Русская версия

Search document title:
Content search 2 (exact):
ENGLISH DOCS FOR THIS DATE- Routine 3A - B611107 | Сравнить

SCANS FOR THIS DATE- 611107 - HCO Bulletin - Routine 3A [B028-049]
CONTENTS ROUTINE 3A Cохранить документ себе Скачать
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 7 NOVEMBER 1961
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 7 NOVEMBER 1961
St Hill StudentsSt Hill Students

ROUTINE 3A

ROUTINE 3A

I have found a way to undercut the speed of a goals terminal run.

I have found a way to undercut the speed of a goals terminal run.

This consists of a discovery of a new piece of the puzzle — The Modifier.

This consists of a discovery of a new piece of the puzzle — The Modifier.

By use of the Modifier the basic terminal of a goals chain may be isolated without running off the upper terminal.

By use of the Modifier the basic terminal of a goals chain may be isolated without running off the upper terminal.

Routine 3 consists of finding a goal, finding a terminal and running it on the Pre- Hav Scale, combined with sec checking. Then one finds a new terminal for the goal, etc, etc.

Routine 3 consists of finding a goal, finding a terminal and running it on the Pre- Hav Scale, combined with sec checking. Then one finds a new terminal for the goal, etc, etc.

ROUTINE 3A consists of:

ROUTINE 3A consists of:

  1. Having pc write a goals list.
  1. Having pc write a goals list.
  • Adding various types of goals to the list (Secret, etc).
  • Adding various types of goals to the list (Secret, etc).
  • Assessing the list and locating the goal by elimination. (The above steps are unchanged from Routine 3.)
  • Assessing the list and locating the goal by elimination. (The above steps are unchanged from Routine 3.)
  • Compiling a list of MODIFIERS by asking the pc what would make the goal impossible to attain, what would keep it from happening, what would be its consequences if attained, etc.
  • Compiling a list of MODIFIERS by asking the pc what would make the goal impossible to attain, what would keep it from happening, what would be its consequences if attained, etc.
  • Assessing Modifier list by elimination. (Assess Modifiers without repeating goal.)
  • Assessing Modifier list by elimination. (Assess Modifiers without repeating goal.)
  • Combining goal and Modifier as the question for terminal (who or what would [goal & modifier] ) and compiling a terminals list.
  • Combining goal and Modifier as the question for terminal (who or what would [goal & modifier] ) and compiling a terminals list.
  • (Otherwise same as Routine 3)(Otherwise same as Routine 3)
    1. Assessing terminals list by elimination to obtain the terminal. (Same as Routine 3)
    1. Assessing terminals list by elimination to obtain the terminal. (Same as Routine 3)
  • Assessing Pre-Hav Scale for level. (Same as Routine 3)
  • Assessing Pre-Hav Scale for level. (Same as Routine 3)
  • Forming multi-bracket commands and running or using a packaged command. (Same as Routine 3)
  • Forming multi-bracket commands and running or using a packaged command. (Same as Routine 3)
  • Routine 3A is also combined with ordinary sec checks as well as a Dynamic sec check gained from a Dynamic Assessment.

    Routine 3A is also combined with ordinary sec checks as well as a Dynamic sec check gained from a Dynamic Assessment.

    Havingness and Confront are also found and used during auditing of terminal on levels.

    Havingness and Confront are also found and used during auditing of terminal on levels.

    ____________________

    The resulting terminal will be found to be more fundamental than the Routine 3 type terminal and should run much faster.

    The resulting terminal will be found to be more fundamental than the Routine 3 type terminal and should run much faster.

    ____________________

    I developed this by deducing that if a goal is held in suspense in time, it must have another side to it like a problem.

    I developed this by deducing that if a goal is held in suspense in time, it must have another side to it like a problem.

    A problem is postulate-counter-postulate.

    A problem is postulate-counter-postulate.

    To stay fixed, a goal must have a counter-postulate.

    To stay fixed, a goal must have a counter-postulate.

    Both goal and Modifier must be contained in one basic terminal, otherwise the postulates would not be out of reach of the pc.

    Both goal and Modifier must be contained in one basic terminal, otherwise the postulates would not be out of reach of the pc.

    This terminal may be far more real to the pc and the whole package may blow more rapidly.

    This terminal may be far more real to the pc and the whole package may blow more rapidly.

    ____________________

    In those cases where a goal has been found, do Routine 3A Steps 4 through 9. Get Modifier and terminal checked out when found.

    In those cases where a goal has been found, do Routine 3A Steps 4 through 9. Get Modifier and terminal checked out when found.

    ____________________

    So far the Modifier list has been very short, the pc getting it on the first question in some cases and half a dozen in others. Ten would seem a fair number.

    So far the Modifier list has been very short, the pc getting it on the first question in some cases and half a dozen in others. Ten would seem a fair number.

    ____________________

    Definition: A Modifier is that consideration which opposes the attainment of a goal and tends to suspend it in time.

    Definition: A Modifier is that consideration which opposes the attainment of a goal and tends to suspend it in time.

    In practice all Modifiers so far found have Dianetic type denyers in them which put them semantically out of sight.

    In practice all Modifiers so far found have Dianetic type denyers in them which put them semantically out of sight.

    Example: Goal: To be a Willow Wand. Modifier: So as never to be reached. Accordingly, the pc also never reaches the Modifier in his thinking but dramatizes

    Example: Goal: To be a Willow Wand. Modifier: So as never to be reached. Accordingly, the pc also never reaches the Modifier in his thinking but dramatizes

    it.

    it.

    Goal + Modifier for terminal use would be “Who or what would be a willow wand

    Goal + Modifier for terminal use would be “Who or what would be a willow wand

    so as never to be reached”. Terminal assessed from list: “A bending reed”.

    so as never to be reached”. Terminal assessed from list: “A bending reed”.

    ____________________

    In those cases that have gone Clear, the Modifier ran out, almost unnoticed. In those cases that haven’t gone Clear, the pc is still dramatizing the Modifier while running the goal and cleaning off one terminal from a chain.

    In those cases that have gone Clear, the Modifier ran out, almost unnoticed. In those cases that haven’t gone Clear, the pc is still dramatizing the Modifier while running the goal and cleaning off one terminal from a chain.

    ____________________

    I suppose we may find in some cases that we have the Modifier but not the goal. In such a case the question would have to be (in Step 4 above) “What goal would make one eventually decide to be that way”. I do not know positively of any such cases as yet, I am only providing for the possibility. Where the person’s “goal” seems to be a defeat, I would suspect it was the Modifier with the goal before it not yet found.

    I suppose we may find in some cases that we have the Modifier but not the goal. In such a case the question would have to be (in Step 4 above) “What goal would make one eventually decide to be that way”. I do not know positively of any such cases as yet, I am only providing for the possibility. Where the person’s “goal” seems to be a defeat, I would suspect it was the Modifier with the goal before it not yet found.

    Nothing in this means that all terminals are wrong. Some may be found to be the same terminal as before. Others will be found to be more basic. A few will seem not to compare.

    Nothing in this means that all terminals are wrong. Some may be found to be the same terminal as before. Others will be found to be more basic. A few will seem not to compare.

    ____________________

    All cases now running on a goals terminal as per Routine 3 should be reassessed at once as per Routine 3A to save time in auditing.

    All cases now running on a goals terminal as per Routine 3 should be reassessed at once as per Routine 3A to save time in auditing.

    L. RON HUBBARDL. RON HUBBARD
    LRH:esc.rdLRH:esc.rd