Want to talk to you now about recent developments gained from the staff reports and my own research and processing and your boo-boos. Now, also, your successes.

I'd like to talk to you tonight about havingness. Now it seems that this might be a point we could overstress, you know, and we could have too much to say on this subject. But actually, there's very, very little has been said on the subject. Matter of fact, it doesn't matter how many reams I've written or how often I've talked on the thing, I've probably not scratched the surface of the subject of havingness.

Audience: Thank you.

First and foremost, havingness is the postulate that one must communicate versus the postulate that one must communicate to something. Do you at once see that this poses a cross-postulate? I must communicate / I must communicate to.

I'm not going to invalidate everybody tonight; no sense in doing that.

Now, if there's nothing to communicate to, all he can do is communicate through. And he would have endless, unlimited space with nothing stopping the communication all the way.

Now, as a matter of fact, there are a couple of faces I see here, whose recent auditing I have had very, very fine reports on. Very fine reports. So, we evidently have turned a couple of corners. So, we are evidently getting, as you have gotten, rather consistently good results throughout, but we're starting to get some spectacular results, and that's all I ever settle for. That's right. Nothing but a spectacular result.

Now, I want to call to your attention a little sport that is carried on in one part of the world - it used to be a Greek sport, and it's been transferred over to Spain. And it's also done in Mexico and so forth. They get a bull who was stupid enough to pick up a mock-up in that general neighborhood, and they get him in there and they get him to run at a cape. It's quite interesting. He runs at the cape, and he goes through the cape. And he runs at the cape and goes through the cape. And he runs at the cape and goes through ... You can just watch this bull's morale deteriorate.

Now, the worst part of a spectacular result is this: is when it becomes average, it ceases to be spectacular. You get that?

Finally - finally they take some old horse that is padded with blankets and so forth (question mark, because the padding is never thick enoughSpanish thirst for blood) and they let the bull finally charge and push at the horse. And usually the bull gets the horse and the picador over between the fence and himself. And it's nice and solid. And boy, that bull goes to town. You can just see his morale go up, up, up, up, up, up, up. In fact, he would practically be a well bull if he could find it solid enough.

Audience: Yes.

Well, as gory as this spectacle may or may not be, the point of the matter is that the picador leans on him very heavily into the hump with a big fork and discourages him from pushing that hard against something solid. And by the time they get him out there again charging at this cape - never a man, he never hits a man, he never hits a horse, he never hits a wall, he just hits this red cape and there's nothing there. Nothing there. Nothing there.

Now, I can tell you that the last three months preceding this early February 1956 lecture have been months of turmoil in the field of processing and, to a much lesser degree, in the field of organization. They have been months of turmoil. Because all of a sudden under the heavy microscopic eye of Scientometric testing, which is always kept on the results coming up, processing results ceased to demonstrate uniform gain - all of a sudden.

The bull, without really being hurt, he's - it's - probably feels kind of sore, but he's lost no blood to amount to anything; he's really not in a bad state, physically. Supposed to be totally physical, this whole bullfight, but it's not physical at all. He just loses his nerve. And he finally stands there in terror and sinks, then, into apathy. And he gets to such a point that a matador can come around and fixate him.

It was about the same time that Not-Knowingness Processes were released into general hands. Now, that is a great oddity. One would look at once to see if it was the lack of success of these Not-Knowingness Processes.

And, a good matador, if he really knew his business - they don't do this at all well. I mean, these guys want to make a big splash and a display and so forth. Once in a blue moon you see a good matador. And this fellow will simply fix the bull into any position - he could probably even stand him up in the air, you know, if he wanted to. Because the bull is now in a state of shock. He is hypnotized into a belief that there is nothing solid anywhere. That no matter how hard he charges, he will hit nothing. And he's gone. He's gone. I imagine if they simply kept him pushing at the red cape just a little bit further, he'd probably fall over dead anyhow; probably has nothing to do with the sword.

One would look to see whether or not it wasn't some other factor because in looking at Not-Knowingness Processes, and the profiles gained by simply running "not-know" and "don't-know" and "exteriorize" showed gain. So, some other factor had suddenly been introduced. And what this other factor was, lord knew.

The physical aspect of a bullfight and the aspect of a thetan in the physical universe are not too wide apart, since the trick in the physical universe is to get them to charge nothing. Get them to charge nothing and keep them convinced, one way or the other, that there isn't anything they can charge. Got it? Until at last, they do not believe that they can touch or lean on anything. And not being able to touch or lean upon anything, they then have the feeling that if they did utter a communication they would simply expend what mass they have because their communication would just go on forever. They would not be able to touch anything. Those walls are no longer real.

But I tried consistently, from the time that these gains stopped showing up, in very remarkable style, until a relatively short time ago, to discover what had been dropped, sort of suddenly, out of auditing. And I eventually found that the Remedy of Havingness had been dropped out of auditing, and although you get early gains on Not-Knowingness or Don't-Know Processes, and early gains on all Separateness Processes, too often - in fact, rather usually - the preclear starts to run out of havingness and auditors had had a Remedy of Havingness so high on the old Six Basic Processes, they had seldom looked at it. They didn't realize it was something that you ate and slept with, you know? They didn't realize it was that germane, that important.

Very odd. Very odd. Here are these two counter-postulates. If an individual supposes that he should communicate, and if his joy and game and so forth is communication - mind you, it takes that game - postulate there - and if at the same time there is nothing with which he can communicate, no terminal, he has the vista of endless space. His communication itself is making the space. And then there is nothing to stop his communication, so there is no end to it, and it makes him feel very weak indeed. He just shoots the roll, you might say, every time he says anything because it never winds up anyplace.

And so, we had to take a complete overhaul of the entire subject of Scientology and reevaluate all of the importances of it. Which wasn't an auditor's fault, or it wasn't the staffs fault, really wasn't my fault; it's just something had gone a little bit awry.

So, he eventually does this interesting thing: He says something into a mass which he himself puts there. Now, however we want to classify this, whatever conditions or significances we wish to place upon it, nevertheless follows that this aspect of man fighting himself is man merely trying to reassure himself that there will be something to hit with his communication. You see that?

A recent report, in fact today, from the Hubbard Guidance Center of Washington, DC, demonstrates now that a Remedy of Havingness has been put into action (and these reports only reflect its being in action one week there), reflect a gain once more. A good gain. And this leaves us with some preclears that we've got to go back and process, because they didn't get gains.

Now, he therefore puts masses up here, he puts pictures and so forth, so in case nothing is receiving his communication he still can reassure himself and say, "There is something there, there is some mass, I can accumulate something that I can go knock, knock, knock on, one way or the other, and my communication just won't go on forever."

Now, what an oddity. What an oddity to all of a sudden come alongeverything's sailing along beautifully, you're getting beautiful gains and then suddenly, wham, no gain. Because at the same time we had come much closer to a very distinct understanding of the human mind, the human beingness. We came close to an understanding of life and human beingness, closer than we'd ever been before, and all of a sudden we didn't get any gain. What happened?

He just doesn't like this idea - again, merely a consideration - but he still doesn't like the idea of speaking into a vast nothingness, so he himself accumulates his own terminals. And we get an oddity here of an individual constructing a universe, perforce, because he cannot have the universe in which he finds himself - the physical universe.

Our processes got too strong. The processes got too powerful, too suddenly, and overwhelmed the havingness because the masses and spaces of life are problems. And we had suddenly, just like that, reached out and solved too many problems simultaneously and weren't holding up the comparable gain in terms of havingness. Don't you see?

Now, a thetan is totally capable of constructing a universe himself, and the cycle is somewhat like this: He builds a universe of one kind or another, himself. Then he, in - by agreement and so forth, finds himself involved in a larger universe. To a marked degree, he simply invests the universe which he himself has created into this larger universe. Sometimes he doesn't like it, but sometimes he does.

Audience: Mm-hm.

And he then finds himself cojoining and existing with and in the physical universe. And now, because the physical universe does not offer him a sufficient number of terminals to receive his communications, he then begins to manufacture his private universe all over again. You got it?

The processes all of a sudden started to burn up all the havingness on the track because they solved oh, problems, problems, problems. In other words, we got too good. You could say that.

Now, that's very important to understand, then, that the (quote) universe (unquote) that people are packing around with them when they come to you as a preclear are usually secondary universes. They have come into being because the individual has found an insufficiency of universe in the physical universe. Well, it's quite interesting that anybody could find an insufficiency of universe in a universe which is so capable of solidity as the physical universe. It's one of the madder things that could happen.

Now, you can tear up a preclear with such rapidity today, with some of the material which has been developed in the last four or five months, that for the first time I must give you a considerable caution on the use of Scientology. Use it lightly, if you please.

But it's done by disenfranchising the individual. You tell him he cannot address, cannot touch, cannot reach. And we interpret it as "cannot have a terminal." Reach, touch, address, have - whatever you want to call it, that terminal cannot exist for him. That's all it means.

Now, this is an interesting state to be in: To know more about life than we'd ever known before and get no gain, and then to go back and have to pick up something that we've known about for three years and bring it up to the fore solidly, study it all over again, reevaluate it anew and find out brand-new data about it in the light of the additional material we knew.

And so, he stops talking to it. He says it doesn't exist. An interesting thing that somebody would get into the opinion that the wall didn't exist, because that happens to be the truth of the matter. It's very easy for him to fall into that one. See, the wall doesn't exist. That's an easy thing for him to fall into, because the wall is a consideration. All right.

Well, that really puts us in present time with Scientology. But it also tells us that the materials which we have had to hand have not at any time been lacking in some power.

Now, as we observe this, we find him forced into truth. And I've said before that the probable aberration, all up and down the track, is that an individual is forced into truth and away from a game.

Three years ago when Creative Processing came out, we had ourselves a very, very weighty tool. But we didn't know just as much as we needed to know about the exact internal anatomy of existence, you see? And therefore we used

As long as he can ably create, even as low a level as a lie (a slightly less low level, a problem), he still can have a game. But when he's no longer able to create, no longer able to put anything there, there isn't anything there. He comes upon the truth of the matter, so that all aberration seems to add up to is an enforced truth. This is a very great oddity. An enforced truth.

Creative Processes to shave off the edges of the preclear, you know, instead of just take an auger and bore the center out. You get the idea? All right.

You are made to admit that what you conceive is there, is what is there in some such a way; and of course, you get an as-isness of the situation. And so you get a destruction of the terminals which you normally would have or utilize or a destruction of the spaces which you would utilize.

Now, today, although we have abandoned no information, we have a much better understanding of the Remedy of Havingness. Now, I call your attention to SOP 8; good old SOP 8, which appears in Scientology 8-8008. What was called Step IV of that process is very interesting. It is called Expanded GITA - means give and take, wasn't an Indian word; it's just a short name, give and take.

Mothers work on this rather hard - fathers, schoolmasters and so forth, "You must tell the truth." And they wonder if there's anything to this fact that a child ceases to be creative and imaginative after he's been around for a while. They must conceive there is something dreadfully, dreadfully destructive in this child's lying.

So that you had the individual take some havingness and throw away some havingness. And the way you did this was get him to waste, accept, desire, and be curious about various items. And there was a tremendously long list, tremendous list in that old SOP 8.

The person who would conceive the imaginative impulses of a child to be lies is, himself, in the interesting state of conviction that there isn't anything there anyhow, and there had better not be anything there anyway.

Now, that step is very workable today, there's nothing wrong with that step, but you could certainly narrow the living daylights out of that list, you see. Just what factors do you use?

Let me call to your attention again a manifestation of a child who comes in and asks you for a sixpence. And he goes through various parts of the Tone

Well, we find out oddly enough that it really doesn't matter what factor we use in the list. The havingness is the thing. Havingness is the thing. It isn't the significant havingness. The significance isn't as important as the actual mass involved.

Scale as he slides on down and finally tells you when he hits the bottom of the scale - and even if you hold a sixpence out to him - finally tells you that he doesn't want the sixpence.

So, going back and coming up to present time on the whole subject, we now prepare Six Levels of Processing, Issue 8. And dedicate it to old SOP 8. And we devote the entirety of Level One of SLP Issue 8, 1956, to the Remedy of Havingness - the entirety of Level One.

Do you know the child could get into a position where he has to make nothing of every sixpence he comes across. A rich father, in denying a child money - actually, it's an interesting thing that the rich man's son is usually the more aberrated child on the subject of money. And it comes about since he's told all the time that he can have everything, you see, and then he - all these things are enforced on him in some fashion. His power of choice as far as money is concerned is overthrown here and there, and finally he comes into the status that there isn't any money anyway, and the old man's fortune falls into his hands and swish! Gone.

And in actuality, this is all we do with a preclear to start out with. We get him to sit still, to find the auditor, find himself in the auditing room. Find out if he has a present time problem and at once begin to use a Havingness Process. At once. No slightest break.

You take the rich man's son and audit him, and you will normally discover that he cannot have money. Money is something that if it did come into his vision in any way, he would have to make nothing out of it at once. This is a fascinating thing.

Now, this Havingness Process is not as good a Havingness Process as many of them. But very often it's as easy as the preclear can be handled, you see, it's just - he wouldn't go for anything more than this.

Now, let's just get off of such a - interesting subject of money and a relatively uninteresting subject such as a wall, and we find the same thing applies to the wall.

His present time problem is, if it is there, a pressing thing. And to take his attention off of his present time problem is, to be very, very, very technical, a boo-boo of the first water. To yank his attention off of a present time problem is to cave the present time problem in on him. All right.

Now, this child says, "I just shot a giraffe out in the backyard, mama." His mama is in pretty good condition, she says, "Yes, well make sure you bury it."

Now, I suppose I can be allowed a few mistakes, I suppose. I make a practice of being right at least 2 percent of the time. And in an early Operational Bulletin (if you ever see a file of them), you will find me saying that if I were running a case and just running them all out, I would simply handle everything as a present time problem and ask the person repetitively what he could do about it.

Mama is very well educated in the subject of havingness, and she knows there's no giraffe in the backyard. And she asserts this fact to the child. "Johnny, you really didn't see a giraffe in the backyard, did you? Now, tell me, Johnny. You realize you'll break my heart with these lies."

Well, do you know you can get away with this with a person who is having no difficulty with havingness. But as nearly every preclear you're going to lay your hands on has difficulty with havingness, you just better throw that out the window and say, "This we will put in solid brass to demonstrate Ron can be wrong."

This is in the standard happenstance to mock-ups in children. I've had people turn around to me and tell me, from time to time, as a writer, some of the darnedest things about imaginative sequences, you know. They tell me that that really didn't happen, you know, explain to me how that really didn't happen and be very upset by it. Of course it didn't happen. Wasn't a word of truth in the whole sequence. Should have been obvious. But they cannot differentiate quickly and accurately enough between the creative and the truth of the matter.

Don't ever solve it.

And so, they are on such an interestingly unbalanced pivot with regard to walls and so forth, that if you started to create a new wall, you see, with a lie or something of the sort, they would know not only that this wall really doesn't exist - it'd be a pretty thin thing to them - but they know also that your wall had better not exist. And you're trying to give them a wall!

For heaven's sakes, never solve the present time problem for the preclear. It may be the last one he's got!

Wrote a story one time about "Beyond the Black Nebula." Or Nebula" and, oh I don't know if there's anything on the other side of it. I never looked. But, gee, people got upset about that story.

Now, let me show you how far this can go. It can go as far as when Mr.

It posed the fact that there is, in Orion, a tremendous barrier, a black barrier, across this particular galaxy. And I made people look at this fact and then dreamed up some causations behind it and so forth, and probably this barrier as they read the story was threatening to get actual and thick, you know, and they were saying, "B-zzz-zzz-zzz I don't want this barrier. You shouldn't do that to us, Ron." You know, that kind of a reaction.

Jones calls up on the phone - you've put an ad in the paper that said, "I will talk to anyone for you about anything," or something like this. You've doneand he calls up and he says, "I have a problem, Mr. Auditor. I have a problem, a very terrible problem. My wife has hiccups and has driven away her boyfriend," or whatever it is. "I'm now having to support her," you know? Something like this. He has this horrible problem. All right, fine.

Well, here's a point. Here's a point: The person who could have a wall didn't care how many black barriers were manufactured. The person who could have something accepted a new manufactured wall in the spirit that it was given - the spirit of a game. But when that person could no longer have, he could no longer accept anything offered to him.

Do you know that you as an auditor could sit right there on the other end of the telephone and defeat one, your ad; two, the preclear's case; and three, all of your group ambitions and future basic course plans, by simply saying, "Well, that's fine. What could you do about it?" And you ask him this four or five times, and he feels fine about that problem for the moment and says goodbye and hangs up, and an hour or so later, really feels like the devil. It was the last one he had. It's very valuable.

Very interesting thing. I imagine there are a great many girls that, if you walked up to them and gave them a pearl necklace, they would have to assure themselves of the fact that it was a phony or it was something of the sort or that it was worthless. They probably would take it down at once to get it assayed, just assure - and then if they were told it was a real pearl necklace and so forth, they would be quite upset about it. You could probably spin them in: ruin their whole lives by giving them a pearl necklace.

You are really talking, to the people who call you there, to a very high level of the society. These are people who can at least have a problem and know it. And that's a fairly high level of the society. You think you're going to talk to nothing but nuts on such an ad. No, you're just going to take the cream right off the top. When that ad doesn't work anymore, there won't be any wheels moving out here.

Now, here we have - here we have a case of nonactuality. This girl knows that jewels can't exist. See? It's simple; jewels don't exist. And what she keeps on saying is not what she is saying at all. She's saying the rest of the way, "Jewels don't exist. Jewels don't exist." You see? "Is it real? Is it not real?" You take to mean "Is it there or isn't it there." This isn't what she's saying. She's saying, "Honest, it doesn't exist." See? "Really, it doesn't exist."

You get the idea? Because it's really a high-level activity to know you have a problem and to want to communicate with somebody and to make things a little bit better. That's a pretty good notion for somebody to get. All right.

Now, one of the more interesting ways that people make nothing out of things is to misintend them. So, that you could come back the next week maybe and find she'd used this necklace to decorate a cake or something or other. You know - anything.

Now, you could defeat the whole thing simply by solving it for him. No, the thing to do is to tell him that that is a gee-whizzer. That is the darnedest problem you ever heard. You don't see how he can live with this problem. And undertake at once, on an emergency basis, to complete his communication with grave fears that it will do no good. He'll feel wonderful. Furthermore, he'll come around and see you. Furthermore, he'll probably join your group. That's the way it'll go, you see? But don't solve it.

You find this amongst savage tribes, particularly. I have had numerous experiences of handing out knickknacks and things like that to the kids or the elders of the village, and so on. And things that obviously should be used for one purpose or another, you know? Good can opener. They still get canned meat filtering into the country every once in a while. Come around, fellow's wearing it as a locket. It's almost impossible to guess, how wide of the intention they can throw something. Well, that's kind of, you know, to get rid of it.

Well now, similarly with this individual preclear who sits down there in your auditing room, for heaven's sakes don't start out by solving anything for him. The solution is a straight line. It has no mass; it's very, very unentangled. The top solution to everything, you understand, is for nothing to be here at all. Do you see that? There'd be no universe, no planets, no bodies, no governments - nothing, you see; it'd just all be solved. No game.

Now, on a high-toned basis they would simply be trying to make it persist. On a low-toned basis they'd be saying it doesn't exist. So, you get the two manifestations meaning two different things in comparison to where the person is in relationship to havingness. All right.

So, the ad infinitum at which we are looking is not attainable, at once, with a preclear. What you have to do - what you have to do is give him enough mass to counterbalance taking problems away from him. You can actually substitute nonsignificant mass and space for actual significant problems. Because problems are a lower inversion on mass. We got it? See?

This whole thing of havingness then comes down to communication and terminals. And there's a great oddity about the whole thing. And anytime that you have difficulty with the problem of havingness with the preclear or have any difficulty with the problem, that's because you've departed from this rather strange maxim. It's hardly a law, but it's a recognizable thing. There can't be enough havingness, you see? You never get a superabundance of terminals.

You do a substitution. You give him some havingness, and he will surrender some problems, and then he'll get better. Otherwise, he'll hang fire.

I saw Helen of Troy the other day - movie. And, here are the Trojans outside the walls. Now, you'd say, "Now they would be resenting those walls badly." In other words, they were trying to not have those walls, so they could have the spoils of Troy. All right. Fine. Fine.

All right. We ran into a strata of processes, then, a few months ago that simply started wiping out the whole track and every problem on it. And naturally, we weren't giving them enough havingness to substitute for it, and the net result was they were not showing many gains on graphs there for a while. And that was a disastrous thing as far as I was concerned. How can we possibly be this expert and get results this lousy? That was a question I was having to answer for a long time. All right.

There's a certain greed there that is interesting, isn't it? They want the spoils inside the walls. They can't have those - the walls say they can't have those, so you get the interplay there.

But we answered it. And apparently, well, we're well out of the woods on this. But in the process of answering this, the darnedest amount of data turned up, and some of the data reaches into odd places that I am actually quite ashamed of. I'm ashamed that some of this data is around. But I'm going to give it to you anyhow. You want it?

But the funny part of it is, is the reason they couldn't have them, is because they couldn't have the walls. You can develop almost any situation in life and resolve it on that basis.

Audience: Yeah.

You're trying to get over a barrier to gain something else. Well, it's a cinch that you can't have the barrier. If you can come into possession of the barrier, you become into possession of the rest of it. It's very amazing.

Well, first and foremost, the datum which stands here in the world concerning atomic fission has a great deal of chance of being used against man. Up to a very short time ago I said, "There's some chance that man will never use this bomb against his fellow man."

The only reason a person can get trapped is because he can't have traps. You see? And the only reason he goes out and gets himself trapped is because he can't be trapped. It's really quite, quite interesting.

In researching havingness, in researching this problem which we were confronted with here, I found out quite the contrary. There isn't every chance that it's going to be used, it's a dead certainty it's going to be used. And why?

But the systems which we have to own and have - "own" and "have" are really two little different things. You start owning something properly and it doesn't exist anymore. So "have" is maybe a misownership.

Well, we have to go back to an old friend of ours called the GE, the genetic entity. Now, as you know the parts of man, and if you've ever observed these things while auditing people, you will know that the awareness of awareness unit is the personality of the being. This awareness of awareness unit is something that observes other things. The masses are not the personality. They are simply adjuncts or masses appended to a personality.

If you really have all the walls and barriers of the physical universe, they pose no problem to you. You have to select some of them out as unhaveable. And then you can have a problem in connection with some other havingness.

The body is quite something else than the individual, and the individual is not his body. But something is running this body, and this something we call the GE. And falling in line with our own researches, and incidentally, agreeing with the ancient Greek, we discover that this seems to be located in the center of the body or in the vicinity of the stomach.

If you do not have methods of acquisition, there really is no acquisition possible. There would then be a total acquisition. And if you had a total acquisition, you would, own everything there is. And the way to own everything there is, is simply to own everything there is without any system of owning everything there is. And then make sure that you misown it so it'll continue to exist.

Now, the GE is a fascinating brute. I have had to study the Scientology of the GE, of recent weeks, and have discovered it to be distinctly different than the Scientology of the awareness of awareness unit, or the thetan. They are distinctly different.

You get the oddities of problems which enter at once when we counterpose these two postulates: communicate to something. See, I must communicate and there must be a barrier to communicate to, but of course a barrier is antipathetic to a communication. No, a barrier is necessary to a communication. No, a barrier is antipathetic to a communication. No, a barrier is necessary to a communication because your communication must stop somewhere.

And so we are auditing a thetan, an awareness of awareness unit, over the desire for dead bodies of the GE. And we have actually been balked, as we know, in handling the thought patterns of the individual, by some countercurrent in the person. There was something there arguing him into a worse life and a more upset circumstance. There was something there. And we were at war with this somethingness, and we didn't quite know what it was.

Well therefore, life well played would be a game of commenting in the proper direction toward the right barriers and not trying to go through the wrong ones. But you could get into some interesting problems if you tried to leave this room through that wall and take your body with you. See, that would be an interesting problem.

It is contained in the Scientology of the GE, and this is distinct from the Scientology of the thetan. It's distinct in this way: The overt act-motivator sequence is not operative on or trained into a GE. There is, then, no restraint.

It's liable to throw somebody into apathy, but the funny part of it is - funny part of it is, it wouldn't throw him into apathy anywhere near as fast as simply being able to leave this room with his body through the wall. That would upset him. I guarantee you, that would upset him. No barriers. Nothing stops anything anywhere. All right.

Now, we know what the overt act-motivator sequence is, you go over and hit Joe and your own nose starts hurting. You know that phenomena. Some people get so bad off that they think a hostile thought, an hostile thought to some organization, and immediately thereafter figure the organization is about ready to do them in. This is a quite ordinary sequence, but it has its own values in restraint. It is quite a game in itself. This thing we call conscience, this thing we call "moral lack of temerity, moral timidity." We, in other words, are restrained by our own reactions to a very marked degree. Well, oddly enough, these restraints are contained in the reactive mind. They are. Hadn't anything to do with the GE.

Now, let's look at Remedy of Havingness in the light of stops. In Dianetics: The Modern Science of Mental Health, there are a great many command phrases. I seriously doubt if anybody in England has really taken a look at the behavior of engrams.

There are many men around who are "Operating GEs," not Operating Thetans. And this whole matter of the GE becomes excessively important to us when we discover that the GE can be affected by a thetan but ordinarily is not, and that the reactive mind is operative upon the motor controls and other parts of the anatomy, but not upon its thinkingness. And there is a separate thinkingness in the body which has very little to do with this reactive mind. It has nothing to do with a thetan. But boy, can it influence the body. And that is the GE.

These are some of the wilder things. Person gets into a prenatal engram, something like that. These things are unheard of. They don't exist - or didn't. They are now written up in medical journals. But, they didn't exist.

Now, the GE is going on down the genetic line. And we first hear of the GE, in something on this Earth called the lee Cube. He sort of tells us that he got dumped in the sea, you know? And we've gone all over this, you find it in the History of Man which was researched by an E-Meter. All of this material was relatively para-Scientological. We weren't at all unhappy about it or happy with it, it's just material which was consistently and continually reported to us. All right.

The funny part of it is, you can take anybody and with a few magic phrases: "The somatic strip will now go to (in a certain moment in time), and when I snap my fingers the first phrase will occur to you." And the fellow will roll up in a ball. He can't help himself. He's never heard of Dianetics, never studied it. That's the way it goes.

We put this material together and we find out that the GE has been coming along this line from some time. He has a history of being a plankton and a clam and so forth. As a matter of fact, you can get your best friend to have his teeth pulled out simply by telling him all about the worries and woes of a clam. And you come on up the line and you follow the genetic blueprint. Now, what we're looking at is the genetic blueprint, which is on excellent enough authority - even Darwin, the monkey man, whose hindsight only went back to apesight, and who could have looked a lot further - even Darwin admitted that there must be some kind of a blueprint for existence.

You can run somebody through birth, and if an obstetrician were standing there, why, he could tell you exactly what type of birth this fellow had. Exactly what method of delivery was practiced in this particular case and so forth. Because the fellow quite ordinarily goes into contortions over the thing.

Well, this blueprint for existence we found in Scientology: we know its anatomy, how it's put together, and how long it's been on the way. But this is not the thetan or the awareness of awareness unit. He hasn't been on the track like this. This isn't the way he operates. This isn't where he came from. This isn't what he does. He handles and monitors these bodies that are put together on this genetic blueprint. And he skips off the genetic line and comes back onto the genetic line again. All right. So much for that.

You run him through a sperm sequence - these are all very doubtful things, you understand, they only exist on complete evidence. And he goes through a sperm sequence, and it's impossible for a human being to lie on his back and then wiggle his feet from side to side in an S-curve; and yet, people run through the sperm sequence do that.

When the GE dies, it sails off like a thetan and makes another mock-up on the same, more or less, genetic line. You see? The thetan just sails off. He leaves that genetic line and, really, enters some other genetic line most ordinarily. You see? So, there are two different livingnesses in the body, and they go at death in two different directions. And one of them carries with it the entirety of the life pattern of the last life or lives, and the thetan doesn't bother. He just not-knows the whole thing and skips it. All right.

You can throw them into the conception engram - moment of conceptionand you will see, in lots of them, this odd foot-switch and shoulder-switch wiggle. They are assuming S-curves, in the wriggles on the way, which are not possible for a human body to assume.

Now, here's a great oddity. These two things, they're sitting there together and responding in a coordinated fashion while you're auditing the preclear. And one of them we haven't been paying very much attention to.

Another thing, you can run a person through an inoculation of some sort or another. You can sit there and if you really know your Dianetics and you know how to run an engram right bang, you can watch the flesh sink in as the needle touches the flesh. It's quite interesting, because there are no muscles to do it.

Once upon a time, a fellow by the name of Freud talked about the horrible ravening beast that underlie all of our motives. Most of the time I have considered Freud was pulling, at least, a longbow. I knew I didn't have any horrible, ravening beast. I've turned around suddenly and I've sometimes found a mock-up of a lion or a snake in back of me, but never any real, horrible, ravening beast that was giving me advice and monitoring my directions. But obviously if there is dramatization in reactive thought, there is some kind of a reaction that takes place that the individual doesn't seem to have any cognizance of.

The evidence of the engram, completely aside from the electronic deposit and so forth, is quite abundant. But the whole subject of the engram is a subject of can't have. If the individual couldn't have the environment and couldn't have the cirtumstances he was undergoing at the time, it's a cinch he'll have an engram.

Well now, it is not true that a thetan has a horrible, ravening beast and a terrible conscience and a censor and fully equipped with an ad-libido something. It's not true that he had all this bric-a-brac. But it is true that a thetan is in somebody's skull that has a lot of bric-a-brac and is a beast. Get the - bit of a difference here.

See how that would be? Because he resists the environment to such a degree and considers it so foreign, so solid, and so dangerous, that he actually makes a sort of an energy plaster cast of the thing, and so makes a facsimile. Quite intriguing.

The GE's Scientology does not include an underlying, ravening beast which springs forth unbeknownst to it. It is a ravening beast. Get the difference? It has no suspicions whatsoever concerning its own character. It knows it's terrible and it loves it!

He really resists. You can ask somebody to stand here and resist with energy this window, and then let him go on for another ten minutes and ask him, "Can you remember resisting the window?"

Now, it's perfectly all right to malign this GE because all it can do is give you a headache, kick your teeth in, tear your head off, and cause you to murder or sell your grandmother.

And the fellow says, "Oh, sure."

But here is a certain thing that is interesting: This thing has not been educated into a thorough belief that when it does something to somebody, something will happen to it. That's the thetan's idea. That's a thetan's idea; not the GE's idea. The GE doesn't run that way at all. The GE runs on unlimited, continual overt acts by it to others with compound interest and no liability. And that's a fascinating view to take, because it says that it is unrestrained.

And you ask him to remember it a little bit better and just slide him back in time to the moment he was resisting the window. And he will have, usually, a backwards picture of the window. You tell him to turn it around and he'll have a print of the window. Quite amusing. All right.

The test of it is, is can you run - worse, can you run a GE? Yes. Yes. The thetan, by doing mock-ups and remedying havingness and straightening up certain other things, puts the GE under control. It's quite interesting. So, Remedy of Havingness showed us up, suddenly, this Scientology of the GE. All right.

So, that tells us, then, something very important. That the visible engrams were those of loss. Those things the individual resisted - those things he couldn't have in the environment, he resisted - they are backwards. They usually are black-backed. Just like you had the pictures on the wall turned face into the wall, you see. You get a backwards print. And the back of the picture is black. All right. That's a lot of people's blackness, and that's why blackness succeeds lots of pictures. A person has lots of pictures and then finally blackness. He's gone down the role of being able to have, and then has said, "I must not lose."

Now, will a GE run on receiving motivators? Well, the oddity is the thetan runs on receiving motivators. The GE doesn't run on receiving motivators. Do you get the idea?

Now, let's see what that is. There is a thing called a tensor beam. A thetan can do something that a physicist hasn't yet learned to make energy do here on this planet. But elsewhere physicists can do this. That is to say, they make a beam grab something - tractor.

If you try to get the GE to believe, by mock-up or otherwise, that he can be destroyed, he just gets unhappy. He isn't pleased at all. Now, you get the difference of beingnesses here we're operating with.

You put a beam on the chair and pull it towards you. You can get the idea of doing that. If you can get the idea of doing that, energy will perform it. That's all there is to it. Now, if the chair, of course, were steel and you had a huge magnet in your hand, you could see how the chair would come to you.

To unconfuse these two is the act of exteriorization. When an auditor gets these two things unconfused in a preclear, the preclear is better able to handle his life and beingness.

But a thetan can do this without the thing being of steel. He can do a tensor manifestation. And he can put - actually put a beam around the back of somebody's head and stand him there. Have you been talked to lately by somebody who didn't have much to say? Huh? It's very stupid of any lecturer, you know, to restimulate boringness engrams. But the fellow actually feels - it seems sometimes as though he has a beam around the back of your neck, and he's holding you there and you can't leave.

There was something that looked, then, like a subconscious or an unconscious mind. Only it wasn't a subconscious and unconscious mind. It was the livingness which is a resident in and composes the stomach and structure of the body - acting, thinking, and reacting.

The electronic structure of a pretty girl who has just walked down the street is a very interesting thing to observe. Every guy she's passed has put a tensor beam on her, you know, tsk, tsk. Well, that's "Mustn't let the terminal go any further away." That's the motto of that beam, see.

The GE dines upon death. That's all a GE wants. The basic philosophy of the GE is not survive. There is not much question about survival. The basic premise, the dynamic principle of the GE happens to be this: "If there is any other life form anywhere alive, I cannot be happy or live."

So, the individual can have, and then he'd - can lose. He decides he can lose; and if he feels he's going to lose any part of the environment, he will hook a beam over it. Do you see how this is? And he'll hold it there in front of him.

Wow. The "only one" ne plus ultra. "If there's anything anywhere alive," it says, "I can't live." Wow. How does it respond to this? How could you possibly find this out? How could you test this?

And if you take a facsimile apart very carefully (aside from simply mocked-up or copied facsimiles, that's very possible, too) you will see that it is - if the preclear is looking at it - is cross-sectionalized as a tractor beam. He's trying to hold something from leaving him.

Well, part of the processes which I had to sort out, put together, in the line of havingness, consisted of sacrifices: Were dead bodies more acceptable than live bodies? and so forth. Not only were they more acceptable, they were the only things that were really acceptable to the GE.

Now, he tells you, "Oh, I don't like these pictures, and they bother me, and all of this, and they're very, very upsetting to me." Take a few away from him. He'll start to crab at you. He is actually unable to retain to him the actual object, and so, he gets a picture of the object which he can look at straight.

Now, the thetan could receive motivators. I've lectured to you about motivators, remember, body motivators. The thetan, evidently, is the one who receives these body motivators, not the GE. So, we're not putting the ravening beast any more under control by running motivators.

Now, below that level he goes into blackness, and this blackness is simply pressing on things. He pushes things. See, things mustn't come any closer. Well, that fellow has already gotten himself into some frame of mind with regard to something. Anybody has got some blackness on his track. It isn't true that cases are black and other cases aren't black. Anybody has got some blackness on his track. Sometimes you start to run a wide-open case that will just run along fine, and all of a sudden it all goes black.

What we must do as a process is to have the preclear mock up things out in front of the body which are then sacrificed to the body. Now, I use the word sacrifice, very advisedly, very advisedly, because you can go so far as to have the "holy knife" and the altar and you can have anything mocked up you want, as long as it's a known sacrifice.

You could take almost any preclear today and start to remedy his havingness and all of a sudden blackness will show up. Well, you better know enough to say, "Mock up some blackness and shove it in."

Now, in order to keep from tearing up the fellow's track and to make sure that he's putting new ones there instead of old ones he's picking out of the GE's bank, you have different things occur. You have modern dress. You have "occur tomorrow." You have green bulls and polka-dot doves, you know? Anything that really differentiates it, so that we just don't drain the bank down. And thousands and thousands of things being sacrificed are much better, providing he's certain that they are and have been - the GE is certain they are and have been sacrificed to his livingness.

So, we get the engrams of resistance. And the engrams of resistance are black. And we get the engrams of "Mustn't go away," and they are pictures. And an individual who can't have the physical universe, can't have anything leaving him because he can't have anything else, you see, he at least retains a picture and there is how he builds up this secondary universe. Now, that really isn't his universe. It's pictures of the physical universe which he has in lieu of

Now, this is a frightening thing to look at and examine. It tells us at once why many of our preclears go off the rails in auditing. We have a double direction here: the direction of auditing the thetan and direction of auditing the GE.

Now, an individual only gets into a frantic frame of mind about things leaving him if he can't have anything else. He's talking to a friend, and this friend and he have been very good friends for a long time, and this friend says 'Well, I'm going up to Galway, now, and, I'll be up there for a couple of years.' And the fellow goes zzzzuh, you know. Trying to persuade him to stay, you know.

Now, listen, if a GE has nothing in mind but the obliteration of all life, what do you think his ambitions are in relationship to a thetan? Same thing. Same thing. All right.

If you ask anybody who did that, he would not be able to tolerate the amount of distance between himself and Galway, number one. He would not feel that he had any other friend anyplace. See, he's already on a big scarcity of friends.

Now, we take a GE and examine him as to this: What is the relationships of the GE ... You understand he actually is resident in the stomach; he's right there in the middle of the body. What is his relationship to, let's say, the legs? Well, there haven't been enough legs sacrificed to him. He's got a scarcity of leg sacrifice. And he starts to sacrifice the body's legs. And we get cripples.

All right, you've got lots of friends and one of them says, "I'm going to Galway." You say, "Okay, fine. I'll be up and see you someday." You let him go, you get the idea? That says you can tolerate that distance, and he doesn't, to that degree, reduce your havingness. Person would be in good shape, you see? He'd also be very easy to get along with. All right.

He starts to sacrifice the body's head, back, ridges. We get hunchback material and so forth. It's quite interesting material, because it tells us the source of deformity in the body and gives us at once its solution, which is just having anything with that condition sacrificed; but never letting the GE be sacrificed, you see. It won't run that way. It'll run on the thetan, but not the GE. So, we just go on with sacrifices.

Now, as we look over the general situation on the subject of havingness then, we find out that it is a decline from having one's own universe exclusively, to a matter of cooperating with the universe, which is the physical universe; and then we run out of havingness of the physical universe, and we get into a point of a little anxiety - we might lose parts of it. And from that we pass into "We're liable to acquire some of it." And we get a flip. And therefore, we must resist parts of the physical universe, and from there we go on to total not-have. That is a disenfranchisement - total disenfranchisement of the individual.

Now, this works out to an idiocy of complexity if you want it to. Fellow walks in and he's - his shoulder is hurting. So, you say, "That's fine. Now, mock up a fellow with a bum shoulder and have him sacrificed to the body," and he does. And does that a few times, the shoulder lets up.

Now, I'll tell you a little game. You ever find yourself flinching a bit from a pc? Pc is sitting there running something quite restimulative one way or the other, and you find yourself flinching a trifle. You find yourself sitting back. If you were to look at your own physiological anatomy, you would find out that your space has collapsed to about here, right about to the end of your nose, and he's got the rest of the space in the room. That's you being uncomfortable.

What happened? Well, there was just enough death, of all things, enough death. And that is the motto of the GE. If he can have enough death, he's happy.

What happens? You can't have him, so you put a barrier up there that you can have and talk to anyhow. To that degree, you go out of communication with the preclear.

It evidently is less important that mass occurs than that the mass be good and dead and preferably that it be sacrificed. Now, you take somebody who can't eat bacon, he can't eat eggs, he can't eat this and that. He has to eat coconuts and drink swizzle tea and he's very, very careful of his diet somehow or another. And you'll find there's only one thing wrong with his diet: He didn't see it die.

Tell you a little stunt, horrible stunt: Sometimes a very sensitive preclear will know you are doing this, and they get - dzzzuh. You look over the preclear. You find out you're kind of backing off, you know? The preclear's life is private. The preclear's case is the preclear's case. You really don't have any business, you know. You feel, "Well, I'll let him talk," and you kind of find yourself backed up into no space and he's occupying all of the space. You just find out what part of the preclear you can have. Because that's what's happened. You've run out of havingness of preclear. That's all that's happened.

And it's fabulous. You have small rabbits and chickens and things like that, you know. Have him mock those up being dragged in and then have them executed, you know, and have the soul go off to heaven (they all do this, by the way, they let the soul go off to heaven, you know), and wham, right into the GE goes the body of the rabbit or the chicken, and so on. It's the fastest operation you ever saw in your life. It just goes in slurp.

Do you know that this can happen to you, and you lose the preclear; you really go out of session as an auditor. And do you know that if you have too few preclears that you begin to believe that there aren't any. And you don't reach for anybody or process anybody, because they don't exist.

Now, the odd part of it is, is the thetan has a conscience. And he believes that certain things should happen to him. He believes in reciprocity. He believes he's alive, other people are alive, you see. And if he does things to other livingness, then things should happen to him. GE doesn't subscribe to this at all.

Well, that's the beginning of it. One preclear is rattling on at a drooling rate of horror, horror, horrible fates and so forth, and you kind of start backing up, you know? It's all for the preclear, and your space finally gets to about here, see.

So, body motivators run just fine on the thetan, but foul up the GE. And this was where I first discovered this. I discovered something was fouling up running body motivators, and I had to isolate it and find out what it was and where it was, and all of a sudden, I found myself looking down the long microscope at the genetic entity as a separate thinkingness and beingness. It's what keeps the body moving and rolling and its philosophy is "So that I can live, all things must die."

Well, you've run out of the havingness of one preclear. And then you're liable to lose another one, and then you're liable to lose another, and then it'll get to be a habit.

Now, there's a cure for this. It goes on this gradient scale: You get things sacrificed to the GE by mock-ups, you see. Things sacrificed, sacrificed, sacrificed, more and more; and you'll find, shortly, that things are going into the genetic entity, although they still have a little life left in them. You know, the soul is gone but some of the cells are still alive, and it's still acceptable to the GE.

And then pretty soon you'll be saying, "Well, I haven't audited anybody for weeks. They don't exist. I mean, it's very hard to get preclears. It's very difficult to get preclears." This is just a case of havingness.

And so, it builds up on this gradient scale very nicely until the GE is satisfied with something alive and is no longer pulling this liveness - this live object forcefully into the body. Two things happen: one, first the GE can accept only death; we improve that consideration until the GE can also accept lifeliving beings. They go in, and then living beings that don't have to go in, and then living beings that he can let remain or go where they please or operate on their own determinism, don't you see? And then living beings he can throw away. You got the idea?

But the same law applies. If there's anything wrong with the subject of havingness or the subject of terminals it is, there are not enough. There cannot be a superabundance of terminals.

In other words, we can civilize the GE with a considerable betterment to the digestion, to say nothing of the arms, legs, and the rest of it. Got it?

Honest to Pete, this street could not be stacked full enough full of preclears, see, really, to satisfy your idea of preclears if you were really rolling. Oh, you'd say, "It's wonderful. I got eight thousand preclears to audit between now and next month."

Now, that is a rather fantastic discovery to make because it's a very basic discovery in the problem of what is man doing and where is he going. All a person has to live is a somewhat hungry youth, and all he has to do as a thetan is to finally get beaten down to a point of where he's in total agreement with all the ambitions of the body ... Who have we got? We've got a conqueror.

You probably - if you really had that and you could have them all and so forth, boy, you'd be a happy guy. Eight thousand preclears - you mean you're going to audit twenty-eight hours a day, huh? All right. But that would be the frame of mind you'd be in at the same time.

I understand somebody spent two million pounds - I think it was Howard Hughes spent two million pounds to make a picture called The Conqueror. John Wayne, of all people, starring in it, and an old pal of mine, a very good friend of mine by the way, Susan Hayward, starring in this thing. Huh! Two million pounds this Conqueror is worth. I wonder why this is the most expensive motion picture ever made?

So what? You know? I work thirty-nine hours a day, it's all right with me. Audit one on the phone, one in front of me. A couple of preclears that were in the waiting room, we'd put them in an antechamber and have them co-audit. I've done that, by the way. Anyhow ... Don't like to have people wait.

Did you ever hear of Genghis Khan's pyramids of skulls? Brother, you talk about an "Operating GE" . . . no conscience of any kind. Total, unlimited slaughter. They used to flatten, the Mongols did, cities - opulent cities and their populaces - so flat that their ponies wouldn't stumble when ridden across them at a hard gallop. That was their brag. Pyramids of skulls. Death, death, death, death, death, death. Somebody comes along and spends two million pounds making a picture about this jerk. You talk about the deification of the gastric origin, that's it.

Now, there is a cycle of it. And it's quite interesting if you look over the preclear that is doing this to you. You know, you're running out of space, you just look him over and find out what he's got you can have, you will find out that your level of havingness of the preclear has dropped a hell of a long way. And you can build it back up again. As you're auditing him you just quietly and privately pick it up. Sometimes the preclear gets aware of the fact that he's all of a sudden surrounded. It's quite interesting.

So, you wonder why the populace at large can be appealed to by things and creatures that make nothing out of everything and why they neglect creative efforts. The GE has no idea of creation. The GE can only consume, he cannot create. It must be that people are to some degree running on their stomachs; must be quite prevalent.

But he only gets upset about it if he can't have his body. What little tenuous grip he's got on what little body he has left is so light that the idea of any other influence around him drives him half mad. And if he's in that kind of a condition and you suddenly start adding up: (Let's see, what can I have about this guy?) "Yeah, that's fine. That's very good. Now, tell me something else you could consider dead ... That's fine." (Now, let's see, what can I have about this guy?) You see, and (I could probably have the dirt in his socks or something like that.)

And when you look at the thirst and rapacity on the parts of many governments for taxes and sacrifices, from their electric chairs and hangman's nooses and so forth, we sort of get the idea there must be some operating GEs working in there, too.

And if he's in fair condition, he will actually feel better about it. But if he's in very bad condition, he's liable to get very jumpy.

But it would give such people nothing but supreme pleasure to have an entire city sacrificed to them with atomic fission. Nothing but pleasure. The moral restraint will not be present. A hideous thing to have to face.

But there's an oddity. And after you've done that to a preclear or two or six - you know, just do it once in a while, look it over - when you get in a frame of mind where you can have preclears, you're actually running on "What body could you have?" you see?

It tells us, if we wish to make the experiment with a few preclears, that even those chaps that we process - we find out there is an operating mechanism like there - and then the cases that won't run at all, run exclusively on this. We discover at once that we had certainly better take something into our computation and reality. Just come off the maybe about it because there's no maybe there. That's what it tells me.

And what you're doing is a gradient scale; instead of reaching out of the bin of your life and selecting a body that you can have, you just pick out what you can have about a body, you see? You run the gradient scale approach and build it up, and you'll find out oddly enough that you can have this preclear. And the moment you can have him, you can really make that guy well. You're liable to get tired of seeing him sit there running considerations and computations and that sort of thing, and say, "Oh, hell," and as-is the condition of his leg and mock up another one and shake him by the hand and tell him, "Goodbye."

It says within the next five years somebody's going to clobber somebody. Why? So that somebody's stomach can be titillated. That's a horrible thing to have to look at.

You think I'm joking. But if you were in a terrific state of havingness with regard to preclears in general, why, your ability to handle them would be rather fantastic. You would only minimumly account on sorting out the right combination. You would keep their havingness remedied. You'd keep them exercised one way or the other and so forth, and you'd straighten them out. All right.

Naturally, you'd expect action of this character to come from countries which are very genetic-entity, you know? They're very MESTy, very materialistic, very sold on the idea that food is all, you know? And we have such countries. And they have atomic fission.

That is primarily a very practical application of these principles - talking to you about. There actually can't be enough of them. If you can't have a preclear or if a preclear were to make you nervous or upset in some fashion, it's just a not-having and the answer is there aren't enough of them.

So, not to just ... Be cheerful about it. I mean, there's nothing to it; if we know that we can probably do something about it. We can probably razz them off of their penchant.

That's an oddity, but this just works out. It's one of those outrageous things. This shouldn't be. It should be that there should be considerations which said, "There are enough, there are too many, there are too few." And you should be able just to have these considerations bang, bang, bang, just like that. Not as long as you're hanging around a body in this universe. The consideration which works out is, is "there can't be enough."

But the point is that, organizationally, why, we'd better figure out a few things. We better figure out - write ourselves a book, called "Radioactive Burns, Their Treatment - Their Care and Treatment," or something like that, and a basic textbook on handling radioactive contamination, so forth, with Scientology and otherwise. And give it an emergency address someplace or another that isn't likely to be in an immediate bomb area, you know and spread it around, and put it in the bookstores. Do a few things about this sort of thing and just stop regarding it as "Well, it's very silly for somebody to even figure that somebody'd do . . ."

Funny part of it is, the moment that you get into a consideration that there are quite a few, you run out of greed. You just pass right on out of greed on the basis. You pass from greed into abundance. Greed only comes about in the face of a scarcity.

People who think it won't happen are the people who think. And they are sizing up everybody by themselves; and they themselves would not do such a thing to their fellow man. But there have been such people who thought and created and were restrained in their own actions in the periods of such people as Genghis Punk, the great stomach.

Government down here says, "Prices are going to go up in August." That's an envisioned scarcity. Well, they'll create the scarcity. "Prices are going to go up." Everybody who's got a plugged - penny will be down at the stores buying the commodities off the shelves at the lower price in anticipation of a rise. So, there'll be a scarcity so the prices will go up in August. And then everybody's got it in the back closet moldering. So, we get into the symptom of waste. So, greed leads to waste.

Now, where we get in this deep in research, we are into something sufficiently significant that we can start predicting what the behavior of a certain organism is, and predict it with certainty, why, we're of course on a more positive course ourselves. We're leaving just that much less to chance and that much more to control. And chance is all right for a gambler or a fellow who doesn't have much game, but when there's a lot of game anyhow, why, you can start cutting into the chanciness of existence and make it a little more positive. And so we can do that now and we intend to.

Now, as an individual looks out across the face of this particular universe, he is prone to believe that there's an awful lot of space there with darn little matter in it. And he gets planet-happy. A lot of people get planet-happy. Sometimes it takes very extreme forms. Sometimes some people are being good simply because they can't have anything; even if they stole it, they couldn't have it. You get the idea? That's a kind of an apathetic being good, you know? That's the sort of being good that a lot of agencies of one kind or another think is the only sort of being good there is.

Well, that's just one of the things that I wanted to tell you about this evening, and there are several more that are equally - not quite so dramatically startling, but they mean quite a bit to us, particularly since it's rather necessary that we get a better grip on this thing called processing.

These people are just unfathomably bad to have around. You said it. They're down on a make-nothing-out-of-it death ratio. If the government or somebody starts to go, they are the first ones covertly to be around the corner and pitch that cobblestone. Get the idea?

Radioactive burns have, at this date, no cure. They're cumulative. It can be rather easily discovered, however, that the bank is just saturated with radioactive engrams. You can always throw radioaction into restimulation if you want to. All right.

They are the food for any revolutionary. They are the troops. Because they have no responsibility for anything. And any change they compute then, loses them nothing. And having no vested interest, they thereby compose a revolutionary area in a country. You want to look at the poverty-stricken people who have nothing, but more important, amongst those, those that can't have anything, either.

The reason radioactive burns are restimulative and cumulative, which is the important part of them - you know, fellow gets five minutes' worth of burn today, five minutes tomorrow, five minutes the next day, and the next thing you know he's got fifteen minutes' worth of burn - it doesn't wear off the way other burns do. All right.

Just because a person doesn't own a lot of money doesn't mean he can't have a lot of money. There are a lot of fellows who have a lot of money who can't have a dime; they're very dangerous people. They're at a level of no responsibility on the subject of money. And they will do the most confoundedly stupid things.

Why is this? It's because it throws the engram bank into restimulation so easily and keeps it into higher and higher restimulation, and there he is.

There's some fellow by the name of Jackalson, I think, that owns a lot of stores, in Jackalson. He's an interesting fellow. He just has zillions and millions and millions of pounds. And he can't have one threepence. If you were to walk up to him and hand him a threepence, he would probably say, "What's that?"

Now, you can take a rather serious burn and on this basic law which isit sounds incredible sometimes in the field of havingness, but on the basic law in havingness - that one never gets enough of anything. You see, there aren't things around which you can have too much of. That's what throws havingness off. And that gets you to resisting and doing all sorts of things.

He really can't have money. And so he goes on accumulating money, accumulating - but it isn't real! He'd just as soon do in every life form there is. He would hang, draw and quarter people to get another tenpence out of them. And here he is, he owns everything everyplace, getting in everybody's hair, and organizations are stumbling all over him, they don't know which end they're going - it's a fantastic picture.

There aren't things around that you can have too much of in spite of a thetan's belief that this is so. See, he makes a game of this. There are things around he can have too much of as far as he's concerned, but that's his game. Factually, there aren't any things around that he can have too much of. You see, he can always have a scarcity. And anything wrong with his havingness is on the score of scarcity.

This is somebody who can't have money who has to have money. You got the idea? Well, the truth of the matter is, he is a poverty case. He's a not-have case. And, boy, that fellow can cause people an awful lot of trouble. It could cause a government trouble, if you were to go up to one of these chaps and offer them a couple of quick pounds, they probably would sell out to any other government that came along. I mean, they have no responsibility. Their vested interest is - doesn't exist, you see? That's what's very, very poor. These people are not regulatable in any way. They can't have anything. All right.

Individual has terrible gastric pains. And you say, "Oh, my, we must get rid of those." Oh yeah? No, no, no. That's the wrong philosophy. The right philosophy is "Let's see how we can get enough of those." Got the idea?

Now, let's take the opposite to that: a fellow who has everything and doesn't have to have anything. He's also uncontrollable. He isn't hungry. You can't appeal to this man because he's got what you are trying to offer him. He's got the very pound that you have in your hand.

He's got some problems. Well, the philosophy is "Let's not figure out how to get rid of these problems, let's figure out how to supermultiply them," you see, though that's the other factor. And anywhere we look in havingness it's this rationale that kicks us along.

You're trying to say, "Now here's this pound and I want you to run down to the corner."

It is the same thing in radioaction. If your sidewalks and streets and the sidewalks and streets of the world were all radioactive, you wouldn't care two pins for any atom fizzle. See, you wouldn't just care two pins for it. It wouldn't be anything to you. Bomb would go off - flash! And you'd say, "Somebody's being careless today," and go on drinking tea with somebody. Get the idea? It's its scarcity.

And he says, "Why should I run down to the corner?"

An individual has quite a few radioactive engrams. They are thrown easily into restimulation, so he's already abundantly aware of radioaction. Abundantly aware of this. And now, all of a sudden there's a chance to get some more. A bomb explodes over there two miles and only blows his bloody head off, you know? He'll go, "Gee, I didn't blow my stomach out either, you know? I mean, that's bad. I've been cheated."

"Well, here's this pound, I want you to run down to the corner."

Well, on an injury basis, he looks up at the radioactive flash and he says, "Oh, that's terrible, I must get away from it." Wrong computation for auditing. See, that's his - that's the way he thinks about it and that's the way he reacts and that's what he does.

"Well, why should I take the pound? I've got the pound."

But an auditor, looking at the case, has to think another way in order to do something about the radioaction. He says, "Gee, that guy was scarce on radioaction. Look at him - stone-blind. Boy, he really had a hunger for that stuff."

"No, you haven't got the pound, I have the pound."

And, so, what do you do? You just have him mock up more radioactive stuff, and you make the walls radioactive and the ceiling radioactive and the floor radioactive, on a creative basis. Or make the radioactivity more radioactive.

You'd say, "Oh, ha-ha-ha. It's in your hand, but it's my pound."

You'll have a little bit of difficulty doing this sometimes. You'll occasionally have to have somebody waste radioactivity for a little while before he can start to mock it up easily. And boy, when he has, to his satisfaction, the walls glowing a bright green, you know, all of a sudden his own radioactive burns will turn off. I've had considerable experience with this already.

"You mean, for the privilege of putting this in my pocket, I am to walk down to the corner. My pockets are full." You'd get into a very nonsensical sort of argument.

The US government loves to use up its taxation money by blowing up bombs and, in any given twenty-four hours, probably uses up twelve to fifteen million dollars' worth of uranium or something; particularly since it's irreplaceable, you know.

The fellow, in other words, would be above the level of game of "have" if he were doing this. And the other fellow's below the level of game of "have," and both conditions can produce a randomity in an area, more than somebody can handle.

And, they use the deserts out in Arizona and Nevada and anyplace that somebody might have a good time, you see. And, they keep blowing this stuff off. And then great clouds of radioaction blow across the country and burn holes in the newspapers in Chicago and everything. And the newspaper says in glaring headlines, "Scientists Claim Radioactivity Did Not Affect Any Other Area Than Salt Flats." You know? "Radioactivity, As a Result of the Fallout, As Reported Increased in Wyoming, Actually Is Only Up 200 Percent from Normal," you know. Just utterly psychotic, the reports on this radioactivity.

If all the workers in the British Isles were suddenly to have no use for any pay, goods or commodities, there would be that game. That would be a gone game, see? At once.

They evidently can't have enough of it, can't have it, must have it; and if they do get it, they've got to lie about it. You get the confusion that goes on there? It must be a problem, it can't be a problem. For instance, they blow up typical American homes and things like that. They never blow up any Russian homes. It's really wild. All right.

Nobody pretends that anybody would get up to that level of game. The funny part of it is, they get up toward that level of game and they go back into action on the game. Only they play the game now efficiently and they play it as a game. Not as a dead, serious, horror that they have to face somehow. That's the difference. All right.

People can see these flashes occasionally. Somebody will be riding down the road or out in the front yard or something like this, and there'll be a terrific flash off on the horizon someplace or another and he happens to be looking at it, see. And by morning his face will be nicely bloated and his eyes will be in very terrible condition.

You can ask this question, "Are you enjoying life?" In other words, "Is life a game to you?" You would ask at the same time, "By any chance, are you in the band of havingness below owning everything there is, and above owning nothing and having to make nothing out of everything there is? Are you by any chance in that band?" Or, "Are you enjoying life?" These are the same questions - identical questions. No real difference.

Actually, if his havingness is in good shape - look at these two things - you can expend a solution, you see. You can solve it. You can say, "Where did you see it? Where are you now? Good. Where did you see it? Where are you now? Where did you see it? Where are you now? Where did you see it? Where are you now?" And all of a sudden the swelling goes down and his eyes get all right.

Except one fellow wouldn't be in the universe. He wouldn't be there to ask. So, hypothetically it's an incorrect statement. But the guy who can't have anything and is resisting it, boy, is he there. He's there. He's stuck. He's stuck, thud. Right there.

But you see the danger of that? If he had a very serious burn such as gained by somebody working in a laboratory, you'd say, "Where did you get it? And where are you now?" His radioactive conviction is now high, and you're going to have to run other engrams and do other things. Don't run the engrams. Add to them.

Now, let's look at this thing called "stop." The old engram used to have "stop," "holders," and so forth. Now, these are embryonic barriers. These are barriers aborning, you might say; the statement or postulate "to stop." And an individual who gets an anxiety about havingness begins to accumulate out of his manufactured bank all of the stops and begins to hold them near him so that he will have barriers that can receive something, and he won't get into this condition of the bull.

The safe process then, or any Havingness Process, the safe process is to add to the condition. Got it? Make more of it. Not less of it. Increase it; don't decrease it.

See how he does it? He selects all the stops out of the bank, almost knowingly, and puts them there, and he will then have a barrier. There will be something there to resist; something there with which a game can be played. And thereby and therefore, he forms a false wall in a secondary universe. The primary universe is the physical universe, as far as he's concerned, in the state that he's in.

So he's got pain. All right. So he has pain. That's fine. Why does he have pain and why is he holding on to pain? Because it's valuable.

Now, there's an earlier universe which is his universe. And that had barriers and walls, too. But, you'll find that the preclear will thrash around for a while - he'll eventually discover this home universe.

There's an interesting old test in SOP 8, Expanded GITA Step IV. You have an individual waste pain. And he discovers something uniformly - I don't care who you take, whether it's a butcher or a cabinet minister, you do the same thing with him, you get the same result. You have this individual waste pain, and he really gets so he can waste it real good, and he always comes up with this cognition: "You know, well, that's good stuff, pain. That's nice. I like that. I know I shouldn't be saying that, but it's kind of nice." See, that's the oddity that enters in there. So, what do you do?

But for our processing purposes, we are talking about this primary universe, the physical universe. And we're talking as - the reactive mind, the facsimiles, engrams, energy, pictures in it, as a secondary universe which is formed by reason of not being able to have the physical universe. And that's how the reactive mind gets born, that's where it comes from.

Fellow is in great pain. It isn't that he doesn't hurt enough, it's that pain is too scarce, so he is feeling it. If he had a little more pain he wouldn't feel it. Now, that sounds odd, but it doesn't sound odd. You don't push more pins in him. That's an Indian method, they understood this too, you know. A fellow hurt like mad in the stomach, so they beat his feet; that got his attention off of it real good.

Now, you very often have to get a preclear over the humps on the subject of havingness on his reactive mind. We do that on Creative Processes, and so forth. But these extend at once to a higher echelon - the physical universe. And then if you remedy his havingness totally on the physical universe and got him to have everything in the physical - no longer with mock-ups - you just have him look at things and find out what he could have, and you had him totally remedied on this subject, he would then be able to and be in a position to create a home universe or universe of his own. See how the graduated scale goes here. It goes from reactive to physical to home universe.

You start the individual putting pain in the walls, and have him make the curtains hurt and the chair hurt and put pain out here and pain there and create pain - two things occur: At once he takes over the automaticity of hurting, and he adds to the scarcity and makes it an abundance.

Somebody could separate out of this universe simply on havingness alone. First he'd have to be able to have his reactive bank. Then he'd have to be able to have the physical universe. And then he'd have to know that he could create something else. You see how that would be? All right.

You must always be prepared, in havingness, to waste. The individual says, "Oh, I couldn't possibly make any pain out of the thing." He can always waste it. Well, similarly, the GE is wasting life because it can't have it. So, that's where you find it on the Havingness Scale. See?

This game of havingness is absolutely necessary to auditing. Apparently, havingness to many people means barriers. And barriers means lack of freedom. But to you, an auditor, a barrier should mean a game. And an absence of barriers is the trouble with the preclear. He hasn't enough barriers.

In radioaction and its treatment you have to add to it. And this is certainly something for you to know and certainly something for you to remember, because the least that will happen to any country in the Northern Hemisphere is it'll get fallout, the like of which you'll have to go down the street wearing an umbrella, you know? And that is, don't permit yourself to get so spooked about radiation that you don't run "Add to It" as a process. See, that would be the only danger.

Now, you can say this about anything. Preclear is exhausted. He hasn't got enough exhaustion. Preclear has got a cold. He hasn't got enough cold. Preclear has migraine headaches. Hasn't got enough migraine headaches.

You, right now, could be run on radiation sufficiently, putting it into the walls, to completely remedy your and your body's havingness of radiation. Nobody's tried this, but I'm sure from earlier tests and other things, that you could probably put your hand up in front of a stream of gamma rays that would ordinarily fry somebody, that it'd feel pleasantly warm. I think you could do this. That's not a tested thing. But there are many solutions in that particular line. All right.

See? Anything it is, it's just, at once, it's on this: Something has gotten scarce and the next step after getting scarce is for it to get valuable. Now, the mechanism of something getting valuable is, first, it must get scarce. And after that it becomes very, very, very valuable; and then it becomes so valuable it's rare, and when it becomes rare ... How many women have you seen with Kohinoor diamonds walking down the street in the last few minutes? None.

Now, in havingness in general, we have, in havingness, discovered something three years ago which we now drag out and add to: the Waste, Accept, Desire scale. The DEI Scale we call it: Desire, Enforce, Inhibit.

Well, you might even wonder if a Kohinoor diamond existed. And I'm sure there is many a girl who is very good looking who has reached this point of havingness about Kohinoor diamonds. I'm sure she kind of doubts that they exist. They're probably all cut glass. If you were to ask her suddenly about it, she'd probably answer in that wise there, "Oh, I - I don't see what's so good about them, you know, if they do exist." She's in an apathy on the subject.

Now, let's take a look at this old scale and let's get what will probably be the basic anatomy of running Havingness on Level One. Of course, we solve that present time problem by getting him to create problems of comparable magnitude and create other problems of comparable magnitude and more problems of comparable magnitude. And if he can't create, we make him lie about the problem, you see? Lying is the lower echelon of creation. And, we go at this rather easily so as not to knock out his havingness. That's importantwe no longer give an inventory. Got that? We no longer give one. Why?

And that's a very dangerous state for women to get into. If they got this way about diamonds, fur coats, Rolls-Royces, ten-pound notes - holy cats! Think of what would happen. The whole game of the society would just be gone. All right.

Because it as-ises too much energy and we may just run the fellow down enough in energy that he can't function in sessions to solve that present time problem, and then we're really - we've really had it, you see?

Now, as we look over, then, the subject of havingness, we must not ourselves, in trying to do something with the preclear, fall across this one. Just intellectually, if processing didn't measure up to it on ourselves, we would have to say, "All right. Well, we just kind of take this on face value and so forth: Barriers are not necessarily bad. Barriers are necessary and what's really happened to the preclear is, is he's run out of barriers and thus has run out of games, so he is now detesting barriers. And therefore, we will simply figure out some way to give him some more barriers."

Sometimes it's unprofitable to process somebody who is undergoing an emotional strain if you know the emotional strain will be at end in a few days. The best time to process him is when the strain is at end. Otherwise you just spend all the time working with a present time problem. Don't ever leave a present time problem half-solved, by the way, and say, "Well, that's good enough and we'll get on with it now."

Tell you an interesting process that comes along in this line. Just have the preclear start mocking up walls flat against his nose. I don't care what kind of walls - black walls or anything else, just have him mock up walls flat against his nose.

No, if this person's really under pressure with a present time problem, you know he'll go on the next twenty-five hours of auditing under the pressure of the remaining pressure of the present time problem. His attention then is being yanked off it. He's picking up somatics, and he's behaving strangely in session. And he shouldn't behave this way in session. It's just because you didn't thoroughly solve the present time problem, or another one arose during auditing which is too much for him to handle. And you handle it by getting him to invent problems of comparable magnitude, always standing by to remedy his havingness any crude way you can the moment he goes anaten or starts to jiggle. Something a little bit nervous, you know? He starts to go like this, you know, and says, "I don't - sure would like to have a cigarette, you know? Haven't we been at this long enough?" Well, listen, if he goes that far before you noticed it, you ought to be shot. No kidding.

This is one of these processes that can just go on and on and on with continuing cognition and so forth; the walls will get better, and better walls, and better walls, and he will be amazed because he will start protesting at once about these walls. He'll say, "Oh, I don't know. Up against my nose, isn't that awfully close for a wall?"

Auditor was running somebody the other day on spotting walls, a good auditor, and he was running a guy on spotting walls. And the fellow spotted a wall and a wall and a wall and all of a sudden the auditor was aware of the havingness cut-away. The fellow's hand as he pointed was beginning to shake a little bit. Just this much, you know? So, he ran it a couple of more commands just to make sure, and the fellow really started to get jittery then. In other words, he had looked and he had found the entering threshold of a reduction of havingness. He'd actually noticed it, and he could have remedied it easily if he'd remedied it right then. You understand? He could have remedied it easily. If he goes on to a point of where the fellow is twitching all over the place, the guy is practically out of control. It's very hard to remedy havingness when you get them that far.

So, we just get walls, walls, walls, walls, and more walls; and do we do anything with them? Nope. Nope. Just - the wall is there, just let it evaporate or stay there or do anything else. They don't care what you do with them. And just keep mocking up walls. Now, if we wanted to get a little fancier, we would have him waste walls for a while. This is what he's doing anyhow. He's wasting barriers, see?

Now, let's distinguish here, at once, between a repair and remedy of havingness. A repair of havingness is having him mock up and push it in. Push it into the body, push it into himself, we don't care what. It's "push in"repair.

Now, a wall, actually, is a highly special kind of barrier. But anybody recognizes - a preclear very often won't recognize a person as a communication terminal or something which will act as a backstop. You don't get a backstop, you see, in a communication terminal. He's fogged up about this; he thinks his communications go through them, he can't conceive it. But he knows more or less that if he did run against a wall and hit his head on it, that the wall would be there and his head would be there; there'd be an impact. He knows this, so you have him mock up walls and you capitalize on this amount of information.

Remedy of Havingness you run a mock-up and push it in, and mock up and throw it away until he can throw one away and be convinced that he has really thrown one away. Now, we say we've remedied havingness on that object. That's the difference between a repair and a remedy of havingness.

Well, you could have him waste them for a while if he couldn't even do that; and after a while, after you've asked him for ways to waste walls, you finally have him mock them up, he would be able to get them.

Quite important because if you keep pushing in, you'll restimulate the thetan's motivators - not the GE, he doesn't have any - the thetan's motivators. The thetan will get the feeling after a while like he's done something or he's guilty. That's just because things are being pushed in on him. See? So, you have to throw one away every once in a while; it makes him feel good. All right.

Now, a little bit fancier on the thing: You'd have him go over and feel the wall. But the funny part of it is, is they are very often so far downscale on the subject of the wall, that although they feel the wall, they are not sure of the wall. The moment they stop feeling the wall, they're merely looking at the wall, they say, "Ah, well, it's - like that; it's obviously a wall. If I walked over and ran into it, I guess I'd bump my head, I suppose, I don't know." You know, certainty.

Now, we enter into a scale - reaching way back there and picking up the old scale and remodeling it - right with the present time problem, preparing to remedy havingness at any time, with this scale. And we find for the remainder of Route One that this scale applies; and it's an interesting scale. And it starts with "possibly motivators." That's for the thetan, you see, "possibly motivators." That would be such a thing as ". . . a problem it could be to you," or something like that. But it's a shove-in proposition, or it starts with - you see, with anywith a different individual it could start with different things. But he's somewhere on this scale, and you're going to go up the scale, and then the scale itself has harmonics; it repeats itself. So, we don't care, we'll just give you the full scale, and you'll find him going through the various upper echelons of thisrepeating it, in other words.

Now there, as we go up the line, we would eventually have him get into the idea of terminals. And we would start having him waste and make communication terminals - one of the upper steps of SLP 7 - just mock up terminals. Mock up terminals. Mock up terminals.

Motivators. That's an inflow of some kind or another. You have him mock up things with the intention to kill him, or do something of this character. That's not absolutely necessary; we'll find that on the run somewhere. We'll find that condition.

If you had a preclear who was in terrible shape and you just ask him to mock up walls flat against his nose, why, he would get someplace. This is a certainty.

The next one up is Waste which we call today "sacrifice." We convert the whole idea of waste into sacrifice, see? All right.

Now, you want to know what those funny ridges he's got - what are these funny ridges he's got? He's got a ridge here, he's got another ridge here, and he has terrible pressures against his ears, and he complains about these things. What a nut. He complains about them. He's complaining about them, about having them, when as a matter of fact, he can't have them! Do you get the idea?

And the next one up the line on this is "possession of live havingness," again, an inflow. And the next one is quite interesting. It's one that we've never looked at before, but it's obviously there. And that's "What wouldn't you mind letting remain where it is?"

Now, that's what he's doing. And so therefore you say, "Put some more walls there." And when he first starts this he gets the basic impulse of the preclear. The preclear is in real bad shape, going to come in there and he knows just exactly what he's doing - he's going to make nothing out of everything. Nothing out of this and nothing out of that and nothing out of something else and nothing out of that and make nothing out of you, and he goes away and he makes nothing out of your bill. And if you just let him get away with this, he's going to stay in processing forever. But in view of the fact that he makes nothing out of your bill, too, what's the point?

And that is the stop between the inflow and the outflow. And that is a terrifically effective auditing question. A fabulous auditing question that was sitting right there, very observable in the action of inflow and outflow on havingness, but we just never used it. I just never noticed it.

So, pc's got a ridge. Conclusion: He hasn't got enough ridges. Pc's got a cold. He hasn't got enough colds. Pc's got a bum leg. He hasn't got enough bum legs. Pc's got some bad lungs. He hasn't got enough bad lungs.

"What wouldn't you mind having remain right where it is?" You know? Or just have him mock things up right where they are, and just let them stand right where they are. They don't go in, they don't go away; just mock them up. See, there's that interim step. And then the next is, "reject." "What could you dispense with?" And of course, the whole cycle can go all the way over again. Now, that's not smoothly stated nor smoothly worked out.

Now, when we were first studying havingness three years ago, I rather supposed that it was an interchange of energy which ran out the bad and left the good. Don't you see? This was a matched terminal affair. We had the preclear mock up a person with a cold out in front of him, you know? And we had him do this several times, and we considered that the cold discharged.

But this is smoothly worked out. And this is a process on havingness that you can't do without today: The way out is the way through. The way to be at liberty in this life is to be able to have or not have this life at will. To be able to have or not have bodies, space, environment, planets, mock-ups, anything. You get the idea?

That was not the action. I always stated that kind of cautiously to myself that it just didn't seem quite right because it was not quite workable, because the havingness reduced if we did that too much. If we put two people with colds facing each other, yes, the preclear's cold would get better, but his havingness would go down in some fashion or another. It was kind of mysterious.

Once you could have all these things or not have them at your own discretions you would be free, and so would your preclear be free. And this is a basic road to Clear. And it's simply this: "Look around this room and tell me what you could have." The individual spots those things he could have.

Well, the mystery of the thing has to do with just this one thing: We didn't have him mock up enough colds, and they weren't bad enough colds. We didn't have the cold really running and dripping, you know? No sonic in it: slurp!

When he has a lot of these or has - actually sure - you don't keep nagging him and unstabilizing him by saying, "You sure you could have that thing?" and so forth - but he's actually sure he could have most of the things in the room, you ask him what things he wouldn't mind having remain right where they are. And we can let everything sit that way. You next ask him what he could dispense with in the room. What he didn't have to have.

And if we actually have him mock up colds and shove them in on himself, and mock up colds and throw them away, and mock them up and shove them in, he'll eventually - if you have him throw away things and push them in and waste them, do anything with them at all, but mock them up and do something with them - he'll eventually get the idea, you know, "There are more colds in the world than this one. What do you know? Uh-huh." And he'll let go of it. It becomes less valuable.

Now, you could run that cycle and those three auditing questions over and over and over in sequence, you see? You flatten each one, flatten the next one, flatten the next one; then you can start with the next one - with the first one again and flatten it anew and flatten the second one anew and flatten the third one anew. But you will be going out into the outer universe.

Now, therefore, in the treatment of chronic somatics and psychosomatic illness, you've got an answer. It's a fantastic answer. The use of it is a lower echelon. "What problem could a cold be to you? Invent a problem a cold could be to you." Lower echelon. And to get a complete recession and cessation of it, you'd have to follow through with a Remedy of Havingness of colds. He hasn't got enough colds. Now, if you can do this, you can handle chronic somatics.

Now, I'll tell you how to keep from getting restimulated. I told you the other evening, I'm going to tell you again because this is the hottest thing that's ever happened as far as an auditor is concerned. He's a little bit leery of his preclear; that's because he can't have his preclear. If he finds himself getting restimulated by a preclear, all he has to do is look at that preclear and little by little on a gradient scale find out what part of that preclear he could have. What part of that preclear he could have remain the way it is, and what part of that preclear he could throw away.

Now, the reason a guy is stuck in a body, obviously, is because he hasn't got enough bodies. He's not running eight or nine, he's only running one. And he gets the idea very easily that he doesn't have enough bodies. Obviously, the answer is, "What body could you have?"

And the odd part of it is, when he's done this drill, all he has to do is change his mind sometimes and the preclear suddenly gets well. So, that's not just the road to Clear, that's the road to being Christ.

Remedy his havingness with it. Ask him again, "What body could you have?" And he tells you, "Well, I don't know, a duck's body maybe." Remedy his havingness with it. You don't care what it is. And remember that the end of a Remedy of Havingness is being able to throw one away. He throws one away and knows it, why, that's the end of the Remedy of Havingness. All right.

Well, anyhow, you get this - the essence of the steps I've been giving you on Level One. That a person must be willing to have, to let remain, to throw away; and if he can do these things, why, he's going to have an awful easy time of it.

Therefore, as we look over this general situation, we discover that we must bring our preclear into a possession of a great deal more of the physical universe than he has. So regardless of the subjective remedies, we've got to get him into a physical universe remedy, too. And the way we do that, we ask him, "Look around here. What could you have?"

Your preclears are obsessively pulling in, obsessively flowing away, or they're obsessively stuck. So, we solve all these things with various drills and other commands which we'll write down in due course; but you solve all these problems of havingness in Level One. If you've got anything left to audit, then you go ahead with the remaining steps of SLP.

We don't let him do it subjectively. You make him do it with his eyes wide-open, "Look around here, what will you have?" And you, if you're retreating from him, look at the preclear and find out what you can have about him.

Okay?

This is, in essence, auditing - where she is going and how she is done.

Audience: Yes. Got it.

I hope these principles about havingness can assist you a great deal. There are too many preclears around still making nothing out of everything. It's easy to get them over this - just boot them up so they can have something.

All right.

If they make nothing out of everything, they can't have anything. Those two remarks go together. If they've got something and are holding on to it, they haven't got enough of it. If they haven't got anything at all, they haven't got enough of that either. Abundance of terminal is the answer.

Thank you very much.

Thank you very much.

Audience: Thank you.

Thank you very much.

Thank you.