Thank you.

Thank you.

Well, from a survey of this I would say some of you can audit. And the rest, why, we're pretty good at training Fortunately.

Okay. Here we go. Second lecture of 1st of May.

All right. This is the 1st of May. This is May Day. Mayday. That's a radio signal for "SOS." And if you feel in an SOS frame of mind . . . First of May, AD 12, Saint Hill Special Briefing Course.

I suppose after that first lecture some of you will be calling Mayday! Mayday! But remember, if you do, the response will be, "What withhold has been missed on you?"

All right. I might as well start in giving you hell. So you think you can audit? Ha! You know the hard thing that we have doing? The very, very rough thing we have doing? Is getting an auditor to ask the simplest question. I don't know, maybe there's some vocal selector on "missed withholds." Maybe there's some vocal impasse. Maybe it is absolutely impossible for most people to say "Have I missed a withhold on you?" Maybe there's something in the onomatopoeic of that syllablization. Perhaps the phonetics of it are insurmountable. But that's the hardest thing we have to do. That is the toughest thing to do. It is utterly wild!

All right. I'm going to talk to you about HCO Info Letter April 29, AD 12, Routine 3G: Experimental Preview of a Clearing Process.

We have had more than one case of somebody letting a pc die before they would say it! That's pretty fantastic, isn't it? "Have I missed a withhold on you?" It's simple, isn't it? Now, if — the syllablization can't be the reason because there's another way you can phrase it. "Is there something I should have found out about you?" Ho-ho-ho, that fooled you. you can't keep telling me, "Well, because of my — because I was Japanese in my last life I can't say it." Because you can say it, because there are several ways with which to say it.

And the first thing you should know about this is it is complete. And that's your first miss on it. You're going to read this and you're going to be sure that it is incomplete — that there's much more to be known. Because all the comments I've had on this to date — there will be other issues on this material, of course — but all comments I have had is on the basis of additive, additive, what do we do about the additive? You know, somebody says, well, what do you do about all the — you know, we got this — we got this right away and everything's fine and we think this is beautiful and this straightens out everything, but now, what do you do with oppterms of the items which have already been found? Unfortunate, you see, but it happens to be covered here. You don't do anything with them, you see?

Now, you needn't be taken so aback. But it's only that you haven't heard me. See, on this one I am forced into an involuntary withhold. See, I feel like somebody screaming in a soundproof room. Pc comes down out of session — duhuh- into one wall, caroms into the other wall. The auditor comes down beaten to pieces, you see — just absolutely — face utterly flat, you know? And says, "That certainly is an ARC breaky pc. He just has ARC breaks all the time." Obviously the auditor cannot utter these words: "Have I missed a withhold on you?" It is fabulous!

It really — if it doesn't say it here . . . This, of course, doesn't cover precisely Model Session. It doesn't give you — it doesn't — it doesn't give you a lot of the procedural actions. But as far as the — as the technology itself is concerned, it is jolly complete. So you in studying this, you see, what you should do is read what's here, not add something and worry about it.

People will actually let a pc sit in front of them and yap and scream and go out of session and have his list all mucked up and his brains knocked out, while the auditor sits there and says, "Well the pc really ought to be controlling the session anyway. And what do I have to do with the session?" It must start with that kind of an attitude, you see. "I have no responsibility for what this fellow is doing because he — look at him — ha-ha-hrrr. Well, what could I do about it?"

You can do that. you can add something and then worry about it. And if it isn't here, don't worry about it. That's the first message, you know, you got. You say, "Well, what — what — what about a pc, what about a pc who had a goal and — he had a goal all right and they found this terminal, you understand? And the terminal was audited on — what have you done to — what couldn't have happened with or — or something And it was audited that way for 269 hours and so forth. Now what do we do?" You know, you do . . .

Well, you couldn't have done anything about it without Scientology. And perhaps you would have had a rough go of it even a few months ago when you didn't know about missed withholds. But in the few months we have known about it . . .

That hasn't anything to do with it. It says the way you patch up and go back and backtrack is you check out the goal. It doesn't say a thing about doing anything with a terminal. But we couldn't care less about the terminals. Forget the terminals.

You ever see a boa constrictor in a zoo? You ever see these? They have glass fronted cages and you look through the glass fronted cage and see this boa constrictor. You ever see this? You know how they feed them? They have a machine and every six months they pry open the boa constrictor's mouth and start the machine going and it puts hamburger — six months' worth — into the boa constrictor. That's the way they feed them. That's actually true. Now, don't make me get one of those machines to teach you this — please! Now, please learn it for the importance that it has.

Why? A broad survey of everything done on 3D Criss Cross is it's been done wrong. It's horrible to behold, but it's absolutely my observation. I haven't seen a complete list yet. So I'll tell you if you want to finish off a 3D Criss Cross, your best stunt with this... This — this isn't — this doesn't concern — it gives you the steps of 3D Criss Cross, but it really doesn't concern itself totally with repatching up 3D Criss Cross.

Let me read you a list of some of the things which a missed withhold cause — and only a missed withhold causes these things. Now, don't get the idea that there's a — see, I think maybe you're not hearing me because you think there's a lot of other things. And there are not. There are no other things that cause these things. The fundamental cause of this long list I am about to read you is missed withholds and nothing else. There isn't any other manifestation from here to the other end of this universe, if you've ever been there — and I'll send you, if you don't learn this — that causes any of these things, except missed withholds. You have a GPM because of missed withholds! Now, that's how important the missed withhold is. You'd never have a single item if people hadn't kept missing withholds on it and you haven't kept missing withholds with it. Now, that's something to know. This is very important.

I can tell you how to patch up 3D Criss Cross. It is just, take the source items, you know, what should we disregard, you're trying to get something done the fellow had and he had the Prehav level, "God Almighty" and something like this — it doesn't matter. You just take that line and take the original list and complete it.

It is almost as if the basic principle of existence is: thou — when existence is good — "Thou hath not missed a withhold." And when existence is bad, "Thou hath mithed a withhold." See? Now, that's how important that can be.

You don't do anything with the terminal, see; you can take the list source and complete it. And it's very odd, you know, but you're going to be able to get — apply these tests. But none of these tests would apply to any lists you've done yet — they wouldn't apply. Well, just experimentally, take any list you have done on a pc. I don't care, even if the items checked on 3D Criss Cross. Take the list and just read the first twelve items to the pc and watch the tone arm move. Uuuhhhh. It didn't go down as fundamental as it could have gone. Right? So therefore, even though the terminal checks out very nicely and is sitting there very nicely and everything like that, you can still bleed charge off the list and you can get deeper into the Goals Problem Mass with the same type of list.

Now, let me read you the list of the things which only a missed withhold cause. And which are caused only by missed withholds and which missed withholds, asked for, heal — bang Just like that — bang. There is no monkey business about it. A missed withhold properly asked for, the meter properly cleaned on missed withhold, remedies each one of these fifteen things and many more. The number is almost infinite but these are the best ones:

See, you can go further every time and the funny part of it is, is all the 3D Criss Cross you have done, of course, has blown charge off the bank. None of it is in vain.

One: Pc failing to make progress. Now, we used to say that was a present time problem. Well, a present time problem comes into existence because somebody has missed a withhold on him. That-he's missed a withhold on somebody else and after that they have problems. You understand? A pc in the presence of missed withholds will not get any graph change. All right.

Now, the rationale of 3D Criss Cross that you went on and found items and opptermed items and found items and opptermed items and they eventually come down and you get more and more fundamental items. In other words, we are blowing off charge on a gross basis of taking many items and the charge would eventually bleed off the Goals Problem Mass. See, that was the rationale of 3D Criss Cross. Well, this makes a pc pretty uncomfortable, experience has shown.

Two: Pc critical of or angry at the auditor. Pc critical of or angry at the auditor. Now, do you know that you sometimes make a flub. And have you made a flub and the pc didn't protest? And have you made a flub and the pc did protest? Well, now, listen, don't get hung in this mess. you made a flub; the pc protested about it. So therefore you were wrong and he was right. So therefore, it's reasonable. And you know that's why you don't pick up missed withholds? Because it's so reasonable. I spit on reasonability. It's so reasonable.

Now, we can also get into the Goals Problem Mass more deeply and more fundamentally by getting a goal. In other words, a goal is a better thing to operate with on each one of the line plot lines to find a Goals Problem Mass. It's — it — you know, it's all in the interest of shortening up the auditing You'll always get a more fundamental item by going off from a goal. Always. It goes deeper. Why does it go deeper? Well, the pc isn't being asked to confront any mass. He's only being confront — asked to confront ideas and so he can go into the Goals Problem Mass and he can confront more and more and more ideas. He can rack around — and of course, he's basically confronting the idea in the mass he is stuck in.

One auditor said, "Well, the pc sat there and kept calling me a coward and saying I was a coward and I was afraid to audit him and that sort of thing and it was true. So what could I do about it?"

So a goals list is only asking him to confront ideas, not asking him to confront any masses. And then you turn around having found that he is trapped on the fourth basement floor — you found this by ideas, you see. Now, you get him to list the items and he'll eventually list the item which surrounds the idea you found. See, it's all on the basis that it's easier to find the idea than it is to find the mass.

Now look, look, get this real straight. Yes, it's true. Absolutely. That was perfectly true, that the pc was uttering these words and that the auditor was guilty of the charges. But that wasn't what the pc was upset about.

Pcs will confront ideas endlessly, but will not very often confront masses, which are painful to them. All the technique of war is based upon this fact. Somebody can confront and snarl and quarrel with the ideas of the enemy. And then he walks out and bares his bosom to some mass — shells, flame throwers, something of that sort — and he loses himself a body.

Do you know, it's not what's known that's wrong with the pc, you see? No. The reason the pc protested and got upset about it, is because the pc has a missed withhold. See, it doesn't matter how reasonable the pc's squawk is. You know, you dropped his goals list into the spittoon. You know, and when you got up to fetch it, dumped the E-Meter over his head, you see. And he says, "What the hell are you doing?" Now, if he says, "What the hell are you doing?" it's because a withhold has been missed earlier than that. Do you follow this?

He could argue about their counter-philosophy, you see, all day and all night, you see and he'd still have a body, you know. So he's accustomed to being able to confront ideas. He can argue with ideas. He can confront ideas. He can do this with ideas and that with ideas and so forth. Do almost anything but change his ideas. And therefore, in the Goals Problem Mass, in racking around the person is, of course, confronting more intimately the idea which is encysted in the terminal which he is actually in. He can confront that and he can tell you what that is without being able to tell you what the mass — terminal — see, what the mass of a terminal is or identify the terminal. He can tell you about the ideas of a terminal before he can tell you about the terminal. You see that?

See, don't get so doggone tied up in the reasonability of it. Very often the pc's complaints are correct; very often the pc's complaints are incorrect. It does not matter whether the pc's complaints are correct or incorrect. The pc is complaining because you have missed a withhold on the pc. And that's all there is to it. There isn't any more explanation to it than that. Do you see? This bypasses reasonability.

So therefore, a goals entrance, taking the goal as your departure point each time, reaches more fundamentally and more deeply into the GPM. This is the theory of it. And now, having reached the goal of this mass, why, of course, you go ahead and identify the item. And the item you identify will have that goal. And that's — that's all there is to it. Now, that he's identified it, however, he's got to differentiate it and separate it. He thought many things had this goal, but only one thing had the goal per the list that you did.

Now, of course, you can take an auditor who can't do a Model Session and doesn't know an E-Meter — one end of it than the other — can't follow on any TR, and he's stumbling and fumbling in all directions, and trying to end the session with no rudiments. And before the session has started he said, "Well let's see, I'll do my Model Session. Now, let's see, what part of it is . . .? Let's see. Have I . . .? Let's see, where is it here? Oh yes, 'End of session!' No, no, I mean — uh, I mean — uh . . ."

And you got down to the bottom of the pot and, of course, there he was and he's mixed up with this particular — this item. It's a mass, you know. He's in the middle of that bowling ball, not in the other five hundred. And the reason the bowling ball is hung up is, of course, it is opposed against another bowling ball and which has exactly opposite ideas. Now, by oppterming the item which you have finally found, of course, it is hoped — and this is theoretical and experimental, of course — it is hoped that these two bowling balls will just go whumphh and that will be the end of that.

And do you know the only reason the pc gets upset is because a withhold has been missed on him. you search it out sometime. You go into this thing, you know, and you'll see that's a fact. See, the missed withhold might be such a thing: "Well, you schnook, why the hell did they ever let you out of the Academy?" Still a missed withhold. See, for a few minutes, for a few seconds, the pc was — tried to be nice about it. Tried to be patient about it. Tried to, you know. Get it audited anyway. You know, try to get the session going so they're stonily not saying anything oh, you've been there, have you?

Because it's fantastic that they could be suspended in space and time and be so timeless because they happened so long ago. How are they still there? It's a freak. It's a freak. The GPM is composed of these accidentals and there are not very many of them that are poised. It's something like how do you — how do you take a boulder as big as a two-story house and balance it upon the exact pinnacle of a windblown mountain peak, you know. It — you could stand there for a long time and study this and say, "How the hell is that thing balanced there?" you know? It couldn't happen! See?

Look, I told you a long time ago that it took a half an hour to an hour and a half for the pc to blow a session. This is just empirical observation. This betokens the fact that something must have happened that much earlier. And the something that happened that much earlier was a missed withhold. But you can see it; you can see it on a pc. you can see it growing and growing and then the pc finally blows.

Well, down basically in the Goals Problem Mass, how could — how could you get such an exact balance between a terminal and an oppterm that they hang up in equal force and perpetuate themselves for trillennia. Man! That takes some doing

And a real dumb auditor with no observation of the pc, auditing the meter instead of the pc or something, see, auditing the — his memory or something, doesn't see this, and all of a sudden the pc explodes and tries to blow session and the auditor tries to put this back together again. And if the pc is halfway out the door, that is not the time to try to patch up a session, see? See, it had already happened a half an hour to an hour and a half earlier. So this is not the time to patch up the session. The time to patch up the session is routinely and regularly, earlier.

You mean you found a waterbuck who is just as strong as a tiger and a tiger who is just as strong as a waterbuck. And a waterbuck who has just exactly these antagonistic ideas to a tiger that make the tiger's antagonistic ideas to a waterbuck hang up. And now that hangs up in time and the pc is still creating it. It's still persevering. It is still hung If he was — just had an identity and he was still creating this identity, he long since would have ceased to create it. See, there just isn't anything — for a reason, for him to go on creating it. He's just saying, "It must survive." Well, that's kind of odd. Well, of course, it survived and now it isn't surviving

And the way you patch it up — now this is, it's very complicated and I know it's very hard to understand, and I know there — that it's almost impossible to utter these words — is to say to the pc, "Have I missed a withhold on you?" Not when he leaves the session. When he's going out of the door, I want to point out a physical fact to you: the E-Meter cans are no longer in his hands. They are lying dented on the floor, see. So you don't ask him that at that time.

Well, why must it survive? Well it must survive because it is opposed. It is always opposed, so it always must survive. How the devil did he arrange that in his reactive bank? That's marvelous, you know. How — you get down to figure out how in the name of God could you have these two cannonballs fired from peak one and peak two directly at each other with the exact balance velocity that they hit each other exactly in midair. You see, that would be an artillery freak to end all artillery freaks.

No, the technical way to go about it, you see, the real professional attitude, is to ask him the question while he is still sitting in the chair. And now if you're a real pro you will notice that the pc is not in good comm with you when he ceases to be in good comm with you merely by the tiniest inflection of voice. And at that moment you will ask, "Have I missed a withhold on you?" And it goes glang. And he tells you what it is and then you clean it up properly. Do you know how to clean one up properly? Well now just a minute. You say, "Have I missed a withhold on you?" And he says, "Yes, I had a fight with my mother this morning."

I think in World War I, in the whole of World War I, they eventually found an unexploded shell that had been hit by another shell. It had a shell in the side of it. And everybody thinks this is marvelous. As a matter of fact, it's in a museum someplace over in France.

Now, a huge crossroads yawns before us. And there's a tremendous boulevard which has magnetic attractors laid into it all down the left. And the little, tiny straight path on the right is not at all attractive, see. And most auditors drive down this tremendous wide highway by saying, "What was the fight about?" Ohhh-ohh. Oh, no. Oh no, we've had it now. We're on the M1 at a hundred and twenty-five miles an hour with no brakes and can't find the ignition switch. There isn't any way of stopping now because things just go from worse to worser.

I don't know how many billions of bullets and shells were fired in World War I, at what close range and almost never did one shell hit another shell, see.

No, that little, little path on the right is the one we want. And we say, "Good," or "Is that all of it?" or "Good, thank you. All right. Is there any other withhold I have missed on you?" See. And that steers us right back into the session again, see. That's all we do. Trouble with it is it's too cockeyed simple, you see? You see? It's too — much too simple. And as long as you keep getting knocks on missed withholds you keep asking for them. And when he gives them, you don't develop them. you just understand and acknowledge them. That's all you do with them. Don't do another thing. And the pc just sinks back into session beautifully. He just goes right back into session. It's gorgeous. It's marvelous. It's such magic, nobody ever heard of such a thing. It's unbelievable until you've done it.

Well, it's just that kind of thing. And all these — all these billions of lives and identities a person's had, how does he have one that hangs up against another one that exactly, so that afterwards it will accumulate other identities and then accumulate other balances and accumulate and accumulate and he's still, weirdly enough, creating all of these things simultaneously and so forth. You just couldn't do it.

Pc is screaming his head off. You can't even be heard above the highpitched roar, see. But you manage — he finally takes a breath, and as he takes that breath you say, "Have I missed a withhold on you?"

Just get the idea right now of creating simultaneously 585 different identities all at the same minute, each with all of its own particular. . . Well, you're doing it. Well, how do you do it? Well, that's because there's just a couple down at the bottom of it and that's what you're creating. And the rest of these things, of course, just accumulate and accumulate and accumulate and, of course, they don't uncreate. You got the theory back of this?

Now, oddly enough, "What are you trying to make me guilty of?" is not palatable to pcs. It isn't. It's a piece of technology but if — pcs don't like it. And the next one is, "What have you done to me in this session?" The pc doesn't like that either. But pcs for some reason or other always take this like little lambs. "Babies cry for Castoria," you know? And, "Have I missed a withhold on you?" You see, you've already accused yourself. See? And very often this strikes him that you're being terribly clever. "How did you know?" See? He doesn't connect it with roaring at you. Very interesting technology.

Well, therefore, it is of interest in terms of (1) shortness of auditing time and (2) pc comfort, to achieve the most fundamental grip that you can get on the Goals Problem Mass as soon as you can get it.

I'll read you another one of these conditions:

In other words, the earliest grip, the deepest — the deepest grip, the earliest. This is what you're trying to do. You're trying to get there mostest with the firstest and when you got that, why of course, you're that much closer to doing something about it.

Three: Pc refusing to talk to auditor. That happens ordinarily fifteen or twenty minutes before the blow. So that's just a little closer to the end of session and the final blow, you see? But the conditions are the same. Up to fifteen, twenty minutes, half an hour before that refusal to talk to the auditor there has been a missed withhold with magnitude. Ordinarily the session started out with a missed withhold, continued with a missed withhold while twenty or thirty new missed withholds developed. And then the pc goes into a total withhold.

Now, there's a couple of phenomena which have been observed and one of them is that later on, after proper terminals have been found and goals and terminals have been found in Routine 3, that later on you get nothing but constant blow of terminals. In other words, you try to find the terminals for that goal and you no more than find them than they blow. And then eventually you'll take a goal and you'll no more than find the goal than it will blow. Some of you have seen this happen. Some of you have experienced it.

See, there's such a thing as an involuntary withhold, too. The mechanisms of the ARC break — if you really want to promote an ARC break with the pc, you can, by hanging him with withholds which are involuntary. The involuntary withhold is something else. The pc says, "cat," and you don't acknowledge it. And he says, "dog," and you don't write it down or acknowledge it. And he's giving you list items, you see, and you just sit there and gaze off into space or something like that. And the next thing you know, he gets the idea that he's withholding Naturally he is because he's not communicating The funny part of it is, the same question serves. "Have I missed a withhold on you?"

Now, I'm trying here with this approach to move that phenomenon right up to the beginning of clearing, see. So we're doing nothing but blowing and we're never auditing, see. We're never auditing a process on these things, see. Just knock out auditing a process and just do it all by assessment. Well, that's the definite theoretical approach to this thing and that's what's hoped for.

"Yes, goddamnit. I said 'cat' and I said 'dog' and so forth. And you missed these as withholds."

All right. We know definitely that these things do blow. Well, all right. Let's move that up to the beginning of the case instead of experiencing it at the end. That's the effort here. And the other one is this: That a pc never feels better than when he has his goal and his first terminal. He just feels marvelous and many of you will agree with that. That's a marvelous sensation to have those two things beautifully and accurately spotted and everything is fine. you feel great.

Now, the thing to do is acknowledge these things. And you just acknowledge the fact that you've missed the withhold. That's all you have to do about it. Straighten out the situation with the pc if it's the fact you actually didn't put a couple of items down on the list. But honestly, it cures it up right away.

Well, now the second that you find a modifier and the second that you find an opposition terminal, you really never feel worse. You've had it right there at that point.

There are many types of involuntary withholds. Do you realize that most of you have all — are out of ARC with the Marcab Confederacy at this time because you're not saying anything to them. Somebody who is very Christian, extremely Christian — you know, has to have permission to eat breakfast and has to have permission to eat lunch and then forgiven for the evening. You know, their life wholly turns on these little pivots — will sooner or later in one lifetime or another listen for a moment after the prayer, you see, or something, and the circuit they've been using hasn't — hasn't spoken for some time. They get no acknowledgment. And they realize they've been talking all this time to the Big Thetan, you see? And nobody's ever said a word. And they get madder than hell at the Catholic church, you know. And they start revolutions and burn popes and . . . It's marvelous.

Well now, why is this? It's because you were coming away from the Goals Problem Mass in old Routine 3 clearing. You see, we're trying to push Routine 3 clearing straight on through the Goals Problem Mass, then there's no relapse of clearing We're trying to push it through the lot, you see, so that you don't get a Keyed-Out Clear state but you get a Clear state that is absolutely straight through. All right.

The most adventurous activity you could possibly engage upon would be to start something that couldn't ever have any acknowledgment. See. Because sooner or later that's going to bust everybody up into a screaming fury. Because it's going to add up to nothing but one long chain of missed withholds. You follow that?

Now, the modifier apparently has a lot to do with the oppterm, so why find it? You're going to find the oppterm in due sequence anyhow and it'll have to do with the modifier anyway, so why bother with it, see? It is associated with — I'm not saying that it is — but it's associated with the oppterm.

Now, this refusal to talk is the realization that one can't because one isn't being heard. Well, there's two ways to go about this, is acknowledge the living daylights out of the pc and give him about twenty or thirty acknowledgments in a row, one way or another. Or just ask him if you've missed a withhold. And he'll come back into communication with you, because of course these all seem to him like withholds. See, although he isn't withholding anything he can't communicate anything, so therefore he is, you see, withholding, in his opinion. You got it?

In other words, you find this terminal, you find this goal, you find this terminal. All right. It's the opposition terminal to the terminal you find that is going to turn up with the modifier. So the second we find the goal, if we then find the modifier, we key in the Goals Problem Mass and key it in hard.

Now, of course we covered number four: pc attempting to leave session. That's what happens after the pc refuses to talk to the auditor or the reverse of the flow is scream at the auditor. See, there's a reverse side of the same flow. He's not talking to the auditor then, either. In fact he's practically unintelligible ordinarily. And by the way, auditing can get a pc — I will tell you something — auditing can get a pc into this state when the auditor himself is being technically very bad. When his TRs are very bad, and so forth, he can just stack up, stack up, stack up, stack up, these involuntary withholds. And just keep stacking them up, stacking them up, stacking them up. And eventually the pc gets into a screaming fit.

Well, there's theoretically an easier way to key in the Goals Problem Mass and that is simply by finding the oppterm itself without finding any modifier. Because we don't need the modifier in order to find the oppterm. We're going to find the oppterm by complete listing

There are — is no such thing as "an ARC breaky pc," you understand? There's only auditors who can't acknowledge, you see, and won't audit the pc, that's all. Because you could take any — I could take any person in this room and in the course of fifteen minutes of a session that they would think was letter-perfect, have them absolutely screaming enough to break plaster off the ceiling in an ARC break. You could do it to any pc, so don't think this is a specialized pc condition; it is not. you can get any pc into this state. They go out of — you can just drive them out of their minds. It's a liability in auditing. So don't classify one pc as ARC breaky and another pc not ARC breaky, because they could all be made to ARC break. There isn't a person here I couldn't do this to.

Now, therefore, we've blown a piece off the GPM of magnitude. Now, if we find a new goal and we find a terminal for this new goal and then we oppterm it, we again snap the pc back in against the GPM, but we do it gently. And what we're doing is consistently chipping chunks off the GPM while clearing the person and theoretically, he shouldn't hit these heavy, steep dives.

Just by asking you a question forcefully and then never acknowledging anything you say. Just be doing just that, see. And I'll say, "Well come now, come now, have you ever been to school?"

Now, these items, when they start disintegrating and so forth, are hot and cold and electrical. And they are quite — quite an experience. And you can get somebody on a hot summer day shivering so his teeth rattle. These things are cold, man. Well, why are they cold? Well, why are they painful, why are they this, why are they that? Well, there's a lot of reasons, but to get an electrical standing wave into that condition takes some doing It's hard to do. And it's got to be intolerably cold and intolerably hot and intolerably electrical and actually has to be all those three things to hang up. That's why they all don't hang up.

And you say, "Yes, I've been to school."

A person who's living his present life in southern California at this time is never really too hot and really never too cold, you see? And if they stay away from the mains plugs, why, they're seldom too electrical.

"Have you ever been to school!"

So if you were to go back in the future and find this life in southern California at all, it would simply be because it was hung up and associated with or keyed in, was keyed into a GPM that was too — an item that was too hot and too cold and too electrical, you see? In this lifetime, none of you have frozen to death. You haven't. You've been pretty cold, but none of you have frozen to death. I guarantee that. The best proof is you're here. See?

"I have been to school!"

None of you have ever burned up. Well, you've been singed around the edges here and there, now and then, but the fact that you're sitting here right now shows that in this lifetime you haven't burned up, see?

"You're not answering my question. Have you ever been to school?"

And you haven't been killed by heavy voltage because in this lifetime you are still alive. But you have lived many lives, I assure you, in which you did freeze to death and in which you did burn up and got shocked in the bargain. It must have been fun.

And if we just kept up this thing — man, boom! That's all you have to do, you understand? Because you're creating a missed withhold every question. And you just stack them up, bing-bing-bing-bing. Actually pc's can faint, have heart attacks — almost anything you can think of under this kind of treatment. You can do anything you want to to a pc in the way of making him thoroughly ill just with this kind of treatment. Never acknowledge anything he says. Every time he says something, say something else. Don't ever acknowledge it. Just follow that course. You say, "Well, we're going to list this list. What should be disregarded in order to make people sick?" You know, whatever it is, you see.

You take a doll body, for instance, you consider rather precious. It goes 200 centigrade and a minus 175 centigrade. And you thought it was your old pal, Bill, as you walked around the corner and it wasn't. It was a Fourth Invader and at that moment, you got oh, a few megawatts in the brisket. That kind of thing, don't you see?

"All right. Is there anything that should be disregarded to make people sick?"

You were minding your own business in this civilization and everything was fine and somebody dumped an atom bomb on you. See?

And the pc says, "Well, medicine."

That's the kind of thing this sort of thing takes. It takes duresses. Duresses of magnitude. Now, you sit here and you know the limitations of the body you've got. And you know that if the temperature drops to 56, you shiver and if it goes to 82, why, you start getting too warm. Not much of a margin there, don't you see?

"Yeah. Well, I know — but uh — is there any uh — get the question, now: Is there anything that should be disregarded to make people sick?" You see, you haven't written down anything.

And somebody slips you 240 British volts, you say, "Yipe!" And you say that's a lot of jolt — 240 volts a jolt! Nonsense. I was holding onto 240 volts the other day and mostly had muscular kick to the thing. But with this body, I don't think I would take it up as a pastime. But it — you get hit sometime with a — oh, about two or three million volts and you'll see the difference.

And he says, "Well, uh, medicine."

Gormley Castle used to be down here. I was riding over to a tourney one day and was half-armed in a rainstorm — I had half steel armor on in a rain storm. The rest of it slung on the back of the horse. Brother with me and a groom and they had the rest of the armor. And so 'elp me, lightning 'it. And you know armor on wet ground makes the most marvelous conductor. Knocked me plumb silly, it did. Plumb silly. It's happened to me several times. But it — it's always you go sit down after a while and say, "Oh, no," you know. You think about it. It preys on your mind. Some — that's something — it upsets you. It makes you absent-minded. It makes you flinch, and so forth.

And you say, "Now, listen to the question carefully this time."

I remember at that particular instance I rode right on to the castle and the grooms went out and got the bodies and my brother was still alive, but the groom was awful dead and laid the body on the bed. I stood there, you know and thought that was okay and went back over to Europe and walked in and — just shows you a guy goes hnhh! You know, I walked in and I fell over the old mither who was busy scrubbing the floor and of course, wet, you know, wet floor, you know and God! volts were coming up me like that, you know — and I step in her scrub bucket and walked through her and she gets a 'ell of a shock, you know. she says, "Coo, what's that?" you know or words to that effect. And go over to the table and sit down at the table and pick up my fist and look around and there's no mead, you know. Not a bit. It was about 1495, something like that. And so I pick up my fist and I start to say, "Godderdammerung, bring me in some mead," you know. And I go bang, you know and my fist goes straight through the table. And I say, "Wait a minute, boy." "Oh, no, I'm dead." Bright, moonlight night and there's a dog howling outside, so I walk out in the moonlight and decide for the next 55 years I'll have to be a ghost. Well, it was a very shocking experience. But you could get discombobulated and upset and not know what you were doing. I didn't. I went and picked up a baby or two, but . . .

Honest, you can just blow them right straight up. They'll scream, man! Take them maybe fifteen minutes to work up to it, but if you do it adroitly, he'll — even though the guy doesn't — even though the guy might start out knowing what you're doing, he'll still scream. See how you can stack them up? Those are all just missed withholds. And if you turned around after that and said, "Have I missed a withhold on you?" he'd say, "Yeah, you refused to say anything about medicine." You clean this all up, and he comes right back to battery just like that.

Anyhow, the point is, is it takes a lot more than you're even aware of confronting in order to pick up electronic masses and then keep mocking them up because, you see, they're so dangerous because you have to keep them mocked up, you see, because they're so dangerous, you see?

In other words you can create and dissipate an ARC break just as easily as that. Just refuse to receive anything from the pc and then afterwards find out if you've missed a withhold on the pc. By refusing to receive anything from the pc you'll get the ARC break and all manifestations. They'll scream at you or they eventually refuse to talk to you. They go into complete apathy. They go into such apathy by the way, that they can't talk. They're not being unwilling; it's unable! And then they eventually know it's for the best that they get out of that room. Well, they might walk out howling and they might walk out absolutely mum, but they feel like hell.

It's very logical. If you didn't keep them there, they're liable to get away, you see and blow your 'ead off, you know. So therefore you have to keep them created. You figure it out. You're the one that's been doing it mostly. But you see, if you didn't have that mass then some other mass would get you. Well, now, when you figure out that this particular incident I've been telling you about, which I consider rather amusing — I'm going to have to go down and — Gormley Castle one of these days and look and see if the old tilt field is still down there and so forth. I'd better not tell any of the Englishmen about it because they just used to raise hell around there, you know.

All right, you — so you can turn the manifestation on by missing withholds and you can turn it off by asking if you've missed any withholds. In other words, an old pal of mine who did most of the helicopter work other people have gotten credit for in subsequent years, sits there and argues with the whole University of Kansas at Lawrence. He takes them all on. It's just a small pastime with him. He told me one time, he says, "Well, if you really knew your business," he says, "you could make — if you really knew anything about the mind, Ron," he said, "you could make people laugh at will and cry at will." And he said, "Then that would be a good test whether you knew anything about the mind. you know?" Well, I won't say it went so far as I immediately made him laugh and cry, but here is something: If you really know the mechanism of something, you can turn it on or turn it off, you see? And you sure know the mechanism of an ARC break. You can turn one on; you can turn one off. You can create them and you can vanish them.

I committed enough overts that one day I was riding through there in about 1600, fell off the back of my horse, stone dead. Overt-motivator sequence caught up just like that.

Now, in view of the fact that you can be sitting there acknowledging the pc perfectly every time he speaks and taking care of everything he says, and you're doing all this perfectly, and so forth, how does a pc still have an ARC break? Well, the withhold that you've missed just has been ticked but hasn't come up, see? It could be something like this — it could be as vague as this: he read in a magazine — he's read in one of the Scientology magazines that one won't make any progress, you know, if he's thought evil thoughts. You know, or something. You know, something weird like this. He's got some misinterpretation. You're busy auditing him and you're going down the line. And you say, "Well, are you withholding anything?" And at that moment why, you're auditing with a Tasmanian meter or something. Something, something's going on, you know. I mean, it hasn't got anything to do with auditing; you miss this entirely. Or at that particular moment he's totally ARC broke or he's so scared of you he's not in-session or something happens and you don't get any register on this meter, see. you go by and all of a sudden you find out you're getting no place fast. you should sense that something is wrong with the session.

There's no mass connected with that lightning That's free track. You got an idea what I'm talking about? See. Well, look. If that's free track, what the hell is one of these masses? Well, they're that way.

When you sense something is wrong with . . . One of the ways of doing it is the needle bobs and then you ask a question or while you're asking a question the needle does something or the needle does something during and after you ask the question. Regardless of what you're saying the needle is active, see? There is no timing between you and the meter, let me put it that way, see?

Of course, earlier on the track, you had more horsepower. And you could keep more mocked up. you could stand up to more, so the violence is pretty terrific. And a pc hits these things and he turns ice cold, on the masses and hell keep telling you how cold he is and turn on the fire and you — God, you look at your watch and find out it's 90. And you — pc all of a sudden, he gets roaring red-hot. He is awful hot, terribly warm. But, the odd part of it is he less often gets warm than he gets cold because he's used the warmth of the mass time and time again. He's bled the warmth off of it, don't you see? But the coldness is less motional, so what's left as residue is the most motional mass so he is more likely to be cold. Now, he also gets electric whiz whizzes going around one way or the other. You call these things somatics. And they'll come in odd patches of some kind or another. Well, that's all the GPM and its manifestations.

You say, "Do you eat catfish for breakfast?" see, and the thing falls on "do" and "breakfast" but not on any timing that has anything to do with you, you see. you say — apparently, you know, it looks like it fell on "do" and "catfish" or something like this. And then you look up at the pc — one of the things to do is just stop talking to the pc for a moment. And you'll see it's doing the same thing. Heh-heh-heh-heh-heh. What do you know? Hoo-hoo. And you say, "Do you eat catfish for breakfast?" And the needle goes dip-bob-dip, you know. Hmmmm. "Do you eat catfish for breakfast?" and it goes dip-bob-dip — latent this time, you see. "Do you eat cat ." It goes, dip-bob-dip. Just don't ask anything for a moment. It'll go, dip-bob-dip. It's haunted. You watch that sometime because that's the commonest thing that happens on one of these things. It's called a needle pattern.

Now, the more gently you can pick this thing apart, the more comfortable the pc is. you can also drive the pc through it as though you were a Sherman tank leaving El Alamein, but you — it can be done, don't you see? But you get dented fenders. It's — it's one of those things, you know? And it can be sufficiently duressful. It wouldn't do anything drastic to your pc, but he gets very uncomfortable.

All needle patterns are caused by missed withholds — all needle patterns.

Now, 3D Criss Cross short-listed, improperly itemed, opptermed the wrong way to and so forth, turns on such phenomena as ice-cold, red-hot and all you — you can't really bring yourself to go over and touch the light switch because it's liable to leap at you. You're sure of that.

Number five: Pc not desirous of being audited or anybody not desirous of being audited. Grandma is sitting there and she's going natter-natter-natter-natter-natter-natter. "The idea of little Johnny getting audited," and so forth. Johnny, little Johnny, is forty and married, see. But, "Little Johnny shouldn't be getting audited. Why are you interested in that sort of thing? What's the idea of doing anything about that? Nyah-nyah-nyah-nyah-nyah," she chews some more snoose.

So all of these data add up to the fact that we want a faster gain more comfortably for the pc. Now, you — the more sectionally you pick off the term and oppterm of the GPM, the more comfortable the pc's going to be in the process. Okay?

You go in there to audit John, you see, and she's sitting over there in the chair. And she's going vitriol, vitriol, vitriol, vitriol, you know. Make up your mind. You've missed a withhold on her.

Elementary — so far. Right?

How could you? You've never talked to her? Oh, but you're the one who's supposed to know. So you see, it's automatic. It'd startle her half to death if you walked over and put a — E-Meter cans in her hands and said, "Have I missed a withhold on you?" you know, "Is there something I failed to find out about you, Grandma?"

But there's some more gains that come with it. And that is that you're going straight through to Clear because you'll be picking up the hearts of the masses in which the pc is stuck, most reliably. And you're going straight through and your improved gain will come out at the other end. Whereas that's not true of 3D Criss Cross. 3D Criss Cross is a rolly coaster. Sometimes your lines are right and sometimes your lines are a bit off. And nevertheless you're making it, but at what cost — sometimes, you see. you — and an auditor can be dead wrong in this. He — the auditor can get awful knuckleheaded about this kind of thing.

"Well, I should say there is, son."

The funny part of it is and — that apparently — and this has to be born out — that errors in 3D Criss Cross are probably most remediable by rerunning Routine 3 as 3G. Let's say you picked up "Who or what have you liked?" and you got no tone arm action, you list it as a short list and nulled it out with twenty-five repetitions of each item, ARC broke the pc into having only one item left and put that down and then opptermed it. Well, you'll find out that this is less fundamental than the GPM and when you get a goal, theoretically, when you get a goal and you find its terminals, all of a sudden these others will blow off as locks. You'll run into these errors sooner or later and plow them out with a Routine 3G.

She'd probably tell you, too. It's quite remarkable. It all depends on how good your presence is. you have to hold her in that first couple of seconds to get over the rage surge. Then she'll talk to you like a canary bird, you know. She'll just sing, sing, sing Well, you prompt her a little bit, you know, and away they go at it. They'll argue for a little while and then there they go. It's — she says, "I would never be audited." Why would she never be audited? Because somebody, including you, somebody else and other somebodies and also you have missed withholds on her, that's all. That's simple, see.

Now, what we have needed in doing Routine 3s — let's go into whys. What we have needed is for the auditor to know how to do it before he'd done it. And that has been very nearly impossible — because the weak end, the difficult end, the end he's going to have trouble with, is the end he starts on, i.e., a goals list. Goals lists are hard to do. Because this person's goals have always been invalidated and because the GPM is only hung up because the goal has been invalidated, the invalidations of goals is almost the common denominator. It is one of the common denominators of every item in the Goals Problem Mass. And the common denominator of it, of course, attracts the overt-motivator of it.

There is no other reason people don't want to be audited. You see, these are all on the bracket of, "There is no other reason," don't you see? There isn't also the fact that the libido often comes into conflugence with the lumbosis, you see, and makes a censorious subconscious. See, that has noth — that explanation isn't there either, see. It's just missed withholds, that's all. Nothing — nothing more.

And you're sitting there and you dare look cross-eyed while you're reading off "I want to wear hats," you see. you say, "I want to wear hats" and you all of a sudden look a little odd for a second and that invalidates that, you see. And the pc — you've got a missed withhold right there — and there we go, see. Now, you can list hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of goals with the rudiments out and you can null and scrunch and batter and with the rudiments out and rough auditing and so forth — go around just trying to find a goal.

People try to make so much out of this, you see. And then they all say, "Well, the ARC break is so terrible." This person is so vitriolic. They've gone down to the police department and they've told the police there that everybody in that Scientology office should be arrested and everything else, and — and so forth. You say, well, it's because they're a member of the Communist Party. Well all right, they're a member of the Communist Party. That's reasonable. And you say it's because they have an uncle who's a psychiatrist. That's reasonable. It's because they've been in an institution. That's reasonable. These things are all true, don't you see. Everything's all true. Nobody argues with any of these things. But the reason they did it was because somebody's missed a withhold, see.

Now, we've had a number of units over in the States and in Australia and so forth which were trying to find goals on one another. And they were making it within about six weeks on some of them. This was an heroic performance. It was rough! But it was only rough because the auditors were rough. We were having to train the auditor to do it on something that can only be done if the auditor's perfect. Well, it gets idiotic, isn't it, you see? It's one of these things — you only get one chance. See, you can bust a pc up eight ways from the middle and it takes a real expert to put the pc back together again.

And this reporter comes in to get a story from you for the newspaper. He sits there the whole damn time with a missed withhold. See, what you should know is he's going to clobber you, man. The way to start in on some guy, he's — guy's sitting down there with a hell of a sneer on his face, and say, "Well, all right. I'm quite aware of what you're going to do. You're going to go — you're going to treat me nice, and then you're going to go back to the paper and write a hell of a thing. You've already got orders of the kind of story you're supposed to write on the newspaper. You're already — city editor's been telling you. I wonder why you came down here to get any details because you've got the story all written in your typewriter already, huh! That's right, isn't it Jack? Ha-ha!"

You string this wire from the Empire State Building to the Chrysler Building. And you hand the person — the auditor — a wobbly-wheeled bicycle. And you see, he's never had any other wire. There's never been any wire on the ground. As a matter of fact, he's never even had a bicycle on the ground, you see. And you say, "Okay, son. Now, just — just ride along that wire over to the Chrysler Building You'll find it's very easy." And, you know, he shakes. He — he does. He — and very often picks himself off of Madison Avenue or somewhere as a spot. I'd say 95 percent of the time he picked himself off the lower avenue as a grease spot.

The guy goes, "I-huh-hoo-oooh . . ."

They just don't do it. you say, "Find the goal." Nyuuh. See, it takes terrifically smooth, letter-perfect auditing. Where has he had a chance to accumulate a Routine 3 perfectly smooth, letter-perfect activity? Well, he hasn't — in the past, but he can now because we can do a Routine 3D Criss Cross and he can make mistakes and makes pcs uncomfortable and find out what complete lists are and how the meter operates and get practice running Model Sessions, getting off missed withholds and invalidations and making everything run at once and he feels less like a one-man band who's had its arms and legs cut off. He can get used to it.

"Well, let's find out something about your personal life now that we got that established and you don't know anything about the thing. Let's see, what withhold has your wife missed on you?" Put him on the meter. "Well, take a hold of the cans!" "Take them! All right, now, what withhold has your wife missed on you?" Heh-heh huh!

So the pc blows his stack a few times. All right. Let him find out how to patch things up with missed withholds. He's doing a lousy job, the auditor is, but still the pc finds out eventually. "Hey, what do you know, I found the wrong item and opptermed it and so on and picked up the missed withholds and the pc said it was all right. What do you know about this?" you know? And he gets on top of auditing.

"Oh, well, I . . ."

Now, Prepchecking is a good school to learn how to do the meter and so forth, but it still doesn't prepare you all the way to go through all of the one-man band actions, of finding a list and nulling it and finding the item and checking it out and all that. It just doesn't. That's a specialized activity. Well, you've got 3D Criss Cross which in itself is quite valid as an activity, if done right. Yeah, just let the — let the person go on.

Hold him back to the — against the wall until you get them cleared. And he'll walk out of there saying, "God damn them people, why don't they mind their own business!" He won't dare write a word, man! Marvelous.

Now, the best way to get somewhere near the GPM is with the Prehav Scale. The Prehav Scale will get you shallowly near the GPM. A goal will get you much closer in to the GPM, you see, but a goal is not something you're going to let the fellow tamper with till he learns how, see? So we're going to eliminate our little Abe — can't go swimming until he learns how — out of this thing, you see and turn the auditor loose on 3D Criss Cross.

All right. Now, this is a new one to you:

We have a perfectly valid process then which can be used as a training procedure, which I think is wonderful. Because there's really no difference to nulling a goals list than nulling any other list. There is no real difference, except that the goals list is fantastically vulnerable to invalidation and bad auditing. It requires tremendously adroit listing and handling

Number six: Pc boiling off. Oh, you thought it was from some other things, didn't you? Oddly enough a stuck flow is the basic cause of the actual mechanics of boil-off, but apparently a stuck flow is only caused by a missed withhold either way to. And all boil-off is a missed withhold. So you say to the pc, you say to the pc — you're nulling, you know — and you say, "Cat, dog, catfish, waterbuck," and the pc goes zzzzzzzz, see. Well oddly enough, if you went on and read the list you'd still get the proper reactions on the thing — doesn't matter whether he's boiling off or not. But you should at that stage of the game say, "Have I missed a withhold on you?" Particularly when you hear him snore.

Well, the toughness of a — of a 3D Criss Cross list will stand up to it. You've only got one chance at the pc's goals list. Of course, you've got lots of chances at 3D Criss Cross masses. You can get item after item, you see?

Listen. If you let a pc even go fuzzy, you've missed a withhold on him. See, they go a little bit fuzzy and then they get a little bit dopey. And then they go into a zzzuhhhh. And they go all the way on out. Every one of those stages is caused by a missed withhold.

You understand now, that if you get the right Prehav Scale — that's all these Auxiliary Prehav Scales — you get a right level, if you list that properly. If you get the practice of completing the list and then oppterming it and completing that list and so forth, you're liable to get a blow occasionally. I mean a blow of the two items. It's liable to be all smooth as grease. But if you missed, you're just going to make the pc uncomfortable — total liability. You haven't done any irremediable harm because you could probably either straighten out that, that you did wrong or eventually you take the pc over into Routine 3G type of assessment and it blows the whole thing out. In other words, all those items and everything are all going to be appended to this and that and the other thing and that's all going to blow out anyway. So you got a remedy which is below the level of intermediate remedies.

You understand, when I say "missed withhold" it isn't something about they have murdered the cook and stuffed her body in the dinner dishes. We're not looking for any blood here. It's just the fact that they came into session and wanted to go to the bathroom and didn't. Now, that makes a corking withhold. And you didn't find out about it. And that's enough to make a pc completely boil right out in the session. Anything you try to do with the pc, the pc boils off. Bing-bang. And you finally better find out what it is and straighten it out. That's all boil-off and all fogginess and all stupidity. It's all low IQ. That isn't mentioned in there, but it would be a section under six.

So you can teach somebody to do 3D Criss Cross and the case will make progress and everything is fine and so forth. And you get a chance to look at them sadly and say, "Well, Betty do you think five items is going to make a complete list?" you know? "See if you can get six." And the auditor is saying, "Four or five hundred items on the list. How could you ever get through that many items? I mean look at the paper, do you know and gosh!"

The next one is: The pc is exhausted. How many of you have wished that you didn't feel so exhausted? All right. Let your auditor wish right now that he'd picked up a few withholds off you — missed withholds, you understand. Pick up the missed withholds. Entirely different subject, you know, than picking up withholds.

You know, well, goals list of six or seven hundred goals. Well, so what? The — you get to that point finally where you're used to doing lists and so on. It doesn't matter how long the lists are. you can take a six hundred goal list. So what? See? That's nothing Null it down — not ARC break it out and null it down. And it goes astray, put it back together again, hook it up right and so forth. In other words, he's able to do it, now. He's able to swim after he's learned how. He's able to ride this bicycle from the Empire State Building to the Chrysler Building quite easily since he's been riding it only a couple of feet above the ground for some time, see? That's just the difference of approach.

Withholds you pick it up with Prepchecking, you can even pick up missed withholds with Prepchecking But withholds are withholds. You have to develop withholds. What has he done that is contrary to mores and all this kind of thing A big subject, withholds.

And we're very rich in having a training process which gets benefits for the pc and which will only make the pc too cold or too hot or too damned electrical. Or it'll sometimes turn on a chronic somatic and the pc will go around with an awful cold — easily explained — because, of course, everybody is having a cold these days. And you get a mass half in-out of his ear or something of the sort and he has a horrendous earache. Well, try to keep him from going and seeing the osteopath or something. He's not suffering from oral lumbosis. He's simply suffering from — he — all — all he's suffering from is the wrong item opptermed, complicated with missed withholds. That's exactly all he's suffering from.

But missed withholds is a very tight, narrow subject. It's something you should have found out and didn't; something he should have found out and didn't; something it should have found out and didn't; some something they should have found out and didn't; something the pc should have found out and didn't. Don't you see? All of these things classify as missed withholds. "Should have — should have found out." Exhaustion — exhaustion and the sensation of tiredness and all the rest of that, pin right down on the subject of missed withholds. The pc finishes the session feeling very exhausted — some withholds have been missed. It's as simple as that.

Well, the end product of this is a trained auditor and a working procedure.

And there's an awful lot of pcs come into HGCs and they come in because they're so exhausted and never have any pep or energy. And this is one of their prime examples. Well, it's just missed withholds. Simple. I mean, something that makes that much fuss in life, you see, to be that simple, is why everybody overlooked it. you see, because this little drop of water called a missed withhold couldn't possibly cause that avalanche and explosion called Vesuvius. But it did.

Now, you'd be surprised how adroit you have to be to get a goal. Only when you can do listing easily and do a complete list, a nice complete list and get all the items properly off of it and find the final item and oppterm that nicely. Oh, when you can go through all those operations, because it is very easy to take a complete list of goals and go down the line and knock that off. But you will find even then that it requires a little more adroitness. Goals go out like that.

All right. Your next one, eight: Pc feeling foggy at session end. you actually, in going over your end rudiments should notice whether or not the pc can talk to you. I mean, that's interesting — it's all right for you to go in consultation with the meter and ignore the pc. you actually should only handle things in end rudiments which knock on the meter. But as you're sitting there — I'm not asking you to do this routinely and all the time, you know. you know, I'm not — not to put your attention on it or anything like that, but just the way you'd up your own havingness, you know, by noticing the settee or the ceiling or something; notice there's a pc sitting in the other chair, you know. And notice the pc is sometimes mmmm-mmmm-mmmm . . .

Before you — well, Prepchecking gets you heavy reads. You're very often a quarter-of-a-dial on a fall, you see and sometimes even a dial and I've seen stuff struck on an E-Meter which was 16 consecutive dial drops, see. So there's heavy drops.

And you say, "Is it all right if I end the session now?"

All right. Now, on 3D Criss Cross you get used to reading something that's — that may be as little as a quarter of a division. Oh yeah, a tiny little division like that and a goal could very well come out reading a 32nd of a division. We're reading with a microscope. It can read very little and go in and out just bing-bang, bing-bang, bing-bang Just in and out like that. It's reading very nicely. You're saying, "To sell apples. To sell apples. Is there an invalidation on this?" Ping!

"Yaaaaahhhhh."

"All right. What was that? All right. Thank you very much. Have I missed a withhold on you? Oh, yes. Well, thank you. All right. Thank you. Have I missed a withhold on you? That's clean. Yeah, all right. Fine. To sell apples. To sell apples. To sell — Is there an invalidation?" Man, it's like sorting yourself through — through the labyrinth, you know. You've got to be pretty good.

Well, I know it isn't — I know it isn't absolutely necessary to — according to Model Session, in order to do this, but he might have been asleep. Something else might have happened when you passed "Have I missed a withhold on you?" in the end rudiments, you know? Pick up a few just for fun, you know? Not for any reason — yeah, just for fun, noticing that you have a pc, you might pick up some of the missed withholds at the end of the session and notice the pc brighten right up and cease to be foggy. It's quite an interesting thing to watch.

And before, with any Routine 3 process, you took an auditor totally green and you threw him into the soup and the pc went into the soup right after him — 1350 and they still haven't found the pc's goal. How he ever found any is miraculous.

Pc starts into a boil-off — pick up the missed withholds right in the middle of the session, you see. End of session the pc says he feels real weird. You know, he doesn't know whether he's here or there or otherwise. Pick up a few missed withholds on him. He's always got some. They're little cotton-picking withholds. They haven't got anything to do with anything broad or expansive. Big missed withhold: You didn't find out that he wanted a cigarette and a break. But he knew he had better not have a cigarette and a break because he is also very interested in getting his goal found so he doesn't mention it. At session end he's going blah. "Have I missed a withhold on you?" "Is there something I should have found out?" Well, he thinks. And you say, "that, that," you know.

Now, therefore, Routine 3G is 3G because of goals. It's a Routine 3, employing goals. But it also employs several different principles. And the principle is that listing is auditing and that we're going to do our auditing by listing. So we cut out the impatience of it all. "Well, let's find something so we can audit it." This we're not interested in. The listing is the auditing

"Oh, oh that. Huh. Oh, it's nothing very much. I didn't tell you that I wanted a break and a cigarette about an hour ago. I didn't tell you I wanted a break and cigarette about an hour ago. Heh-heh. Nothing to that." He's all cheered up. He's all alert. Didn't take anything at all, don't you see? These things are little, tiny, damn, fool things, you know.

When we find the item, we're going to oppterm it. And when we oppterm it, we hope if all is well, that we will get a small ping and perhaps we will. This is still susceptible to a bit of speculation. Perhaps we'll get a bit, perhaps this will become invariable. And, we get ping and the oppterm — we found it and then all of a sudden we can't find it. And there's no charge on the oppterm list and we can't find the terminal and we can't find the goal. And, of course, we turn right back and find a new goal, a new terminal and a new oppterm. Just that repetitive cycle. That's the cycle we hope for. We'll try everything we can to make that come true.

If you always put "in this session" ahead of your question, why, you find yourself keeping the pc quite alert and quite capable of being audited without ever plowing up any backtrack. When you're doing a Routine 3 Process you don't particularly want to be plowing any backtrack. And you'll find that it's a pretty good thing to do that.

But here's this "listing is auditing" as a principle. Now that's a brand-new principle so you shouldn't really care how long your list is. But that your lists are so long — remember, don't lose your speed and adroitness. You've got to be able to list rapidly and handle the pc rapidly and keep the rudiments in rapidly and all these things have to be done. Otherwise this becomes an activity of months and months and months because you're handling tremendous numbers of items. So its — you have to pick up — and adroitness and facility by which you can sit down and list 300 items, keep the pc talking, keep the missed withholds off, so the — three quarters of the session isn't blown because of the pc's boiling off. you can even knock out a comm lag probably with missed withholds. And you're not stopping the pc all the time, you know and you'll get down to where you developed a knack of making a pc give you a list — staying broad awake and giving you a list and plowing right on down the line. Well, that would make good auditing, see? And then you get the knack of a — of testing How you test this thing — how do you find out if it is complete and so forth. How do you get used to that? And now nulling it ought to be as easy as pie. A list ought to go out bzzzt.

One thing argues against that is once in a while you pick up not a missed withhold, but sometimes you will pick up something that wasn't known about the goal or something like this and it'll be backtrack. But that's not as valid as asking for an invalidation — when you're doing with items and goals you should ask for lots — you should ask for invalidations, you see, and things like that. That's not a missed withhold.

When you're able to do all that and oppterm it and do all that sort of thing, when you're able to do that with 3D Criss Cross, when you get over to 3G, you'll find out that it isn't all that easy to get that goals list. That's all right. The pc can write it out of session and all that sort of thing and you can complete it in session and you can go through those ramifications, but you'll find it's far more susceptible to shift an invalidation — than to — and it's greasier. It's greasier. Now, it's here and now it isn't here. It's more susceptible to sporadic reads and all of that kind of thing And, you spend more time, "Is there an invalidation on this item and thank you. Now, Ill check that again. Is there invalidation on this item? That's clear. Thank you very much."

But "In this session have I missed a withhold on you?" Actually, if you did no more than that, if you never picked it up any earlier than this session, you'll still keep the pc alert. And don't think by finding a great big avalanche of the thing stemming all from the basic-basic a hundred and eighty trillion years ago — you pick up one missed withhold a hundred and eighty trillion years ago — he's going to stay bright in the session. No, he's not. See, it's the session missed withholds that are important to your auditing and doing Routine 3, is all I'm trying to tell you.

All right. And now you go ahead with the item and so forth and all of a sudden why, this has gotten a needle pattern. "Have I missed a withhold on you?" You see? You pick up the missed withhold. "Thank you very much." Needle pattern disappears. "I'll ask that again. Have I missed a withhold on you? That's clear. Thank you." And you go on from there. Don't you see? And you work at it and it takes pretty — it's pretty slippery. It requires a pretty slippery auditor in order to get a goal easily and hold it there. This is what I've learned about Routine 3 activities.

All right. Number nine: Dropped havingness. Can squeeze at the beginning of the session, a quarter-of-a-dial drop. can squeeze at end of a session, eighth-of-a-dial drop.

Routine 3 was never defeated by its own successfulness or its own potential — its own technology. The technical facts of Routine 3 are still technically accurate. They are — they are there. What defeated Routine 3 was lousy metering, incomplete Model Sessions. We didn't have all of the rudiments necessary. We didn't have missed withholds to hold the thing in-session. We didn't have the Mark IV meter, tremendous item there — all in one piece. We had meters that were reading electronically but were not reading the mind. Marvelous, you know. And we didn't have a lot of things that we have now in order to punch this thing along And basically we hadn't grooved in and insisted on the auditor doing a perfect procedure.

"Have I missed a withhold on you?"

And now today we can say what a perfect procedure is and an auditor can do a perfect procedure, so therefore Routine 3 would be as workable today as it ever had. The Routine 3 did have one technical liability. It is that you could tip into the Goals Problem Mass and then separate one item off the Goals Problem Mass and then blow it out sideways and you'd get a key-out without having approached the remainder of the Goals Problem Mass.

"Yes. So, so, so and so-and-so. Yes, and . . ."

Well, by oppterming, we continually prevent this from happening without caving the pc in. So this thing has become feasible. Auditing this is very simple and all I actually expect an auditor to know how to do perfectly is his TRs, Model Session, his E-Metering and to know exactly what he's supposed to do as he comes down the line with listing and testing and so forth. That — that's all, you see?

"All right. Thank you. Now, let me clear that. Have I missed a withhold on you?"

That is not very much in actual fact. If he can do these things perfectly, then the — he can read a meter perfectly, he'd soon get used to finding out what an invalidation looks like and what it doesn't look like and what a needle pattern that suddenly turns on looks like and how to turn it off. He'll learn all of these things rather easily. Then learning through Routine 3D Criss Cross, how to handle lists, why, he should then be able to turn over to the Tartar of all Tartars — goals lists. Be able to find a pc's goal and really sail.

"Yes. Yap-yap-yap-yap-yap." "All right, all right. Let me test that out. Have I missed a withhold on you? Yeah, well that's clean. Squeeze the cans." Bang A quarter-of-a-dial drop. No Havingness run.

That's the approach. We're rich in a tremendous amount of technology. Basically, if we had just used the technology or been able to use the technology, we had when we were doing Routine 3, that would have been quite successful too. But not realizing the amount of flub there was on the existing technology, of course, I went for broke and straightened out all the rudiments and got a little complete Model Session and figured out all the elements and added up anything that could go wrong and what caused ARC breaks and you know, just solved a tremendous number of technical problems in order to make it come out straight. This ought to be like falling off a log, if you — if you learn how to do it.

You'll find the havingness will go right back up, and even improve. Particularly if you're picking up missed withholds on a little bit broader basis you'll find that havingness improves all over the place, not just "in this session." You just say well . . . If you're prepchecking, particularly, on some missed withhold Zero Question. Man, you'll find that havingness picks up and picks up and picks up and picks up. Because what it is — what is it? It's a not-reach, isn't it? And havingness is a reach.

And it doesn't require any freak solutions. You don't have to get very imaginative about this. But you have to be very precise and you have to audit the pc that's there — right there in front of you. That's the pc you audit. And if you do all of that, why, you'll make a good show of it.

All right. Number ten: Pc telling others the auditor is no good. "Joe is really a schnook. He really can't audit worth schnooks." You're passing at this moment on this list out into the outer perimeter of life. We've gone out of the auditing session. That's why that is marked there as number ten. It isn't these are all of them; it's just those that most concern the auditor.

There's no sense in trying to do any of these things if you're still having trouble with a meter — obviously. If you're still gagging on Model Session, if your TRs are wildly out, if you don't know how to conduct a two-way comm, if you — inevitably he says, "Well, I don't know. Yes, I do have a present time problem. I had a fight with my mother this morning."

And what is known at once about this pc? Well, that the auditor missed a withhold on the pc. That is actually all there is to be known about it. Of course, it is bad auditing now that you know about it.

And you say, "What was the fight about?" And you wonder why you never get anyplace with a case, you see? It's these little things. And it's being able to audit the pc who is sitting right there in front of you. you be very careful and double check everything, you know. You're not quite sure that the — "Yes, is there invalidation on that item?" you know? And "Let me check that again. Is there an invalidation on that item? All right. That's clean." See?

Now, in earlier auditing, earlier than two or three months ago, it was possible for a pc to be pretty badly cut up by never being acknowledged to what he said. And a whole bunch of withholds stacked up and the guy got into a lot of ARC breaks, thrown into an apathetic state and all this kind of thing, because it was rocked-up auditing. Yeah, he'll argue about this auditor. But that doesn't — even though we didn't know the technology, that doesn't say it didn't exist. You see, people studying Scientology only — only people who study Scientology really don't know anything about it, you know. They haven't really done anything with it, you understand that. They make this mistake. They think that every time we come out with something new, old things cease to be true, you see. The ARC Scale went out because we've just said there's an Effect Scale. Yeah, oh, you'll find that rather consistently. Of course, they never had any reality and didn't understand the ARC Scale in the first place.

In other words, an auditor first gets terribly obsessed with making an awfully good show of it. you know? When something like the drum majorettes from the University of San Antonio, you know — or something — he's going to make a terribly good show of it. Hasn't anything to do with a pc, you know. But he's going to make an awfully good show of it and he knows he's only supposed to ask once, he thinks, you know and his "Now-I'm-supposed-to's" catch up with him, you see. And he'll actually fake through. You know, he says, "Well, have I missed a withhold on you? Thank you. That's — that's clear."

You'll find these people hanging around PE Courses and things like that. And they say, "Why is Ron always changing his mind?"

And he thinks it'd look awfully clumsy on his part or revelatory or something if he — if he said, "Have I missed a withhold on you? I'll repeat that. Have I missed a withhold on you?"

Ron isn't changing his mind! See? The thing's still true, you know? Well similarly, just because we have learned of a datum doesn't mean it didn't exist before we learned of it. See? It didn't materialize at the moment we learned about it. It had been there all the time. Well, this was the cause for all of these ARC breaky sessions and all of these prior upsets in auditing See, whatever the score was.

"Oh, well, yeah."

Now, formerly it was simply an index of how well, really, how perceptive an auditor was, and how well he acknowledged the pc. And if he was not very perceptive and he didn't acknowledge the pc, and if he also ran a lousy session, of course, his pcs had a hell of a time. And the pcs would all go around saying, "God, that was a lousy auditor." Well, they might have been right.

"All right. What's that now?"

But today, under this understanding, see, all right, you just — auditor's missed a withhold, that's all.

See, he didn't catch it the first time. He thinks he'll look — he's so anxious to look good that he stinks. You get somebody coming into session there, man, you can just hear the high tension going through his power lines, you know. Hasn't anything to do with the pc. And all of a sudden then, he starts — he finds out he can ride the bicycle. And after that, why, he audits the pc in front of him. He does it rapidly. He does it well and he knows what he's doing and so on. But we've got the processes necessary by which he can integrate his knowledge without killing the pc. And who knows, he might even someday do the pc some good. So that's quite valuable, quite valuable to have a training routine for a senior routine. And it's what we've needed for some time. And I'm very happy about it.

Now, what do you say about this pc. They said, "Well, this fellow, this fellow Schnooks up in the Northwest" — or something like that — "My God, was he a terrible auditor."

I don't say that Routine 3G will remain exactly as it is under the gun and under inspection as you've done it because you haven't yet begun to make mistakes. That's always a necessary part of it, you know? You haven't yet begun to make mistakes. There are certain things — will get explained. The only thing I try to have happen is let's not — let's not have to explain so many things that nobody can recognize Routine 3G when we get through, see. That often happens.

Your instant response is, "What withhold did he miss on you?" You understand?

I found out that auditors in doing lists, so very often — short lists — so very often pick up a sporadic reading item. That it is the commonplace, not the oddity. It is the commonplace for an item that is finally found to be reading three times out of eight, three times out of five — I'll be kinder. "Well, I've got the item. Yes, it reads, reads every — hauh. Well, it's because of course he has overts on you, Instructor. The reason it didn't check out is actually I didn't really clean his overts off on you. you — it's all clean with me, you see and so it worked out with me all right, you see, but when you checked him out, then, you see, the rudiments were out with you and that's why it was reading sporadically, you know?"

Now, instantly you — you see, it just doesn't matter otherwise than you've got a snarl up of auditing track. So if you're auditing the person — I'm talking about in an auditing session and he says, "Well, Schnooks was terrible. And he just about cut my throat from ear to ear."

That's all part of the auditor trying to look good. After he ceases — tries so doggone hard to look good, which is symptomatic though of the process of learning, he starts all of a sudden to do a whale of a job. It — all that counts to him — it's not whether he looks good or not. It's whether or not the item is the item. See, that's what's important. It's whether or not the list was complete. It's whether or not the oppterm fitted. It's whether or not the pc wound up at the end of session bright and sassy.

"What with " If you're clearing up by Prepchecking and past auditing and that sort of thing. You don't do these things while you're running Routine 3, you understand. Prepchecking, you're trying to straighten out the pc so the rudiments stay in. You'd ask some question, "What withhold did Schnooks miss on you?"

You see, all these things are the important things to him. But he gets out the importances first and of course the first important part of training is to get the, just the standard action of being able to sit there and look at the E-Meter — down, you know? Sit there and look at the E-Meter without putting yourself on the cans instead of the pc or something like that, you know? "I had a wonderful session today. A wonderful session today. It was the pc held the cans, see. And we got — we got the session really started. Eleven o'clock at night and it's still going, but we got the session really started. I really got him in-session, you know." Big game. Big win.

Oh, you'll get the Seattle phone directory. God, it'll be that thick. But they'll mostly be little things. Don't look for any big home runs. And they'll basically be fundamentally that he didn't acknowledge well, see. The auditor didn't acknowledge well and the auditor wasn't very perceptive. Pc stumbles into session, falls in the door, exudes alcohol fumes to the point where if it got as far as the gas stove in the kitchen the whole house would have blown up, you know. And the auditor takes him in session and audits him, you know, never noticing that he's three sheets to the wind with the demon rum, you see?

"This pc was willing to talk to me after the session. This is the first time this ever happened to me as an auditor." You know wins, wins of various kinds. Now, I'm not really being sarcastic. Auditing can get that grim. Auditing is terribly simple. There is a response for every situation that you can get into in auditing today that will get you out of that situation. We are not grasping in the dark and we don't require freak solutions. It isn't now that we're trying to wind everybody up like dolls, but we've actually got it there and when the auditor gets certain that he has the answers, he can sit there in a relaxed frame of mind and he really sees things and he really audits and everything whizzes.

And the pc gets along fine and then all of a sudden says, "You know, I'm not supposed to be audited while I'm under the influence of alcohol." And then immediately concerned, and says, "You know, that auditor probably didn't notice I was under . . ." so therefore what hasn't been acknowledged is his alcoholism, so therefore that has no chance of blowing and he feels stuck with the alcohol, see.

Auditing, by the way, around the world is succeeding. It's much better, infinitely better after a year of training here at Saint Hill than it has ever been in the past without any slightest doubts whatsoever. And the Saint Hill graduates who have gone back home and raised hell and for the most part have brought tremendous gains in, in auditing And the stuff coming through on the lines today — the reports coming back from HGCs and so on — are much superior to what they had been in the past. But there is still tremendous room for improvement and of course you're the crew who will bring the next big surge of improvement, so work well on it.

It's all on the basis of. . . Actually the whole thing is explainable on TR 4. You need no more technical explanation than TR 4. That which is not acknowledged continues to exist. Remember the old, very interesting old processes we had, something like the "Great Okay." You know, that kind of thing? Gee, I bet that about blew some peoples' heads off, man. It must have been fabulous. The "Great Okay."

Thank you.

If you were to look at some girl — if you were to look at some girl and give her a terrific acknowledgment of one kind or another, you know she might vanish. But knowing women, I don't think she would. She'd have other withholds that would hold her together.

All right. Eleven: Pc demanding redress of wrongs. Now, that applies to a — pc is saying you ought to audit them 196 more hours free and demanding redress of wrongs — saying they're going to sue somebody over auditing or something like this. Well, you know, anything, it doesn't matter. And it doesn't matter if it happened and it doesn't matter if it's reasonable, and it doesn't matter if it's absolutely scurrilously antisocial — this occurrence — it doesn't matter! The fundamental of it is, and the cure of it is all contained not in court, but in missed withholds. "What withhold did the auditor miss on you?" "What should the organization have found out about you?" You understand? It blows; solves the situation. Simple, once you look at it.

Twelve: Pc critical of organizations or people of Scientology. Just the same that I just said. They say, "Natter-natter-natter. Oh, those people up in Johannesburg they're absolutely no good," and so forth. Well, what did Johannesburg fail to find out about them? That's the only thing. Bang! See? Johannesburg must have failed to find out something about them.

Get this kind of a situation: Now, George, George writes from Cape Town and he says to Johannesburg, he says, "Please send me a book and here is — here are ten rand" or something, and, "apply the rest of it to any research funds that you have." And the book department credits them with this for new books. And you know that person will get very upset and critical of Central Organizations. It won't have anything much to do with this payment they sent in. As a matter of fact trying to locate this will take a moment or two. He obviously has not been acknowledged. He actually was trying to give you some money. And you didn't take it. See, you applied it to his account or you did something else with it, you know? You've missed a withhold of some kind or another, you see.

He's tried to say something and it hasn't been acknowledged. He's tried to communicate something and it has not occurred. When people write you a letter and they say, "Is it true that Ron uses boats for roller skates?" or — and so on and it's that sort of thing. And "Is it true that — uh — do auditors have to wear gumboots while auditing pcs?"

And you look at this long list of questions, you know, and you say, "Oh, for Christ's sakes," you know. What a . . . And you say, "Why don't you come in and see the Registrar?" Oh, no, man. No. Every question you didn't answer becomes a missed withhold. Noooo! Now, these things can be very, very weird. Three years after a lady wrote in and asked for any data we had on processing children, I found the letter in Central Files. It had been answered several times. No second letter had ever come from this lady. But several Letter Registrars had written her letters. And none of them had answered her question do we have a book, you see, on child — on auditing children, you know? So I was — I used — very often every few years I'll be in some organization, I'll pick up a bunch of stuff out of CF and write some letters just to give some examples, you know? And every now and then why the HCO Communicator will up and mail them. This has been known to absolutely send a Letter Registrar into fits because he'll suddenly hear from people enthusiastically that they haven't written to. Because I will invariably sign their name, you see? You know?

The Letter Registrar is Dorothy Jay, you see, and something like this. I'll sign the letter Dorothy Jay, don't you see, and send it out. Just answer the question. "Yes, we have a — yes, we have a book called Child Dianetics that tells all about. . ." No preamble, see. "Yes, we have a book called Child Dianetics that tells about auditing children. We are sending you a copy in return mail and you can pay us for it if you wish." Terrific enthusiastic response from the lady, see. Three years we've been missing a withhold on her, see. So she's never communicated to us. Well, we go back and we say patiently — on some of these letters — we say, "No, auditors do not have to wear gumboots while giving sessions." And all of a sudden we get a vast burst of enthusiasm.

This is so much so that if you were to simply go through a Central Files or your own files and pick out every letter you'd ever received from anybody on the subject of that and checked it over very carefully to make sure that every question in those letters had ever been answered, you would all of a sudden be inundated with mail. It's quite fascinating

This — people all over the place pick up missed withholds very, very easily on organizations and on private auditors — very easily. Now, people critical of Scientology broadly go on the basis of, "They should know what I am thinking." They're usually kind of nutty. They're not going outside the realm of Scientologists and they should know what I'm thinking. And they don't know what I'm thinking because they haven't written to me, and they don't know what I think and we think something else and they haven't found out about it, and therefore they're no good and we ought to mow them all down!" Just as elementary as that. We failed to find out about them.

One of the best ways to knock out a complete entheta campaign against Scientology is just describe everything that you do know about the people who are attacking you. one of the most effective ways of doing this is to send this detective around to investigate them and then they know that you haven't missed a withhold. And you know, they shut up just like that. The most fantastic magic you ever heard of. Detective never finds out a thing.

They've been living an exemplary life, a totally exemplary life working for Russia in the American Foreign Office and there they are, you know. And — but they hear a detective has been around and now they know that you know, see.

If they're still unsure that you know, why, they will still be upset. So if you were to stand in front of one of these Joes and you could say, "Well, now that we know all about you, there's nothing much more we could say is there?" The guy will go away absolutely crushed. He actually would fall for that. Weird. But as long as you really don't know about them you're in trouble with them.

And of course, there isn't anything that substitutes for auditing. But you actually can put up a facade or you can find out the information so that it ceases to be a missed withhold. One of the effective ways is not only find out the information, but publish it. A-r-r-r-g-h. We're talking about somebody way outside; you say immediately that'd be libel suits.

Isn't that interesting that all these years I have never had a real libel suit ever filed against myself or a Scientology organization for publishing the absolute facts learned. Don't go into any fancy monkey business, just publish the facts. Say, "Well, most of the communists in the University of Australia are — amongst the professors — are shacked up with students and they're held under blackmail. And so are the Roman Catholic fathers connected with that particular university and they are held under blackmail for perversion. And that is why communism and Catholicism seem to be hand in glove in Australia — because of the same blackmail racket."

"Well, God" you'd say, "breathing anything like that these people could execute you at dawn, you know! They'll just yank you up in front of court and take billions away from you."

Well, they were going to take all kinds of things away from us up to the time we really put the blocks to them with it. I don't think we've ever heard anything since. The only entheta we've got now is in Brisbane. And that's pretty easy to dispense with — Brisbane. Just go up river a little bit and let them float on out to sea.

But, there's the missed withhold in operation in the society.

Now, fourteen: Lack of auditing results. And we go back actually a cousin to number One. We would say broadly in any organization that is there because we say, "broadly in any organization." If that organization is getting into trouble it's lack of auditing results and that's all, or of practice. That's just lack of auditing results. And those lack of auditing results rest on the cornerstone, not of other technology, but the missed withhold.

You want to clean that up, just clean up missed withholds wherever you can lay hands on a pc and all of a sudden your organization will soar. That is the most magic method of repairing an organization's results, income, public presence, lack of buildings or anything else. It would be right under that heading Quite important.

Joburg have to learn that right now and they haven't learned it too well. Washington is living down some of its sins and crimes. This is what you have to do to set it all back up again. You have to pick up all the missed withholds.

And, number fifteen: Dissemination failures. You're talking to somebody, you're trying to tell him about Scientology and he can't seem to understand about it and he argues about it, and he says, well it — "The I-Will-Arise Holy Rollers to which I belong are far superior and we've had that answer for many years." The answer is, "What have I failed to find out about you?" So he tells you and then he says, "Yeah, I'd like some auditing."

The trouble is it's too pervasive and it's too magic. It's too simple. And for that reason auditors miss it. So this bulletin on which this lecture has been based and which is not at all in — there's a lot more in this bulletin than there is in this lecture — May the 3rd, 1962, HCOB, ARC BREAKS AND MISSED WITHHOLDS and that sort of thing has a certain design. And that's a how-to-use-this-bulletin. And it's a very funny thing that it is headed with, "How to use this bulletin."

Every time you hear any of these things taking place in any branch of a Central Organization or an auditing session or anything else, you hand the person who is at the receiving end of the upset a copy of this. That doesn't matter if he's a student, he's a preclear, he's an organizational executive, anything else.

Pc comes down, he looks all busted up. The auditor comes in and says, "My God that's an ARC breaky pc." Just reach in the drawer, get one of these, and hand it to him. Tell him to read it and tell him to report to the HCO Sec to take an examination on it.

Honest — it's the only answer. There isn't any point in doing anything else. Now, naturally, the person has to know his Model Session, his E-Meter and so forth. And has to be able to handle the tools and weapons of his business in order to even fetch up and get off the missed withholds, don't you see? So it goes without saying that people have some skill in handling meters and Model Sessions and that sort of thing. Beyond that point there is nothing but missed withholds that cause upset.

This is a fantastic principle. And it comes right back to the fourth TR. And it goes right into the communication formula. And it goes right in to not-knowingness, and it goes in at — it finds a birth or a cousin, in almost every factor we have ever handled in Scientology one way or the other. The person with missed withholds has the idea that he can't reach so it goes into havingness, and on and on and on. you got the idea?

So it's very important technology. And listen, you don't need to have, ever, an ARC breaky pc. you never need to make a flub on a list. These things are archaic. They belong to our Stone Age, see. We're into a much higher level of technology today. As well as requiring new auditing precision, we've got this particular tool.

Why should you ever have anything but a session that was smooth as glass?

And if you don't have, it's just you really don't believe this: That ARC breaks are only missed withholds. Okay?

Audience: Yes.

Thank you. Take a break.