or something like that.

LRH: Oh! Oh, all right. Okay. Okay. In this lifetime, have you mainly protested? In this lifetime, have you mainly protested? Anything else on that?

PC: No.

LRH: All right, it’s in. In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to protest? Okay. In this lifetime, have you mainly not protested? Okay.

In this lifetime, have you mainly hidden? Okay. In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to hide? Okay. In this lifetime, have you mainly not hidden? All right. Well, any thought on that?

PC: Just thought those were all amusing.

LRH: All right. Any other thoughts that you’ve got there?

PC: No, just – like „In this lifetime have you mainly hidden,“ you know. Oh, dear!

LRH: All right. Okay. All right.

In this lifetime, have you mainly revealed? Okay. In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to reveal? You got another thought here, what was it?

PC: Well, I thought, why yes, some people would react on hidden, you know. Take a criminal or something like that, he would be hiding from the police, and so forth.

LRH: Hm. Yeah, all right. In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to reveal? Something about that?

PC: No.

LRH: All right. In this lifetime, have you mainly not revealed? Have you mainly not revealed? Okay. In this lifetime, have you mainly made mistakes?

PC: [laughing]

Accusative, that wouldn’t… See many a pc taking umbrage at that!

PC: Yeah.

LRH: All right. In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to mistake? I don’t get that at all! Failed to mistake.

PC: Failed to make mistakes, hm?

LRH: Hey, that’s – that’s probably right! Maybe that was a typo, huh?

PC: Hm!

LRH: All right. In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to make mistakes? All right. In this lifetime, have you mainly not made mistakes? All right, you had a thought a moment ago, what was it?

PC: Uh, I thought it would be very interesting – somebody you know.

LRH: That’s real…

PC: That was – I don’t know…

LRH: All right. In this lifetime, have you mainly asserted? Flying needle here. In this lifetime, have you mainly asserted? All right. In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to assert? Okay. In this lifetime, have you mainly not asserted? In this lifetime, have you mainly not asserted? All right.

In this lifetime, have you mainly changed? Okay. In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to change? Okay. In this lifetime, have you mainly not changed? Okay.

In this lifetime, have you mainly damaged? Okay. In this lifetime, have you – that’s an awful accusative one, too, isn’t it…

PC: Hm, yes.

LRH: … when you get right down to it? All right. Any thought on that you didn’t utter?

PC: No.

LRH: All right. In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to damage? Okay. In this lifetime, have you mainly not damaged? Have you mainly not damaged? All right. Well, we’ve only had a couple in so far.

PC: Hm!

LRH: All right. In this lifetime, have you mainly withdrawn? All right, that banged. What did you have to think about that?

PC: That this is one of the students’ levels. One student had that level assessed.

LRH: All right.

PC: It was the wrong level.

LRH: Hm?

PC: It was the wrong level.

LRH: Oh, all right. Check it again. In this lifetime, have you mainly withdrawn? Okay, it’s still in. In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to withdraw? In this lifetime, have you mainly not withdrawn? All right. In this lifetime, have you mainly not withdrawn? All right, any thought on that? All right. In this lifetime, have you mainly not withdrawn? All right, not in.

In this lifetime, have you mainly convinced? Okay. In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to convince? You have had a thought now.

PC: Had a thought. I noticed that we were in on the – uh – on some of the Prehav level levels, now. You know?

LRH: Hm, hm! In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to convince? Okay. In this lifetime, have you mainly not convinced? Okay. Anything else? All right.

In this lifetime, have you mainly proven? Okay. In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to prove? All right. In this lifetime, have you mainly not proven? Any thought there?

PC: No. There’s not much I haven’t not proven. The only thing I have not proven are all the scientific experiments. I never could get them to work out in the laboratory.

LRH: Uh – huh.

PC: So you might say I – I failed to prove conclusively all the principles of physics and chemistry.

LRH: All right.

PC: That’s about all I’ve not proved.

LRH: Okay. All right. Let me ask you that again. In this lifetime, have you mainly not proven? Have you mainly not proven? Have you mainly not proven? Nope. Out.

In this lifetime, have you mainly been right? In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to be right? Okay. In this lifetime, have you mainly not been right? What did you think about all that? That’s in.

PC: That’s in? Hm!

LRH: Hm?

PC: Well, I just remembered, along back there, that one of the students has „failed to be right“ as their level. You know? And so I sort of perked up my ears on it. That’s all.

LRH: Oh, all right. Very good, thank you. In this lifetime, have you mainly not… What’s that?

PC: I don’t know. I didn’t think of anything.

LRH: All right. In this lifetime, have you mainly not been right? All right. In this lifetime, have you mainly not been right? All right. Anything more to say about that?

PC: Uh – uh.

LRH: That’s out. Not been right? Not been right? No, that’s out. Okay. Thank you.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: In this lifetime, have you mainly been wrong? Accusative, isn’t it?

PC: Oh, dear!

LRH: All right.

PC: Hm.

LRH: All right. In this lifetime… I can see it now – some HGC pc really cutting and running on that!

PC: Yeah, ha.

LRH: … have you mainly been wrong. All right. In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to be wrong? Okay. In this lifetime, have you not been wrong? Okay.

In this lifetime, have you mainly won? Okay. In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to win? Okay. Failed to win? Okay. In this lifetime, have you mainly not won? Okay.

In this lifetime, have you mainly lost? Okay. In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to lose? Okay. In this lifetime, have you mainly not lost? All right.

In this lifetime, have you mainly agreed? Okay. In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to agree? Okay. In this lifetime, have you mainly not agreed? All right.

In this lifetime, have you mainly disagreed? In this lifetime, have you mainly disagreed? In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to disagree? You had a thought here of one kind or another.

PC: I’m suppressing a sneeze a little bit.

LRH: Hm?

PC: I was suppressing a sneeze, but it didn’t. . .

LRH: Well, go on and sneeze.

PC: No, it won’t sneeze.

LRH: All right. Okay. In this lifetime, have you mainly not disagreed? Have you mainly not disagreed? Something wrong with „mainly“? You keep binging a little bit on „mainly.“ There it is. There.

PC: Oh, isn’t that part of the saying right there, the plains, and the something or other and you know, the saying, you know, and mostly on the plains, mainly on the plains, the…

LRH: Oh! All right. All right, very good. In this lifetime, have you mainly not disagreed? Not disagreed? In this lifetime, have you mainly not disagreed?

In this lifetime, have you mainly ignored? All right. In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to ignore? Okay. In this lifetime, have you mainly not ignored? Okay.

In this lifetime, have you mainly decided? Okay. In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to decide? Okay. In this lifetime, have you mainly not decided? All right. Any thought on this?

PC: Uh – uh.

LRH: All right, in this lifetime, have you mainly propitiated? Okay. In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to propitiate? Okay. In this lifetime, have you mainly not propitiated? Okay.

In this lifetime, have you mainly held off? All right. In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to hold off? All right. In this lifetime, have you mainly not held off? Okay.

In this lifetime, have you mainly pulled in? Okay. In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to pull in? All right, what was that?

PC: I thought – it sounded like getting into a bit of physical exercise type of business here, you know, pull in, push out…

LRH: Ha – all right.

PC: … push up and…

LRH: All right. In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to pull in? Failed to pull in? Any more thoughts on that? That seems to…

PC: No, you know, about the only thing I could think of, you know, like failing to pull in the anchor, or something, only I haven’t had any anchors to fail to pull in. But uh…

LRH: All right.

PC: It doesn’t make sense to me, frankly.

LRH: Oh, it doesn’t?

PC: No.

LRH: All right. In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to pull in? All right. In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to pull in? All right. In this lifetime – in this lifetime, have you mainly not pulled in? Okay.

That’s better. A few more to go here, we’re doing fine. Well, we’ve got three more columns of them, to be precise.

PC: Hm-hm.

LRH: In this lifetime, have you mainly remained? Okay. In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to remain? All right. In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to remain? Okay. In this lifetime, have you mainly not remained? Okay.

In this lifetime, have you mainly prevented? In this lifetime, have you mainly prevented? Okay. In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to prevent? Oh, what are you thinking about there?

PC: I got a bit of the thought, that „endure“ is on this list, you know.

LRH: Oh, „failed to endure“?

PC: That’s right. After having been run for hours and hours and hours on the terminal, on that „endure,“ you know, I thought, oh, dear! That might be coming up soon!

LRH: All right, very good. All right. In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to prevent? Okay. In this lifetime, have you mainly not prevented? Okay.

In this lifetime, have you mainly pressed on? Okay. In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to press on? Okay. In this lifetime, have you mainly not pressed on? All right.

In this lifetime, have you mainly avoided? Okay. In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to avoid? Okay. In this lifetime, have you mainly not avoided? All right. You’re having a big think here, of some kind or another.

PC: Oh, I was thinking that, yes, I suppose those levels – you know, I was trying to think of what people might answer to these sort of things. I found myself thinking about it. You know, a level like that…

LRH: Oh, all right. All right, very good. In this lifetime, have you mainly blocked? In this lifetime, have you mainly blocked? All right. Some thought about that level? That’s in.

PC: No, I thought of Arthur’s blocks and children’s blocks, and that sort of thing.

LRH: All right. Okay. In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to block? There’s something here.

PC: Ah, it just seems like an – a funny level to me. You know, I suppose it means putting barriers up. But, uh – every time you say blocked, you know, I think of blocking out incidents.

LRH: Mm-hm.

PC: And I think of – uh – blocks. And I think of failed to block.

LRH: All right, very good. In this lifetime, have you mainly blocked? In this lifetime, have you mainly blocked? Okay. In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to block? All right. Those are not in. In this lifetime, have you mainly not blocked? Okay.

In this lifetime, have you mainly retreated? In this lifetime, have you mainly retreated? In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to retreat? All right. In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to retreat? In this lifetime, have you mainly not retreated? All right.

In this lifetime, have you mainly reached? Okay. In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to reach? Okay. In this lifetime, have you mainly not reached? Okay. In this lifetime, have you mainly not reached? Okay.

In this lifetime, have you mainly attacked? In this lifetime, have you mainly attacked? Big thought on this someplace?

PC: Attacked stayed in one time before. And then went out. I just remembered that.

LRH: All right. In this lifetime, have you mainly attacked? All right. It’s – it’s staying in this time. In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to attack? In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to attack? That’s not in. In this lifetime, have you mainly not attacked? All right, there’s a read on that. Anything else you care to say about it?

PC: No.

LRH: All right. Those two stayed in. All right.

In this lifetime… You got a thought going here.

PC: Well, I thought it was interesting, that one could attack, it would – both attack and not attacked are in, you know?

LRH: Hm.

PC: I suppose one can get a ridge built up on attacking and failing – not – not attacking, you know.

LRH: Hm.

PC: And that’s why both levels could read.

LRH: All right.

PC: Otherwise it sounds rather paradoxical.

LRH: You what?

PC: Otherwise it sounds rather paradoxical, you see.

LRH: All right. Okay. Anything else on that?

PC: No.

LRH: This needle’s gone mad.

PC: Oh, I suppose, yes, I was thinking, I wonder if „to attack“ was part of the Helatrobus goals.

LRH: Ah! All right. Thank you. Sorry to pester you about it. In this lifetime, have you mainly stopped? All right. In this lifetime, have you mainly stopped? Okay. In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to stop? All right. It’s not now in.

PC: Mm-hm.

LRH: In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to stop? Well, what happened?

PC: I don’t know! I ha – I just – oh, I thought, that people would probably wonder why you said „That’s not in – failed to stop“ because they won’t know that – that was uh – a lower level.

LRH: I’m not particularly making this for anybody else.

PC: Oh, I see. All right.

LRH: All right. In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to stop? It’s not in.

PC: Hm-hm.

LRH: In this lifetime, have you mainly not stopped? All right. We’ve picked up a hell of a dirty needle here, all of a sudden.

PC: It’s getting sort of long, wondering when we’re going to – sort of get through. I know we got two more columns.

LRH: Well, it’ll be over in just…

PC: Hm.

LRH: … just a moment. Thank you.

PC: Hm.

LRH: In this lifetime, have you mainly confronted? Well, you’ve got something more than that worrying you, lady.

PC: Oh, I suppose I’m wondering what level it would be. All I can think of.

LRH: All right, very good. That cleaned it up quite a bit. All right, in this lifetime, have you mainly confronted? In this lifetime, have you mainly confronted? In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to confront? In this lifetime, have you mainly not confronted?

In this lifetime, have you mainly communicated? Have you mainly communicated? In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to communicate? In this lifetime, have you mainly not communicated? All right. Thought here?

PC: I thought – possibly. Mm.

LRH: Hm. All right. In this lifetime, have you mainly not communicated? Not communicated? Not communicated? In this lifetime, have you mainly not communicated? No, that’s in with a touch here. All right, we’ve got about five levels in, now.

All right. In this lifetime, have you mainly been prideful? Okay. In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to be proud? Any thought here?

PC: I thought then – that’s the first time I’ve heard of that one. You know, and what’s that? Mm-hm.

LRH: All right. In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to be proud? Some more challenge on this of some kind?

PC: I had a – was my itch.

LRH: All right. In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to be proud? Boy, that reads! Nothing else about it?

PC: Uh – uh.

LRH: All right. That’s in. In this lifetime, have you mainly not been prideful? Mainly not been prideful? You mainly not been prideful? You’ve got something going here, man. Look at the number in all of a sudden.

PC: Mm. Well, it sort of began with „‘attack.“ And how could it be attack and not attacked, I thought. And then I was surprised when you said „been prideful,“ I thought, you know, prideful. I’ve never heard of prideful! I suppose it’s proud. You – you mean you’ve been proud!

LRH: All right.

PC: You know? And it started with some of these staying in, and I just didn’t understand, or dig, you know, like „failed to pull in,“ and „blocked“ – blocked! You know, the instant thing I thought of there was the children’s blocks.

LRH: Hm.

PC: You know? And um – that’s about all!

LRH: All right, thank you. I’m sure that cleaned up the needle quite a bit here.

PC: Hm.

LRH: All right. In this lifetime, have you mainly not been prideful? In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to be proud? All right. In this lifetime, have you mainly not been prideful? Okay.

In this lifetime, have you mainly sympathized? In this lifetime, have you mainly sympathized? In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to sympathize? In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to sympathize? In this lifetime, have you mainly not sympathized?

In this lifetime, have you mainly recovered? In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to recover? In this lifetime, have you mainly not recovered? All right. Two columns to go!

PC: Good!

LRH: We’ll be over this – very few…

PC: Very good!

LRH: … moments. Okay?

PC: Hm!

LRH: In this lifetime, have you mainly helped? In this lifetime, have you mainly helped? In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to help? In this lifetime, have you mainly not helped? All right.

In this lifetime, have you mainly known? In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to know? In this lifetime, have you mainly not known? Okay.

In this lifetime, have you mainly caused? Have you mainly caused? All right. In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to cause? All right. In this lifetime, have you mainly not caused? All right.

In this lifetime, have you mainly believed? In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to believe? In this lifetime, have you mainly not believed? Okay.

In this lifetime, have you mainly cured? Cured? In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to cure? All right. In this lifetime, have you mainly not cured? All right.

In this lifetime, have you mainly liked? In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to like? In this lifetime, have you mainly not liked? All right. Have you mainly failed to like? Have you mainly not liked? Have a thought there?

PC: No.

LRH: All right. What’s the matter?

PC: I just was thinking, that was amusing.

LRH: What’s that?

PC: That – that was amusing, I thought.

LRH: All right. Very good. In this lifetime, have you mainly endured? In this lifetime, have you mainly endured? In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to endure? In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to endure? In this lifetime, have you mainly not endured?

PC: Only thing I can think of is who’s that and what have you endured? I’ve endured, endured and failed to endure in this lifetime. What have you failed to endure? ‘Endure!“ You know?

LRH: All right.

PC: Aw!

LRH: Okay. In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to endure? In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to endure? In this lifetime, have you mainly not endured? Okay. They’re not in.

PC: Good.

LRH: In this lifetime, have you mainly abandoned? Okay. In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to abandon? In this lifetime, have you mainly not abandoned?

In this lifetime, have you mainly given up? In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to give up? In this lifetime, have you mainly not given up? Okay.

In this lifetime, have you mainly been sane? In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to be sane?

PC: Oh dear!

LRH: All right. In this lifetime, have you mainly not been sane? Okay.

In this lifetime, have you mainly been curious? In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to be curious? All right. In this lifetime, have you mainly not been curious? Okay.

In this lifetime, have you mainly desired? All right. In this lifetime, have you mainly desired? In this lifetime have you mainly failed to desire? Failed to desire? In this lifetime, have you mainly not desired? All right, anything you care to say now?

PC: Uh – uh.

LRH: All right. In this lifetime – in this lifetime, have you mainly enforced? Okay. In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to enforce? In this lifetime, have you mainly not enforced?

In this lifetime, have you mainly inhibited? In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to inhibit? In this lifetime, have you mainly not inhibited? Okay. One column left to go.

PC: Hm.

LRH: Okay? Hm?

PC: Good.

LRH: All right. Any comments you care to make here?

PC: Have a terrific somatic on an – on my arm. I don’t know where it turned on. But…

LRH: Yeah?

PC: Uh…

LRH: Is that so?

PC: Yeah. It’s been on for some time.

LRH: All right. Anything else about it?

PC: Uh – uh.

LRH: All right. In this lifetime, have you mainly had? In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to have? In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to have? In this lifetime, have you mainly not had?

In this lifetime, have you mainly looked? Give me a little rundown.

PC: Mainly I was suppressing moving my arm. It’s quite…

LRH: Hm?

PC: … it hurts quite bad.

LRH: Is that so?

PC: Badly. Yes. Hm. Oh, „looked!“ That’s an interesting level – I thought about being in Spain and…

LRH: Hm?

PC: … doing what the Spaniards do. And oh, how the look!

LRH: Yes. All right. In this lifetime, have you mainly looked? In this lifetime, have you mainly looked? In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to look? In this lifetime, have you mainly not looked?

In this lifetime, have you mainly been serene? In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to be serene? Okay.

In this lifetime, have you mainly been enthusiastic? All right. In this lifetime, have you failed to be enthusiastic? All right.

In this lifetime, have you mainly been conservative? Okay. In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to be conservative? All right.

In this lifetime, have you mainly been bored? All right. In this lifetime, have you mainly not been bored? Okay.

In this lifetime, have you mainly been antagonistic? Okay. In this lifetime, have you mainly not been antagonistic? Okay.

In this lifetime, have you mainly been angry? Have you mainly been angry? Okay. In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to be angry? Okay.

In this lifetime, have you mainly resented? Okay. In this lifetime, have you failed to resent? All right. Failed to resent? In this lifetime, have you mainly not resented? Any thoughts here? No thoughts at all?

PC: Just trying to hold still…

LRH: All right.

PC: … in spite of my arm…

LRH: Still hurting you?

PC: Still hurts! Hm!

LRH: All right. In this lifetime, have you mainly not resented? I roughed up your needle now. Why is that? How’s that?

PC: That’s better.

LRH: All right. In this lifetime, have you mainly not resented? Mainly not resented? Okay. In this lifetime, have you mainly feared? All right. Have you mainly feared? What’s the thought on that?

PC: I thought that that – I know two people who’ve had that as their level. Hm!

LRH: In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to fear? In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to fear? What’s the big thought here? Failed to fear?

PC: I don’t know!

LRH: All right. In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to fear? Reads. All right. In this lifetime, have you mainly feared? In this lifetime, have you mainly feared? In this lifetime, have you mainly not feared? Oh come on, what do you got here?

PC: I haven’t really been thinking of a thing, except I know that „feared“ is two other people’s level. One level, I know, it didn’t run on them, and another level on another pc, I know, it didn’t run on this pc, another pc I know is being currently run on it.

LRH: Well, all right. Anything else about that?

PC: No, I just puzzled over „failed to fear.“ I haven’t failed to fear.

LRH: All right.

PC: I haven’t feared much either, but I certainly haven’t failed to fear!

LRH: Okay. All right. In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to fear? Failed to fear? Okay. In this lifetime, have you mainly not feared? In this lifetime, have you mainly not feared? All right. They’re both out.

In this lifetime, have you mainly been in grief? Okay. In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to cry? All right.

In this lifetime, have you mainly been apathetic? Okay. In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to be apathetic? All right.

In this lifetime, have you mainly inflowed? All right. In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to inflow? Okay. In this lifetime, have you mainly stopped inflow? All right.

In this lifetime, have you mainly outflowed? In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to outflow? In this lifetime, have you mainly stopped outflow? Okay.

In this lifetime, have you mainly…

PC: Sorry.

LRH: What?

PC: My foot was itching.

LRH: All right. In this lifetime, have you mainly stopped outflow? Some…

PC: No, I just noticed we’re down near the bottom, and I’ll be glad to get through with the list.

LRH: All right, very good. In this lifetime have you mainly stopped outflow? All right.

In this lifetime, have you mainly thought? There must be something else, everything is reading.

PC: No, I just would like to get on through, you know, and that’s a few more.

LRH: Oh, you’re on your „press on.“

PC: Yes, I’m on my „press on,“ you know.

LRH: All right, very good. Well, you’ve only got another half a dozen.

PC: Hm.

LRH: All right. In this lifetime, have you mainly thought? In this lifetime, have you mainly thought? In this lifetime, have you mainly thought? All right. In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to think? In this lifetime have you mainly not thought? All right. In this lifetime, have you mainly thought? Okay.

In this lifetime, have you mainly evaluated? All right. In this lifetime, have you mainly evaluated? Something going on here?

PC: No, just wondering what the pause was. What the pause was all about.

LRH: Hm. All right. In this lifetime, have you mainly evaluated? In this lifetime, have you mainly evaluated? All right. In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to evaluate? Something’s going on here.

PC: Hm. I’m – just can’t understand why we suddenly started going so slow! I said that I’m getting near the end of the list and I want to complete, you see.

LRH: All right. I don’t care if you are. That needle suddenly – you’ve pressed your needle into a complete…

PC: Yes!

LRH: … crash.

PC: I was just wanting – come on! You know? We’re almost through.

LRH: Why?

PC: Because I just would like to get a level, that’s why! You know? We’re almost through with the list!

LRH: All right. We bypass some charge here?

PC: No. Except it seems like an awful long wait!

LRH: All right. Have I gone across your level? Have I abandoned the right level? Mm-hm. All right. In this lifetime, have you mainly evaluated? All right. In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to evaluate? All right. In this lifetime, have you mainly not evaluated? All right.

In this lifetime, have you mainly had opinions about? All right. In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to have opinions about? Okay. In this lifetime, have you mainly not had opinions about? All right. That’s it. Take a break!

LRH: All right. This session is resumed and we have about – oh, a very few of these levels in – only three or four. Four or five. Six, maybe. All right.

Anything you care to say before I start doing this? All right. Well, let me give you a fast one here. On this list has anything been suppressed? Yes? Hm?

PC: I suppressed – uh – impatience in getting through the list.

LRH: All right. On this list has anything been suppressed? Seen the read again.

PC: Some eagerness to get the level now.

LRH: Hm?

PC: Eagerness to get the level now, you know?

LRH: All right, very good. On this list, has anything been invalidated?

PC: Well, some of the ones I didn’t quite understand, you know, like „blocked“ and pulled in – „pull in,“ and uh – you know, like those.

LRH: All right, very good. Okay. List. A little something left on it.

PC: I’ve got some, you know, feel, got – feel somaticy, you know.

LRH: We ran across something here, didn’t we?

PC: Yes, and my head hurts, and ooh! So…

LRH: A rough go.

PC: Hm!

LRH: All right, let’s see what we’ve got here, okay?

PC: Hm-hm.

LRH: Your ears sensitive?

PC: No, bit chilly. The room got a bit chilly. It’s warming up, I’ve turned the burner on.

LRH: You’ll be all right?

PC: Hm! Be okay.

LRH: Want to put a bathrobe over your legs?

PC: No, that’s fine.

LRH: You sure?

PC: Hm!

LRH: All right, anything else you care to say here? Yes?

PC: No.

LRH: All right.

PC: Felt like I was going to sneeze.

LRH: Hm?

PC: Felt like I was going to sneeze again, but I didn’t.

LRH: All right. Something else?

PC: Just my head hurts and I really don’t… Well, that’s all.

LRH: All right. Okay, let’s take up these levels now. And the first level we have – I’ve got a very dirty needle here.

PC: Well, I thought of, in the break, panorama, the South African information . . .

LRH: Ah!

PC: … book, and I thought that the government put out a very nice, interesting magazine, there, you see.

LRH: Hm-hm.

PC: And um – I thought that – uh – and also they show pictures of the – of the 1948 German – uh – war orphans, who arrived and were adopted by South Africans, you know? And I thought that that was – um – you know . . .

LRH: Mm-hm.

PC: … an interesting gesture.

LRH: Hm! All right, good. Anything else happen in the break? A little something. You jumped a half a tone arm high.

PC: Can’t think of anything else that happened in the break.

LRH: All right. Anything else upsetting you here? Is it trying to get on? Yes.

PC: Hm!

LRH: Press – on type.

PC: Press on! Charge!

LRH: All right. All right. Now, in this lifetime, have you mainly protested? Protested? In this lifetime, have you mainly protested? All right. Anything you care to say about that level?

PC: Hm, that’s one of the students level.

LRH: Hm?

PC: I know it’s one of the students’ level.

LRH: Yeah. All right. All right, good enough, it’s in. In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to reveal? In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to reveal? In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to reveal? In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to reveal? In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to reveal? All right, on this level has anything been suppressed? Yes – very badly.

PC: Well, it’s a button in the rudiments and, you know.

LRH: Hm – mm.

PC: I have – I know I failed to reveal. Whether that’s mainly what I’ve done in this lifetime, I don’t know.

LRH: All right, very good. In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to reveal? All right, that’s in. Okay.

All right. Your needle’s pretty awful dirty.

PC: Well, I don’t

LRH: And your tone arm went up – way up during the break.

PC: Uh! Yeah, that’s all I did, I saw that South African magazine, and I thought that and I – and I thought about the blankets, and I thought… I didn’t even wonder about the levels, I didn’t even think about them. I just noticed that somatics had turned on, and I was feeling a bit, you know, bad.

LRH: Hm, hm – mm.

PC: And – um – that’s all. I hoped it came out to an interesting level – that’s about the only thing I’m worried about.

LRH: All right. In this lifetime, have you mainly withdrawn? Have you mainly withdrawn? That’s in.

In this lifetime, have you mainly attacked? In this lifetime, have you mainly attacked? They’re all in!

PC: Hm! I’m not thinking about them or saying well, that – you know, I’m not doing anything like that.

LRH: In this lifetime, have you mainly not attacked?

PC: The only thing I can think about is I am anxious, and – uh – you know – and hope I can get an interesting level, and hope that – uh – it’ll run all right, and hope that it’ll get a chain that will produce tone arm action and, you know, sort of getting down toward the bitter end, I would like to come up with something that is the level, you know?

LRH: All right. In this lifetime, have you mainly not attacked? In this lifetime, have you mainly not communicated? Have you mainly not communicated? Oh. Whoa, man – just whoa!

PC: Well, what do you want me to do?

LRH: I will take care of it.

PC: All right.

LRH: All right. In this session – in this session has anything been suppressed? Yes?

PC: I’ve suppressed impatience, on getting on with it and getting my level.

LRH: All right, very good. In this session, has anything been suppressed?

PC: I suppose I suppressed levels that I didn’t – was – wasn’t particularly interested in or didn’t think I had anything on them, or something like that. I can’t really say that. I suppressed thinking about other things, during the session, and I suppressed my horror of waiting in the session.

LRH: Waiting?

PC: Waiting. Yes.

LRH: All right. We’re going to assess three things here. Felt bad. In this lifetime, have you mainly felt bad? In this lifetime, have you mainly felt bad? In this lifetime, have you mainly felt bad?

In this lifetime, have you mainly waited? Have you mainly waited? All right. In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to wait? Have you mainly failed to wait? All right.

Now, all right. Let me finish these rudiments. All right. In this session, including the break, has anything been suppressed? All right, I’ll check it on the meter. In this session, including the break, has anything been suppressed? Yessum?

PC: My hand moved. I suppose I suppressed somatics.

LRH: All right. In this session, including the break, has anything been suppressed? All right, did you think of anything else? In this session, including the break, is there anything you have been careful of? Yes?

PC: To hold still.

LRH: All right. In this session, including the break, is there anything you have been careful of? Yes?

PC: Not to ARC break.

LRH: All right, very good. In this session, including the break, is there anything you’ve been careful of? All right, in this session, including the break, is there anything you’ve failed to reveal? Yes?

PC: My level.

LRH: All right. In this session, including the break, is there anything you’ve failed to reveal? I got another one. What was that?

PC: I don’t know – I suppose I thought that maybe South Africa, in accepting the German war orphans, they liked – liked Germanic stock of people, you know, that kind of people.

LRH: Hm-hm. All right, very good. In this session, including the break, is there anything you failed to reveal? Yes ma’am?

PC: Well, if it is, I don’t know what it is, I failed to reveal it to myself.

LRH: All right. In this session, including the break, is there anything you’ve failed to reveal? All right. What – what’s the rest of the gen on these war orphans? That’s what’s had your tone arm up.

PC: Nothing. It’s just I saw a picture in the magazine of war orphans who came to South Africa in 1948. And I thought that was a very nice gesture, you know, because the rest of the Western world, and the rest of the world were putting them practically in concentration and DP camps, you see. And I thought that was a jolly decent thing; and I thought that they’d probably thought that – uh – German racially were a good stock to bring to the country, you know, as – uh – and then I also thought that they, with the scarcity of white population, naturally they would want a greater proportion of white population. And that’s all I thought about it!

LRH: All right, thank you.

PC: Hm.

LRH: All right. In this session – in this session, including the break, is there anything you’ve failed to reveal? All right. Is there anything you’ve failed to reveal? Something?

PC: Well, „failed to reveal“ is one of the levels that we have in that’s reading.

LRH: All right, thank you. In this session, including the break, is there anything you’ve failed to reveal? Good, that appears to be clean. In this session, including the break, has anything been invalidated? Has anything been suggested? All right, has a mistake been made? All right, what’s the mistake?

PC: Well, waiting, now, will always dirty my needle up. So sort of when I get the f – when I see you sort of looking at the needle, you know – and I’m waiting for something to happen in the session, I think, oh dear, my needle is going to get dirty.

LRH: Well, all right, very good. In this session, including the break, has a mistake been made? All right. In this session, including the break, has anything been protested? In this session, including the break, is there anything you’ve been anxious about? In this session, including the break, has anything been decided? All right. I don’t get any reads. How’s that?

PC: All right.

LRH: Your needle’s now clean. And you’ve lost your half – a – tone gain.

All right, let’s do these things again, huh?

PC: All right.

LRH: All right. You still haven’t got an ARC break?

PC: No.

LRH: Got an ARC break? A bit?

PC: No, I just was hoping let’s – let’s get on, you know? Before the needle dirties up again. If you’ve got a clean needle, make the most of it, you know?

LRH: All right. All right, in this lifetime, have you mainly protested? In this lifetime, have you mainly protested? All right, that’s out.

In this lifetime, have you mainly failed to reveal? All right, that’s out.

In this lifetime, have you mainly withdrawn? In this lifetime, have you mainly withdrawn? All right. In this lifetime, have you mainly withdrawn? All right.

In this lifetime, have you mainly attacked? In this lifetime, have you mainly attacked? Okay. It’s out.

In this lifetime, have you mainly not attacked? Have you mainly not attacked? In this lifetime, have you mainly not attacked? All right.

In this lifetime, have you mainly not communicated? In this lifetime, have you mainly not communicated? In this lifetime, have you mainly not communicated?

All right, there’s something else going on here, now.

PC: It’s mostly facial pressure and somatics.

LRH: Hm?

PC: Around my face.

LRH: Something about your face?

PC: Noticing facial pressure and somatics.

LRH: All right. In this lifetime – in this lifetime, have you mainly felt bad? In this lifetime, have you mainly felt bad? Anything about that level?

PC: Hm.

LRH: In this lifetime, have you mainly felt bad? All right.

In this lifetime, have you mainly waited? In this lifetime, have you mainly waited? In this lifetime, have you mainly waited? All right.

In this lifetime, have you mainly not liked? In this lifetime, have you mainly stopped outflow? Well, what thoughts have you had there?

PC: „Waited?“ I thought, well, yes I certainly have waited around a lot. Well, I just noticed them going out and then I hoped they weren’t going out because I – because of suppress, or anything like that.

LRH: All right. Good enough. In this lifetime, have you mainly stopped outflow? All right. In this lifetime, have you mainly stopped outflow? Have you mainly stopped outflow? Stopped outflow? Stopped. Stopped.

Now, all right. In this lifetime, have you mainly felt bad? In this lifetime, have you mainly felt bad? Have you mainly felt bad? All right.

In this lifetime, have you mainly not communicated? Have you mainly not communicated? All right. In this lifetime, have you mainly not liked? In this lifetime, have you mainly not liked? In this lifetime, have you mainly not liked? Yes – all right.

PC: That reminds me of a Prehav – hav – uh – level that we used to run on 3D Criss Cross. That was dislike and, you know, what have you disliked? And I think we came up with something, I forget what it was we came up with.

LRH: We did what?

PC: A 3D Criss Cross line on that. It was disliked. What have you disliked?

LRH: Hm.

PC: You know?

LRH: You listed this at one time…

PC: Yeah.

LRH: … or another? Similar.

PC: Hm.

LRH: All right. Very good. In this lifetime, have you mainly not liked? In this lifetime, have you mainly not liked? Still with us.

All right. In this lifetime, have you mainly not communicated? All right. Now, on that level has anything been suppressed?

PC: I suppose communication.

LRH: Hm?

PC: It was communication and I know we’ve had that in reading, sometimes, you know, before.

LRH: All right. On not communicated has anything been suppressed? Yes, a tiny bit.

PC: Oh, I think it would be easy to list, I suppose, I suppress thinking that.

LRH: All right. On this level, has anything been suppressed? Yeah, another suppression?

PC: Listing on it.

LRH: All right. On this level has anything been suppressed? I got another suppression. You don’t think so?

PC: I don’t think so.

LRH: The level itself kind of is a suppress.

PC: Yeah.

LRH: All right. On not communicated has anything been suppressed? All right, that seems clean. On not communicated, has anything been invalidated? Apparently a bit of invalidation.

PC: Well, I suppose the other level being in invalidates it.

LRH: All right, what level?

PC: The other level that we have that’s in, on the list. Because there are two level – two levels in, or something like that, so each one invalidates the other. Um, um, also when we got to that point before and it was in, you said, “Ah, there’s something wrong here.“ And you got in all the rudiments. So that tended to invalidate the read that was on that.

LRH: Oh, all right. Now, okay. Now, on this level has anything been invalidated? Another invalidation?

PC: It seems like it almost came out on the list before on the Prehav Scale. I’m not sure whether it is or not. It got invalidated in favor of something else.

LRH: All right. On this level has anything been invalidated? I got another read here.

PC: Well, I’m protesting the question now, I really don’t have…

LRH: Are you protesting.

PC: Yes…

LRH: All right.

PC: … I am.

LRH: Very good. On this level has anything been invalidated?

PC: The rudiments! And invalidate!

LRH: All right, very good. On this level, has anything been invalidated? Anything been invalidated? All right. In this lifetime, have you mainly not communicated? Have you mainly not communicated? In this lifetime, have you mainly not communicated?

Are you suppressing this now, or anything? In this lifetime, have you mainly not communicated? Have you mainly not communicated? All right. Now, on this level, has anything been suppressed? On this level, has anything been suppressed? All right. What did you think of?

PC: Oh, the buttons tend to suppress it because they’re going on and on and on and on and sort of a protest on the – on mid ruds.

LRH: All right. On this level has anything been suppressed? Okay. In this lifetime, have you mainly not communicated? Mainly not communicated? All right. That is to some degree still with us. Not communicated? All right. Anything been invalidated here? Mistake been made?

All right, here’s the other level that’s in. In this lifetime have you mainly not liked? In this lifetime, have you mainly not liked? That level is out. On this level has anything been suppressed? Yes?

PC: Yes, I realized I was alter – ising it every time you said it. Not liked, I would think disliked.

LRH: Oh, all right. On this level, has anything been suppressed? Another tick.

PC: I couldn’t think of what it was we got assessed out on the 3D Criss Cross line, on disliked.

LRH: Hm-hm. All right. On not liked, has anything been suppressed? All right, on not liked, has anything been invalidated? Okay. In this lifetime, have you mainly not liked? What have you got – what are you thinking about?

PC: I keep thinking that – I keep objecting to „not liked.“ You know? It’s disliked. You know?

LRH: You’re trying to alter – is this thing?

PC: Trying to alter – is it. But I suppose I can accept it as „not liked,“ and let it be „not liked,“ instead of trying to change it to disliked. But I would never say I not – liked something, you know.

LRH: I see, there’s a continuous protest on this level.

PC: Um!

LRH: Is that right?

PC: Um!

LRH: All right. In this lifetime, have you mainly not liked? In this lifetime, have you mainly not liked? Not liked? In this lifetime, have you mainly disliked? In this lifetime, have you mainly disliked? In this lifetime, have you mainly disliked? There’s a slight stick on disliked.

PC: I keep thinking, well, if it does assess out then I’ve already done a list on it, and I won’t have to do any listing.

LRH: Oh? Oh – yeah? All right. Good. In this lifetime, have you mainly disliked? In this lifetime, have you mainly not liked? Not liked? Not liked? All right. What gives with this level?

PC: I don’t know.

LRH: All right. In this lifetime, have you mainly not liked? In this lifetime, have you mainly disliked? In this lifetime, have you mainly disliked? On this has anything been suppressed? I didn’t get a read. In this lifetime, have you mainly not liked? Not liked?

All right, on this level has anything been suppressed? On this level, has anything been protested? On this level, has anything been decided? All right.

In this lifetime, have you mainly not liked? Not liked? In this lifetime, have you mainly disliked? In this lifetime, have you mainly not liked? Got any thoughts about this level?

PC: No, just seems a bit derogatory – like in this lifetime, have you mainly not liked. It’s like I’ve been going around mainly not liking. You know?

LRH: Oh, you think it is critical?

PC: I think it’s a bit critical. Yes. You know?

LRH: All right. Very good. Thank you.

In this lifetime, have you mainly not liked? Have you mainly not liked? All right. In this lifetime, have you mainly not liked?

All right. We’ll try the other level. In this lifetime, have you mainly not communicated? In this lifetime, have you mainly not communicated?

All right. In this lifetime, have you mainly not communicated? All right. Not communicated is out and not liked is in.

All right. Just a minute. I’ll straighten this out. Why? You protesting the assessment?

PC: No. I just – I – I had a feeling like it would come out to be something that I wasn’t particularly interested in. You know. I could see myself getting a chain on when’s the last time you disliked or not liked – you know – cabbage or something like that.

LRH: I see. You’ve been thinking about this since we…

PC: No, I just thought of that.

LRH: All right.