Probably the No. 1 lesson that has to be learned by a Case Supervisor without any wiggles or doubts or derails is that he can be (and must not be) driven off standard tech by false auditing reports.

At least half the failed sessions he gets are false reports!

The whole "secret" of producing high case gain and total results with Dianetic and Scientology auditing lies in the following:

The auditor has not noted some of the things he did or he has noted things that did not happen.

The person who falsifies an auditing report usually is the same person who gets bad results. Naturally.

When an auditor can produce exact auditing on Dianetics you know he can audit.

The report is usually not knowingly false. It does not include the data as to why the session failed.

Dianetics is a very simple, precise procedure. The major errors are

This leaves the Case Supervisor with an impression that standard tech was done but that it failed. That sends him into a figure-figure and proposing unusual solutions. This gets him into reviewing reviews, long hours of C/Sing, backlogs and an area muddied up by "failed cases".

(a) misassessment (inability to use a meter usually but out TRs can do it)

A Case Supervisor has to know his Standard Tech forwards and backwards.

(b) taking narrative somatics and running them

In a correct auditing report of a failed session the answer as to why it failed is neon light big and glaring. So the Case Supervisor corrects it and corrects the auditor.

(c) forcing a pc toward "earlier incident" when it required "earlier beginning" making the pc jump chains

But that is only true of about half the failed sessions the Case Supervisor gets. THE OTHER HALF OF THE FAILED SESSIONS ARE FALSE REPORTS.

(d) fumbling commands

Instead of going the route and first getting inventive and then damning tech and taking up Yoga, the Case Supervisor must realize:

(e) out TRs.

1. That if he himself doesn't know his Dianetics and Scientology cold, he will certainly never be able to spot errors in its application.

An auditor's poor TRs and corny errors such as above will prevent Dianetic results.

2. That standard tech – Dianetics and Scientology – are invariable in results and that the only variables are the Case Supervisor and the auditor.

But the Standard Dianetic auditing is so simple THAT IT DEMONSTRATES CLEANLY WHETHER THE PERSON CAN AUDIT OR NOT.

3. That there are no "different" pcs.

This is not true of Scientology auditing particularly VI, VII and VIII. Here the procedure is more complex. The errors of the auditor are obscured in the possibility of a wrong C/S or a complex pc. Thus whether the auditor can audit or not, just as an auditor, is obscured.

4. That 50% of the failed sessions are also false reports if you can't find in the folder why the session failed.

Thus, with the auditor as a variable factor, the tech can look variable.

5. That if you can't find in the folder why the session failed or the pc isn't doing well you get the pc asked about the session and get data as to why it failed. (The answers and outnesses will amaze you.)

Therefore you can lay down this rule as truth and it will be truth until the end of time:

6. That when the above fully dawn on a Case Supervisor he becomes totally successful.

If a IV, V, VI, VII or VIII cannot produce invariably excellent results his basic auditing is deficient but obscured by the complexity of material.

There is a sort of breakthrough a Case Supervisor makes, a sort of crisis he passes through where the above points suddenly become glaringly clear to him. After that he is a hard-eyed, uncompromising precisionist that nothing gets by and whose field area gets results – results – results and tech and stats soar.

Therefore it is vital that an auditor be a proven result-getting Standard Dianetic auditor before any result can be expected of him in his/her Scientology auditing.

It doesn't take too much. Given a command of the tech, Dianetics and Scientology, he can spot easily in the worksheets why a failed session went adrift, send it to review to be remedied and send the auditor to cramming.

We have now had several dark mysteries cleared up on this subject with many examples. For instance one auditor who had been thought a competent VI and had been "auditing" for years was found to be getting too many failed pcs; he was trained up as a Standard Dianetic auditor and on his first sessions it was found that he could not produce Standard Dianetic results; he was vigorously groomed on his TRs which were wildly out and always had been and made to do the very exact business-like procedure of Standard Dianetics. He then got excellent Standard Dianetic results session after session on his pc and could be designated as a very good Dianetic auditor. He was briefly retreaded on his Scientology materials and at once could get terrific results with upper level Scientology.

But the session where the pc left session with "F/N VGIs 2.0" and arrives at Examiner with "needle tight, 4.3, Indicators poor" and in which all seems usual and standard…! Hey! That's a false auditing report. It doesn't mean standard tech doesn't work! It means a false worksheet. You haven't got the data needed to handle or do the next C/S.

From this we can state without any fear of contradiction by your future experience that:

So you have somebody else ask the pc what happened in that session and get it written down and get the folder back.

An VIII who is not a proven Standard Dianetic auditor as well is not dependable as an auditor no matter who trained him.

Man, it would knock over an elephant. Some of the things you get back! "Well he was reading off items I guess but I couldn't hear him…" "I asked him not to shout and he said 'I'm the auditor not you'. " "I kept trying to tell him I was exterior…" "He wouldn't accept the withhold. He said it wasn't a withhold because he'd heard it from my wife…" "I had to keep telling him what the next command was…" "But it wasn't a headache that I was trying to get handled. I was vomiting during most of the session…"

The practice of loosely certifying HDCs without total proof that they get excellent uniform session results on Dianetic pcs can foul up the whole field and jeopardize the entire auditing future of the student. To certify an HDC who doesn't get provenly excellent Standard Dianetic results is an act of treason against all that person's future pcs and all the rest of us.

Boy, the world of Never-Never-Never that lies behind those reports where you can't find the reason!

If tech is "out" in an area it will be because some of the auditors, whatever their class, are not capable of delivering simple Standard Dianetic sessions, regardless of the level at which they are auditing. And out tech will be compounded if the Case Supervisor is not also an excellent HDC for he won't know the errors for which to look.

Suddenly, as I say, the Case Supervisor makes his own personal breakthrough. His "I wonder what's really wrong with this pc…" turns into, "Auditor to cramming to Review R3R commands and TR 104. Pc to Review to Fly a rud or GF to F/N. Assess Auditor, Auditors, Commands…"

When you can really dig this and know it and get it in practice the bulk of out tech and "failed pcs" in an area will vanish.

Oh, you say, we don't have an Examiner in our Franchise – listen, you better teach your receptionist to do an Examiner form – Yes, but we don't have a Case Supervisor or cramming – brother, are you so in love with the buck that you'll salt out your whole area with failed cases just to get high pay on low stats? Auditing is a TEAM action. If you can't do it as a team action it's not Standard admin to begin with and sure as shooting your practice or your franchise will fail in the long run.

I know it is sometimes hard to achieve a simplicity as simple as Standard Dianetics but when it is done, tech worries from there on up are over.

Maybe that's the first breakthrough the Case Supervisor makes. To realize auditing actions are team actions.

But not to get off the rails, IF YOU CAN’T FIND THE FAILURE IN THE FOLDER GET THE PC ASKED, FOR YOU’RE LOOKING AT A FALSE IF ONLY INCOMPLETE WORKSHEET.