Русская версия

Search document title:
Content search 2 (exact):
ENGLISH DOCS FOR THIS DATE- FN Everything - B710314R73 | Сравнить
- Talking the TA Down - B710314-2RA77 | Сравнить

RUSSIAN DOCS FOR THIS DATE- Все до ПС - Б710314R73 | Сравнить
- Снижение РТ Разговором - Б710314-2RA77 | Сравнить

SCANS FOR THIS DATE- 710314 - HCO Bulletin - FN Everything [B011-025]
- 710314 - HCO Bulletin - FN Everything [B044-025]
- 710314 - HCO Bulletin - FN Everything [B142-017]
- 710314 Issue 2 - HCO Bulletin - Talking the TA Down [B011-026]
- 710314 Issue 2 - HCO Bulletin - Talking the TA Down [B011-044]
- 710314 Issue 2 - HCO Bulletin - Talking the TA Down [B044-026]
- 710314 Issue 2 - HCO Bulletin - Talking the TA Down [B044-044]
- 710314 Issue 2 - HCO Bulletin - Talking the TA Down [B077-004]
- 710314R - HCO Bulletin - FN Everything [B079-046]
- 710314R - HCO Bulletin - FN Everything [B130-004]
- 710314R - HCO Bulletin - FN Everything [B130-005]
- 710314R - HCO Bulletin - FN Everything [B130-006]
CONTENTS F/N EVERYTHING Cохранить документ себе Скачать
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 14 MARCH 1971R
Corrected & Reissued 25 July 1973
(Only change being word "by" in para 4 changed to "but".)
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 14 MARCH 1971RA
Issue II
REVISED & REISSUED 18 Dec 1974 AS BTB
RE-REVISED 26 Feb 1977
RemimeoRemimeo
All LevelsAll Scientology Levels

F/N EVERYTHING

(Revised to delete paragraph 13, page 3 which made reference to getting TA down from 3.5/3.2 with an L1C which is a violation of C/S Series 44R C/S Rules – Programming From Prepared Lists and to delete paragraph 3, page 4 as per a 16 Oct 75 Errata)

Whenever an auditor gets a read on an item from Ruds or a prepared list (L1B, L3A, L4B, etc., etc.) IT MUST BE CARRIED TO AN F/N.

TALKING THE TA DOWN

To fail to do so is to leave the pc with by-passed charge.

(A FLAG EXPERTISE SUBJECT)

When a pc has had several reads on various lists which were none of them carried to F/N, it can occur that he will become upset or depressed without any other apparent reason. As one has DONE the lists without F/Ning each item, one now has the mystery of what is wrong?

One of the Hallmarks (sign of) an expert auditor of any Scientology Classification is the ability to talk the TA down if it is high at start of session. It is not a new Technique. It has been done for many years by well trained auditors and is done at Flag simply and expertly as needed.

The error is reading items from Ruds or prepared lists cleaned to no read but not carried to F/N.

If one understands the anatomy of the human mind and what is by-passed charge he will understand this simple but important technique. Scientology auditors of all levels should be able to talk the TA down quickly and simply without restimulating the pc further.

This action (amongst many such refinements) is what makes Flag auditing so smooth and indeed makes it Flag Auditing.

The TA is not talked down by getting overruns, ruds or ARC breaks. It is not done by rehabbing former releases. It is done by the simple time honored action of asking the right question, getting it answered, and – letting the tone arm blow down.

When an auditor first tries this he may well think it is impossible.

By letting the tone arm blow down, it is meant that the auditor does not have any attitudes or ridges toward the preclear, and lets him blow off charge which will bring the tone arm down.

Yet it is simplicity itself. If you know bank structure you know it is necessary to find an earlier item if something does not release. What has been found as a read on a prepared list would F/N if it were the basic lock. So if it doesn't F/N, then there is an earlier (or an earlier or an earlier) lock which is preventing it from F/Ning.

The auditor never interrupts the PC while the tone arm is moving.

So the RULE:

To ask the right question on this technique, you must first know what you are trying to accomplish. Why do you want to bring the TA down?

NEVER WALK OFF FROM A READING ITEM ON A RUDIMENT OR A PREPARED REPAIR LIST BEFORE YOU CARRY IT DOWN (EARLIER SIMILAR) TO AN F/N.

The answer is simply, that the TA being high (3.5 or above), indicates that there is some mass the preclear’s attention is on. You want that mass out of the way so that you can direct the preclear’s attention where you want it.

Example: ARC Brk reads. Pc says what it is, Auditor does ARCU CDEI. If no F/N, Auditor asks for an earlier similar ARC Brk, gets it, ARCU CDEI, etc. until he gets an F/N.

So what you simply do is get the preclear to tell you what is in restimulation so that it will key out without driving the preclear further into his bank – and thus restimulating more mass.

Example: PTP reads. Carry it E/S (earlier similar) until a PTP F/Ns.

You must not further restimulate the preclear’s bank because it already is restimulated by something. The mass is right there. You can see it reading on the meter. But as this is not the mass you came into session prepared to run, it would be a Q and A to change the C/S and program by running it.

Example: L4B: Has an item been denied you? Reads. Answered. No F/N. Is there an earlier similar denied item? Answered. F/N. Go on to next reading item on the list.

So you must destimulate the pc by having him tell you what it is that his attention is on and thus free his attention so that you can run the major action.

Example: GF assessed once through for reads. The next C/S must take every item on it that read, by 2WC or other process, to an F/N.

Briefly, in talking the TA down, you are freeing the preclear’s attention from where it is so that you can then direct it where you wish.

So there is a much more general rule: EVERY ITEM THAT READS MUST F/N.

HOW TALKING THE TA DOWN IS DONE

In Dianetics you get the F/N when you run E/S secondaries or engrams to an erasure, F/N, Cog, VGIs.

Talking the TA down is simply starting the session as usual, and if the TA is high – 3.5 or above – asking the pc a question such as one of the following – using good ARC, excellent TRs, granting the pc beingness not soppy or sugary, but being there comfortably and even pleasantly if the preclear is not upset.

In Rudiments, every out rud you get a read on is run E/S to F/N.

Some of the questions you could ask are:

On a prepared list you take each read to an F/N or E/S to F/N.

“Do you have your attention on anything?“

On an LX list you run each flow chain to an F/N.

“Is there anything you’d care to tell me?”

On GF you get by whatever process an F/N.

“Since your last session has anything happened you’d like to tell me about?”

On Listing by the Laws of Listing and Nulling, your eventual item listed must F/N.

“How have things been going lately?”

So another rule:

“How have things been going since your last session?”

EVERY MAJOR AND MINOR ACTION MUST BE CARRIED TO AN F/N.

Or on occasion you could ask “Have you had any wins lately?”

There are NO exceptions.

The question should be phrased to limit the time period to just what the preclear’s attention is on and not to drive him into his bank by restimulating new things.

Any exception leaves by-passed charge on the pc.

It is lightly, lightly, with one eye on the pc and one eye on the meter so you can see if the Tone Arm blows down and what it blows down on.

Also, every F/N is indicated at the conclusion of the action when cog is obtained.

This does not get wild and complicated. There is no Q and A. Perhaps the pc will say “no” and the question will not have any reaction on the meter. Try another question but stick to one of the types given.

You take too soon an F/N (first twitch) you cut the cognition and leave by-passed charge (a withheld cognition).

If the meter reads and the pc says nothing and the tone arm is not blowing down you could ask “What was that?” or “Did you have a thought there?” (See Fishing a Cognition drill, BTB 25 June 70 Fishing a Cognition.)

__________________

You will also find certain subjects the pc mentions give a blow down. These can be used by noticing them, redirecting the pc’s attention to them when the pc changes the subject and the TA starts up. Example: He says “Mother”, TA blows down, he goes on to “Father”, TA starts up. Casually ask him about his mother again and it will go on down. This is dangerously close to a Q & A except it manipulates the TA. A little of this goes a long way.

I could take any folder and simply write out the ruds and prepared list reading items and then audit the pc and carry each one to F/N and correct every list so disclosed and wind up with a very shining, cool calm pc.

When all else fails look back on your W/S for the lowest TA read and redirect the pc’s attention to that subject and you may get your F/N.

So "Have reading items been left charged?" would be a key question on a case.

Don’t get accusative or abusive or evaluative.

__________________

The preclear will answer you and the tone arm will start blowing down. Sometimes the preclear will not answer, but will be looking, and the tone arm will start falling.

Using lists or ruds on high or low TAs that are not meant for high or low TAs will get you reading items that won't F/N.

Never interrupt while the tone arm is blowing down, even if the preclear isn’t talking.

So, another rule:

Write down on the worksheet whatever names, items, events or whatever it was that blew the tone arm down and circle it.

NEVER TRY TO FLY RUDS OR DO L1B ON A HIGH OR LOW TA.

When the tone arm has stopped blowing down you can indicate to the pc what happened by saying: „There was charge on ……… (the subject which blew the TA down). “ (Warning: This may not be used as a substitute for a good TR 2 or to pull the pc out of session.)

One can talk the TA down (see HCO B on Talking the TA Down).

The pc will usually say something like: „There sure is charge on the subject!“, and you’ll almost certainly get F/N, cog, VGIs. You would, of course, indicate on the worksheet what happened and write „indicated“.

Or one can assess L4B.

You’d let the preclear have his win on this by indicating the F/N, then you would go on to your C/S actions. If your C/S stated „Fly a rud if no F/N. “ you wouldn’t have to fly a rud because you have your F/N.

About the only prepared lists one can assess are the new Hi-Lo TA HCO B 13 Mar 71 and possibly a GF+40 once through for biggest read. The biggest read will have a blowdown on it and can possibly be brought to F/N. If this occurs then one also handles all other items that read.

CONCLUSION

__________________

The auditor observes the preclear. By his presence alone, the auditor can make the preclear feel safe and willing to be in session and this alone will often bring the tone arm down if it is high at start of session.

The most frequent errors in all this are:

Auditors with presence have been seen to do this time after time. Auditor presence of this caliber is not unusual even at lower levels. It is the auditor who controls the session, the pc’s bank, the pc’s attention and the pc’s TA.

  • Not taking a read earlier similar but just checking it and leaving it as "clean".

In talking the TA down, it is the action of getting the pc’s attention off the mass and into session which brings the tone arm down.

  • Not using suppress and false on items.
  • When the TA is down, the auditor skillfully directs the pc’s attention to that portion of the bank he wishes to restimulate and run in accordance with the C/S.

  • And of course leaving a pc thinking things are still charged by failing to indicate the F/N.
  • The major cautions in talking the TA down are:

  • Indicating an F/N before Cog.
  • 1. Don’t turn it into a major action. Use it only to get the TA down and leave it.

  • Not going back through the folder to handle ruds and items that read but were called "clean" or were simply abandoned.
  • 2. Use talking the TA down only at the start of session and not in the middle of a session if the TA goes high.

    A pc audited under tension of poor TRs has a hard time and does not F/N sometimes, inviting overrun.

    An auditor should never start a session with the tone arm high. An auditor with good presence, good TRs and the ability to grant the preclear beingness will never need more than just a few minutes to talk the TA down and get into the C/S quickly.

    The rules then to happy pcs are:

    Lt. Cmdr. Joan Robertson
    Training & Service Aide
    Revised & Reissued as BTB by
    Flag Mission 1234
    I/C CPO Andrea Lewis
    2nd Molly Harlow
    Approved by the Commodore’s
    Staff Aides and the Board of Issues
    Re-Revised on 25 Feb 77 by
    AVU I/A Assistant
    Authorized by AVU for the Boards of Directors of the Churches of Scientology
    BDSC:DM:RG:BOI:CSA:AL:MH:JR:mh:lf
    • GOOD TRS.
  • F/N EVERYTHING FOUND ON RUDS AND LISTS.
  • AUDIT WITH TA IN NORMAL RANGE OR REPAIR IT SO IT IS IN NORMAL RANGE.
  • L. RON HUBBARD
    Founder
    LRH:mes.nt.rd