This is a most interesting and revelatory processing check. It may be done at any time but preferably after the last two pages of the Joburg (Form 3) and Form 6 on old Scientologists and Form HCO B 21 September 1961, Children’s Sec Check, on others. Doing this check at once on brand-new people engages their interest and eases the way to more severe checks.

This check is run as follows:

Run 3 questions or 20 minutes of the check. Then run 10 minutes of the pc’s havingness process. On any particularly hot trio of this check, go over the three again and again. It will be noticed that the check is divided in sections of 3 questions each for that purpose.

Use the current HCO British E-Meter. Many withholds dc; not show on other meters even when their electrical responses are the same as the British meter. The mental responses are not the same.

NEVER LEAVE A QUESTION UNFLAT ON ANY PROCESSING (SECURITY) CHECK. Nul the needle reaction before leaving any question (although an unflat question can be interrupted to run havingness).

Run in Model Session 21 December 1961 or later with Rudiments IN. Short session a pc to keep them in when the pc is restive. Do a thorough job on the withhold question in the rudiments even when doing a Processing (Sec) Check.

Use only instant reads. Repeat question exactly as written and see if it is nul before leaving it.

1. Have you ever withheld a vital piece of information?
2. Have you ever made anyone guilty of withholding vital information?
3. Have you ever prevented anyone from making others give vital information?
4. Have you ever withheld looking?
5. Have you ever made anyone guilty of not looking?
6. Have you ever prevented anyone from making others look?
7. Have you ever withheld emotion?
8. Have you ever made anyone guilty of being emotional?
9. Have you ever prevented anyone from making others emotional?# Have you ever withheld effort?
10. Have you ever made anyone guilty of using effort?
11. Have you ever prevented anyone from making others use effort?
12. Have you ever withheld thinking?
13. Have you ever made anyone guilty of thinking?
14. Have you ever prevented anyone from making others think?
15. Have you ever withheld symbols (words)?
16. Have you ever made anyone guilty of using symbols (words)?
17. Have you ever prevented anyone from making others use symbols (words)?
18. Have you ever withheld eating?
19. Have you ever made anyone guilty of eating?
20. Have you ever prevented anyone from making others eat?
21. Have you ever withheld sex?
22. Have you ever made anyone guilty of sex?
23. Have you ever prevented anyone from making others have sex?
24. Have you ever withheld a mystery?
25. Have you ever made anyone guilty of a mystery?
26. Have you ever prevented anyone from causing others a mystery?
27. Have you ever withheld waiting?
28. Have you ever made anyone guilty of waiting?
29. Have you ever prevented anyone from making others wait?
30. Have you ever withheld unconsciousness?
31. Have you ever made anyone guilty of unconsciousness?
32. Have you ever prevented anyone from making others unconscious?# Have you ever withheld anything?
33. Have you ever made anyone guilty of withholding?
34. Have you ever prevented anyone from telling a withhold?
35. Have you ever withheld security checking?
36. Have you ever made anyone guilty of security checking?
37. Have you ever sought to prevent another from security checking?

The check may be continued using any specific knowledge, any perception, any emotion (see Tone Scale), any version of effort (force, strength), any version of thinking including doubt and suspicion, any version of symbols (including books), any version of sexual actions, any eating or consumption of anything (including money), any version of mystery including stupidity, any version of waiting, and any version of unconsciousness including sleep and chemical or physical means of producing sleep.

By running the general version first and then doing a survey of any pc’s announced difficulties along the Know to Mystery Scale and then by putting down these items on the appropriate places in the check, great case gains can be made.