Русская версия

Search document title:
Content search 2 (exact):
ENGLISH DOCS FOR THIS DATE- Use of Correction Lists (CSS-072) - B711220 | Сравнить
- Use of Correction Lists (CSS-072) - B711220R77 | Сравнить

RUSSIAN DOCS FOR THIS DATE- Применение Коррекционных Списков (КС-72) - Б711220 | Сравнить

SCANS FOR THIS DATE- 711220 - HCO Bulletin - Use of Correction Lists [B011-274]
- 711220 - HCO Bulletin - Use of Correction Lists [B047-044]
- 711220 - HCO Bulletin - Use of Correction Lists [B079-046]
CONTENTS USE OF CORRECTION LISTS METERING TRs NUMBERS OF LISTS METHOD OF USE Cохранить документ себе Скачать
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 20 DECEMBER 1971
::HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 20 DECEMBER 1971 R
REISSUED 27 SEPTEMBER 1977
RemimeoRemimeo
CS Series 72CS Series 72

USE OF CORRECTION LISTS

USE OF CORRECTION LISTS

A current survey shows that the weakest point in C/Sing done in orgs is failure to use Prepared Lists for Case Correction.

A current survey shows that the weakest point in C/Sing done in orgs is failure to use Prepared Lists for Case Correction.

There are some other points. For some reason C/Ses are being inventive instead of following the C/S Series and doing standard repairs and grades.

There are some other points. For some reason C/Ses are being inventive instead of following the C/S Series and doing standard repairs and grades.

Probably the failure to use Prepared Correction Lists derails the use of standard actions. There are very few actions which do not have their own Correction Lists.

Probably the failure to use Prepared Correction Lists derails the use of standard actions. There are very few actions which do not have their own Correction Lists.

There is nothing in Dianetics and Scientology as miraculously workable as correction lists.

THERE IS NOTHING IN DIANETICS AND SCIENTOLOGY AS MIRACULOUSLY WORKABLE AS CORRECTION LISTS.

The only things which prevent the list from working are

The only things which prevent the list from working are

(a) Auditor’s Metering

  1. AUDITOR’S METERING

(b) Auditor’s TRs.

  • AUDITOR’S TRs.
  • METERING

    METERING

    When the auditor’s meter is habitually placed where he cannot see (1) The meter needle, (2) The worksheet and (3) The pc with one directed look, then he misses reads.

    When the auditor’s meter is habitually placed where he cannot see (l) The meter needle, (2) The worksheet and (3) The pc WITH ONE DIRECTED LOOK, then he misses reads.

    All three have to be seen at once.

    All three have to be seen at once.

    The faults are

    The faults are

    i) Eyesight poor

    1. Eyesight poor

    ii) Glasses rims obscure one while looking at another

  • Glasses rims obscure one while looking at another
  • iii) Position of the meter.

  • Position of the meter.
  • It is a Standard Cramming action to look into these points whenever a correction list is said to be blank.

    It is a Standard Cramming action to look into these points WHENEVER A CORRECTION LIST IS SAID TO BE BLANK.

    For example a GF is done by Auditor A on Monday. It is done again by Auditor B on Tuesday. Reads are found by B. This means Auditor A is missing reads.

    For example a GF is done by Auditor A on Monday. It is done again by Auditor B on Tuesday. Reads are found by B. This means Auditor A is missing reads.

    This is far more common than believed.

    THIS IS FAR MORE COMMON THAN BELIEVED.

    TRs

    TRs

    When an auditor can’t be heard or is overwhelming the pc the list won’t be valid.

    When an auditor can’t be heard or is overwhelming the pc the list won’t be valid. An auditor’s TRs show up more quickly on a Correction List than anything else.A pc ARC Broken by TRs 0 to IV will not read properly on a Correction List.

    An auditor’s TRs show up more quickly on a Correction List than anything else.

    NUMBERS OF LISTS

    A pc ARC Broken by TRs 0 to IV will not read properly on a Correction List.

    The number of Correction Lists is large.

    NUMBERS OF LISTS

    It is unthinkable to do Word Clearing without ever using a WC Corr List. Yet we find folders with bogged Word Clearing sessions where the list was never used.

    The number of Correction Lists is large.

    There is the Green Form for general case upset, the Green Green Form for Solo, L1C for ARC Brks over a period, L3B for Dianetic bogs, L4B for listing and nulling goofs, Int RD Corr List for Int-Ext corrections, a Power Corr List for Power, GF 40R for resistive cases, C/S 53 and Hi Low TA for TA misbehavior, L7 for Clearing Course, and others.

    It is unthinkable to do Word Clearing without ever using a WC Corr List. Yet we find folders with bogged Word Clearing sessions where the list was never used.

    C/Ses trying to “solve cases” without using Correction Lists is like trying to repair flat tires without puncture patches — it just CAN’T BE DONE.

    There is the Green Form for general case upset, the Green Green Form for Solo, L 1 C for ARC Brks over a period, L3B for Dianetic bogs, L4B for listing and nulling goofs, Int RD Corr List for Int-Ext corrections, a Power Corr List for Power, GF 40R for resistive cases, C/S 53 and Hi Low TA for TA misbehavior, L7 for Clearing Course, and others.

    THE PRIMARY TOOL OF A C/S IS PREPARED CORRECTION LISTS.

    C/Ses trying to „solve cases” without using Correction Lists is like trying to repair flat tires without puncture patches – it just can’t be done.

    It is not inventive ways of “solving cases”.

    The primary tool of a C/S is prepared correction lists.

    METHOD OF USE

    It is not inventive ways of „solving cases”.

    Where you have inexpert auditors you always order Method 5, which is just a full rapid assessment. Then the C/S sorts out the reads and C/Ses what to do as very well covered on the lists themselves and the C/S Series.

    METHOD OF USE

    Then the auditor does the C/S.

    Where you have inexpert auditors you always order Method 5, which is just a full rapid assessment. Then the C/S sorts out the reads and C/Ses what to do as very well covered on the lists themselves and the C/S Series.

    A Green Form is always done this way. It will bog on any other method like 3.

    Then the auditor does the C/S.

    There are different methods of handling lists. L1C is always done Method 3, carrying each read as it is found Earlier Similar to F/N.

    A Green Form is always done this way. It will bog on any other method like 3.

    A GF 40R is done Method 3 and then the engrams are run for each read where engrams are indicated.

    There are different methods of handling lists. L1C is always done Method 3, carrying each read as it is found Earlier Similar to F/N.

    It’s up to a C/S to use Correction Lists, to coach his auditors into proper list use and to get corrected any misuse.

    A GF 40R is done Method 3 and then the engrams are run for each read where engrams are indicated.

    A C/S who can’t or doesn’t use Prepared Correction Lists isn’t a C/S at all but a “person puzzled about cases”.

    It’s up to a C/S to use Correction Lists, to coach his auditors into proper list use and to get corrected any misuse.

    Correction Lists, standard programs and the Grade Chart and Grade Commands and materials.

    A C/S who can’t or doesn’t use Prepared Correction Lists isn’t a C/S at all but a „person puzzled about cases”.

    These are the tools of the C/S. There are NO others.

    Correction Lists, standard programs and the Grade Chart and Grade Commands and materials.

    A C/S is one who uses these things. He is Supervising that they are used when they are supposed to be.

    These are the tools of the C/S.

    L. RON HUBBARD
    Founder

    There are no others.

    LRH:nt.pat

    A C/S is one who uses these things. He is Supervising that they are used when they are supposed to be.

    L. RON HUBBARD
    Founder
    LRH:nt.rd