Every auditing session is carefully kept track of and reported on by the auditor.
This issue lays out how to write up a session and gives examples of the forms that are used. Look at the forms attached to the back of this issue as often as you like, so that you have a proper balance of mass with the significance you are being presented with.
The following are terms that are used in connection with auditing and writing up an auditing session:
ADMINISTRATION: The action or fact of keeping auditor's reports and other records related to an auditing session. (Abbreviation: Admin)
CO-AUDIT: A team of any two people who are helping each other reach a better life with Scientology or Dianetic processing.
CO-AUDITOR: One who audits another co-auditor under supervision and after training at a given level.
PC EXAMINER: That person in a Scientology church assigned to the duties of noting pc's statements, E-Meter phenomena and pc indicators after a session or when a pc wishes to volunteer information.
CASE SUPERVISOR: That person in a Scientology church who gives instruction regarding the auditing of preclears and supervises the auditing of preclears. (Abbreviation: C/S)
Proper session admin is a very important activity. As a co-auditor, you are part of a team including the case supervisor, the co-audit supervisor and the pc examiner. Every member of this team has his separate duties in ensuring your co-auditing sessions are technically correct and that accurate and agreed-upon administration procedures are followed.
Part of your duties concerning the admin of your auditing sessions is to make it clear what happened in the session itself so that the session can be properly supervised by the C/S and so that an accurate record exists of what occurred. These records are kept in the pc's folder.
Here are the things that are always included in your session write-up:
WORKSHEET: A worksheet is supposed to be the complete running record of the session from beginning to end. (Abbreviation: W/S)
AUDITOR REPORT FORM: An auditor's report form is made out at the end of each session. It gives an outline of what actions were taken during the session and the exact process commands used. (Abbreviation: ARF)
SUMMARY REPORT FORM: A report written after the session on a fill-in type standard form which is simply a summarized record of what happened and what was observed during the session. (Abbreviation: SRF)
EXAM REPORT: A report made out by the Examiner when the pc goes to the pc examiner after session or goes on his own volition. It contains the meter details, pc's indicators and the pc's statement.
C/S: A case supervisor's direction of what to audit on a pc. C/S also stands for the action of writing the direction, meaning to «case supervise».
An example of each of the above session admin terms is attached to the back of this issue.
The order in which these reports are clipped together and put into the pc's folder for presentation to the case supervisor is as follows:
The case supervisor usually writes the C/S (case supervisor directions of what to audit on a pc) for the next session. If the co-auditor is certain of what the next session action should be, he can fill it in himself and the case supervisor will OK it providing the co-auditor has recommended the correct next action for the pc. The case supervisor also grades the session just given. He lets the auditor know how well done the session was based on how standardly it was delivered.
FOLDER SUMMARY: The folder summary is a white piece of paper stapled to the left inside front cover of the pc's folder. The folder summary is a list of all of the auditing actions that have been done on a pc. It is in consecutive date order and shows what processes were audited and their end results. It includes each session's date, total time and the exam result. (Abbreviation: FS)
Attached is an example of what the folder summary should look like.
Extra copies of all of these forms will be available from your course admin or the organization's bookstore.
All of these reports (except the session worksheets) are filled out at the end of each session. They must be written very legibly so that the case supervisor can read them and see what occurred in the session.
The worksheet is written as the session is going on. It is a running record of the session and what happens during the session. The auditor does not, by any means, pay more attention to his admin than he does to his pc or to his communication cycle with his pc. He must, however, write down the main occurrences of the session. The most convenient way of keeping worksheets in a non-metered co-audit session is to have your worksheet paper on a clipboard and available for notations during the session.
After the session, the co-auditor can fill in (with red ink) any details he may have missed writing down during the session. He also goes over the worksheets he wrote during the session, and clarifies any words that are not easily readable, by BLOCK PRINTING the word above the one that is hard to read, as in the following example:
VERY
The pc was xxxxx happy.
The block printing (as with any after session clarification of a worksheet) is done in red ink. The original worksheets are never thrown away, copied, erased, deleted from, etc. in any way other than as described above.
Standard admin is a vital part of the technology of auditing and is something that every good auditor adheres to and takes pride in.
PAT SMITH (red) 22 Feb 80 (red)
JAN JONES (red)
Session went very well. (red)
Next C/S:
1. Reach and Withdraw on Outdoor Environment (blue)
2. Reach and Withdraw on Pc's Personal Living Area and MEST (blue)
3. Reach and Withdraw on Pc's Working Area (blue)
Jan Jones (red)
After Session: Qual Div ____FLAG____ (Place)
Volunteered: Date: 22 Feb 80
Medical: Time 12:00 pm
PC or Pre OT Name: Pat Smith
Last Grade Attained: Purification R/D
Grade, Course or Action Being Attested:
PC's Statement (write down exactly what PC says):
I had a great session!
TA Position & any BD: 2.3 PC Indicators: VGIs
State of Needle: F/N (Wide)
F/N Indicated to PC: Yes
Mark Brown
(Signature of Examiner)
Route this form to Tech Services which routes it into the folder.
When illness reported make this out with a carbon under it and route orig to T/S and folder and carbon to MO or Qual Sec. Rush route any roller coaster later report or sick rpt to folder to prevent C/S errors.
The auditor checks each one off and fills in the appropriate data.
PC: Pat Smith
AUDITOR: Jan Jones
PROCESS RUN: Environment Locational
PC GAINS: PC got into PT.
SESSION OBSERVATIONS:
1. How did pc do in relation to what was run? Great.
2. Effectiveness of process: Excellent.
3. Emotional state of the pc and whether this improved: Bored. Improved to happy.
4. Any misemotion: No.
5. Preclear appearance: Neat. Well groomed.
6. Mannerisms: Twitches in mouth occasionally.
7. Mannerism changes: Stopped twitching his mouth.
8. Any change in skin tone: Got pinker.
9. Did color of eyes change? Yes Get brighter? Yes Get dull?
10. Any comm lags: Yes.
11. Any cognitions: Yes.
12. Any pains turn on? No Pains turn off?
13. Any sensations turn on? No Sensations turn off?
14. Any difficulties: No.
15. Did you complete the C/S instructions? Yes.
16. Was the pc happy at session end? Yes.
DATE: 22 Feb 80
PRECLEAR: Pat Smith
TOTAL SESSION TIME: 18 minutes
AUDITOR: Jan Jones
| Start of Session Environment Locational Clear Command – «Look at that (object)» Start of Process 1. Look at that (object). End of Session |
11:50 11:52 12:08 | PC VGIs PC understood command PC cognited «I feel much more in present time!» F/N VGIs at Exam |
Pat Smith 22 Feb 80
Jan Jones
| PC is well fed and rested
- yes
Start of Session 11:50 PC – VGIs Clear definitions of command: That (PC gives correct definition) at (PC gives correct definition) look (PC gives correct definition) |
Clear command: «Look at that (object)» PC – I would view object with my EYES xyxs 11:52 Start of Process Look at that (object). Command given repetitively about 25 times first in the course room and then outside. PC looks at objects, becoming brighter. Then originates – I feel much more in Present Time! Indicators Very good indicators PC very bright End of Session 12:08 |
PC: Pat Smith
| 18 Mar 71 time: 1 Hr |
(Name of Objectiveprocess) Process unflat Exam:F/N GIs |
| 20 Mar 71 time: 2 Hrs 20 min |
(Name of Objective process) Process run to its End Phenomena Exam: F/N VGIs |
| 21 Mar 71 | PC Declares Completion of (Name of Objective process) |
| 22 Feb 80 time: 18 min |
Environment Locational – run to E/P. Exam: F/N VGIs |
PRECLEAR:
DATE:
AUDITOR:
TOTAL SESSION TIME:
| ...... | ...... | ...... |
The auditor checks each one off and fills in the appropriate data:
DATE:
PC:
AUDITOR:
PROCESS RUN:
PC GAINS:
SESSION OBSERVATIONS:
1. How did pc do in relation to what was run?
2. Effectiveness of process:
3. Emotional state of the pc and whether this improved:
4. Any misemotion:
5. Preclear appearance:
6. Mannerisms:
7. Mannerism changes:
8. Any change in skin tone:
9. Did color of eyes change? Get brighter? Get dull?
10. Any comm lags:
11. Any cognitions:
12. Any pains turn on? Pains turn off?
13. Any sensations turn on? Sensations turn off?
14. Any difficulties:
15. Did you complete the C/S instructions?
16. Was the pc happy at session end?