Occasionally you run into a case that "has never committed any overts. " Such a person might, for example, never seem to have anything on F2.

The routine questions of the Expanded Grade processes are not checked for read before running them. The exceptions are only as expressly designated where it is a part of that individual technique, or on listing questions such as the main Grade IV process.

The proper way to do a Return (Progress) on this is Gradient Scales, discussion of what a harmful act would be, who could be harmed.

Generally:

An HC Out-point session should be done first if it's really bad.

1. When you're picking something to run on an individual that is handling his individual manifestations it must read well before you run it. Not all pcs have "a sharp pain in the left elbow" or are upset by false teeth or have a prepcheckable item called "reviews" or have an item for "Who or what has suppressed you?"

You'll find a kooky fixed idea like "thetans cannot be hurt" or "overts are their own fault," etc.

2. When you're running something that is common to all thetans – i.e. that all thetans have – then the charge is there, though it could take a little while to run the meter action into the process. Probably with Ruds well in most of the standard processes would read anyhow, if you happened to be looking at the meter; thus later you can check a previously run Grade process for read as an indication of whether or not it's flat.

Versions, very light of A-R-C-U, notably agreements crack this sort of thing.

To run 0-B you'd check the item for read before using it in the blank in the command … but you wouldn't check "communication", find no read, and then skip Grade Zero on the pc. All the processes of the level are run on each pc.

Ron, in mid-1970, developed some additional processes to handle the type of case that "has never done anything bad. "

Some appropriate C/Ses are listed here for use on this type of case.

For someone achieving minimal results, or with a generally fat Review folder:

1. Fly all Ruds.

2. List to a BD F/N item – "What shouldn't be known?"

For someone responding to routine overt pulling (due to, say, natter or no gain) with "no overts," "no withholds," "I wouldn't expect anything to happen from it... ," etc.:

1. Assess GF 40. Include O/R.

2. Two-way comm the points that read (except Ruds that read as out).

Try to phrase the Two-way comm to get his attitude towards the subject that reads rather than do the Class VIII remedy.

Don't use "you," use "anyone," "others," "another" as he hasn't great reality on himself and it would sound accusative.

Followed later by:

1. Discuss why overts are necessary.

A pc with R/Ses doesn't really run right. His F/Ns collapse at Exams. This pc can be listed on "What would be an overt?" to BD F/N item. Then next session, the item found can be run Quad Recall and Quad R3R.

This last list question can miss a withhold, so check for such if there are unexpected BIs at Exam after the listing session (as well as for wrong items).

For someone with fixated attention on an individual (e.g. tends to natter about that person for session after session):

1. Fly a Rud if no F/N.

2. List by L&N – Who or what in your past does ________ remind you of?

3. a) What did you do to (item found)?

b) What did you withhold from (item found)?

Also there is:

1. Fly a Rud if no F/N.

2. List "Give me an example of an overt" to BD F/N item.

Followed by:

1. Fly a Rud if no F/N.

2. Run (on item found on "Give me an example of an overt"):

Quad Recalls

Quad R3R

Another C/S is:

1. Fly a Rud if no F/N.

2. Assess Help, Failed Help, Refused Help, Prevented Help.

3. On result: Quad Recalls, Quad R3R.