Русская версия

Search document title:
Content search 2 (exact):
ENGLISH DOCS FOR THIS DATE- Administration Outside Scientology (DIV1.DEP3.ETHICS) - P650402 | Сравнить
- Heed Heavy Traffic Warnings (0.COM) - P650402 | Сравнить
- Urgent Urgent Urgent - False Reports (DIV1.HCO) - P650402 | Сравнить

RUSSIAN DOCS FOR THIS DATE- Ложные Доклады (КРО-1) (ц) - И650402-1 | Сравнить
- Предупреждения об Интенсивном Потоке на Линиях (ц) - И650402-3 | Сравнить
- Фронтальные Проверки по Процессам (КРО-4) (ц) - И650402-4 | Сравнить

SCANS FOR THIS DATE- 650402 - HCO Policy Letter - Administration Outside Scientology [PL008-057]
- 650402 - HCO Policy Letter - False Reports [PL008-056]
- 650402 - HCO Policy Letter - Heed Heavy Traffic Warnings [PL008-053]
- 650402 - HCO Policy Letter - Meter Checks [PL008-054]
- 650402 - HCO Policy Letter - Starrate Checkouts for Process [PL008-055]
CONTENTS ADMINISTRATION OUTSIDE SCIENTOLOGY Cохранить документ себе Скачать
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 2 APRIL 1965
Gen Non-Remimeo

ADMINISTRATION OUTSIDE SCIENTOLOGY

You will find, oddly and weirdly enough, that if you fail to use Scientology admin and Dev-T policies on the society outside Scientology that trouble will occur.

If you just make it a blind rule to always do so, you will avert much trouble and upset.

Where somebody writes you (say a business firm) an off-line or off-policy (off their policy too) or off-origin despatch and you don’t point it out and send it back to source and say why, endless Dev-T will occur! We have had an actual case of it in the US Government which sent us a letter off their policy. We did not handle it asDev-T and so far it has cost a couple thousand dollars just because we didn’t!

Now take the case of the Mar 1, 1965 Amnesty. It was released so that the new Justice Codes could be issued and because we needed a cleared track for new org patterns such as certification changes and classification shifts.

Well, it was a piece of Scientology Admin. So to hell with whether they think it stupid or wise, just use any Scientology Admin or Policy Letter excerpt to slam people’s hats on in governments or anywhere.

Examples: The FDA of Washington DC is really trying to get off the hook on its attack. It may eventually commit further overts unless given an Amnesty. So the HCO Continental Secretary US should mail a copy of the Policy Letter to the head of the FDA and each high official of that area including the Secretary of Health Education and Welfare of the US and the president, with a note on HCO stationery stating “This Amnesty was issued primarily for Scientologists so we could issue new Justice Codes in our organizations but it happens to include you also. Scientologists therefore may not attack you for your former actions, and also if you do not continue to attack us we cannot even sue you. While you may consider it high handed of us to issue a General Amnesty, remember we have a rather enormous population to look after across the world and we probably do a much better job of it than you do since we know our business.” Who knows (or who cares) the result of this. We have at least done our job.

Example: Parliament hi Victoria is really covered by the Amnesty and each should be mailed an exact copy even Galbatty and the R.C. church officials, the head of the state government and even Holy Joe Anderson who headed the “Enquiry”. A note should accompany it “While this Amnesty was issued primarily for Scientologists so that we could then issue new Justice Codes for our organizations, it happens that you are also covered by it. Thus it excuses your erroneous attack on Scientology during the last year and the effort to break our organizations by the cost of it. Thus here is your copy of the General Amnesty of 1 March 1965.1 think you would be wise to accept it.”

Then we are quite in order sometime in the future, to respond to any further nonsense from these humanoids if we have to label them suppressive.

It would obviously be quite out of order in view of the newness of our codes to slap them for acts which we ourselves have issued an Amnesty on.

If the Internal Revenue Service (off-policy in refusing the FCDC non-profit status though it qualifies) continues to act up or if the FDA does sue we can of course Comm Ev them and if found guilty, label and publish them as a Suppressive Group and fair game. I assure you that this is less hollow than it sounds.

We are bound by two things:—

1. We are not just a group. We are the possessors of very powerful technology and we are still part of this civilization.

2. We owe our progress to the peace we have maintained (strenuous though it was) in our environment.

If we continue to let loose on the civilization around us with our powerful technology without giving that civilization a chance to accept us and abide by it we will have chaos very soon.

Therefore whether “society” accepts or not we must also extend our “Pax Scientologica” as a spearhead before our direct technical action or nobody will stand still to be audited but run in terror and just a handful of us will go free. The rest of society will simply cave in.

So we may as well develop the habit early regardless of whether they accept our admin tech or not. Extend it always. Shrug at any gasps or protests.

And then we’ll have a spread over things that forms no ridge between “them” and “us”.

You see, none is fair game until he or she declares against us. And only those who so declare are suppressive. Don’t err in thinking the whole is against us. That’s just an ARC Break. Most are for us. Our files are crammed with applause. Our complaints drawer is a very tiny one. It would do any Scientologist good to see the thousands upon thousands upon thousands of “Hurrah for Scientology” in our files and the little tiny batch of sour grapes. Yet because what’s wrong as cases with the tiny batch is that they use the word “Everybody” continually in their cries and howls so people they talk to find it hard to locate them in their dispersal. They are the ARC Breaks kid in person. “Everybody” and “nobody” and entheta are their stocks in trade. Such cases speak of “the masses” and “the public” as against us and so we sometimes fail to note that the whole complaint is from this puny runt raving from the whirlpool of his own overt acts. Such a person makes a greater effect on the unthinking than he should. He is giving continual false reports.

GENERALITIES ARE NOT WRONG UNLESS THEY ARE COMBINED WITH A FALSE REPORT AND INTENDED TO UPSET SOMEBODY.

The generalities of these bank puppets intend to deny the good (nobody, nothing) and generalize (everybody, everything) the bad. And so such people are really just spinners for the local spin bin. Yet you find “society” electing and appointing them since such birds echo the exact reactive bank of each individual in the mob. You can easily form a bad mob. It’s awful hard to form an enthusiastic mob—they have to be sane!

So the individual in “Society” is so far from against us that even White House clerks have sent us copies of government despatches about us. Society is in the grip of a lot of ARC Broken paranoid peewees like Galbatty in Australia or the head of the FDA in Washington. Such men grab such posts because they are men of fear. Such men are just animated banks. If such cannot destroy you, they will destroy themselves. They will confess at the drop of an electrode if told to do so, poor puppets of their banks that they are.

So don’t heed who is pretending to be in charge “out there”. There really isn’t any thetan in charge. “Human leadership” is usually just the guy with the most bank. When you want to handle one of these “leaders”, put the guy’s hat on. Hard. With Scientology admin and policy.

Never fail to use Scientology Admin or Justice to handle the individuals in the society beyond our edges. Sounds adventurous. Well, it is! But effective, too.

We have the tech.

It’s designed to handle bank conditions.

Use it.

And use our Dissem Formula ruthlessly at every chance and in any situation.

You will only fail to handle a situation if you don’t handle it with Scientology. The older methods have failed. Hell! That’s why we’re here!

L. RON HUBBARD LRH:ml.cden

[Note: See HCO Pol Ltr 21 October 1968 CANCELLATION OF FAIR GAME.)