Русская версия

Search document title:
Content search 2 (exact):
ENGLISH DOCS FOR THIS DATE- Routine 0-A (Expanded) (S0) - B641226 | Сравнить

RUSSIAN DOCS FOR THIS DATE- Саентология 0 - Б641226 | Сравнить
- Шаблон 0-А Расширенный (САЕН-0) - Б641226 | Сравнить

SCANS FOR THIS DATE- 641226 - HCO Bulletin - Routine 0A (Expanded) [B004-042]
- 641226 - HCO Bulletin - Routine 0A (Expanded) [B030-026]
- 641226 - HCO Bulletin - Routine 0A (Expanded) [B040-044]
- 641226 - HCO Bulletin - Routine 0A (Expanded) [B073-005]
- 641226 - HCO Bulletin - Routine 0A (Expanded) [B147-016]
CONTENTS ROUTINE 0-A (EXPANDED) LISTEN STYLE CO-AUDIT Cохранить документ себе Скачать
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 26 DECEMBER 1964
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 26 DECEMBER 1964
RemimeoRemimeo
FranchiseFranchise
Sthil StudentsSthil Students
Sthil Co-auditSthil Co-audit
SCIENTOLOGY ZEROSCIENTOLOGY ZERO
(Corrections to HCO Bulletin of 11 December 1964, “Processes”, and to HCO Bulletin of 10 December 1964, “Listen Style Auditing”)(Corrections to HCO Bulletin of 11 December 1964, “Processes”, and to HCO Bulletin of 10 December 1964, “Listen Style Auditing”)

ROUTINE 0-A (EXPANDED)

ROUTINE 0-A (EXPANDED)

An additional command increases the usefulness of this routine. It is therefore rewritten as follows:

An additional command increases the usefulness of this routine. It is therefore rewritten as follows:

The auditor makes a list of things people generally can’t talk to easily. That includes parents, policemen, governments and God. But it’s a far longer list. The auditor must compile this list himself or herself out of session. It may be added to by the auditor from time to time. It must never be published as a “canned list”. Scientology Instructors and Scientology Personnel should not be listed on it as it leads to upset in sessions.

The auditor makes a list of things people generally can’t talk to easily. That includes parents, policemen, governments and God. But it’s a far longer list. The auditor must compile this list himself or herself out of session. It may be added to by the auditor from time to time. It must never be published as a “canned list”. Scientology Instructors and Scientology Personnel should not be listed on it as it leads to upset in sessions.

STEP 1. The auditor chooses one of the subjects off the list and uses it in Steps 2 and 3 below until the pc is comfortable about it. Subjects from the list can be chosen in sequence or at random. A chosen subject is not left until the pc is comfortable about it. By this is meant, the pc would not feel disturbed talking to the subject chosen.

STEP 1. The auditor chooses one of the subjects off the list and uses it in Steps 2 and 3 below until the pc is comfortable about it. Subjects from the list can be chosen in sequence or at random. A chosen subject is not left until the pc is comfortable about it. By this is meant, the pc would not feel disturbed talking to the subject chosen.

The auditor does not ask the pc which subject or if it is all right to choose that subject as the pc at the moment of selection is not likely to feel comfortable about any of the listed subjects and so will just reject. No, the auditor just chooses one and starts on it.

The auditor does not ask the pc which subject or if it is all right to choose that subject as the pc at the moment of selection is not likely to feel comfortable about any of the listed subjects and so will just reject. No, the auditor just chooses one and starts on it.

STEP 2. The auditor asks, “If you could talk to______ (chosen subject), what would you talk about?” Pc answers one or more things at greater or shorter length.

STEP 2. The auditor asks, “If you could talk to______ (chosen subject), what would you talk about?” Pc answers one or more things at greater or shorter length.

STEP 3. When the pc seems satisfied the question has been answered, the auditor then says, “All right, if you were talking to______ (chosen subject in 1) about that what would you say, exactly?”

STEP 3. When the pc seems satisfied the question has been answered, the auditor then says, “All right, if you were talking to______ (chosen subject in 1) about that what would you say, exactly?”

The pc is expected to speak as though talking to the subject chosen in l.

The pc is expected to speak as though talking to the subject chosen in l.

STEP 4. The auditor notes whether pc is comfortable about the subject chosen in Step 1, yet without asking pc. This is done by noting the voice tone or text of what the pc would say. If it is shy, diffident, or if it is belligerent or annoyed, the same subject is retained for a new go with Steps 2 and 3. If the pc seems bright and cheerful, a new subject is chosen from the list for a working over with Steps 2 and 3. If the subject in 1 is retained, the auditor again does Steps 2 and 3 above over and over until the pc is cheerful. A subject chosen in 1 is not left until the pc really can respond cheerfully. When this is accomplished, a new subject is chosen as Step 1 and the process is continued with Steps 2 and 3 using the new subject.

STEP 4. The auditor notes whether pc is comfortable about the subject chosen in Step 1, yet without asking pc. This is done by noting the voice tone or text of what the pc would say. If it is shy, diffident, or if it is belligerent or annoyed, the same subject is retained for a new go with Steps 2 and 3. If the pc seems bright and cheerful, a new subject is chosen from the list for a working over with Steps 2 and 3. If the subject in 1 is retained, the auditor again does Steps 2 and 3 above over and over until the pc is cheerful. A subject chosen in 1 is not left until the pc really can respond cheerfully. When this is accomplished, a new subject is chosen as Step 1 and the process is continued with Steps 2 and 3 using the new subject.

The whole of Routine 0-A is flat when the pc feels far more comfortable about talking to specific items and isn’t shying off from items on the list. It is flat, therefore, when an ability is regained on specific items on the list and the list items aren’t producing big new changes in the pc’s communication ability.

The whole of Routine 0-A is flat when the pc feels far more comfortable about talking to specific items and isn’t shying off from items on the list. It is flat, therefore, when an ability is regained on specific items on the list and the list items aren’t producing big new changes in the pc’s communication ability.

LISTEN STYLE CO-AUDIT

LISTEN STYLE CO-AUDIT

It is expected that by the time an auditor is permitted to do the Zero Routines, Individual Listen Style will have been entered upon.

It is expected that by the time an auditor is permitted to do the Zero Routines, Individual Listen Style will have been entered upon.

Until the class seems able to run individual sessions, old “R-1-C” can be used by the auditing supervisor on a group basis using Listen Style Co-audit until the group has the idea of sessions.

Until the class seems able to run individual sessions, old “R-1-C” can be used by the auditing supervisor on a group basis using Listen Style Co-audit until the group has the idea of sessions.

Routines work best on Individual Listen Style. The pc is always wondering, in Listen Style Co-audit, if the auditing supervisor is listening to him personally. The auditor is not the receipt point of the pc’s comm in many instances.

Routines work best on Individual Listen Style. The pc is always wondering, in Listen Style Co-audit, if the auditing supervisor is listening to him personally. The auditor is not the receipt point of the pc’s comm in many instances.

Old R-1-C is the best training mechanism to get auditors to run sessions. In this process the auditing supervisor just chooses something for all the pcs to talk to the auditors about, like a dynamic or a common social problem.

Old R-1-C is the best training mechanism to get auditors to run sessions. In this process the auditing supervisor just chooses something for all the pcs to talk to the auditors about, like a dynamic or a common social problem.

L. RON HUBBARDL. RON HUBBARD
LRH:jw.rdLRH:jw.rd