Русская версия

Search document title:
Content search 2 (exact):
ENGLISH DOCS FOR THIS DATE- Clay Table Healing Goof - B650427 | Сравнить

RUSSIAN DOCS FOR THIS DATE- Ляп при Исцелении с Помощью Пластилинового Стола - Б650427 | Сравнить

SCANS FOR THIS DATE- 650427 - HCO Bulletin - Clay Table Healing Goof [B005-011]
- 650427 - HCO Bulletin - Clay Table Healing Goof [B040-055]
- 650427 - HCO Bulletin - Clay Table Healing Goof [B081-021]
- 650427 - HCO Bulletin - Clay Table Healing Goof [B148-007]
CONTENTS CLAY TABLE HEALING GOOF re Clay Table Healing Cохранить документ себе Скачать
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 27 APRIL 1965
Remimeo Sthil Students

CLAY TABLE HEALING GOOF

The following letter from Ian Tampion outlines a common trouble with CTH. The pc doesn’t answer the question!

This comes really from running it on a pc who isn’t that high in grades. The pc can’t yet hear and answer a question.

L.R.H. Assoc Sec Perth

Dear Ron,

re Clay Table Healing

I have heard something ”on the grapevine” about CTH which if correct (as it sounds) will be something that is pretty uniformly being goofed, at least in Australia.

It comes with the question ”What should be near (body part)?” – as I understand it you want what should be near it, that is, the guy has a headache, body part ”head”, should be near it is ”no headache”. In other words, is the ”should be near part” the absence of or reverse to, the condition being healed?

I was formerly taking anything that seemed to make sense to the pc so I bet plenty of other people have too – amazingly enough it’s even worked quite well too!

Best,
Ian
L. RON HUBBARD LRH:wmc.rd