Русская версия

 Search document title:
Content search 2 (exact):
ENGLISH DOCS FOR THIS DATE- Checking Evals (DATA-28R) - P730919-1R75 | Сравнить
- Checking Evaluations Addition (DATA-28R1) - P730919-1 | Сравнить
- Multiple Sit Eval Format (DATA-28R2) - P730919-2 | Сравнить

RUSSIAN DOCS FOR THIS DATE- Проверка Оценок (ДАН-28) (ц) - И730919R75 | Сравнить
- Проверка Оценок, Дополнение (ДАН-28-1) (ц) - И730919-1 | Сравнить
- Ситуации, Состоящие из Нескольких Частей (ДАН-28R - 1) - И730919-1 | Сравнить
- Форма для Записи Оценок Нескольких Ситуаций (ДАН-28-2) (ц) - И730919-2 | Сравнить
- Формат Оценки Ситуаций, Состоящих из Нескольких Частей (ДАН-28П-2) - И730919-2 | Сравнить

SCANS FOR THIS DATE- 730919 Issue 1 - HCO Policy Letter - Ideal Scenes, Ethics Whys and Bright Ideas [PL078-019]
- 730919 Issue 1 - HCO Policy Letter - Ideal Scenes, Ethics Whys and Bright Ideas [PL079-009]
- 730919 Issue 1R - HCO Policy Letter - Checking Evals [PL032-024]
- 730919 Issue 1R - HCO Policy Letter - Checking Evals [PL045-028]
- 730919 Issue 1R - HCO Policy Letter - Checking Evals [PL051-014]
- 730919 Issue 1R - HCO Policy Letter - Checking Evals [PL067-021]
- 730919 Issue 1R - HCO Policy Letter - Checking Evals [PL070-014]
- 730919 Issue 1R - HCO Policy Letter - Checking Evals [PL68-064]
- 730919-1 - HCO Policy Letter - Checking Evaluations - Addition [PL034-029]
- 730919-1 - HCO Policy Letter - Checking Evaluations - Addition [PL045-029]
- 730919-1 - HCO Policy Letter - Checking Evaluations - Addition [PL051-015]
- 730919-1 - HCO Policy Letter - Checking Evaluations - Addition [PL067-020]
- 730919-2 - HCO Policy Letter - Multiple Sit Eval Format [PL034-005]
- 730919-2 - HCO Policy Letter - Multiple Sit Eval Format [PL045-030]
- 730919-2 - HCO Policy Letter - Multiple Sit Eval Format [PL051-016]
- 730919-2 - HCO Policy Letter - Multiple Sit Eval Format [PL067-019]
 CONTENTS MULTIPLE SIT EVAL FORMAT SITUATION ONE SITUATION TWO PROGRAM SITUATION ONE TARGETS SITUATION TWO TARGETS Cохранить документ себе Скачать
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 19 SEPTEMBER 1973-2
ADDITION OF 2 OCTOBER 1977		HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 19 SEPTEMBER 1973-2
ADDITION OF 2 OCTOBER 1977
RemimeoRemimeo
Data Series 28R-2Data Series 28R-2

MULTIPLE SIT EVAL FORMAT

MULTIPLE SIT EVAL FORMAT

For multiple situation evaluations, the following is the correct format to use in the final evaluation write-up:

For multiple situation evaluations, the following is the correct format to use in the final evaluation write-up:

SITUATION ONE

SITUATION ONE

  • POLICY:
  • POLICY:
  • SITUATION:
  • SITUATION:
  • STATS:
  • STATS:
  • DATA:
  • DATA:
  • OUTPOINT COUNT:
  • OUTPOINT COUNT:
  • PLUSPOINT COUNT: (As applicable)
  • PLUSPOINT COUNT: (As applicable)
  • WHY:
  • WHY:
  • ETHICS WHY: (As applicable)
  • ETHICS WHY: (As applicable)
  • WHO: (As applicable)
  • WHO: (As applicable)
  • IDEAL SCENE:
  • IDEAL SCENE:
  • HANDLING: (For a multiple sit eval, the plan is written here, e.g.­-"HANDLING: Find and train executives...." etc.)
  • HANDLING: (For a multiple sit eval, the plan is written here, e.g.­-"HANDLING: Find and train executives...." etc.)

    • SITUATION TWO

    SITUATION TWO

    • POLICY:
    • POLICY:
  • (And so on, as per above)
  • (And so on, as per above)

    • The above format is repeated for as many situations as were evaluated.

    The above format is repeated for as many situations as were evaluated.

    Then:

    Then:

    PROGRAM

    PROGRAM

    • 1. (First target)
    • 1. (First target)
  • 2. (Second target)
  • 2. (Second target)
  • And so on.
  • And so on.

    • The program targets to specifically handle the Whys of each situation should be divided up as follows:

    The program targets to specifically handle the Whys of each situation should be divided up as follows:

    SITUATION ONE TARGETS

    SITUATION ONE TARGETS

    • 4. (Or whatever number, in sequence, after any beginning general targets) Make up a list....
    • 4. (Or whatever number, in sequence, after any beginning general targets) Make up a list....
  • 5. Go through the org....
  • 5. Go through the org....
  • 6. Go and see....
  • 6. Go and see....
  • (Etc.)
  • (Etc.)

    • SITUATION TWO TARGETS

    SITUATION TWO TARGETS

    • 19. (Or whatever number, in sequence, following the Sit One targets) See that....
    • 19. (Or whatever number, in sequence, following the Sit One targets) See that....
  • 20. Call on ....
  • 20. Call on ....
  • 21. Get the ....
  • 21. Get the ....
  • (Etc.)
  • (Etc.)

    • One does this for as many situations as were evaluated.

    One does this for as many situations as were evaluated.

    When writing and issuing a set of program orders or mission orders separate to the eval itself, the usual program or mission order format is used, except the operating targets get divided up as shown above.

    When writing and issuing a set of program orders or mission orders separate to the eval itself, the usual program or mission order format is used, except the operating targets get divided up as shown above.

    Compiled from AO 536-10 and FMO 1672 as the proper format per direction from LRH as given in ED 270 FBCompiled from AO 536-10 and FMO 1672 as the proper format per direction from LRH as given in ED 270 FB
    L. RON HUBBARD
    Founder    		L. RON HUBBARD
    Founder
    Assisted by
    S. Hubbard
    AVU Verifications Chief    		Assisted by
    S. Hubbard
    AVU Verifications Chief
    LRH:SH:pat.nfLRH:SH:pat.nf