Русская версия

Search document title:
Content search 2 (exact):
ENGLISH DOCS FOR THIS DATE- Learing Process Education by Duplication and Repetition - BTB690914-5 | Сравнить
- Learning Processes - Education by Evaluation of Importance - BTB690914-2 | Сравнить

SCANS FOR THIS DATE- 690914 Issue 1 - Board Technical Bulletin - Learning Processes - Education by Evaluation of Importance [BTB09-013]
- 690914 Issue 2 - Board Technical Bulletin - Learning Processes - Group Teaching by Definition Agreement [BTB03-016]
- 690914 Issue 3 - Board Technical Bulletin - Learning Processes - Education by Duplication and Repetition [BTB03-090]
CONTENTS LEARNING PROCESSESEDUCATION BY DUPLICATION AND REPETITION Cохранить документ себе Скачать
BOARD TECHNICAL BULLETIN
14 SEPTEMBER 1969
Issue V
Reissued 20 July 1974 as BTB
CANCELS
HCO Bulletin OF 14 September 1969
Issue V Same Title
BOARD TECHNICAL BULLETIN
14 SEPTEMBER 1969
Issue V
Reissued 20 July 1974 as BTB
CANCELS
HCO Bulletin OF 14 September 1969
Issue V Same Title
RemimeoRemimeo
Course SupervisorsCourse Supervisors
StudentsStudents
All LevelsAll Levels

LEARNING PROCESSESEDUCATION BY DUPLICATION AND REPETITION

LEARNING PROCESSESEDUCATION BY DUPLICATION AND REPETITION

This method is fantastically simple, with very successful results in raising IQ level and cause over learning, accepting and knowing data. The first step is given in the example below and is the first gradient.

This method is fantastically simple, with very successful results in raising IQ level and cause over learning, accepting and knowing data. The first step is given in the example below and is the first gradient.

Coach: I am going to say three numbers. One, two, three. What did I say?

Coach: I am going to say three numbers. One, two, three. What did I say?

Student: One, two, three.

Student: One, two, three.

Coach: Good. Do you remember what I said? Do you remember what you said? (used alternatively)

Coach: Good. Do you remember what I said? Do you remember what you said? (used alternatively)

Student: One, two, three.

Student: One, two, three.

Coach: Good.

Coach: Good.

This is done using variations of the three numbers, checking how the student is doing every now and then until the student is comfortable and relaxed without any physical pain or tension and he can recall without difficulty what you said and what he said. Check before going on if he can remember the First set of numbers you gave him. Then we go up one gradient and have the student reject or accept data at will.

This is done using variations of the three numbers, checking how the student is doing every now and then until the student is comfortable and relaxed without any physical pain or tension and he can recall without difficulty what you said and what he said. Check before going on if he can remember the First set of numbers you gave him. Then we go up one gradient and have the student reject or accept data at will.

Example:

Example:

Coach: All chairs are purple. What did I say?

Coach: All chairs are purple. What did I say?

Student: All chairs are purple.

Student: All chairs are purple.

Coach: Okay, both of us said all chairs are purple?

Coach: Okay, both of us said all chairs are purple?

Student: Yes.

Student: Yes.

Coach: Are they?

Coach: Are they?

Student: No.

Student: No.

Coach: Alright you could disbelieve something I said and throw it out couldn’t you?

Coach: Alright you could disbelieve something I said and throw it out couldn’t you?

Student: Yes.

Student: Yes.

This step is done using examples of non-significant data which are totally incorrect. When he has regained his power of choice we go on to the next step, that of teaching and getting across the actual datum you want to teach him.

This step is done using examples of non-significant data which are totally incorrect. When he has regained his power of choice we go on to the next step, that of teaching and getting across the actual datum you want to teach him.

Coach: Preclears should always be acknowledged. What did I say?

Coach: Preclears should always be acknowledged. What did I say?

Student: Preclears should always be acknowledged.

Student: Preclears should always be acknowledged.

Coach: Is this true?

Coach: Is this true?

Student: Well I don’t know.

Student: Well I don’t know.

Coach: Alright, now give me a graphic example of that using these two items.

Coach: Alright, now give me a graphic example of that using these two items.

Student: The glass as the preclear says-I’ve had enough, I’m leaving. The coke bottle which is the Auditor must always acknowledge the preclear and says-OK.

Student: The glass as the preclear says-I’ve had enough, I’m leaving. The coke bottle which is the Auditor must always acknowledge the preclear and says-OK.

Coach: It’s not very workable is it? Alright modify it.

Coach: It’s not very workable is it? Alright modify it.

Student: If you want good auditing results acknowledge your preclear.

Student: If you want good auditing results acknowledge your preclear.

Coach: If you want good auditing results acknowledge your preclear.

Coach: If you want good auditing results acknowledge your preclear.

Student: Good!

Student: Good!

Coach: Thank you end of session.

Coach: Thank you end of session.

________________________________________

So in this way you can teach a person a datum without duress. Let him think about it and argue it out, get him into agreement. There is no rote set of commands. It consists of two-way comm based on the above format, and getting him to demonstrate with objects in the room. This way he will KNOW the datum, not just a bunch of words.

So in this way you can teach a person a datum without duress. Let him think about it and argue it out, get him into agreement. There is no rote set of commands. It consists of two-way comm based on the above format, and getting him to demonstrate with objects in the room. This way he will KNOW the datum, not just a bunch of words.

Taken from the 15th ACC Methods of Education
Reissued as BTB by Flag Mission 1234
I/C: CPO Andrea Lewis 2nd: Molly Harlow
Authorized by AVU
for the
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
of the
CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY
Taken from the 15th ACC Methods of Education
Reissued as BTB by Flag Mission 1234
I/C: CPO Andrea Lewis 2nd: Molly Harlow
Authorized by AVU
for the
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
of the
CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY
BDCS:SW:AL:MH:mh.rdBDCS:SW:AL:MH:mh.rd