Formula 13 will move almost all cases satisfactorily up to finding the havingness, finding the confront, help O/W terminal and thus clear.

But there remain certain very few cases that do not move on Formula 13 as such. A variation is required. These are:

Formula 13 will move almost all cases satisfactorily up to finding the havingness, finding the confront, help O/W terminal and thus clear.

1. The hyper-critical case

But there remain certain very few cases that do not move on Formula 13 as such.

2. The big withhold case

A variation is required. These are:

3. The case that wants no processing

1. The hyper-critical case

Case 1 does not move because he is continually chopping Scientology, Auditors, the Org, etc behind the auditor. This should be suspected when Formula 13 does not work. The chopping is severe to prevent ordinary Formula 13 from working. The answer is to run Formula 13 with assessment on Scientology terminals for the O/W plus any Scientology invalidative person or persons our pc is in contact with in PT.

Case 2, the Big Withhold, has a crime of magnitude when it will not move on Formula 13. "What question shouldn't I ask you?" may not remedy this if it's big. "Think of something you've withheld" interspersed with the casual question, "Is there anything you'd like to tell me?" every half dozen O/W questions should produce an unburdening of the withhold to the auditor. There may be more than one withhold of this nature.

Case 3 is the person who has never had processing and wants no processing but sits in the chair and runs off answers misemotionally. The oldest approach was "Tell me why you shouldn't have processing. " Presession One is more modern. The latest experimental process is "Tell me something you don't want," repetitively.

Case 1 does not move because he is continually chopping Scientology, Auditors, the Org, etc behind the auditor. This should be suspected when Formula 13 does not work. The chopping is severe to prevent ordinary Formula 13 from working. The answer is to run Formula 13 with assessment on Scientology terminals for the O/W PLUS any Scientology invalidative person or persons our pc is in contact with in PT.

All cases above are followed by Formula 13 when willing to be audited or make gains.

Case 2, the Big Withhold, has a crime of magnitude when it will not move on Formula 13. “What question shouldn’t I ask you?” may not remedy this if it’s big. “Think of something you’ve withheld” interspersed with the casual question, “Is there anything you’d like to tell me?” every half dozen O/W questions should produce an unburdening of the withhold to the auditor. There may be more than one withhold of this nature.

Case 3 is the person who has never had processing and wants no processing but sits in the chair and runs off answers misemotionally. The oldest approach was “Tell me why you shouldn’t have processing.” Presession One is more modern. The latest experimental process is “Tell me something you don’t want,” repetitively.

All cases above are followed by Formula 13 when willing to be audited or make gains.