Русская версия

Search document title:
Content search 2 (exact):
ENGLISH DOCS FOR THIS DATE- Comm Cycle Additives (DIV1.DEP3.ETHICS) - P650701-2 | Сравнить
- Ethics Chits (DIV1.DEP3.ETHICS, TECH, QUAL) - P650701 (2) | Сравнить
- Ethics Chits (DIV1.DEP3.ETHICS, TECH, QUAL) - P650701 | Сравнить
- Hats, the Reason for (HATS) - P650701-3 | Сравнить

RUSSIAN DOCS FOR THIS DATE- Добавки к Циклу Общения (ОХС, ТЕХ, КВАЛ) - И650701-2 | Сравнить
- Добавления к Циклу Общения (КРО-4) (ц) - И650701-2 | Сравнить
- Необходимость Шляп - И650701-3 | Сравнить
- Почему Существуют Шляпы (КРО-1) (ц) - И650701-3 | Сравнить
- Почему Существуют Шляпы (ц) - И650701-3 | Сравнить
- Причина Существования Шляп - И650701-3 | Сравнить
- Регистратору по Письмам, Регистратору (КРО-2) (ц) - И650701-4 | Сравнить
- Этические Доклады (ТЕХ, КВАЛ, КРО-1) (ц) - И650701-1 | Сравнить
- Этические Записки (ТЕХ, КВАЛ) (ц) - И650701-1 | Сравнить
- Этические Записки (ТЕХ, КВАЛ) (ц) - И650701 | Сравнить
- Этические Записки (ТЕХ, КВАЛ) - И650701 | Сравнить

SCANS FOR THIS DATE- 650701 - HCO Policy Letter - Comm Cycle Additives [PL009-018]
- 650701 - HCO Policy Letter - Ethics Chits [PL009-019]
- 650701 - HCO Policy Letter - Letter Reg - Body Reg [PL009-020]
- 650701 Issue 2 - HCO Policy Letter - Comm Cycle Additives [PL060-031]
- 650701 Issue 2 - HCO Policy Letter - Comm Cycle Additives [PL060-032]
- 650701 Issue 2 - HCO Policy Letter - Comm Cycle Additives [PL060-034]
- 650701 Issue 2 - HCO Policy Letter - Comm Cycle Additives [PL060-035]
- 650701 Issue 2 - HCO Policy Letter - Comm Cycle Additives [PL060-036]
- 650701 Issue 3 - HCO Policy Letter - Hats, The Reason For [PL009-021]
- 650701 Issue 3 - HCO Policy Letter - Hats, The Reason For [PL093-051]
CONTENTS COMM CYCLE ADDITIVES Cохранить документ себе Скачать
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 1 JULY 1965
Issue II
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 1 JULY 1965
Issue III
RemimeoRemimeo
Ethics HatsBasic Staff Hats
Tech HatsALL DIVISIONS
Qual Hats

HATS, THE REASON FOR

DCO Division

HAT: Slang for the title and work of a post in an org. Taken from the fact that in many professions such as railroading the type of hat worn is the badge of the job.

Tech Div

Organization consists of certain people doing certain jobs.

Qual Div

Disorganization consists of each person wearing all hats regardless of assignment.

COMM CYCLE ADDITIVES

In a smooth organization that runs well and succeeds EACH PERSON WEARS HIS OWN ASSIGNED HAT.

There are no additives permitted on the Auditing Comm Cycle.

When a person has a job that belongs to another hat than his own, he passes the job to the other hat.

Example: Getting the pc to state the problem after the pc has said what the problem is.

Each staff member is a specialist. He specializes in his own hat.

Example: Asking a pc if that is the answer.

When people wear only their own hats then one has terminals in the org. If terminals exist then communication can flow correctly. If communication can flow correctly then work gets done and the org can get in income.

Example: Telling pc “it didn’t react” on the meter.

TERMINAL – a point that receives, relays and sends communication.

Example: Querying the answer.

If people present each wear any old hat or all the hats, then no terminals exist, no communication can flow properly, work can’t get done and there is no income. There is chaos and it is an unhappy place.

This is the WORST kind of auditing.

In a green org staff members don’t know what other staff members do. So they don’t know where to send things so they do them themselves. Worse, they don’t even know there is an org there. It is quite pathetic. Like rookie troops or militia or a mob. Of course the place goes broke.

Processes run best MUZZLED. By muzzled is meant using ONLY TR 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4 by the text.

You can tell a good executive. He only hands out despatches and work to the correct hats. A lousy executive hands the work to anyone handy, regardless of title. He’s in apathy and doesn’t know there’s an org there.

A pc’s results will go to HELL on an additive comm cycle.

The whole theory of successful organization is to have posts that only do specific things, to have sections and departments and divisions which specialize, and to have people who only wear their own hats and know who is wearing the other hats and send their work to them.

There are a hundred thousand tricks that could be added to the Auditing Comm Cycle. EVERY ONE of them is a GOOF.

A train crew has a Conductor. He wears a Conductor’s hat. It has an engineer. He wears the engineer’s hat. It has a fireman. He wears the fireman’s hat. Where do you think the train would get to if each of these three didn’t know who were the other two? The Conductor wearing the engineer’s hat would mean no fares. The fireman wearing the Conductor’s hat would mean no steam. And the engineer wearing the Conductor’s hat would mean no train going anywhere.

The ONLY time you ever ask for a repeat is when you couldn’t hear it.

So beware of wearing other hats than your own, or of being ignorant of what other hats are being worn. For nobody will get anywhere and you’ll find yourself overworked, dismayed and unhappy.

Since 1950, I’ve known that all auditors talk too much in a session. The maximum talk is the standard model session and the TR 0 to 4 Auditing Comm Cycle ONLY.

Each person to his own job and damn the fellow who tries to give you things which aren’t your hat and doesn’t know there’s an org there.

It is a serious matter to get a pc to “clarify his answer”. It is in fact an Ethics matter and if done habitually is a Suppressive Act, for it will wipe out all gains.

Realize that the basic theory of organization is this:

There are mannerism additives also.

1. SO LONG AS EACH KNOWS AND WEARS AND WORKS AT HIS OWN HAT ONLY, THINGS WILL BE SMOOTH.

Example: Waiting for the pc to look at you before you give the next command. (Pcs who won’t look at you are ARC Broken. You don’t then twist this to mean the pc has to look at you before you give the next command.)

2. AND SO LONG AS EACH PERSON KNOWS WHAT THE OTHER HATS AROUND HIM DO, HE CAN GIVE THEM THEIR WORK WHEN IT COMES HIS WAY AND ALL WILL BE SUCCESSFUL AND SMOOTH.

Example: A lifted eyebrow at an answer.

If you let somebody steal your hat (do your work for you that you are supposed to do) that person will soon have you in trouble or have your job so snarled it can’t be done.

Example: A questioning sort of ack.

If you don’t know who in the org is supposed to do what and make them do their own jobs when those drift your way, you’ll be overworked like mad.

The Whole Message is

If somebody tries to get you to do something that isn’t your job on the org board then FILE AN ETHICS CHIT FOR JOB ENDANGERMENT. For at the very least that person is reducing income by not knowing the lines and posts of the org.

GOOD AUDITING OCCURS WHEN THE COMM CYCLE ALONE IS USED AND IS MUZZLED.

When you are assigned an additional duty, make sure it is also properly in your department or division or you’ll be messed up.

Additives on the Auditing Comm Cycle are ANY ACTION, STATEMENT, QUESTION OR EXPRESSION GIVEN IN ADDITION TO TRs 0-4.

Don’t permit people to mess up hats around you or you will be in chaos.

They are Gross Auditing Errors.

Only organization can make your job smooth. And wearing your hat and doing your own job and knowing and making other people wear only theirs and do their own job, is the total secret of organization.

And should be regarded as such.

L. RON HUBBARD

Auditors who add to the Auditing Comm Cycle never make Releases.

LRH:mh.rd

So, that’s Suppressive.

Don’t do it!

L. RON HUBBARD
LRH:ml.cden