LRH: The main reason for this demonstration is the rocket reads. We are very, very interested in how they are doing in the Z Unit and we want to see some items fire, that's what we're mainly interested in. And see how precise their sessioning is. That's our main worry. Now, I don't know - nod, auditor, if you've got your earphones on.

And we'll have a rundown now on these demonstrations.

Auditor: Yes, coming. Coming up. All right.

Well, now, the first session you saw there was - there was a lot of noise and confusion and upset right there at the start. That was a very messy session start. The proper sequence of a session start does not include upsetting the pc. If you want to get a rocket read, keep the pc calm, show him pictures of pretty girls, smooth him out. But don't start banging cans around and so forth.

LRH: All right. Now, what we want is simply to get the session started and just see some rocket reads.

What you do, is you adjust the pc's chair, you clear the room with the pc, you say it’s all right to audit in this room, you don't meter that, and then you get a can squeeze, and then you put in the well - known R - factor and then you start the session. And that sequence is never varied.

Auditor: Good. Thank you.

Now, as far as the meter reading is concerned here, you called a clean on an equivocal read. Auditor did that a couple of times, and of course the next time you call it, it's very often wrong. Now, I notice that you're doing something here which is quite interesting to me and which I myself abandoned some long time ago. It runs like this: You say, "On this list, has anything been suppressed?" Bang, you see. "On this list has anything been suppressed?" Finally the pc says, "No." And you say, "All right, I will check that on the meter," and you check it on the meter, if you get a read, you ask the pc again.

LRH: All right.

Now, the way you're doing it is a way that - I know you haven't been told this, so it's not your fault - for once it's not your fault. I mean, you want to mark this day down as the - a golden day in the history of the Briefing Course, because today we have found something that wasn't your fault, it was my fault. Of course I'm getting Clear, now, you see, and, already first - goal Clear, practically second - goal Clear, so you see I can afford the tremendous majesty of being wrong! You can't afford that yet, see. So this wasn't your fault.

Auditor: All right, Allen. What we are going to do is, we are going to check out your last item again and see that we get a rocket read on it and I am going to prepcheck it for three buttons. Okay?

But the actual right way to do this, so as not to upset the pc, is simply to repetitive, repetitive, repetitive, repetitive until he says no, and then say, "All right, I will check it on the meter," take it over to the meter, and stay on the meter. Don't go off on to repetitive again.

PC: Yeah.

You see, you've got repetitive rudiments mixed up with Prepchecking.

Auditor: Good. Going to plug you in. Please squeeze the cans. All right. Please squeeze the cans. Okay. And again. Thank you very much. There is a third-of-a-dial drop at sensitivity 3 at 2.0 tone arm.

Now, you ordinarily can expect over a long period of time in a Problems Intensive, something like that - you can expect a great deal of this kind of nonsense, you see. You can expect the pc to have a brand - new stream of answers and so forth.

PC: Thank you.

So when you prepcheck, as you would be doing in the Y Unit, why, for sure, go back and say, "All right, anything been suppressed, been suppressed, been suppressed, been suppressed, I'll check that on the meter," check it on the meter, still dirty, "All right, come off of it, been suppressed, been suppressed, been suppressed," check it on the meter, and so forth. Because you've got tons of answers back of this kind of thing.

Auditor: Good. Is it all right if I start this demonstration now?

But not - not when you're running him on rudiments. When you say, "been suppressed," and he said no, you say, "All right, I'll check that on the meter," and just ride it with the meter from there on out, from there on out it's a fast check. You see? That will make life much simpler to you. And it'll save you a lot of auditing time, and it'll save you all of this nonsense about reads and not reads, and you'll stay with the meter and it'll upset you less. And I think you'll find out that's a very good way to handle it.

PC: Yep.

Now, this auditor - I hope you don't mind my mentioning this - actually you look like a bundle of nerves on - on there. Your presence, smooth it out, man, smooth it out. Get those overts off, or something like that, because an auditor should look smooth and calm and inspire a great calm in the pc, do you see? That's much to be desired. And, work on your auditor presence there a little bit and get your overts off on this, that and the other thing and you'll be doing better. Okay.? No offense meant, I'm just trying to help you be a good auditor.

Auditor: Good. Start of demonstration. Has it started for you?

Now, the reason the item didn't fire here, probably, was because the goal wasn't firing. Now, the - if a goal isn't firing, the item fires rather poorly. And while it is true that if a goal is firing badly, or not at all, you get reads on the list and can check out RIs and that sort of thing. Actually when the goal is not firing at all, the read is vastly inhibited. And, that doesn't say that if the goal isn't firing you won't get a read on an RI, you understand, because you could actually have a read on an RI with a goal not firing. But if you want to speed up this fire on the RI and have your list fire better and so forth, keep your goal cleaned up.

PC: Yep.

Now, in actual fact, in 3M the goal starts in, fires very sporadically at first, and then starts firing beautifully, oh, gorgeously. Big stuff. And then goes into one rocket read and two rock slams, and three rock slams, and two rocket reads and one rock slam. You understand? Rock slam gets mixed up in this, you tiger drill it a bit, put in your big mid ruds, actually, on it, which is much better to make a goal read, and you'll find out those rock slams turn back into rocket reads again.

Auditor: Very good. What goals would you like to set for this demonstration?

Now, you go a little bit further and the goal will start rocket reading again. Pow, pow, pow, it's reading fine, providing your listing is all right and not backwards and upside down. And the setup here, in brief, is that a goal goes from very, very hard to make it fire - a lot of prepchecking and so forth, and it reads and then it's - pc sneezes and it doesn't read, and so forth - into bad read on the list but reading a bit better, reading more consistently - you’re not paying attention to the goal, don't you see, but keep listing items, not wrong way to items and so forth, but right way to items, your goal will fire better and better, and better and then finally turns into rock slam, and in - versus, rock slam one time, rocket read - that's in the same call - YOU see. "To be a catfish" - rock slam, "To be a catfish" - rocket read, "To be a catfish" - rock slam. That goes from that phase, the chrysalis phase of the goal - it goes from there on down to fires well and then it begins to fire early and late.

PC: To get the item firing.

You say, "To be a. . ." rocket read " . . . catfish," you see. "To be a catfish" rocket read, you see. It starts firing way offbeat. That's by the time you've gotten three - quarters of its items off of it. And then when you've finally moved down to the line, your goal starts firing automatically, and you'll find some item sometime, and that goal, particularly the first goal, starts going pow, pow, pow, pow, and your tone arm is coming down, and you're not even saying it. Just - the meter is just rocket reading itself on down.

Auditor: Very good. Any other goal?

Very interesting phenomenon, and it goes from there into no read at all, and that doesn't mean all the items are off of it. You find one more item, and the goal rocket reads, and then doesn't rocket read, and you'll find maybe one more item, or patching up the line plot, and for a moment the goal rocket reads, and then after that it is dead, you can't get anything out of it with a whip. There's nothing, nothing there.

PC: Well, to be willing to look at anything that comes up.

And, speaking about getting something out of a goal with a whip, let's take up this next session. Now, May is - you're much better these days. I - your auditor presence is much better and fine. I'd cure myself of this glasses trick, if I were you. You can't hypnotize him with those shiny lenses, you know? I know you're probably - got some kind of a glass that you can't see the pc well, but it's a mannerism you can do without.

Auditor: Good. Okay, Allen. Now, your tone arm is now exactly where it was this morning so I am not going to put any mid ruds in. I'll go straight in on the item, prepchecking it. All right.

All right. Now, this goal that was being checked out on Dick, has rocket read a couple of times, and is actually just being in the process of being prepchecked and checked out, and a goal in that queasy a condition probably is in no state to be shown on TV, so once more we didn't get a rocket read.

On this item "a feeling person," has anything been suppressed?

Now, I won't say the goal is it or isn't it, but I notice, with some horror, looking over this pc's 2 - 12 history, that the dance that was being played was to find an - write a list, and abandon it. And write a list, and abandon it, and write a list and abandon it. I don't know how many of this - times this has been done, but it'd been done - almost - something ridiculous, like about twenty times, something like that. And then they finally found an item, finally found an item, "Who would oppose being Clear?" something like that, and it did beautifully! Let's see, what's that item? Give me that list over there.

PC: Not that I know of.

Female voice: It's, 'A person who wants to do the right thing."

Auditor: Okay. Very good. I'll check that on the meter. On this item "a feeling person," has anything been suppressed? There's a read, what was it? There. There. There.

Yeah, the item was, "A person who wants to do the right thing." And I think after they listed 8,765 pages, they decided the pc was turning black, so they didn't do anything about it. Well, that's an exaggeration, they only listed 20 or 30 pages, you see. Pure idiocy! I mean, you'd get the last R/S you see on the list, and you go 50 items beyond it, and if your tone arm is flat during that period, or if it isn't flat, just that - that's it, take it!

PC: Well, I suppressed thinking about it. Suppressed doing any self-auditing on it.

Now, that actually should be completed on this pc. That thing is - should be packaged up. Now, if you can't find the R/S, the item on that oppose list to this, or this opposing, well do it the other - other way to, and find the item which opposes it. Because I see, very peculiarly, that the goal is being checked is, "To be right," and the item here is "A person who wants to do the right thing." I think they're so mixed up that you're going to have an awful time trying to check the thing out. So I think you ought to get a four - way package on that pc, and then check out the goal, that's the easy way to do it.

Auditor: All right. Thank you. On this item "a feeling person," has anything been suppressed?

Now, if you can get the - an oppterm, a proper and correct oppterm, you can actually list goals against this oppterm the way we were doing it with 3GA Criss Cross. "If that were..." "If you were the oppterm, why, what goal couldn't you have?" And you'll come up with that pc's goal like that. Those are trick ways of finding goals.

PC: Well, there's a few somatics and a bit of a headache come on. It's been ever since we worked out the heading of the question. I sort of would like to list. That's about all.

However, you still apparently could keep on listing. This goals list is only about a thousand long, and you could go right on listing this goals list from there on, watching your meter very carefully, and you would see that some goal would fire on the thing. There have been RRs on the goals list, in spite of all that.

Auditor: All right. Thank you. I'll check that on the meter. On this item "a feeling person," has anything been suppressed? Id like to check that again, I am not quite sure about it. On this item "a feeling person," has anything been suppressed? There is another read, what was it? There. There.

Now, what I was getting around to is you can't make a rocket read read better by shouting the goal to the pc. This must be in a calm, even tone of voice. You don't want - honest, the meter doesn't respond better, the louder! As a matter of fact, quite the contrary. Look over your Effect Scale. And if you say the item in a normal tone of voice, you're much more likely to get a read. So, don't say it in a conversational tone of voice, say it in a crisp tone of voice. Like, "To be a catfish. To be a catfish." Now, this is something that auditors do that I'd better call to your attention. They say, "To be catfish." Didn't read, you see. So, then they say - they say, "To be a catfish!" And that didn't read either. "To be a catfish!"

PC: Yeah. Well, when you started you went straight into the Prepcheck, I wondered if you were going to try and find out if it would read or not, so I don't know whether it's reading or what it's doing.

You know? I caught myself doing it once, and I thought I'd better warn you. I didn't do it again, so you don't have to either. But there is no point in calling the goal louder, it won't make the read come on better. So on.

Auditor: All right, thank you. On this item "a feeling person," has anything been suppressed?

Well, I think May is doing fine, there. I think the pc - I think the pc, with all those lists - how do you survive them? But anyway, they've got a fine item there, and all it needs is to be opposed and a four - way package run on the thing and the pc will feel fine. As far as rocket reads are concerned, as I say, you could go right on with the list and list the things out.

PC: Just items that oppose it. I've tried not to look at them but you gave me the question and it's - so I am trapped into keeping them away from me.

Now we come to this last session and aside from a missed suppressed read, and a couple of other things like that, Peter's auditor's presence there is very good, he has very good control of it, and so forth; I think he did fine. I have actually no comment to make beyond a couple of fluky reads, on the auditor's auditing.

Auditor: Okay, thank you. On this item "a feeling person," has anything been suppressed?

But I do have a great deal to say about how he didn't get a rocket read on this one! Now, he didn't get a rocket read on this one because - well, the pc is listening to this so I - I'll ask the rest of you to listen and I'll only talk over on the right side of the room, all right? Your - the right side of your room there. I'm only going to talk over there, and then the pc, he can listen over on your left! All right?

PC: No.

Now, this pc has done a sales talk, apparently, and everything that comes up - he was even bringing it up in the lecture tonight - I mean in the demonstration - he has a whole stream of oppterms here which are all the baddies. There isn't a single creditable oppterm, from the top to the bottom. And all of his terminals here are all creditable.

Auditor: Good. I'll check that on the meter. On this item "a feeling person," has anything been suppressed? Id like to check that again. It was equivocal. On this item "a feeling person," has anything been suppressed? There's another read, what was it? There.

You mean that pc's goal never deteriorated, is that what we're trying to say here? And of course that goal won't read. There's at least two or three of these items - one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine, ten - ten items, perhaps as many as five of them been listed backwards. And that's very, very certain to knock the goal out.

PC: Well, the opposition to it has been suppressed.

Now, the way - the way you straighten up a line plot like this, you've got over here on the original line plot the oppterms, baddie, the terminal, good. Bad oppterm, terminal good. Bad oppterm, you get the idea? Now, the pc of course wants to keep up his social caste. And so, naturally, he will try to give you an offbeat on that kind of thing. But in actual fact, he's doing himself in. You don't care, really, about the significance of things, but you can take one of these line plots. You can take one of these things and look it over and find out why the case is blowing up. And it's blowing up because at the top of your line plot, on the terminal, you have at the beginning of one of these things, at the top, it comes right on down the line from discreditable, halfway down the plot, sort of neutral, and all the way down at the bottom, very germane to the goal. Very germane.

Auditor: Thank you. On this item has anything been suppressed?

Quite opposite at the top of the terminals list, you see. Not germane to the goal. And that's the way it goes. That's the cycle. It starts in from degraded. . . Some fellow the other day, picked up the high - toned one and said well it was really degraded; the auditor bought it. Auditor evidently doesn't believe in the mechanical test that you make. Mechanical tests are what's important. This is what you do as an Instructor when you're looking these things over. You just make your mechanical tests each time, and you'll be there. Your mechanical tests consist of reading the line question, one way oppose and then the other way oppose. Read it one way three times, read it the other way three times, see which one turns on the most mass or so forth. The one that turned on the most upset isn't it.

PC: Just opposition items.

Now, on the oppterm side you get the exact reverse cycle. You get a high-toned oppterm as your first oppterm and then that dwindles down halfway down the list, to maybe ten oppterms later, or something like that. That is turned into a very opposite thing to the goal. It's now completely opposite to the goal. So, and in the middle ground there, why, maybe five, six oppterms from the top of the plot, and you will find that it's a neutral thing. So you have a sort of a neutral versus a neutral there in the middle of the graph, and then it goes down and it becomes very opposite to the goal. Not necessarily degraded.

Auditor: Good. Sorry, did I chop you there?

One shouldn't use the idea of degraded terminal if you don't understand it. It is - it is the idea of a counter - button, really. It's counter to the goal's sense and meaning. That's what we get. Now, that's what's wrong with that pc and that's why you didn't see that, but of course he was reading an item that had already been listed.

PC: No.

Just take up this last item here. This thing will have to be straightened out and this auditor has only one fault, and some of you don't tell him I said this, don't tell him I said this, because I'll leave that up to somebody screaming it in his ear with a foghorn one of these days. He just won't list twenty - five items beyond the last R/S or RR. And also he's having an awful hard time telling whether something rocket read or not. And, looky here, now, now ...

Auditor: All right, Allen. On this item "a feeling person," has anything been suppressed?

I'm going to show you something right here. Now, looky here. We're going to take a piece of paper here, don't you see? And we're going to lay it along side of the E - Meter, you understand? You can pretend this is an E - Meter and you're looking at the back of it. And here's the auditor and here's the piece of paper. Now, do you see that piece of paper's closer to you and here it is back here on my side. You understand? And as your E - Meter sits there, you can go ahead and monitor the tone arm here, and you can also bring this hand across, and you can slide that up, don't you see? You slide that up. But right close to this meter, you understand? Close to the meter.

PC: No.

Don't pull this one: This really is not proper. Because your face gets so far away - gets so far away from the meter face that you can't see it. Now, here is what the HPA aspirant, in the course, in Darwin - this is the way he does it: He comes over here, and he's got the E - Meter over here, see. So he looks over here and he looks over here, and he lists over here, and he looks back here, and so forth. In other words - too far apart. The way you want that is that paper - bang! See, you understand? Right there, up against that meter. You see that? And slide it up as you go. And you'll find your eye, you 3ee your eye course here, is looking right straight across that meter face, right across the meter face.

Auditor: Good. I'll check that on the meter. On this item "a feeling person," has anything been suppressed? There's another read. There.

And you're - you're always writing with the meter face - you understand, your paper moves up, not your pencil down, you understand. You move your paper up. And in that way you get yourself a sight across the meter face.

PC: Well, that's some of the games conditions I have played with this item and its opposition. That's about all.

Now, you try that the next time you're auditing, and you'll be - you'll be much better off. I know you can't see something like that, you can't - you can't see anything better than this, you can't see anything with that meter downstairs, because of course the meter's way out in front of somebody and a person is listing this way. It's perfectly all right. The meter has to be placed that way so that you can see the meter. And the only way you could do that is get the meter propped up and slide this paper underneath the corner of it and keep it going forward. You could do something like that.

Auditor: Thank you. I'll check that on the meter. On this item "a feeling person," has anything been suppressed? There's another read, what was it?

But look at - look at the point. As long as you have a meter face over here and your list over here, see, here you are on your list and you say, "lawp, dwa, raw, wy, daw zaw - well, I missed that one, so here's a question mark RR and is it something happened there, and I can't quite see it . . ." and so forth, so, question mark, question mark.

PC: Well. . .

Oh, you're not going to get anyplace, man! Keep that together. And this is wrong, in front of the meter here, that's wrong, don't bother with that. Get it right over here at the side.

Auditor: There.

I've been watching an expert do it that way, so I know it works; I myself have been doing it that way. And by the way, by the way, just to give you another good point here, you have some trouble with this colliding with this corner, because that's flat on the table. And you know these rubber feet, that come on the bottom of the meter - if you'll screw one of those rubber feet down here at the lower edge of the meter, the meter tips up and leaves a gap - see? There's a little bit - gap left in there, and your paper can shove up through the gap. You got the idea? Pretty good.

PC: . . . I sort of cognited today that I have now got my goal and I've sort of gone over the hump. And my items are no longer going to be - like the terminal side, are going to be so degrading as they were earlier. They're getting better.

No, you've got to keep your eye in line with that meter face, while you're writing. If you don't you have all of these other difficulties and you've got to go fifty beyond your last R/S, I don't care if the tone arm is what you call flat or not. It - you've got to go at least fifty, you've got to go twenty - five beyond those RRs and fifty beyond the last RR or R/S, on the source list. And you've just got to do that. You'll continue to lay eggs if you don't do that.

Auditor: All right, Allen. Thank you. On this item, has anything been suppressed?

I notice on - that two RRs gave a tiny read. Now, please! What does that tell you? It tells you the list is incomplete. All right, he comes back later and tries to complete the list. But in actual fact, there is a question mark RR here, a question mark RR on this list, which is ...

PC: No.

Female voice: Twenty.

Auditor: Good. I'll check that on the meter. On this item "a feeling person," has anything been suppressed? That was equivocal, I'll check it again. On this item, has anything been suppressed? There's another read on there. What was it? There.

Only twenty items from the end where the pc - where the auditor stopped listing and then he continued the list and, of course, the tone arm now is high on a continued list and that sort of thing.

LRH: Ask him if he is protesting that.

I don't believe the pc's very much in - session. I should think the pc would be getting his head knocked off with all of these things backwards.

Auditor: Yeah.

You know, as a pc, you ought to - any one of you as a pc, where it comes to these items, don't get so socially conscious and go out on a big sell. It's what the auditor says it is, and you just answer up to the tests and you'll do much, much better. We got two auditors as pcs out in the Z Unit who always march forward to the hard sell. The second an item comes up we've got a hard sell going. They hire Batten, Barton, Durstine and Osborn to sell this item, and so forth. We got another pc out there, that it doesn't matter where it occurs, and if it RRs, why, apparently it's some other thing on the list. Well, the auditor, of course, sensibly takes the read and carries on and he'll probably find out that there's an item which is doing this.

Are you protesting the question, Allen?

That's beside the point. Now, we didn't see any RRs tonight. Why? Well, you're just not going by the rules. The middle one, we can't expect that, because the middle session - middle demonstration, because the goal had not been found. The goal was being interfered with with the item. Perhaps if that item were tiger drilled it might rocket read and she'd be away without a goal, you understand? If she's getting an occasional rocket read out of this all she might have to do is just tiger drill that R/S that was found and it will subside to a rocket read, and she is away. And she can do two or three - she can do two or three items there and then ask the pc what his goal is and she'll get it.

PC: Yeah, I'm having a bit of trouble seeing anything on it.

But the point I'm making here - the point I'm making here is your RRs aren't coming on, not because your rudiments are out, but because you're not following close enough in on the laws of Routine 3M. That's all there is to it. Well, let me tell you, if after you've got a half a dozen items - you haven't got a rocket read, oh man, if you haven't got a rocket read two or three inches long after you've got two or three packages off of one of these goals, u ought to quit.

Auditor: I didn't get that.

The best way in the world to make a goal read is to get three right way to listed packages all going off according to the clock and then go back and read your goal. You'll be surprised. You haven't done it - tiger drilled it at all - you call it and it goes bang.

PC: I am having trouble seeing anything on it.

Well, I've taken a look here, and none of you have seen a rocket read. I meant to demonstrate one, so I said to Suzie, I said, "Would you like to go down and put me there in the pc's chair and read my last item up?" Of course, you're not going to get a - you're not going to get a rocket read on something that's been listed down. But, the last item I had doesn't happen to have been listed and it's about that long and it's one of these pow rocket reads. Most of my rocket reads on the second goal look like something that should be sent down to Cape Canaveral so that they can get their rocket program off the launching pad. Because your meter really starts functioning when you come out of the first goal area.

Auditor: Okay. Good. I'll check it again now. On this item "a feeling person," has anything been suppressed? There is another read, what was it? There.

All right. Well, I thought your auditing was pretty good and nothing detrimental can be said about the auditing that has been done by this auditor on this pc. But the other two are simply suffering from just not being steered in the right direction with 3M - not going according to the rules.

PC: Well, I think I - I'm suppressing. Yeah, it is a protest. I protest about messing about with any of these items.

Now, it took me about 150 hours so I could run something that vaguely looked like this - included all of the pilot work on Routine 2. And I really wasn't feeling comfortable about knowing how to run it until I'd done that much auditing on it.

Auditor: All right.

Now, I allow you a certain leeway. I allow you a certain amount of fumble. But what I want to see is less fumble day by day and more accuracy day by day. And if I don't see some improvement I'll come to the conclusion that you're your own best oppterm.

PC: Just want to go straight on and oppose them.

All I want to see is an improvement in what you're doing. And I think we can see that. If you don't understand 3M better on Wednesday than you did on Monday, and if you don't look and sound like a better auditor on Friday than you did on Wednesday, or getting more done, then I'd say you were wound up in some hopeless confusion back on the line someplace and you didn't know what you were doing in the first place and you better get your checksheets passed. Because your progress as an auditor ought to be fairly rapid and you're not going to have anything shifting under your feet now. So there isn't much reason to do other than have good progress as an auditor.

Auditor: All right. Now, I don't quite get what is the suppression here?

Now, you'll run into problems as an auditor, problems of getting on an R/S which has disappeared. Now, that's a tough problem. I'm fighting that problem. All R/S to no R/S, you know, that kind of a - of a - of an action. And you have to get back and settle it and square it up. But it can be done and I expect that you'll hit these difficulties and carry on. But where you have a pc's goal and where you are finding items, honest, it's the most easy, certain, mechanical job you can do. And you just should be going on pocketa - pocketa - pocketa, and tonight I should have seen in two of those sessions all kinds of rocket reads. So I know that your Routine 3 is being done with a big fumble.

PC: I was suppressing the protest.

Now, get on the ball, learn how to do it, straighten it out, and you'll have pcs firing off as though they're being sent to the moon. As far as the quality of the auditing is concerned, as can be expected in Z Unit, the quality of the auditing is very good. I have no fault to find with it.

Auditor: Good. Thank you. On this item, has anything been suppressed?

All right? There is your demonstration and thank you very, very much and let's give the auditors a big hand.

PC: No.

Thank you. Now, let's give the pcs a big hand.

Auditor: Good. I'll check that on the meter. On this item "a feeling person," has anything been suppressed? There's another read, what was it? There.

Thank you.

PC: The exact opposition to it.

All right. So here we are, that's the end of our Wednesday night demonstration, and good night, and see you tomorrow.

Auditor: Thank you. On this item, has anything been suppressed?

PC: No.

Auditor: Good. I'll check that. On this item "a feeling person," has anything been suppressed? I'd like to check it again. On this item, has anything been suppressed? There's another read, Allen, what was it? There. There. There.

PC: That's not so much on the item, but it's the suppression on - uh - we had such a terrific session today. I sort of suppressed writing a letter to Mary Sue and thanking her for pointing out the point where we went wrong yesterday.

Auditor: All right. Thank you. On this item, has anything been suppressed?

PC: No.

Auditor: Good. I'll check that. On this item "a feeling person," has anything been suppressed? Do you agree that's clean?

PC: Yes.

Auditor: Very good. All right. Here's the next button. On this item "a feeling person," is there anything you have been careful of?

PC: Yeah. Not to go onto any audit on it. Not to think about the item. Not to try and do anything with it - just have the item as it is.

Auditor: All right. Thank you. On this item, is there anything you have been careful of ?

PC: Hm. Wondering about it.

Auditor: Good. On this item "a feeling person," is there anything you have been careful of?

PC: Talking about it. Actually, I had practically forgotten it until the session again tonight.

Auditor: Okay. Now, Allen, I don't quite get what the thing that you have been careful of.

PC: Well, I have been careful not to talk about it and I've been - the item - you forget your items very easy, as they blow.

Auditor: All right. Thank you. Oh, sorry, did I chop you here?

PC: No, I was just going to say that the main thing is I am careful not to talk about them too much.

Auditor: All right.

PC: That's all.

Auditor: Good, thank you. I'll check that on the meter then. On this item "a feeling person," is there anything you have been careful of ? Do you agree that's clean?

PC: Yep.

Auditor: Good. Very good. On this item "a careful person," is there anything you have failed to reveal?

PC: Well, it's not so much on the item but it's part of it. Uh - my goal is - one was just to be the first person completely cleared on 3MX. And after dinner I think I will be.

Auditor: Okay.

PC: That's about all I've failed to reveal.

Auditor: All right, thank you. I'll check that on the meter. On this item "a feeling person," is there anything you have failed to reveal? There's a read on there, what was it?

PC: Opposition items. That's all.

Auditor: Thank you. I'll check that on the meter. On this item "a feeling person," is there anything you have failed to reveal?- I'd like to check that again; I'm not sure about the read. On this item "a feeling person," is there anything you have failed to reveal? You agree that's clean?

PC: Yeah.

Auditor: Good. A feeling person. A feeling person. A feeling person. A feeling person. All right. I had one rocket read here, I just want to give it to you.

LRH: There was no rocket read on that.

Auditor: All right.

LRH: That item is not firing, so run through and get the item to fire any way you can.

Auditor: All right, good. Ron said the item wasn't firing so we go through the buttons again.

LRH: There was no rocket read on that, don't - don't be . . .

PC: All right!

Auditor: All right. I have a bit of difficulties here.

LRH: That thing didn't fire at all. It didn't even have a click on it. There is something wrong with this line plot.

Auditor: All right. I am going again through the buttons.

PC: Mm-hm.

Auditor: On this item "'a feeling person," is there anything you have suppressed?

PC: Oh, really confronting the item.

Auditor: Good. On - on this item "a feeling person," is there anything you have suppressed?

PC: Well, being a feeling person. I haven't - I'm sort of not being the item, not that I know of. Not really looking at it. Just answering the - sort of being exterior to it. Looking at the item myself. That's all.

Auditor: Thank you. I'll check that on the meter. On this item "a feeling person," is there anything you have suppressed? Allen, I want to check that again.

PC: Mm-hm.

Auditor: On this item "a feeling person," is there anything you have suppressed? That's clean. On this item "a feeling person," is there anything you have been careful of ? I'm asking you.

PC: Hm. I'm just trying to look.

Auditor: Good.

PC: I'm careful to look. Careful to give up anything that's on it. I am still careful not to try - ah - bring up any other items - the opposition items to it. And you started me more or less on the list of it when you worked out the question. That's all.

Auditor: Thank you.

LRH: You've got to get right-hand buttons too, you know.

Auditor: All right. I am going - I'm going to check the right-hand buttons too.

PC: Mm-hm.

Auditor: On this item "a feeling person," is there anything you have invalidated?

PC: As far as I know you just checked Careful of and never checked it on the meter, huh? I just invalidated that.

Auditor: All right.

PC: That's all.

Auditor: All right. Thank you. On this item "a careful person," is there anything you have invalidated?

PC: No. Not that I know of.

Auditor: Good. I'll check that on the meter. On this item "a careful person," is there anything you have invalidated?

PC: Yeah. You are calling the wrong item. It's "a feeling person - "

Auditor: I am sorry, Allen, I gave you the wrong item here, I goofed here. I am giving it to you correctly. On this item "a feeling person," is there anything you have invalidated? There's a read, what was it?

PC: Oh, invalidating having my attention taken back to this item now that it has gone onto the other list. That's about all.

Auditor: Thank you. I'll check that. On this item "a feeling person," is there anything you have invalidated? That's clean. On this item "a feeling person," is there anything you have suggested?

PC: Well, I just suggested that you didn't clean the Careful of button up and I also suggested you were calling the wrong item.

Auditor: All right. Thank you. On this item "a feeling person," is there anything you have suggested?

PC: No.

Auditor: Good. I'll check that on the meter. On this item "a feeling person," is there anything you have suggested? There's a read, what was it?

PC: I think - my attention went out there when Reg opened the door.

Auditor: Okay. I'll give it to you again. On this item "a feeling person," is there anything you have suggested?

PC: No.

Auditor: Good. I'll check that on the meter. On this item "a feeling person," is there anything you have suggested? There's a read, what was it? There.

PC: Well, I suggested - when the item was called out to me, I suggested it was my item. Ah - when Brian checked it. And I also cognited that "an ironic person" is the one that opposes it and I thought, "Well, what's the use of being ironic if you don't have anyone's feeling to hurt?" That's all.

Auditor: All right. Thank you. I'll check that. On this item "a feeling person," is there anything you have suggested? Td like to check it again. On this item "a feeling person," is there anything you have suggested? There's another read. What was it? There. There. There.

PC: Well, yeah. It's not so much on that item but there's two oppterm items missing off my line plot. And I have been suggesting for two days now that the - one of them is "a decent person" and the other one is "a mediocre person" and I felt they had been bypassed.

Auditor: All right. On this item "'a feeling person," is there anything you have suggested?

PC: No.

Auditor: Good. I'll check that. Is there any protest going, Allen?

PC: No.

Auditor: Good. On this item "a feeling person," is there anything you have suggested? There's another read, what was it? There. There. There. There.

PC: That's ah - well, those last two items - I've now suggested it out loud that ah - the 've been bypassed, so I y have told everyone about it now.

Auditor: Okay. Thank you. I'll check that on the meter. On this item "'a feeling person," has anything been suggested? There's another read, what was it?

PC: Well, when Ron said there was no rocket read on that - uh - it's a sort of a suggestion that that's not the right item.

Auditor: Okay.

PC: And I disagree with that.

Auditor: Thank you. On this item, has anything been suggested?

PC: No.

Auditor: Good. I'll check that on the meter. On this item "a feeling person," has anything been suggested? There's another read, what was it? There. That.

LRH: The right-hand buttons, by the way, are not done repetitive.

Auditor: There.

PC: Yeah, well, when you called the item out when it first came up in the lists, that was the last thing I thought the item would have been. So when you called it, of course, it suggests that that's the item. And that - that's the only suggestion I could think of there.

Auditor: All right. Thank you. I'll check that on the meter. On this item, has anything been suggested? I'll have to check it again. On this item "a feeling person," has anything been suggested? That's clean. A feeling

person. A feeling person. All right. On this item, has any mistake been made? There's a read, what was it? There.

PC: I am having trouble confronting the item as my attention is on the other list. So that's all.

Auditor: Uh - I don't quite get what uh - you mean by the other list.

PC: You started the list running on me when you asked me, "Who or what would oppose a feeling person," I think it was.

Auditor: Mm-hm.

PC: And I sort of have trouble jerking my attention back to look at the item "a feeling person."

Auditor: Okay.

PC: And that's a sort of mistake, I feel.

Auditor: All right Allen, thank you. On this item, has any mistake been made? There's a read, what was it? There. There.

PC: Yeah. You never cleaned the Careful of button.

Auditor: All right, thank you. On this item "a feeling person," has an mistake y been made? There's another read. There.

PC: Mm. When you said there's a rocket read there, there wasn't one there. That was a mistake.

Auditor: Thank you. I'll check that on the meter. On this item, has any mistake been made? There's another read here. There. There.

PC: I think it's a mistake to mess around with them once they've been checked.

Auditor: Okay. Thank you. I'll check that on the meter. Now, Allen, before that - before I check that, is there any protest going?

PC: No.

Auditor: Good. Thank you. I'll check that now. On this item "'a feeling person," has any mistake been made? There's another read. What was it? There.

PC: The more you quote it the more my head aches or the somatic on my nose gets heavier and the mass seems to move in on me.

Auditor: Mm-hm.

PC: That's all. And so it's a mistake sort of, I feel, prepchecking this item. It is not making me feel better, it's making me feel a bit sicker.

Auditor: All right, Allen, thank you. On this item "a feeling person," has any mistake been made? Do you agree that's clean?

PC: Yes.

Auditor: Good. A feeling person. A feeling person. A feeling person. On this item, is there anything you have been anxious about? That reads.

PC: Anxious to have it read. That's about all. I sort of feel that the item is finished with now. It's the other list that is more important. What opposes it. I'm sort of anxious that they don't take the item away from me if it's not reading.

Auditor: All right. Thank you. On this item, is there anything you have been anxious about?

PC: No.

Auditor: Good. I'll check that on the meter. On this item "a feeling person," is there anything you have been anxious about? A feeling person. A feeling person. A feeling person. On this item, has anything been invalidated? There's another read. What was it? There. There.

PC: I just don't seem to be able to look at the item. Uh - just can't seem to take the viewpoint of the item and I just can't get there and I sort of am invalidating having to do it.

Auditor: All right. Thank you. I'll check that. On this item, has anything been invalidated? There's another read, what was it?

PC: I'm sort of invalidating you trying to make me do it, too.

Auditor: I didn't get that.

PC: I'm invalidating you slightly trying to make me do it. That - in - look at that item again.

Auditor: All right. Thank you. On this item, has anything been invalidated? There's another read, what was it? There.

PC: Yeah. I'm invalidating my attention going off to the opposed list to this item. It's making me feel terribly uncomfortable.

Auditor: All right, Allen, thank you. I'll check that. On this item, has anything been invalidated? A feeling person. A feeling person. A feeling person. On this item, has anything been suppressed?

PC: Hmmm. Putting my attention on the item. The item. A bit of pain. Bit of sen. That's all.

Auditor: Thank you. I'll check that on the meter. On this item, has an thing y been suppressed? There's a read, what was it? There.

PC: Annoyance at having to go backwards to the item. That's all.

Auditor: Thank you. On this item, has anything been suppressed?

PC: No'.

Auditor: Good. I'll check that on the meter. On this item "a feeling person," has anything been suppressed? There's another read, Allen, what was it?

PC: Well, I was suppressing a protest I think, about the question reading.

Auditor: All right.

PC: And the item not.

Auditor: Okay. Thank you. On this item, has anything been suppressed?

PC: Not that I know of.

Auditor: All right. I'll check that on the meter now. On this item "a feeling person," has anything been suppressed? There is another read, Allen. What was it?

PC: Being sick, sen, feeling adi - agitated, bit - bit heavy, feel heavy.

Auditor: Mm-hm.

LRH: All right, get him off the buttons on this item. Read his goal. Let's see if you can make his goal fire.

Auditor: All right, Allen. We are not going to carry on with that. Ron just told me to stop the item Prepcheck and all I am going to do - I call out your goal and we see if that fires. Right?

PC: Okay, yep.

Auditor: Anything you want to say?

PC: I just suddenly noticed how my interest came back into the session.

Auditor: Okay. Very good. To be certain. To be certain. To be certain. To be certain. To be certain. Okay we haven't got a rocket read here.

LRH: Now, you see why your item isn't firing because your goal isn't firing. That's all. Close the session down.

Auditor: Okay, Allen. Good. Now, have you made any parts - ah - have you made any parts of your goals for this session?

PC: What were they?

Auditor: To get the item to fire.

PC: Well apparently, no.

Auditor: Good. To be willing to look at what comes up.

PC: Yeah. I was willing to look.

Auditor: Very good. Now, I'd just like to check - get a can squeeze.

PC: Mm-hm.

Auditor: Please squeeze the cans. Okay, I just want to get a few commands of Havingness in. Just put the cans down.

PC: Right.

Auditor: Here's the first command. Point out something.

PC: A TV camera.

Auditor: Thank you. Point out something.

PC: One up there.

Auditor: Thank you. Point out something.

PC: Wall.

Auditor: Good. Point out something.

PC: And that part of that wall.

Auditor: Thank you. Point out something.

PC: Ceiling.

Auditor: Thank you. Point out something.

PC: That door.

Auditor: Fine. Pick up the cans. All right, please squeeze the cans. Very good. Thank you. Now, is there anything you care to ask or say before I end this demonstration?

PC: No.

Auditor: All right. Is it all right with you if I end this demonstration now?

PC: Yep.

Auditor: Good. Now, here it is: End of demonstration. Has the demonstration ended for you?

PC: Yep.

Auditor: Very good. Thank you.

PC: Okay.

LRH: All right. We have an example there of the situation when the goal isn't firing, we can't get an item to fire and there is either something wrong with this pc's line plot, which looking it over it is - everything is "blank" person, a person, a person, a person. Probably something wrong with his line plot. There is probably some earlier item firing here and certainly the goal is not now firing, so this thing has been suppressed or listed wrong way to someplace, or mucked up and it will have to be straightened out. Now there, you did not see a rocket read there tonight. Okay. And here we have May auditing Dick and what we want to have happen here is we want to see this new goal fire. This goal was just found today and may not have a lot of fire in it, but we want to see this goal fire. Pick up your earphones there, May. Got them? All right. Good enough. And all we want to do is see this goal fire very nicely and if it fires without a Tiger Drill, well for heaven's sakes, don't tiger drill it. Okay?

Auditor: Okay. All right. Take hold of the cans please. Thank you. How are you doing here?

PC: Hmm. Not too bad. I thought Id be as scared as hell.

Auditor: Okay. Anything you'd like to say?

PC: No. Let's get on with it.

Auditor: Good. All right. Give the cans a squeeze. Thank you. Okay. The tone arm is at 2.5 on a third-of-a-dial drop.

PC: Hm.

Auditor: Okay? All right, what we are going to be doing here is a Prepcheck session on your goal. Using the goal finder's Model Session.

PC: Okay.

Auditor: All right. We are just going to prepcheck the first three buttons on

the left, Suppress, Careful of, Failed to reveal.

PC: Righto.

Auditor: And do it just until the goal fires.

PC: Righto.

Auditor: Good. Is it all right to audit in this room?

PC: Oh, sure.

Auditor: Good.

PC: Apart from the TV.

Auditor: Okay. Is it all right if I begin this session now?

PC: Yeah.

Auditor: Good. Start of session. Has this session started for you.?

PC: Yeah.

Auditor: Good. What goals would you like to set for this session?

PC: Well, get the goal to fire.

Auditor: Okay.

PC: And uh - feel easy about the TV.

Auditor: Okay. All right. Any other goals for this session?

PC: No.

Auditor: Thank you. All right. I'll check the needle here a moment. Okay. The needle seems to be reasonably clean so I am just going to start in directly with the buttons on the goal.

PC: Good.

Auditor: Okay? Good.

PC: Suits me!

Auditor: All right. On the goal "to be able," has anything been ...

PC: I'm sorry, May.

Auditor: Oh, I goofed.

PC: Not my goal.

Auditor: Okay. That was bad.

PC: Oh yeah, well. Well, I can understand how you feel because that's two of us. I think.

Auditor: Okay. All right, it's all right that I goofed?

PC: Sure.

Auditor: Good. On the goal "to be right," has anything been suppressed?

PC: Well, sort of always had a feeling that I couldn't be right, so I was sort of suppressing achieving it or that I could achieve it.

Auditor: Okay. On the goal "to be right," has anything been suppressed?

PC: Hmm. Hmm. Well, I can't think of anything at the moment. I - I feel there's something. But I - I couldn't get it connected up. Sort of had the feeling of sort of being in - like - like being in - sitting in a - let's say, in a bomber and you have bombed some city or something and it's not right. And you just have the - you know it's not right, but you want to be right. It's as though you've got to suppress being right to do things like that. Phew!

Auditor: Okay.

PC: That all sort of feels heavy.

Auditor: Thank you. Okay. On the goal "to be right," has anything been suppressed?

PC: I had a vague idea there about being criticized by teachers. It sort of makes you feel wrong. And you want to be right. And you want to be right. Ummh - being right like - it's sort Of like holding onto a - a postulate that's uh - and all around you, people are sort of suppressing you or overwhelming you and pushing you back in. So, that seems like a suppression to me. That's sort of thinking of it as an overwhelming. That's all.

Auditor: Thank you. On the goal "to be right," has anything been suppressed?

PC: No.

Auditor: Okay. I'll check that on the meter. On the goal "to be right," has an thing y been suppressed? That reads, what was it? There.

PC: When - when you said the goal "to be right" then, just, you know, in doing that command I sort of felt it hit. And then I sort of suppressed any reaction to it following.

Auditor: Thank you. On the goal "to be right," has anything been suppressed?

PC: Well, I had decided to go out and see another fellow's wife one night and all the time that I was making this decision I-I could feel this, "It's not right" and I was suppressing being right, in order to make that decision.

Auditor: Thank you. On the goal "to be right," has anything been suppressed?

PC: No.

Auditor: Okay. I'll check that on the meter. On the goal "to be right," has anything been suppressed? That reads, what was it? There. There. There.

PC: It's the same sort of situation, same woman and uh - sort of knowing I wasn't doing the right thing there.

Auditor: Thank you. Something you'd like to say?

PC: Yeah. Well it sort of is suppressing the - suppressed the desire to be right. And suppress acting right in order to act wrong.

Auditor: Thank you. On the goal "to be right," has anything been suppressed?

PC: No.

Auditor: Okay, I'll check that on the meter. On the goal "to be right," has an thing y been suppressed? Do you agree that that is clean?

PC: Min.

Auditor: Thank you. Okay. I am going to check the goal now and give it to you, right?

PC: Right.

Auditor: To be right. To be right. To be right. Okay, it isn't giving a good fire now but it is reading.

PC: Yeah.

Auditor: Okay?

PC: Makes me wince a bit.

Auditor: Thank you. All right, now I'm going to prepcheck the next button.

PC: Righto.

Auditor: Careful of. On the goal "to be right," is there anything you have been careful of?

PC: Careful to be right a lot of the times! And careful to insist, too, I am right when I know I am right.

Auditor: Good. On the - did you have a thought there?

PC: I think there was something else coming up there.

Auditor: Okay. On the goal "to be right," is there anything you have been careful of ?

PC: I have a feeling I have been careful to go somewhere away from where I had been working in order to find a - a better place to be right in.

Auditor: Thank you. On the goal "to be right," is there anything you have been careful of?

PC: Well yeah, I have sort of been careful to act right in Scientology so that Ron would know I was being right.

Auditor: Good. On the goal "to be right," is there anything you have been careful of ?

PC: Um - I have been careful to take note of other people's ah - opinions about my behavior; careful to see how they

uh - look at me, to know then if I am doing right. If I am being right, rather.

Auditor: Good. On the goal - did you have another thought there?

PC: Hey, yeah, that sort of uh - sort of gets you outside your - sort of being here, looking out from here, sort of gets you to - puts you outside yourself looking - try to look through everybody else's eyes.

Auditor: Okay. On the goal "to be right," is there anything you have been careful of ?

PC: No.

Auditor: Okay. I'll check that on the meter. On the goal "to be right," is there anything you have been careful of? That reads, what was it? There. There.

PC: To appear calm. It's - it's - it's right to behave in a calm, relaxed manner. I'm quite careful that way. It is sometimes difficult to answer the question now because there are a lot of things one is careful of. Just - just careful of as apart from on the goal "to be right." But still, a lot of one's behavior has to do with being right. Mores and all that.

Auditor: Okay. On the goal "'to be right," is there anything you have been careful of ?

PC: That seems to be all at the moment.

Auditor: Okay, I'll check it on the meter. On the goal "to be right," is there anything you have been careful of? That reads, what was it? There.

PC: Well, I have a bit of a trembling in the little finger here and I was careful not to let it get out of hand.

Auditor: Thank you. On the goal "to be right," is there anything you have been careful of?

PC: I have always been careful to uh - to track down any answer to any question when an auditor says, "That reads," because it's right!

Auditor: Thank you. On the goal "to be right," is there anything you have been careful of?

PC: Careful not to sell this goal.

Auditor: Good. On the goal "'to be right," is there anything you have been careful of ?

PC: Oh, I was at a concert once and I was careful not to cough during the - while the orchestra was playing.

Auditor: Good. On the goal "to be right," is there anything you have been careful of ?

PC: That's all.

Auditor: Okay. I'll check it on the meter. On the goal "to be right," is there anything you have been careful of? Do you agree that that is clean?

PC: Hm.

Auditor: Okay. Again, I'm going to read the goal.

PC: Hm.

Auditor: Okay? All right. To be right. To be right. To be right. The goal is reading, but not firing. Okay?

PC: Okay.

Auditor: All right. We're going to continue the buttons now with Failed to reveal.

PC: Ah. Yeah.

LRH: Ease it off and close the session.

Auditor: Okay.

PC: Oh, you had some instructions.

Auditor: I have uh - just been told here that it isn't necessary to go on any farther with this because it isn't uh - coming

up as it should here in the television area. Okay?

PC: Yeah.

Auditor: All right. Is it all right with you if we leave off this Prep - I goofed. Is it all right with you if I end - if we end off this Prepcheck now?

PC: Yep.

Auditor: Thank you.

PC: Shucks. Huh.

Auditor: Is there anything you'd care to ask or say before I do so?

PC: Mmm. Oh, I did wonder if there were any fires while you were saying the Prepcheck questions to me. I never asked you that.

Auditor: Thank you. Are you asking me that now?

PC: No, no.

Auditor: Okay. All right. End of Prepcheck.

PC: Hmm.

Auditor: Okay, have you made any part of your goals for this session?

PC: Well, I certainly feel easier about being on TV.

Auditor: Okay.

PC: It's not such a - ordeal as I thought.

Auditor: Good. Have you made any other gains in this session that you'd care to mention?

PC: Hmmm. Yeah. I had looked at some of my past behavior in alignment with this girl and uh - it adds up a bit.

Auditor: Okay. All right. Okay. Please squeeze the cans. All right. Put the cans down. Thank you.

PC: Sorry.

Auditor: Going to run a few commands of "Feel that."Okay? All right. Feel that table top.

PC: Mm-hm.

Auditor: Thank you. Feel the chair you are sitting on.

PC: Yep.

Auditor: Thank you. Feel the top of your head. Thank you. Feel the back of that E-Meter.

PC: Hmm.

Auditor: Thank you. Feel that end of the table. Thank you. Feel that end of the table. Thank you. Take hold of the cans. Thank you. Okay. Squeeze the cans. Good. That was the last command.

PC: Hmm.

Auditor: All right. Is there anything you'd care to ask or say before I end this session?

PC: Hmm, how much did we get there?

Auditor: Well, it was over a third of a dial, this time, definitely. Okay?

PC: All right.

Auditor: All right. Is it all right with you if I end this session now?

PC: Yeah.

Auditor: Good. Here it is. End of session. Has this session ended for you?

PC: Yep.

Auditor: Good. Tell me I'm no longer auditing you.

PC: You're no longer auditing me.

Auditor: Good.

PC: Thanks, May.

Auditor: Okay.

There you are. Been in here lately?

TV DEMO: FINDING RRs

PC: Hmm?

Auditor: Have you been in here lately?

PC: I was in here about three nights ago, four nights ago - something like that.

Auditor: All right. Take the cans. All right. Good.

LRH: All right. All we want to do here is turn on a rocket read. Now, one or another of these items found on this pc or the goal will rocket read. And I see by your auditor's report here that the pc's in the middle of a bug list that didn't turn out with an item, so therefore that thing probably won't rocket read, but turn on a rocket read at least with his goal or with something. Okay?

Auditor: All right. Now, is it all right to audit in this room?

PC: Hmm.

Auditor: All right. Good. Now, squeeze the cans. Very good. Now, have you got your normal grip there? Hmm?

PC: Hmm. Yep.

Auditor: All right. Squeeze the cans. Very good. How's my voice to you? Is it soft, loud or ... ?

PC: It's all right.

Auditor: All right. Tm. getting a bit of a flashback through these things. Okay. Very good. We've got about half-the-dial drop. TA is 3.4.

PC: That's not bad, but the havingness is down is peculiar. The cans feel peculiar.

Auditor: Mm. Min. All right. Now, what we are going to do is get a rocket read in this session.

PC: Lots of luck.

Auditor: Ah, the first thing we're going to take up is the item we were attempting to get an opposition from ...

PC: Hm.

Auditor: ... this afternoon. And we'll give that a working over.

PC: Mm-hm.

Auditor: And if we don't easily get a rocket read on that, we'll have a go at the goal or any of the other items.

PC: Mm-hm. 'A commander."

Auditor: What's that?

PC: 'A commander."

Auditor: Okay. All right. Is it all right with you if I begin this session now?

PC: Mm. Yea h.

Auditor: Okay. Start of session. Has the session started for you?

PC: Mm.

Auditor: Good. What goals would you like to set for this session?

PC: Oh well, a simple one: Get a rocket read.

Auditor: All right. Any others?

PC: No. I think that's all that's necessary for this session.

Auditor: Okay. Very good. Well now, let's take a look at this item we've got here. Perverting an agreement. All right. Perverting an agreement. Perverting an agreement. Perverting an agreement. All right, I'm not getting any instant responses on that. There's a latent fall on it. All right. Now we'll prepcheck this with Suppress.

PC: Hmm.

Auditor: On the item "perverting an agreement," has anything been suppressed?

PC: Well, I haven't looked at the fact that I don't like the idea of being in a

position or a condition where I would go about perverting an agreement. Or perverting agreements.

Auditor: Hmm.

PC: And yet when we first came across it I think you will recall I told you that uh - it's very peculiar: I see it over there and yet I know that I do these things.

Auditor: Hmm.

PC: I'll make an agreement and then I'll sort of weasel out of it a little bit.

Auditor: Good.

PC: Maybe more than a little.

Auditor: All right. On the item "perverting an agreement," has anything been suppressed?

PC: Consideration and concern about what others would think about me if they knew that I had this as an item. I mean it's not an admirable item.

Auditor: All right. Good. On this item, has anything been suppressed?

PC: Well, there was a lot of worry and a lot of concern when Ron first came out with the datum that the first item up, if it were, let's say degrading, it probably was the terminal side. And for a long period of time I was concerned about this and wondering and wondering and wondering. I kept on wondering and then I'd suppress the wonder, then I'd wonder some more and suppress the wonder. He'd give another lecture, I'd uh - suppress some more.

Auditor: All right. Okay. On this item, has anything been suppressed?

PC: Well, a little concern because we seem to be going down on one side. If you remember it went down the one channel that we had the prime cause coming up.

Auditor: Yep.

PC: And I was wondering, and suppressed it a little bit and still wonder, if I just didn't back down that "Spiral Staircase" so that the oppterm would be a prime cause.

Auditor: Mm.

PC: And it came out to be something similar to that so far.

Auditor: Yes, yes. All right. Good. On this item, has anything been suppressed?

PC: Well, probably - to a great deal, the times that I have more or less perverted agreements where I would agree to one thing and then gradually I changed my mind. And I justify it by saying that as I change, my attitudes would change, my outlook on life would change and so how could I find myself in agreement.

Auditor: Mm.

PC: You know, it's a weasel way.

Auditor: Mm.

PC: Hm.

Auditor: Very good. On this item, has anything been suppressed?

PC: Well, a big concern I had today about why it was we couldn't get an item - that would match up with it. Why it was that I went into that - I can't really call it an ARC break, it was a sort of a despondency

Auditor: Yep.

PC: . . . in trying to match it up against the oppterm. Now, that might have been a misemotion from the oppterm or something, I don't know. It could be a missed item, I don't know. But all the considerations about it I sort of suppress - I figure that's your headache.

Auditor: Okay. Good. On this item "perverting an agreement," has anything been suppressed?

PC: I've suppressed looking to see exactly what do I mean by "perverting an agreement." You know, I really haven't examined that. When I gave it I had a sort of a flash idea of what I meant by it. And of course, I was putting the blame over there, you know, oppterm ...

Auditor: Yep.

PC: And oppterm characteristics. I haven't really explored thoroughly exactly what perverting an agreement entails. So, what I've suppressed is the examination of the item to find out just what it means.

Auditor: Good. On this item "perverting an agreement," has anything been suppressed?

PC: I think a little bit of the feeling of unwillingness to look and see what it is that I'm opposing - that is, as a perverter of agreements.

Auditor: Yeah.

PC: There's a sort of a hesitancy to look and see what I've been attempting to destroy, damage, commit overts against. That sort of thing.

Auditor: Good. All right. On this item, has anything been suppressed?

PC: I don't get anything directly.

Auditor: All right. Good. I'll check this on the meter. Perverting an agreement. On this item, has anything been suppressed? All right. I'm going to check that again. On this item, has anything been suppressed? Do you agree that is clean?

PC: Mm-hm.

Auditor: All right. Now, on the item "perverting an agreement," is there anything you've failed to reveal?

PC: Well, I failed to reveal easily each time that I have perverted an agreement, that is where I've uh - let's see how I can state this. There have been a number of times when I've made an agreement and then I've backtracked, using, of course, the idea that as I become clearer and clearer and clearer I'll see that some of my agreements were based on aberration.

Auditor: Mm.

PC: It's a cute way.

Auditor: Yeah.

PC: And so these agreements will no longer be binding. And I really don't know that this is true. An agreement made is an agreement made.

Auditor: Mm-hm.

PC: A contract signed is a contract signed and all that sort of thing. At the time I knew what I was doing.

Auditor: Right.

PC: And I still know what I am doing.

Auditor: All right. Good. Did you want to say something further?

PC: No, what I am doing is I'm wandering around. You know, taking a look at different aspects here based on the question.

Auditor: All right. Good. Now, on this item "perverting an agreement," is there anything you have failed to reveal?

PC: Hmmm. The who's involved. That is the individuals involved on the other side.

Auditor: Good. On this item, is there anything you have failed to reveal?

PC: No. But I just took a look - earlier today I gave "a dependent" as an item - and you'll remember it stayed in for a little bit.

Auditor: Mm.

PC: And I said, even though it stayed in it was not a proper item for staying in, you know. But I just realized that it is my daughter. . .

Auditor: Mm.

PC: . . . who I haven't seen for some period of time. And I sort of have a tacit agreement with her that what I am going to do is audit her, clear her, and I'm just wondering if this being away from her, not communicating with her, is a perversion of an agreement.

Auditor: Good. On this item, is there anything you've failed to reveal?

PC: Well, some kind of a self-flagellation you might say because of uh - these tendencies or things that I have done that I am ashamed of.

Auditor: Good. On this item, is there anything you've failed to reveal?

PC: Yeah, I've got a good one: um - starting to get a headache, a pressure headache, just talking about it.

Auditor: All right. Good. On this item, is there anything you've failed to reveal?

PC: A sort of uncertainty about the item as such. That is, it may rocket read and all well and good, it may check out. But still to me it seems like an awfully nebulous thing. It's awfully nebulous to talk about uh - perverting an agreement. An agreement is something that is more or less understood, but then when you modify it, it's modifying something that is understood. It's um - sort of altering an idea or - well, like I say, it's nebulous. It's a nebulous thing.

Auditor: All right. Good. On this item, is there anything you've failed to reveal

PC: Hmm. That Id feel better if it was something I could point to, hold onto, you know - if it had mass.

Auditor: All right. Good. On this item, is there anything you've failed to reveal?

PC: No, it goes back to the same thing of the times that I feel that I have actually perverted an agreement, because there are definite times when I do know that I have.

Auditor: Mm.

PC: And I've justified.

Auditor: All right. Good. On this item, is there anything you've failed to reveal?

PC: I think that's about it.

Auditor: Okay. I'll check this on the meter. On the item "perverting an agreement," is there anything you have failed to reveal? Do you agree that that's clean?

PC: Mm.

Auditor: Good. Perverting an agreement. Perverting an agreement. Perverting an agreement. Perverting an agreement. Perverting an agreement. It's rather dead at the moment. Occasional little tick latently. All right. Now, we'll work over the Careful of button here.

PC: Mm.

Auditor: On this item "perverting an agreement," is there anything you have been careful of?

LRH: Get over onto his goal. Give us a rocket read here.

PC: I'm sorry I missed that. I got blown out.

Auditor: All right. Now, we've got an unanswered auditing question there, I believe. I'll give it to you again. On this item, is there anything you have been careful of?

PC: Well, the simple one is I've been careful to justify any time that I have perverted an agreement, but that's a generalized answer.

Auditor: All right. Very good. Thank you. Okay. What we're going to do now, we're going to leave this item and work on your goal.

PC: Fine.

Auditor: How's that seem?

PC: Well, that seems like a good idea, only now, based on the way things are going, I'm wondering if it's my goal or the oppterm's goal.

Auditor: All right. Okay. Well now, we can work on this ...

PC: Mm.

Auditor: . . . go flat out on it and see if we can get some rocket reads on it.

PC: Fine.

Auditor: Okay?

PC: Mm-hm.

Auditor: All right. I'm just going to make a brief note here. Okay. I'm going to check your goal.

PC: Mm-hm.

Auditor: To be a complete entity. To be a complete entity. To be a complete entity. All right. We are getting a reaction on the meter.

PC: Mm.

Auditor: On this goal, we got a fall and then a sort of a roughed up needle on it, so it's reading. We are getting some sort of a read on it. It's reading more than the last thing we were working on.

PC: Mm-hm.

Auditor: All right. Now, let's tiger drill this. I'll use the phrase repetitively right now. On the goal "to be a complete entity," has anything been suppressed?

PC: I've sort of tended to suppress ownership on the goal lately. Especially since we started down on these various steps, you know - the move over to goal oppose or whatever the version was.

Auditor: Mm.

PC: So, I've not really looked at it. But I've started looking at these various identities, whatever they happened to be.

Auditor: Right.

PC: So there's that suppression of the goal itself...

Auditor: Yeah.

PC: . . . and um - oh., for a period of time after the goal was actually checked out, I sort of suppressed listing, you know, based on the questions we had at the time, the various lines. Gee, there was another suppress I had in mind there. Suppressing listing and then just plain suppressing the goal itself because for a period - of time there - because of the lines, the configuration of the lines and based on me, whatever the "me" is at that particular case

Auditor: Mm.

PC: . . . all I started doing was getting a higher and higher tone arm, you know, more and more mass, more and more crunch.

Auditor: Yeah.

PC: So, I tended to invalidate the hell out of the goal.

Auditor: Mm.

PC: Because if this was what is happening to me because of the goal, who needed it?

Auditor: Yep.

PC: You know, I'd just as soon stay aberrated.

Auditor: All right.

PC: Yeah.

Auditor: On the goal "to be a complete en has anything been suppressed?

PC: One thing I have suppressed is the - the longing - that's a good word for it - the longing - uh - implicit in the goal, you know, for reaching a particular state, or reaching a particular level of communication, beingness, doingness, havingness, all these things - I pretty much suppress that all the time, actually. Otherwise I would be walking around with my insides torn out.

Auditor: Yep. Okay. On the goal "to be a complete entity," has anything been suppressed?

PC: Sort of the grief involved in the failure. The grief involved and the degradation involved in ways that I have prevented others from accomplishing the same thing, which seems to be at variance with the uh - with this first item.

Auditor: Yeah.

PC: I've got a weird mix-up here. I have a particular drive and then I have a terminal that has a different drive entirely, so I start thinking what the hell am I doing?

Auditor: Mm.

PC: You know, it's the raging insanity that you go through - I go through.

Auditor: All right. On this goal, has anything been suppressed?

PC: To a great degree ownership actually, because I don't know - I must be relinquishing ownership, because I don't know when I set it, what the conditions of setting it were, what I was attempting to accomplish by setting this goal, or what I was trying to overcome by setting the goal. The various steps in the degradation of the goal, the alter-isness of the goal, the modifications from being a complete entity to being a completely individuated individual.

Auditor: Mm.

PC: The individuality.

Auditor: Yeah.

PC: So there's this um - uh - suppressed, mostly unknowingly, but to some degree knowingly also, the origination of the goal itself.

Auditor: Good. On this goal, has anything been suppressed?

PC: Sort of a peculiar type of suppression. I've suppressed telling other people they've got to have this goal because it's a good one.

Auditor: Okay. On this goal, has anything been suppressed?

PC: Anger, because it took such a long time to get to nowhere after I got the goal. Six weeks, eight weeks, steadily climbing tone arm, as a high-tone preclear - 5.2, something like that. That.

Auditor: Good. On this goal, has anything been suppressed .

PC: Concern every time it was tested. Concern even now, when you call it. That is: Is it going to read? Isn't it going to read? Is it really my goal? Or isn't it my goal? You know?

Auditor: Good. On this goal, has anything been suppressed?

PC: No, I think that's about the size of it.

Auditor: All right. I'll check this on the meter. On the goal "to be a complete entity," has anything been suppressed? All right. To be a complete entity. Thank you. To be a complete entity. Thank you. To be a complete entity. Thank you. I got two ticks and a final null on that. All right. Now, I'm going to check some other buttons on this. On this goal, is there anything you I've failed to reveal? That reads. What was it?

PC: I'm sorry, I don't - I don't get an answer there.

Auditor: All right.

PC: All I do is just pull a blank.

Auditor: Very good. All right. Now, T'll steer you on this. On this goal "to be a complete entity," is there anything you have failed to reveal? All right. Uh - I didn't get a read that time.

PC: Well, there you go.

Auditor: Okay. All right. Very good. To be a complete entity. Okay. Now, on this goal, is there anything you have been careful of? That reads. What was it?

PC: Has something to do with uh - in listing, listing the items, I've been careful to look and see in order to give you items.

Auditor: Right.

PC: That doesn't really relate to the goal, I believe ' so items derive from the goal.

Auditor: All right. On the goal "to be a complete entity," is there anything you have been careful of?

PC: Not that I know of

Auditor: All right. Very good. On this goal "to be a complete entity," is there anything you have been careful of? All right. Now, is there something being suppressed in this session?

PC: I'm just interested. I noticed before when you put down the tone arm reading there was - at 3.4. And when we ended session it was about - what? - 4.5 or something like that?

Auditor: Yeah.

PC: So apparently whatever ridge that was in during all that period of time Of mislisting, whatever you want to call it, you know, listing the wrong way to and all this, that ridge apparently is gone.

Auditor: Yeah.

PC: Now, I don't feel tremendously different but there is a difference. And every once in a while I just think proudly, 'Ah, my tone arm is down."

Auditor: All right. Okay. Very good. On the goal "to be a complete entity," has anything - I'll give you that again: On the goal "to be a complete entity," is there anything you have been careful of? All right. There's a read there.

PC: I'm careful to - I don't know how to - how to put this - to avoid putting up something or not putting up something, when you call the goal, in order to not prevent it from reading.

Auditor: All right.

PC: In other words, I'm - I'm careful to - not to do something. So, see, I'm careful in not doing something.

Auditor: Good. Okay. All right. To be a complete entity. To be a complete entity. On this goal, is there anything you have been careful of? All right. On this goal, is there anything you have failed to reveal? Okay. On this goal, has any mistake been made? Okay. To be a complete entity. All right. On this goal, is there anything you have been anxious about? Okay. On this goal, has anything been decided? I want to give that again. On this goal, has anything been decided? That reads. What was it?

PC: Well, I've decided to find the basis for the goal whatever the basis may be on the prime motivation for the goal. Find out what the intent was.

Auditor: Good. All right. On this goal, has anything been decided? That reads. What was it?

PC: That as it comes down the descending spiral - I don't mean the "Spiral Staircase" in this case - as it comes down the descending spiral, the tendency is to lead to absolute individuation. See? A complete entity means one thing. That is, to be a complete entity would mean to have total awareness and total recall, all your abilities and all this. When you start looking at it, a complete entity is one which requires no more inflow or outflow so becomes individuated.

Auditor: Yeah.

PC: So - what was your question? I got lost in my description.

Auditor: All right. We're on "decide."

PC: Hmm. Well, I decided that it may be a nice goal in concept but in practice it's pretty poor.

Auditor: All right. Good. Now, I'll check this question. On this goal, has anything been decided? All right. To be a complete entity. To be a complete entity. To be a complete entity. On this goal, has anything been suppressed? All right. On this goal, is there anything you've been careful of? All right. Tell you what: we're going to prepcheck these buttons.

PC: Hmm.

Auditor: We'll take up Failed to reveal right now.

PC: Hmm.

Auditor: Now. On this goal, is there anything you have failed to reveal?

PC: Annoyance, when I first started listing, at the fact that there was no tone arm action, that I didn't seem to cognite, that I didn't seem to get any recall. And I sort of suppressed this. I didn't want to make my auditor feel bad.

Auditor: All right. Good. Okay On this goal, is there anything you've failed to reveal?

PC: A fundamental invalidation on the checkout when an "id" was added - id.

Auditor: Hmm.

PC: And it became "identity" instead of "entity," and it checked out! And so I always carry this niggling little doubt: Well, if they could check out "identity" and it could read and you could check out "entity" and it would read, well, how well do I know what the hell I am doing? Is there some basic resonance here or what? Just what is my goal?

Auditor: Yep. Right. Good. On this goal, is there anything you have failed to reveal?

PC: Well, the hope that I could become a better person for blowing the goal, for doing what I want to do without having some compulsive reason for doing it.

Auditor: Good. On this goal, is there anything you have failed to reveal?

PC: Oh, something I haven't revealed to you lately, maybe. That when this was checked out I didn't get a great deal of pain. I got some few niggling pains and stuff like that. But I haven't had any of these sharp, deep sword wounds that pass through me - through the chest, or where the head's blown off or anything like that.

Auditor: Yep.

PC: Nothing dramatic, you know.

Auditor: All right.

PC: I had a little pain in the toe or my finger would hurt or something like that.

Auditor: Okay. All right. On this goal, is there anything you have failed to reveal?

PC: Yes. I always ask MY auditor if she would let me watch it rocket read. And she said she would let me do it someday. She never did. Id like to see it rocket read.

Auditor: All right.

PC: I never have.

Auditor: Okay. On the goal "to be a complete entity," is there anything you have failed to reveal?

PC: No, I think I've covered all the points we did with one auditor or another and the idea that - I've known this - this is a basic urge, basic drive - very fundamental mode - whatever you want to call it

Auditor: Yeah.

PC: . . . for years and years and years. So when I was finally listening to those and I suddenly cognited on what they wanted. I cognited on what they wanted. It wasn't that - a case of what goal, what goal, what goal. I found - finally understood what they wanted from me so I gave it to them.

Auditor: Yeah.

PC: I mean, that's the way a goal is, really. I mean, that's my understanding of it.

Auditor: Yeah, yeah.

PC: Once a preclear cognites on what you're asking for they give it to you because they know.

Auditor: Hmm. All right. Very good. To be a complete entity. On this goal, is there anything you've failed to reveal? All right. To be a complete entity. To be a complete entity. To be a complete entity. Okay, it's affecting the meter. We haven't got a rocket on it at this time. Now, let's get - take up Careful of. On this goal "to be a complete entity," is there anything you've been careful of?

PC: I've been careful to not push it that other people are being superior to their goals because their goals involved what I consider short track and the fact of the matter is I've

LRH: Okay, close it off and close your session now.

Auditor: All right. Very good. Okay. Now, if it's all right with you we're going to leave that there.

PC: Leave what?

Auditor: The question ...

PC: Oh.

Auditor: . . . and we're going to start terminating the session right now.

PC: Fine.

Auditor: All right. Anything you'd care to say or ask before we end this part of the session?

PC: No rocket read?

Auditor: All right. No rocket read. Anything else?

PC: No.

Auditor: All right. Did you make any part of your goals in this session?

PC: I only made one goal there.

Auditor: To get a rocket read?

PC: Yeah. No, no dice.

Auditor: All right. Very good. I'll check your havingness. All right. Squeeze the cans. All right. Is that the same grip as you started with?

PC: Yeah.

Auditor: All right. Squeeze the cans. All right, that's down a little bit. Put the cans down, I'll run some Havingness. Thank you. Point out something.

PC: That uh - camera right up there.

Auditor: Thank you. Point out something.

PC: The shelf in the corner.

Auditor: Thank you. Point out something.

PC: The stool, the bench - little bench.

Auditor: Thank you. Point out something.

PC: The all-seeing eye.

Auditor: All right. Thank you. Point out something.

PC: Let's see. Your necktie.

Auditor: Thank you. Point out something.

PC: The earphones.

Auditor: Thank you. Point out something.

PC: Microphone.

Auditor: Thank you. Pick up the cans. All right. Now, squeeze the cans. All right. That's higher than when we started. That was the last command. End of the Havingness Process.

PC: Mm-hm.

Auditor: Is there anything you'd care to ask or say before I end this session?

PC: No.

Auditor: All right. Is it all right if I end the session now?

PC: It's desirable.

Auditor: Okay. Here it is. End of session. Has the session ended for you?

PC: Yes. It has.

LRH: All right. Take a ten-minute break and I'll give you a few words on these sessions. Okay?