In finding the bugs in running the South African case, I also had a chance to study the UK case somewhat as the country is full of English people fresh from home and I've already had years of experience with it in England.

I believe that clearing a UK case easily requires between finishing off the Formulas and starting the Regimen a lot of S-C-S or 8C plus the Havingness found effective for the case.

The following commands have been conditionally developed for use with the Pre-Havingness Scale.

Control seems to get inverted on a UK case more easily than on some other nationalities and I think the inversion must be cleared up before Help (as in Regimen 3) can be effectively run.

It should be noted that “Endure”, “Failed Endure” are added to the scale just below “Failed Abandon” and that “No Effect” is added to end of scale.

This isn't a criticism on the UK case. It's just an effort to speed up clearing. A close study indicates that the UK case tends strongly to alter-is a command. It's no wonder, looking over the country's history, that commands got dangerous.

It should be noted that the commands are given in reverse order to Scale.

Therefore, in the HGC in London, I am now going to require an addition to procedure for clearing as follows:

When the Formulas are gotten out of the way and, while still running Failed Help between tests for havingness, the Havingness is found, a period of at least forty-five hours is instituted where the pc is run on S-C-S or 8C interspersed with a few commands of his Havingness every half hour. The last five hours will be run on Op-Pro-by-Dup.

What would you rather not have a bad effect upon?

Only when this is done will the auditor locate the Confront and then continue with Regimen 3.

If a test by the auditor, on any case, regardless of nationality, shows that the pc is poor on control, the above routine should be followed.

Tell me something others don’t want.

This data is backed up by enormous success with S-C-S and Op-Pro-by-Dup in England and the general success of 8C.

I have been looking for the bug in UK clearing for some time and feel that this is its remedy.

What would you consider interesting? What would another consider uninteresting?

What would you consider uninteresting? What would another consider interesting?

S-C-S now has four stages, instead of three. It has been found that at least one pc never flattened start because the body was "already started" being in constant motion and so the pc never could start it. The added command is "When I tell you to stand still, I want you to make that body stand still. " "All right?" "Stand still. "

The remainder of S-C-S is as always.

What communication would you consider bad? What communication would another consider good?

What control would you consider bad? What control would another consider good?

What help would you consider bad? What help would another consider good?

What continued?

What have you endured?

Who couldn’t you abandon? What couldn’t you abandon?

Who have you abandoned? What have you abandoned?

Who have you failed to protect? What have you failed to protect?

Who have you protected? What have you protected?

Who wouldn’t you let leave? What should another keep?

Where would you rather not be? When would you rather not be?

Who has been considered unimportant? What has been considered unimportant?

Who did another consider important? What did another consider important?

What have you failed to withhold?

What have you withheld?

To whom have you failed to do something? What have you not done?

What have you done?

Who have you failed to help? What have you failed to help?

Who have you helped? Who has helped you? What have you helped? What has helped you?

Who has failed to control you? Who have you failed to control? What has failed to control you? What have you failed to control?

Who have you controlled? Who has controlled you? What have you controlled? What has controlled you?

Who has failed to communicate to you?

With whom have you failed to communicate? What has failed to communicate to you?

With what have you failed to communicate?

Who has communicated to you?

With whom have you communicated? What has communicated to you?

With what have you communicated?

Who has failed to interest you? Who have you failed to interest? What has not been interesting?

What have you failed to make interesting?

How have you interested another? How has another interested you? What could you make interesting? What could another make interesting?

What should another not have?

The havingness command for the pc.

[This HCO B was later reissued from Saint Hill Manor on 9 March 1961 with “Franchise” added to the distribution. The commands for “Communication” above are replaced by commands given in HCO B 2 March 1961, New Pre-Hav Command. ]