Don’t, please, don’t start musical chairs again.

Every action that results in a product has a certain tech.

People aren’t checkers. Their jobs are valuable to them.

One finds out about it or develops it.

The correct way to get a Dianetic auditor in Qual is to demand one be selected off a noncritical post and trained.

When one adopts false tech he will then wind up with confusion as false tech will not deliver a product. It delivers a confusion — like psychiatry.

Also, the next lot of recruits will give us new people. Thus, somewhere there in a noncritical post one can find a Chaplain, get him to part-time study the Chaplain’s post. When recruits arrive, he can turn over his post to a recruit and groove it in, then relieve the Chaplain and the Chaplain goes to Dianetic auditor. It takes time. It takes skill to shift personnel without caving the org in by removing stable terminals. These wild shifts deluge us with dev-t, invalidate post importances and make, actually, one unstable dangerous environment.

The more false tech you hold onto or apply the more confusions you will get.

No more musical chairs, please. It’s absolute hell on everyone.

When real tech is invalidated then false tech can enter in. So the test of false tech is does it give a confusion and the test of real tech is does it give a product.

In actual fact musical chairs comes about through recruitment failures and improper org design.

A Mis-U word in real tech then can let false tech in.

There should be HCO Expeditors to take up the slack. From lack of them, all else goes to blazes. When you have no excess personnel, any transfer starts musical chairs.

If the tech is not available for a certain job one then has to develop it. His development will be correct only if it delivers a real product.

We also ask people if they want a post.

When one busily develops tech where proven tech already exists and is available, one is wasting his time.

Get some HCO Expeditors through better recruitment and all is solved.

Technology is that part of knowledge that is used.

So it is not enough just to know. One also has to apply.

If one really knows his tech it is very easy to apply it. When one is uncertain, his application is uncertain.

Life in living forms depends upon real products.

When products take too long to bring about or when they turn out to be overt products then they are not economical to produce. Overdue and overt products are both very costly in time and catastrophes.

If you find in any area you are taking too long to produce a product, then it’s time to review your tech. (A) Does tech exist? (B) If yes, “Am I applying it?” (C) If no, “Do I have to develop it?”

If it is (C), then one had better get very busy sorting it out. It is easier and less expensive to do that than to go on turning out overt products.

Any product has its tech.

Do you know the tech to produce yours?

(Note: Also see HCO PL 23 August 1979, Issues I and II, DEBUG TECH and DEBUG TECH CHECKLIST.)