Русская версия

Search document title:
Content search 2 (exact):
ENGLISH DOCS FOR THIS DATE- OIC Change - Cable Change (DIV1.DEP3.OIC) - P700617 | Сравнить
- Technical Degrades (KSW-5) - P700617R77 | Сравнить
- Technical Degrades (KSW-5) - P700617RA81 (2) | Сравнить
- Technical Degrades (KSW-5) - P700617RA81 | Сравнить
- Technical Dergades (KSW-5) - P700617RB83 | Сравнить

RUSSIAN DOCS FOR THIS DATE- Техническая Деградация (СДС-5, КРО) (2) - И700617 | Сравнить
- Техническая Деградация (СДС-5, КРО) - И700617 | Сравнить
- Техническая Деградация (СДС-5R, КРО) (2) - И700617-1RB83 | Сравнить
- Техническая Деградация (СДС-5R, КРО) (3) - И700617-1RB83 | Сравнить
- Техническая Деградация (СДС-5R, КРО) (ц) - И700617-1RB83 | Сравнить
- Техническая Деградация (СДС-5R, КРО) (ц2) - И700617-1RB83 | Сравнить
- Техническая Деградация (СДС-5R, КРО) - И700617-1RB83 | Сравнить
- Техническая Деградация (СДС-5R, КРО) - И700617R77 | Сравнить
- Технические Виды Деградации (СДС-5R) - И700617RB83 | Сравнить

SCANS FOR THIS DATE- 700617 - HCO Policy Letter - Technical Degrades [PL015-096]
- 700617 - HCO Policy Letter - Technical Degrades [PL069-070]
- 700617 - HCO Policy Letter - Technical Degrades [PL069-071]
- 700617 - HCO Policy Letter - Technical Degrades [PL069-073]
- 700617 - HCO Policy Letter - Technical Degrades [PL069-074]
- 700617 - HCO Policy Letter - Technical Degrades [PL069-078]
- 700617 Issue 2 - HCO Policy Letter - OIC Change - Cable Change [PL015-094]
- 700617 Issue 2 - HCO Policy Letter - OIC Change - Cable Change [PL042-006]
- 700617R - HCO Policy Letter - Technical Degrades [PL034-020]
- 700617R - HCO Policy Letter - Technical Degrades [PL069-072]
- 700617R - HCO Policy Letter - Technical Degrades [PL069-075]
- 700617R - HCO Policy Letter - Technical Degrades [PL069-076]
- 700617R - HCO Policy Letter - Technical Degrades [PL087-001]
- 700617RA - HCO Policy Letter - Technical Degrades [PL042-005]
- 700617RB - HCO Policy Letter - Technical Degrades [Misc22-046]
- 700617RB - HCO Policy Letter - Technical Degrades [Misc24-047]
- 700617RB - HCO Policy Letter - Technical Degrades [PL069-077]
CONTENTS OIC CHANGE
CABLE CHANGE
TECHNICAL DIVISION QUALIFICATIONS DIVISION
Cохранить документ себе Скачать
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 17 JUNE 1970
Issue II
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 17 JUNE 1970RA
RE-REVISED 27 APRIL 1981
Remimeo(Revision in this type style)
All Orgs Scn and SORemimeo
URGENTApplies to all SHs and

OIC CHANGE
CABLE CHANGE

Academies
(Effective for the week beginning 24 July 1970 and ending for
first report 30 July 1970 and continuing thereafter.)
(Cancels HCO PL 29 Mar 70, Tech and Qual Stats.)
(Amends HCO PL Sept 30, 65, Statistics for Divisions.)
HGCs

Tech and Qual Stats are revised as follows:

Franchises
TECHNICAL DIVISION
URGENT AND IMPORTANT

Tech Sec and GDS:

TECHNICAL DEGRADES

1. Total number of well done auditing hours in HGC.

(This PL and HCO PL Feb 7, 1965 must be made part of every study pack as the first items and must be listed on checksheets.)

2. Total points of all students in the Dept of Training for the week past based on the Flag Authorized point system.

Any checksheet in use or in stock which carries on it any degrading statement must be destroyed and issued without qualifying statements.

Dir of Tech Services:

Example: Level 0 to IV Checksheets SH carry “A. Background Material – This section is included as an historical background, but has much interest and value to the student. Most of the processes are no longer used, having been replaced by more modern technology. The student is only required to read this material and ensure he leaves no misunderstood.” This heading covers such vital things as TRs, Op Pro by Dup! The statement is a falsehood.

1. Total of new students and pcs scheduled and to whom service was being delivered in the past week, a newly purchased intensive or course if scheduled and being serviced, counting as one, a 5 hour intensive counting however only as 1/6th of a person.

These checksheets were not approved by myself, all the material of the academy and SH courses IS in use.

Director of Training:

Such actions as this gave us “Quickie Grades”, ARC broke the field and downgraded the academy and SH courses.

Combined points of all students on courses based on Flag Authorized point system.

A condition of TREASON or cancellation of certificates or dismissal and a full investigation of the background of any person found guilty, will be activated in the case of anyone committing the following HIGH CRIMES.

Supervisors:

1. Abbreviating an official course in Dianetics and Scientology so as to lose the full theory, processes and effectiveness of the subjects.

Combined points of all students on their particular courses.

2. Adding comments to checksheets or instructions labeling any material “background” or “not used now” or “old” or any similar action which will result in the student not knowing, using, and applying the data in which he is being trained.

Director of Processing:

3. Employing after 1 Sept 1970 any checksheet for any course not written by myself or authorized by the Authority, Verification and Correction Unit International and accepted by the Board of Directors.

Total number of auditing hours less 5 for each pc backlogged more than 3 days.

Checksheet for Dept. 17 Courses have their own approval lines as issued in HCO PL 2 Jan 80R rev. 31 Dec 80 Department 17 Course Checksheets Approval Line.

Auditors:

(Note: This does not apply to hat checksheets. A hat checksheet may be given Issue Authority by an org LRH Comm and issued as local ED where no senior authorized hat checksheet exists already. HCO PL 30 Sep 70 Checksheet Format)

Total hours audited for each auditor + 1 point for every very well done session.

4. Failing to strike from any checksheet remaining in use meanwhile any such comments as “historical”, “background”, “not used”, “old”, etc. or VERBALLY STATING IT TO STUDENTS.

Tech C/S:

5. Permitting a pc to attest to more than one grade at a time on the pc’s own determinism without hint or evaluation.

Total number of TA Divisions for the week less 25 points for every pc not making his grade at Examiner.

6. Running only one process for a lower grade between 0 to IV, where the grade EP has not been attained.

QUALIFICATIONS DIVISION

7. Failing to use all processes for a level where the EP has not been attained.

Qual Sec and GDS:

8. Boasting as to speed of delivery in a session, such as “I put in grade zero in three minutes.” etc.

1. The amount of money paid for student training into the org for a certificate course. (All solo excepted.)

9. Shortening time of application of auditing for financial or laborsaving considerations.

2. The number of creditable success stories turned in less 2 points for every no-story and less 2 more points for every ethics action taken on a student, pc or staff member.

10. Acting in any way calculated to lose the technology of Dianetics and Scientology to use or impede its use or shorten its materials or its application.

Dir Exams:

REASON: The effort to get students through courses and get pcs processed in orgs was considered best handled by reducing materials or deleting processes from grades. The pressure exerted to speed up student completions and auditing completions was mistakenly answered by just not delivering.

1. 1 point for every non F/N Examiner Report. (It being understood that an Examining Report is done after every session.)

The correct way to speed up a student’s progress is by using two way comm and applying the study materials to students.

2. 10 points for every uncertain or flunked student. (It being understood that students are given meter checks by Examiner and spot Exams for every theory or practical completion.)

The best way to really handle pcs is to ensure they make each level fully before going on to the next and repairing them when they do not.

Note: Each of the 2 Examiner stats loses 100 points for each proven instance of evaluation, invalidation of students or pcs by expression or statement by the Examiner, instances of penalty to be decided by Qual Sec, Div 6 Sec and a third member agreed upon by the two.

The puzzle of the decline of the entire Scientology network in the late 60s is entirely answered by the actions taken to shorten time in study and in processing by deleting materials and actions.

Dir Review:

Reinstituting full use and delivery of Dianetics and Scientology is the answer to any recovery.

1. Errors discovered and corrected in pcs’ folders, 1 point for each plus 10 points for each student completed with VGIs.

The product of an org is well taught students and thoroughly audited pcs. When the product vanishes, so does the org. The orgs must survive for the sake of this planet.

2. Number of falsely signed off items on Div IV checksheets corrected in Cramming.

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

Cramming Officer:

LRH:nt.rd

See No. 2 Dir Review.

Staff Training Officer:

1. GI divided by the number of people.

2. Course completions by staff members.

Qual Consultant:

1. Number of staff, students and pcs spotted in the org during week with Bis.

2. Number of Bis routed or handled.

No Qual C/S Stat as there now isn’t one.

Review Auditor:

1. Errors discovered and corrected in pcs’ folders, 1 point for each.

2. 10 points for each pc completed with VGIs.

Dir C & A:

1. Number of classifications rejected by reason of inadequate case gain or false representations.

2. Number of awards refused by reason of inadequate hours or abilities for the level not attained.

It will be noted that these statistics reflect the original design of Tech and Qual and do not favor “Quickie Grades” for pcs, inabilities in auditors, unpaid staffs or an ARC Broken field.

Accuracy in compiling these stats, posting them weekly where they can be seen and managing on the basis of these is a survival factor in an org.

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:nt.cden