Русская версия

Search document title:
Content search 2 (exact):
ENGLISH DOCS FOR THIS DATE- End Phenomenas - B711205v74 | Сравнить

RUSSIAN DOCS FOR THIS DATE- Конечные Результаты - Б711205 | Сравнить
- Конечные Явления - Б711205 | Сравнить

SCANS FOR THIS DATE- 711205 - HCO Bulletin - End Phenomenas [B011-253]
- 711205 - HCO Bulletin - End Phenomenas [B047-027]
- 711205 - HCO Bulletin - End Phenomenas [B052-043]
CONTENTS END PHENOMENAS Cохранить документ себе Скачать
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 5 DECEMBER 1971
Reissued 21 September 1974
(Only change is signature)
Remimeo Class VII Auditors All Auditors Class VII Course C/Ses Class IV Checksheet IMPORTANT

END PHENOMENAS

Feeding the pc the End Phenomena of a process or action is illegal and very out-tech.

Example: Auditor asks pc”Since the last session did _____(stating the E/P)?”

Or”In this session did _____(stating the E/P)?”

This is evaluating for the pc. The pc has to make it himself then he truly makes it.

The correct way to check to see if a pc has made an E/P (rare as pcs usually tell their auditor their cogs, etc) would be to ask”Did anything occur?” or”Since your last session did anything occur?” If the pc then states the E/P or words to that effect, with F/N and VGIs, the process can be terminated or if necessary, rehabbed and terminated. If the pc does not state the E/P the auditor then knows to continue the process.

These actions apply very definitely to Power Processing – where earlier HCOBs state the auditor can check to find out if the E/P occurred between sessions.

Usually sessions aren’t ended before F/N, VGIs and E/P on a process. It’s easier on the C/S, auditor and pc to complete a cycle of action in the one session.

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt.rd.jh