Where untrained Auditors are finding Whys for a Danger Formula, or post purposes or post products as called for in the Est O System you will get a certain amount of error and case disturbance. Such upsets also come from word clearing by incompetent persons.

The C/S should look for these especially when such campaigns are in progress. He should suspect them as a possibility when a case bogs.

(ПИН означает Потенциальный Источник Неприятностей, что само по себе означает человека, связанного с Подавляющей Личностью).

A C/S must be sure all such papers and worksheets get into pc’s folders.

Поскольку к Дианетическому Специалисту часто обращаются за улаживанием не вполне благополучных преклиров, ему жизненно важно все знать и применять «ПИН технологию».

A common repair action is to

Все больные люди — ПИНы.

1. Do an assessment for type of charge.

Все преклиры, регулярно теряющие достижения — ПИНы. Подавляющие Личности — ПИНы по отношению к самим себе.

2. Handle the charge found by the assessment done.

Если Дианетический Специалист этого не знает, не имеет реальности относительно этого, то в работе с преклирами он может понести ненужные потери.

3. Fly all the reading items found on such assessments by 2WC or direct handling.

В отношении ПИНов имеется большое количество Административной Технологии, и есть специальная Программа для работы с ПИНами.

4. Suspect listing errors on any Why or purpose or product found even though no list exists and reconstruct the list and L4B and handle it.

Они исправляются, если одитор знает свою ПИН-технологию, хорошо одитирует и использует как технологию одитинга, так и административную технологию.

5. Handle word clearing of any type in or out of session with a Word Clear Correction List done in session by an Auditor.

Административная Технология требует Интервью, обычно проводимым Директором Процессинга или Администратором по Этике, и человек должен уладить саму ПИН-ситуацию до получения одитинга. После одитинга по ПИН-Программе проводится проверка на стабильность.

6. When word clearing is too heavy on the pc or doesn’t clean up suspect he has been thrown into implants which are mostly words or the words in some engram. As Implants are actually just engrams, handle it with an L3B.

По этой причине БОХС 17 апреля 72 и полный контрольный лист ИП ОХС 31 мая 71 должны быть полностью известны Дианетическому Специалисту.

БОХС 17 апреля 72 также включен в Серию К/С как 76 выпуск, для гарантии правильной работы К/С-ов с Админом и К/С.

Any item found out of session or by a non-auditor is suspect of being a Listing and Nulling (L&N) error even though no list was made.

Today a correct L&N item must BD and F/N.

So treat such items as you would list errors and try to reconstruct the list and either confirm the item or locate the real item (may have been invalidated and suppressed) or extend the list and get the real item.

The real item will BD F/N.

One can establish what the situation is with a post purpose, a Why or a product or any other such item by doing an L4B.

The commonest reason for self auditing is a wrong or unfound L&N item.

People can go around and self list or self audit trying to get at the right Why or product or purpose after an error has been made.

Nothing produces as much case upset as a wrong list item or a wrong list.

Even, rarely, a Dianetic List can produce wrong list reactions. Ask the pc for his somatics and he blows up or goes into apathy. Or blows. Or attacks the auditor.

All of the more violent or bad reactions on the part of the pc come from out lists.

Nothing else produces such a sharp deterioration in a case or even illness.

Therefore when one gets a sharp change in a case (like lowered tone, violence, blows, “determination to go on in spite of the supervisor”, long notes from pcs, self C/Sing, etc, etc, the C/S suspects an out list.

This outness can occur in regular sessions even when the item was said to BD F/N.

It can occur in “Coffee shop” (out of session auditing of someone), or by Est Os or poorly trained or untrained staff members or even in life.

When such actions as finding items by non-auditors are done on PTS people the situation can be bad, so one also suspects the person to be PTS to someone or something.

“PTS” does not communicate well in an assessment question so one says, “Someone or something is hostile to you” and “You are connected to someone or something that doesn’t agree with Dianetics or Scientology.”

The main things to know when doing such repairs are (a) that such situations as wrong lists or upset people can occur in an org where untrained people are also using meters and (b) that it is up to the C/S to suspect detect and get them handled in regular session.

Do not ignore the possible bad influence.

As the good outweighs the bad in such cases, it is not a correct answer to forbid such actions.

It is a correct answer to require all such actions and worksheets become part of the folder.

One can also persuade the D of T or Qual to gen in the people doing such actions. And do not ignore the effect such actions can have on cases and do not neglect to include them in C/Ses before going on with the regular program.

They can all be repaired.