The word Scientology is one which you might say is anglicized. It comes from the Latin SCIO and the Greek Logos, with Scio the most emphatic statement of Know we had in the western world. And ology (from logos) of course means "study of".

SCIO is "knowing in the fullest sense of the word" and the western world recognizes in it and in the word science something close to a truth.

Continuing on religious and knowledge background of Scientology. When we look at Buddhism we don't wonder that a great change took place in the operating climate of man, because it certainly did. Rome went under just eight hundred years later. Now that's fast, for the time that it was going, because their whole philosophy shattered. The philosophy of every state operating on force alone, and every barbaric society that Buddhism touched shattered.

This is not "science-tology" – and it is not "scio-tology", simply because that is not close enough to English.

The first one to go by the boards was however India itself. India at that time was a very, very savage, barbaric area. So was China. Japan is still characterized very, very impolitely by the Chinese, and the civilization of Japan by Buddhism is almost in modern times. The civilization of Japan was completed by America, so there they meet very closely.

So we use a word which is fairly easy to say, which is simply Scientology.

But now, moving forward on the time track over all of these ages, we discover that it took an awfully long time for the Veda to walk forward and emerge as a new knowledge called the Dhyana. And it took quite a little while for the work of Buddha to move out of Asia. But we see the work of Asia itself, not the work of Buddha necessarily, moving out into the Near East. Now there were trade routes that had existed since time immemorial. Man has no real trace of his own roadways. But the trade routes were quite wide open from very, very early times. We find the Phoenician, for instance, trading very neatly and very nicely up around Great Britain. And sailing out through the Pillars of Hercules we find him; and I was by the way last year standing on the edge of a Phoenician ruin, which was advertised as a Roman ruin, but it wasn't a Roman ruin because it had its inscription in cuneiform, which was a Phoenician script. And this was one thousand BC. One thousand BC.

For quite some time we have not used the word Dianetics, but certainly not because Dianetics does not belong to Scientology. It does, one hundred per cent. It is the subject of the mind and says so. It says Dia-Netics from Dia Nous (with an engineering twist on it – "etics") and DIA NOUS means no more and no less than through mind.

Now in one thousand BC a Phoenician ship demonstrated at least ten thousand years of seafaring technology. It was a very complex ship. And Phoenicia spread its empire out through Europe, and just from where and what and why, we have no real trace. But Phoenicia was, is very well within our own teachings, our own history, and so on.

Of course the western world thinks of mind as something that mental cases have, something of that kind, and we weren't particularly interested in continuing to concentrate upon this thing called mind, although mind is a perfectly useful word.

Well it was a thousand years after the Phoenicians that we first began in the western world to actually alert to a higher level of civilization. For some time the Hebrew in the Middle East had been worshipping in a certain direction, along certain lines. And they had as one of their sacred books the Book of Job, and many other of their sacred works were immediately derivable from similar sources. And into this society apparently other teachings suddenly occurred. Their holy work known to us as the Old Testament is leaning very, very heavily on what I just talked to you about. With the exception that it has a rather barbaric flavor. All due respect to the holy book, it was a long way from home. A long way from home. And we discover the civilized aspect of that religion which we know of in the western world as Christianity, taking place of course at the year, what is it? The year 30 AD, which I think we date, no, no, earlier than that. The year 1. Now we find that, that's of no importance to us, except that everybody who writes a date out here is talking about the man we're talking about. When he puts down AD, and when he puts down BC, we are dating our very calendar from this incident I am discussing here.

In Scientology we are not going "through mind", we are talking about knowledge. Dianetics was a study of the mind, there's no doubt about that, and there is no doubt about it that it is a very legitimate ancestor of Scientology, but Scientology is a thing of considerable amplitude, where Dianetics in comparison was a very narrow thing indeed. And Dianetics belongs, in a sense, in the world of psychology, and Scientology does not belong in the world of psychology and is not "an advanced psychology" and cannot be defined in the framework of psychology. Psychology is an anglicized word, not today true to its original meaning.

The principles known as Buddhism included those of course of love thy neighbor, abstain from the use of force. These principles appeared in Asia Minor at the beginning of our own dates. And I'm not, by the way now, discounting even vaguely the work of Christ or Christ himself, or anything like that. Traditionally Christ is supposed to have studied in India. This is traditional. One doesn't hear of him until he's thirty years of age. And he was a carpenter, and so on. One hears a lot of things. But he also hears this persistent legend that he had studied in India. Well this would of course be a very, very acceptable fact in view of the fact that the basic philosophy about which he was talking was a philosophy which had been extant in India, at this time, for about five hundred years. A little less than five hundred years. So it was about time that it moved out of that area, having taken over by that time two-thirds of the Earth's populace. But we don't quite recognize our Europe, if we think of it as a thriving culture. It was not a culture.

Psychology is composited from psyche and ology, and psyche is mind or soul, but leading psychological texts begin very, very carefully by saying that today the word does not refer to the mind or to the soul. To quote one, it "has to be studied by its own history", since it no longer refers to the soul, or even to the mind. So we don't know what psychology refers to today. It simply got lost. And so we have to step out and take a word which actually means what we mean, which is a study of knowingness, a study of wisdom. We have to take the word Scientology because that is what we are doing.

One thousand years after Christ, better than that. Twelve, thirteen hundred years after Christ a mighty conqueror stopped on the borders of Europe, because he was leaving all areas of civilization, and he saw no slightest gain in attacking an area where everyone was cloaked in fur loincloths. That was Tamerlane, Timouri Lang.

Now philosophically, there is a word called epistemology, and epistemology is quite separate from ontology, another word in the same category. In philosophy matter is considered to be separate. The physical universe is considered one direction thought another direction and so it goes. The available words do not encompass enough.

Now when we look at the Middle Eastern picture, we find ourselves looking at the rise of a philosophy which, however interpreted, however since utilized, is nevertheless a very, very interesting philosophy. You have told your preclears I am sure, to stop running those flows, and to get some space, and so he could tolerate that. And then change his considerations. Do you suppose for a moment that a preclear can actually get anywhere if he continues to use force? Well whether we try to put this into a public practice such as turn the other cheek, or whether we use it for theta clearing, the emancipation of a soul, we certainly are looking at the same fact. We are looking at the words of Gautama Buddha, however we wish to interpret this.

Thus we are already looking at a cloudy vocabulary when we look at the field of western philosophy. In fact, nowhere in the west can we find any qualifications for a study which assumes to reach the highest possible level of knowledge which can be attained by Man or Life. We find nowhere in the western world a word or a tradition which will embrace Scientology. This makes some difficulty for an auditor *Auditor: trained Scientologist. Auditor means "one who listens" and is a person who applies Scientology auditing technology to individuals for their betterment when he is trying to communicate to people in the society around him, since they want to know what Scientology is, and then he speaks to them, in the west, without this tradition.

Now the parables which are discovered today in the New Testament are earlier discovered, the same parables. Elsewhere in many places, one of them, the Egyptian Book of the Dead, which predates the New Testament considerably.

They assume that the word psychology embraces all sorts of eccentricities found in mental behaviour. They assume this so they could not possibly understand how anything related to thought could be said to exceed or not be the same as psychology, and they are left in the dilemma of non-recognition. You have just not communicated in the west when you have said "we study wisdom". You see, if you just said that, they would say, Oh yes, that's all very well, I did that in third grade.

Now we are talking about love thy neighbor. We're talking about be civilized. We're talking about use no force. But at the same time, at the same time, we are talking straight out of the mouth of Moses, so we evidently are at a crossroads of two philosophies. But these two philosophies are both the philosophies of wisdom.

Now, in view of the fact that you go out of communication, in a society which has no standard of communication on the subject about which you are talking, it is necessary to resort to various shifts in trying to describe what you are doing. You have to find the background which actually leads to an understanding of your subject.

Now the Hebrew definition of messiah is one who brings wisdom, a teacher, in other words. Messiah is from messenger. But he is somebody with information. And Moses was such a one. And then Christ became such a one. He was a bringer of information. He never announced his sources. He spoke of them as coming from god, but they might just as well have come from the god talked about in the Hymn To the Dawn Child, who by the way is rather hard to distinguish from gods talked about later on. He's certainly not the Hebrew god, the god the christians worship. He looks more like that one talked about in the Veda. He looks much more like it.

There would be many ways in which this could be accomplished, but let's take up something that is quite important to us and is not limited by any ignorance that we discover in western civilization. Let us take up what amounts to probably ten thousand years of study on the part of Man of the identity of God or gods, the possibility of truth, the inner track mystery of all mysteries. In other words, the mystery of life itself. We find that for ten thousand years, which figure, by the way does not agree today with certain historians (but then they don't know much of the data I am referring to) man has been on this track. We find that the material which is extant even in western civilization and in Asia, has gathered to itself an enormous verbiage, you might say. There are somewhere between – and I think it would be adventurous to state an exact number – 125,000 and 150,000 books which comprise the Vedic and Buddhist libraries. Now that's a lot of books. Here is a tremendous amount of data.

And we come on down to, from there, and we find that we are talking about a meeting place, a sort of a melting pot of religious practices, stemming from various wisdoms. But the highest amongst those wisdoms is apparently the Veda and the teachings of Guatama Buddha. The parables coming from the Egyptian Book of the Dead and from various other places were probably not original with the Egyptian Book of the Dead, so it's just not true that the parables of Christ necessarily came from Egypt, since we know full well that Moses escaped from Egypt, and that the Jewish peoples stem their history from their freedom from bondage in Egypt. Not all of their history, but the history which they speak of mostly in the New Testament.

One could say, if all this data is in existence, then why doesn't the western world know more about it? And we have to go back and take a brief look at what happened about ten thousand years ago, and of course, that's rather cloudy too, but let's put it into the field of anthropology rather than in to the field of history. And we discover that perhaps much earlier than ten thousand years ago, there was a division of peoples here on earth, and the division point was evidently the Ural Mountains. This is material that was given to me by a Professor of Ethnology at Princeton University.

Now here we have a great teacher in Moses. We have other messiahs, and we then arrive with Christ. And the words of Christ were a lesson in compassion, and they set a very fine example to the western world, compared to what the western world was doing at that moment. What were they doing at that time? They were killing men for amusement. They were feeding men to wild beasts for amusement. In the middle reign of Claudius we find thirty-five hundred men being turned loose four abreast, divided half and half across a bridge of boats, slaughtering each other for the amusement of the Patricians. How long can a society stand up when it is worshipping force to this degree?

There was evidently a split of races somewhere in the vicinity of the Ural Mountains. Part of the population which is now in the northern hemisphere went east, and part of it went west. The borning spot of the human race has been variously disputed but if we don't worry about the borning spot and just say – that is more or less what occurred at that time, that there was a sharp division, and that part of the northern hemisphere's people went east and part of them went west – we discover that a singular difference of personality occurred which is in the northern hemisphere the most observable difference.

Now however these teachings were interpreted, the vein of truth was still here. That an exclusive reliance upon force will bring about a decay and a decadence which is unimaginably terrible. And that was the truth which came through. And we find the Buddhist principles of brotherly love and compassion then appearing two thousand years ago.

The people who went into the steppes, into the Gobi, into China, India, and into the various islands, were faced by an enormous chain of deserts. They were faced by privations of great magnitude, and they developed a philosophy of enduring. That was the keynote because that was what their environment demanded of them; they had to endure. And so we find these races colored in a certain way so as to thwart the onslaught of sun and snow. We find them without natural protection in their environment and therefore we find them able to survive long after those who went in the opposite direction.

Now Christianity spread like wildfire throughout Europe. But it was necessary to achieve a certain agreement. And in order to achieve that agreement, many of the practices which you know of today were incorporated into this worship. Basic and early Christianity is not recognizable today in many church practices. It's just not recognizable, I mean, it is very clouded. But these churches themselves recognize as their original source, the New Testament. And the New Testament contains, aside from a few court records and a few legends, all that we know of this particular transition. But here we have this information poorly interpreted, badly carried, through areas which did not know how to read and write, which is quite different from Asia. And we found this church and that church having to pick up and adopt customs in order to gain any entrance into these new areas. And we discover, we discover today the worship of the winter solstice in our Christmas. That is German, and that is also other barbaric societies. Almost every barbarism that's ever existed has worshipped the departure and return of the sun, in the northern hemisphere. And we find this incorporated into

And so it is, their colorations, their customs, and so on, are different from ours just to the degree that they can survive in tremendously arduous surroundings, and the surroundings of those lands is arduous. They are, those races that are there, able to endure. And if you said anything about them, this is certainly a clear statement of fact.

Christianity. And over there we find that incorporated into Christianity, and over somewhere else we find this one. Each time a certain amount of superstition coming into the information line, until we don't know what was on the information line, unless we go back to sources and trace it through clearly and purely. We are again, however, working with wisdom.

They also are tremendously practical. Their practicality is such as to stagger a westerner. The explanations that they will suddenly and innocently voice to a query are always of such sweeping simplicity that they leave a westerner standing there staring with a slack jaw.

What wisdom? The wisdom of knowing how to know oneself to resolve the mystery of life. And when this Christianity was interpreted and imported into Europe there was considerable speculation and resurgence, and an enormous amount of hope. The very same thing that the Buddhists hoped for became the hope, and this is what is very interesting, became the hope of the Christian world. Emancipation from the body. The survival and immortality of the human soul. And although there was a cult in Rome which had this idea, it itself had no great antiquity. And it had evidently stemmed over from Persia, which was closer yet. Now the christian impact wiped out this other cult. But that's because they were just alike. And one couldn't distinguish one from the other, and the Christians won.

Now the races which went in the opposite direction from the Urals, evidently went in to a country which had a heavy forestation. It had a great deal of game and the philosophy of the western world became that of striking a hard blow. If you could strike a blow of great magnitude hard enough and fast enough you could kill game and so you could live. Because of the vegetation and because of many other factors, they did not particularly need coloration.

Now we have this immortality, this hope of salvation being expressed throughout Europe, and they expounded expedient[#bookmark7 1] to keep extending it, because they keep promising people that it was just about to occur. The day of judgment was just about to occur. Now get this as a sort of a barbaric interpretation of what Gautama Buddha was talking about. The emancipation of the soul from the cycle of births and deaths. Now, he was talking about that, you see, and now we get the fact that there's going to be a day when somebody blows a horn. And it's all going to occur. We don't know what barbarism that superstition came from, but we have that superstition today in our society. The day of judgment. At first hell was only the fact that Rome was going to disappear in a sea of lava, and everyone wanted to see Rome die. And that recruited people left and right. They promised them that Rome was going to disappear in a sea of molten lava. And they tried to prove it in Nero's reign, by burning the place down. Well, they didn't have a great deal of success doing it. Rome went on surviving, and was finally taken over entirely, and has since been the orientation point of Christianity. A thousand years or so after Christ they started to try to take back the actual birthplace of Christ in Jerusalem, and there's been considerable argument going on about it back and forth ever since. But the orientation point was made the only stable point, because that was the, that was the part of the world to which all roads led. And that became the dissemination point of all this information. But Rome split off and went back to Constantinople, and we had then the Constantinople branch of this church. And it however received its biggest blow when Russia suddenly turned completely atheist. We don't hear too much of that church anymore. But we still hear a great deal in the western world of this church at Rome. It is still there.

Their own customs did not need to be as thoroughly practical and they were able to dispose of their lives much more easily, you might say, since food was plentiful, as it was not in Asia.

Now the use of Christianity was to produce a certain civilized state. And many people would blacken Christianity by saying it reduced people down to a very low level indeed. This is not true. It took an entire world of slaves and it made free men out of them. This in itself was quite a gain. Took a world which worshipped exclusively force and matter, and made it recognize that sooner or later one would have to turn to the fact that he had a soul.

And we discover western philosophy building up on the behavior pattern of striking a hard blow. Get in quick, hit hard, your game drops and you eat. And beyond that, not very much thought or practicality.

1 Editor’s Note: According to the rendition of this text in THE PHOENIX LECTURES, this should read „they expound it and they find it expedient to been extending it, …

However the truth of this may be, here certainly is something which is said to have preceded a period of 10,000 years ago. It might or might not have truth. But it is a very fast explanation of this – and we discover immediately, as we look at these two worlds, that one of these worlds, having to endure, being faced with enormous privation, would of course develop a certain patience and an ability to philosophize. An ability to think. It would take a long time for anyone to think all the way through something. And a man who is merely accustomed to striking a hard blow is not likely to think all the way through something. When we are up against philosophy, we are fortunately or unfortunately up against an Asian tradition.

Now remember that Christianity and its basic wisdoms and so forth is still available to us in the New Testament. And that this is really, no matter how it has come through the line, is quickly and swiftly traceable back to the Veda. We have a consistent track, in other words, here. This track is very consistent. The same message is coming through. The Christian god is much better characterized in the Vedic Hymns than in any subsequent publication, including the Old Testament. The Old Testament doesn't make near as good a statement of what the Christians think of as god, as the Veda.

This is a tradition which is not necessarily that of colored peoples or strangers. This by the way, would come as a great shock to some people in the western world, to discover that in India the ruling caste is quite as white as any Norseman.

Alright, not to go over this forever, we have, we have the loss of the trade routes, somewhere in the vicinity of about a thousand AD. And land travel ceased. Land travel up to that time had been very, very good between Europe and Asia. You had Europe wearing silks and using Asian products, back and forth. It was a good route through there, but remember that this was very far from a barbarism they were crossing there in the Middle East. This included Caldea, what was left of Caldea, what was left of Babylon, which of course was Persia at that time. It included tremendous numbers of civilization. And these trade routes went right straight through, one to the other. It wasn't run as a straight route, it was run as a relay route. You see, the caravans would go just so far, and then they'd relay their packs, and they'd go just so far, and they'd relay. And they did all this not on any plan, but on a barter system. So you could get goods all the way through.

Well, they have, because they have a tradition of enduring, preserved records. We do not know what went on in North America. We can only guess. We do not know what went on in South America. There are a few ruins kicking around but beyond, this we don't know very much. We get down in to the Mediterranean basin and we discover that there was a certain traffic with Asia and therefore there is quite a bit known about Asia in the Mediterranean basin.

Well those routes were closed and they weren't opened up again. No trade with Asia was opened up until Vasco Da Gama. Now there was an enormous period of noncommunication. A long period of non-communication there. The; what had happened is Genghis Kahn, the various hordes which had been trying to pour out of Russia had cut them time and time again, and the amount of unrest and so forth, the taking of Baghdad and Jerusalem by such people of course just kept these things cut. You couldn't travel safely between these two worlds. And we find that communication doesn't open up again there until sometime really in the seventeenth century. Oh, it opened up a little bit earlier, but not really open. And we find seventeenth century, 'til we find in the middle of the eighteenth century, pardon me, middle of the seventeenth century we find certain eastern practices beginning to show up in France. And about the middle of the seventeenth century there are many books being published, all about you could do this and you could do that, and you'd achieve something else. As a matter of fact, the doctrine of a chakra is an interesting one, because that talks about theta clearing. It talks all backwards and upside down, and so on. You had to clear yourself of seven entities, of which the thetan was the last one, and so forth. But we find this being published in France in the middle of the seventeenth century, having come through on these re-opened sea routes to Asia.

This philosophy of endurance came forward into the Middle East – very poorly, but it was to be found there. The records of Europe we can hold in tremendous question. They do not, for instance, know where or when they had ice ages. They actually cannot trace from one millennium to the next, who was where and owned what. Every now and then they have to write a history, so everybody gets in a good state of agreement and somebody writes a history – but so unreliable that Voltaire dubbed history A Mississippi of Lies. Now where the western world is concerned, we have records which go back – written records – supposedly 3,500 years. This may or may not be true but certainly the schools in the western world teach us that we can go back that far with written records. And in Egypt they go back to Isis, I think, which for the west is quite early. And they have found records in that particular area and they hold these up as being very old. But be very careful, be very, very careful that you do not leave the western world, if you are looking for early records. In order to have a blackout of history and a blackout of knowledge, you have to stay west of the Ural Mountains.

Now quite incidentally during this period, a navigator who should have taken more lessons, but fortunately didn't, by the name of Christopher Columbus, discovered America. He was simply trying to get to Asia, 'cause everybody knew everybody in Asia knew everything and had everything, and so you had to get to Asia. And he ran into America. Fortunately, because he'd miscomputed the size of the Earth so grossly that he would have perished out in the endless oceans if there hadn't been a continent there to receive him.

East of the Urals you discover no such blackout. You discover a recorded tradition of wisdom which reaches back about 10,000 years. And that is the oldest trace that we have.

Now, oh I speak, that is the opinion of the Explorer's Club, almost en masse, concerning Columbus. But a bunch of experts on exploration looked at that man's exploration and shook their heads. But he was a very wise man, he discovered a variation of the compass and various other things. But he failed. It was up to the Portuguese to continue around the bottom of the Cape of Good Hope, and open the lanes to Europe. And as soon as we get them open we first find all of this information flooding in. Information suddenly starting to appear, parts of the Veda starting to appear, various practices of Buddhism, Zen Buddhism, other things start to crop up in Europe. And right along with this we begin to get such things as the Arabian Nights. And in the middle of the eighteenth century we get, you might call, a renaissance of literature, the birth of the novel, and so forth, coincident with the introduction of the Arabian Nights into France. A fascinating flood of information that came in about that time. And the culture had already, during the renaissance picked up considerably, but the renaissance was right in there with Marco Polo. And we find some other interesting routes were open during that time. People had managed to get through.

Now true enough we don't necessarily have to recognize that there are written works any older than any anthropologist in the western world knows about. It does happen, however, that there is a set of hymns which as I recall were introduced into the societies of earth in about 8212 B.C. (The favorite western figure puts it after Egyptian!) These are hymns, and it would seem that if we spoke of hymns then they would contain largely modes or rites of worship, since they are religious, but that would only be our western interpretation of what is religious. These were religious hymns and they are our earliest debt in Scientology. Our earliest debt, because the very early hymns contain much that we know today and which checks against what we have rediscovered, or what we have followed back to, and this material included such a common thing as the cycle of the physical universe, known to you in Scientology as the Cycle of Action (Cycle of Action: the creation, growth, conservation, decay and death or destruction of energy and matter in a space. Cycles of Action produce time.) And this is contained in "The Hymn to the Dawn Child", variously captioned and translated by western translators, but all this information is there.

Well I'm not trying to tell that everything was invented by Asia. But Asia had a tradition of information. They had kept their records, which was not true of the western world. They'd kept their records. And so the information was there. And you might say it was a depository of knowledge which might as well have originated in the western world, gone to Asia, been put on file, and come back again. I don't care how you would trace this one way or the other, but we still find that it was the repository of all the wisdom there was in the world at that time. And it has more or less continued so.

Furthermore, we find in that same set of hymns, the theory of evolution which was brought forward in the west only a hundred years ago, or slightly less, by Charles Darwin. In fact, as we look at these hymns, we discover almost any information you want to discover later. Whether you call it science or what you wish, here is a tremendous body of knowledge.

Now the philosophers, the early Greeks and so forth on forward, made the first division, the first division in wisdom. And they said, "There is wisdom about the soul and there is wisdom about the physical universe." And there's some speculation about life. And this is the tradition of the Greek philosopher. And that has come forward to us as represented by people like Kant, represented to us by people like Schopenhauer, Nietsche, so forth. Interesting, interesting material. And oddly enough, those writings are coincident with new releases of Asian information in Europe.

They are supposed to have come forward in spoken tradition, memorized, from generation to generation, and finally to have been set down. Now this is a western interpretation of what happened to them. I would not care to say how exactly correct this is but I can tell you that today these hymns are still in existence. They are very hard to acquire in the western world.

If you had ever accused Schopenhauer, had you ever accused Schopenhauer of writing nothing but sacred lore he probably would have committed suicide. But, he never wrote anything else.

You have to find the specialized translations of them and they are studied as curiosa more than anything else, but we do not know what sciences would suddenly open their doors should someone sit down and begin to study the Veda. We don't know what would happen. But information seems to have leaked from that direction into the Middle East and into Europe rather constantly over the thousands of years.

Now where did we get this artificial breakdown? We got it right there in the Middle East. The Greek came forward, went through Rome, and the philosophic, scholarly, consecutive line has come to us through barbarisms. What we call science today came to us from a barbarism, priests, which civilized itself. It's an independent chute of information.

Man is fond of believing that yesterday's man was unable to walk, to travel, to move. We find, however, that as late as 1200 B.C. certainly, he had horses, and horses can go almost anywhere. He was able to make his way here and there across the surface of Earth and naturally when you get this, you get a transplantation of information. For instance, today anyone who knows China discovers nothing very strange in Italian cookery. And he would not discover it very strange that Italian cookery suddenly came into being shortly after the return of Marco Polo and many other travelers who had been in the same area. Just because one person wrote about it, is no reason a lot of people weren't there. It is always a matter of astonishment to some member of the Explorer's Club to go in and pick up all the information he needs about an area which is new, wild and "completely unexplored", from a white man or a Chinese – particularly the Chinese – who has been living there for the last forty years. And the explorer brings back the information and publishes it in journals and makes it available to people. The information collected by that white man or Chinese on the ground, collected by that white man or Chinese on the ground, would probably only be told to his family when he got home and not particularly broadcast at all. So we have to recognize that certain information is broadcast broadly and some is merely carried around. Marco Polo and ibn-Batuta happened to be writers, and like writers, they wrote, but that is no reason to assume they were the only people in motion during the last 3,500 years.

Now the western world is specialized in this, and it has never made enough advance in the humanities with it to bother about, so that today it would gladly, just to fill another test tube full of guck, it would very, very happily blow all of man off the face of the Earth. It is completely divorced from the humanities. Where we come to the humanities, and where we have to do anything for the humanities or with the humanities, we go straight back, all the way back as far as we can go, to the Veda, and come on forward. And as long as we're on that track we're on a track which means better men. And when we go on the other track, we're talking about dead men. We're talking about dead men in an arena, and we're talking about dead men on battlefields, we're talking about dead men in cities under atomic bombs. That's what we're talking about. We're talking about barbarisms. And that is the tradition of barbarism. And the only thing that has let the western world survive all along this track was an entirely different track, that which went back to sacred lore ten thousand years.

Thus it is no wonder that we discovered the various wisdoms of Egypt appearing as the earliest wisdoms of Greece. It is no wonder why we look into the Christian bibles and find ourselves reading the Egyptian Book of the Dead. It is no wonder that we look into the middle of the Romantic period of Europe and find that the Arabian Nights had just been translated and discover that European literature did a complete revolution at that point. We're not stressing that nothing has ever been thought up in Europe – but Europe has made tremendous strides forward, immediately that its doors were opened to Eastern information.

Scientology then today could not possibly be characterized, could not possibly be characterized as a science, the way the western world understands science. Scientology carries forward a tradition of wisdom which concerns itself about the soul and the solution of mysteries of life. And that is what it concerns itself with. It has really not deviated. The only reason why I would suddenly come up and do something like this in a western culture, a very simple reason. I studied, my earliest years, the first thing I was exposed to in this life was a rough, tough frontier society. Montana. And there was nothing tougher than Montana, either in terms of weather or in terms of people. And from there I went over to the completely soft Far East. And heaved a long sigh of relief and found out what it meant to be in part of a civilization. And the shock was so great to me that I was very deeply impressed. And so, although I was a young American, I did pay attention. I had many, many friends in the western hills of China, friends elsewhere, friends in India, and I was willing to listen. I was also willing to be very suspicious. And I was willing to be very distrustful. But I was never willing to completely turn aside from the fact that there was some possible solution to the riddle of where man came from.

Because the Eastern tradition says that you can sit and think, and sometimes somebody in the western world is reminded of this, and when he is reminded of it, he is struck by the fact that he can sit down and think too.

Now any work that I am doing or have done, and that you are doing, has a tremendously long and interesting background. You are delving with and working with the oldest civilized factors known to man. Anything else is Johnnie-come-lately. As far as Scientology being a religion is concerned, it has more right to be a religion than the Catholic church has. And could stand up and be proven in court to that effect. Anybody who would dare try to make religion into solely a religious practice would be neglecting the very background of Christianity.

And if we have been taught anything, it is the patience of the East which permitted itself to stop acting long enough to find out how and why.

Wisdom has no great tradition in the western world. But if we are very industrious, it will be up to us to make one. Thank you.

And it's that tradition alone for which we are most indebted to Asia.

But are we indebted to Asia? Is it to Asia at all, or is it merely to man on this planet, who, breaking into two halves, you might say, went east and went west – the common ancestors of Man. All of us have the same potentials, but it happens that the information which has been collected over the years is available in Asia. It has not been preserved in the Western world. Therefore, we look to such things as the Veda. We look to such things as the Buddhist text, to the Tao-Teh-King and other materials of this character from Asia, to carry forward to us information of the past. Who knows but what these materials did not come out of Europe in the first place and go over to Asia. We could follow very dubious tracks in all directions, but we do know as we sit here in the western world, that man has a tradition of wisdom which goes back about 10,000 years, which is very positively traceable. And we find Scientology's earliest certainly known ancestor in the Veda. The Veda is a very interesting work. It is a study of the whereins and whereases and who made it and why.

It is a religion. It should not be confused as anything else but a religion. And the very word Veda simply means: Lookingness or Knowingness. That is all it means. That is all it has ever meant. And so, we can look back across a certain span of time, across a great many minds and into a great many places where man has been able to sit still long enough to think, through this oldest record, and find where it joins up with the present and to what we, in Scientology, are rightly indebted. For to say that out of whole cloth and with no background, a Westerner such as myself should suddenly develop all you need to know to do the things they were trying to do, is an incredible and an unbelievable and an untrue statement. Had the information of the Veda not been available to me, if I had not had a very sharp cognizance of earlier information on this whole track, and if at the same time, I had never been trained in an American university, which gave me a background of science, there could not have been enough understanding of the western world to apply anything Eastern to and we would have simply had the Eastern world again. But the western world has to hit with a punch. It has to produce an effect. It has to get there. Nobody urged Asia to get there. You could sit on a mountain top for a thousand years and it was perfectly all right with everybody in the whole neighborhood. In the west, they pick you up for vagrancy. So, we combine the collective wisdom of all those ages with a sufficient impatience and urgency, a sufficiency of scientific methodology. I think, by the way, that Gautama Sakyamuni probably had a better command of scientific methodology than any of your Chairs of Science in western universities. We had to depend, though, upon scientific methodology and mathematics to catalyze and bring to a head the ambition of 10,000 years of thinking men.

And if I have added anything to this at all, it has simply been the urgency necessary to arrive, which was fairly well lacking in the Eastern world.