How are you this afternoon? Audience: Fine! How are you? Me! Huh!

Good evening. Good evening. How are you?

You know how I am; I never get any processing or anything. Matter of fact, I've been getting some auditing lately.

Audience: Fine.

Did you learn anything in this morning's seminars? Audience: Yes!

Good. Oh, I'm fine.

You did. All right.

Audience: Good.

And do you think this would prove efficacious in your address to Homo sap? Audience: Yes!

I understand that a congress is in progress.

Very good. There's a fellow by the name of Homo sap that lives out in the woods someplace, and we've had quite a bit to do with him. And we found out you couldn't kill him. We found out that there wasn't anything you could do to convince him in any way. So the only thing that remained was to communicate with him fully enough so that we had it taped. You see, I mean, if you communicated with him fully enough and you could handle him totally, why, then you could live with him, see? That's right, isn't it?

Audience: Yes!

Well, now, this isn't exactly a plot which we have - not exactly. This is probably the only far-reaching, well-hatched plot that ever hit earth.

All right. What do you know!

Male voice: You're right.

Now, I don't know whether you like these demonstrations or not.

And speaking of plots hitting earth, I want to tell you just here before we go into these various demonstrations, which you're going to have a lot more of this afternoon and practically nothing else but. That agree with you? I would just like to tell you something about communication that we have overlooked before. Now, I meant to give you a full, long, arduous, learned, salted with verbiage, polysyllables and so forth, lecture on the subject of communication. But I didn't do it. But I'm going to have to sandwich it in here for about three minutes max.

Audience: Yes.

Found out something about communication that is quite fascinating: The third dynamic is a violation of communication formula.

But one can have too much of that sort of thing, of course.

I know that nobody heard me; I know because it's not possible. The third dynamic is a violation of the communication formula. And here you sit, and I am talking to you, and the only difference is I am talking to you, I am not talking to a group. And you all know that.

Audience: No.

Audience: Yes.

And if I was to continue on with these demonstrations this evening, you'd probably be very disappointed, wouldn't you? Probably wouldn't like that.

All right. Now, here's the crux of the situation. Fellows who go out to „save the world“ - I don't think it could stand (as I said in Book One) being saved just one more time; I think that would finish it utterly. These fellows must start by saving one man.

I did, however, in view of the fact that evening - for some reason or other people are more dead in the evening so evenings have more dignity than afternoons. The sun goes down, you see, and the little algae floating on the face of the sea, you see, can't get quite as much energy from the sun. I don't know how they manage this, but they do. And so therefore, the body - remembering this - they're all deader. Well, that's beside the point. The first thing I... We'll continue on with some of these demonstrations then if you like.

The communication formula has to do with attention. You have to be pretty sharp to put your attention on two. It's very easy and simple to put your attention on one.

Good. Fine.

All right. I can put my attention on quite a few people at the same time. The limit happens to be 2,500 people. At 2,501 I blow up. I run completely out of beams. I've actually put that to test. The last time I talked to more than 2,501 I went dith-thu-thuthu-thu-thu-thu-thu and I wasn't communicating; I was talking here. I got smart enough to talk to the first ten rows. At least I communicated with somebody there.

All right. But there's something I'd like to mention with relationship to auditing. I would like to mention this; and it's just said to me that this can't be mentioned too often. And that is simply this: that there are various grades of auditing skill. The first of which is the skill of the Book Auditor. Now, the Book Auditor is a long-time mainstay of auditing. Every once in a while somebody who is auditing out of nothing but a book - he just reads it, he gets what he understands of it and applies it as he imagines it possibly should be applied - every once in a while somebody doing this gets the idea that he's looked down on in some fashion. No, he isn't looked down on; he's eight grades above most of Homo sapiens. He's actually doing something about it. And far from looking down on a Book Auditor we rather look up to them. They have a lot of nerve; they have a lot of guts.

But the third dynamic is an agreement, and all the dynamics are simply agreements. They are nothing but agreements made by individuals.

And there's hardly an HDA or an HCA that wasn't a Book Auditor before he was a certified auditor. And if we start frowning on Book Auditors, why, we will be in an interesting state of affairs. We want everybody to start off in the high gear of HCA, Academy courses - not necessarily at all.

Oh, you remarked one time that the only thing wrong with a thetan was a thetan. It's true; the only thing wrong with him is himself - his various laws and rules. We look down the harmonic scale and we discover that everything a thetan becomes is a harmonic on his natural state of being, to which he seems to object. And that is the game called life: Object to yourself

Now the question is, what can a Book Auditor audit?

But he makes agreements; he makes agreements broadly with many, one after the other. He gets this up to a total conviction, and then we have what is known as the dynamic scale. Now, they're no less real because they are agreed to, but it happens that they are founded on one. So a thetan very easily becomes the „only one.“ It's only necessary for him to get into communication with just one person to cease to be an „only one.“ You got that? I mean, it's just as easy as that. You don't have to get him into communication with the rest of the human race. When you've gotten him into communication with this mystic and mysterious thing called a group, you've gotten him into communication with nothing except an agreement. So he's in communication with an agreement. Fine.

I can get it now, there'll be a lot of old-timers that will just groan, if they haven't already groaned, over the list of things that a Book Auditor should be permitted to audit. These are rather ghastly. Book Auditor processes would include: engram running as described in the first edition, Book One, Dianetics: Modern Science of Mental Health; Fifteen Acts of Scientology, The Handbook for Preclears; Self Analysis in its entirety (and every once in a while a Book Auditor gets really stuck and we say, „Well, run Self Analysis on the preclear,“ and preclears snap out of it); the processing section of Scientology: The Fundamentals of Thought; the various assists which have been listed in many publications and the Co-auditor's Manual processes.

It's quite amusing - I tell this at some risk, because it'll step on a couple of toes. It's quite amusing. We have a method of teaching groups.

Such books as these and such processes as these have been audited successfully over a great many years without very much kicking back.

& The past master ne plus ultra character in this is Dr. Ken Barrett. He, he learned this well and if he never finds out anything else, he's a genius. The only ones that can come up vaguely into doing anything about it, I would say, are just a few other top members of staff. Dr. Steves can do very very well at this, and Nibs is no slouch. And there are some others.

The funniest thing I ever heard about a Book Auditor - he was absolutely sure that he had audited his brother into an insane asylum. He was sure of it. Because he started auditing his brother, his brother promptly went into the insane asylum - was committed. And the Book Auditor almost died in his tracks over the situation. Girded up his loins, so to speak, went into the asylum, finished running the engram, got his brother out. And his brother confessed that he had been feeling that crazy all his life but hadn't dare say anything about it.

& But nobody quite comes up to Barrett. Of course, just between ourselves, he's a perfect idiot in other lines, but... But because of this great skill in handling groups, handling the individuals who compose a group, he could be forgiven any, almost any idiocy. He's a great guy, don't let me lead you astray there.

Well, now, that was a high level of emergency.

Well, we have a system there of teaching a group by definition, and we get members of the group to define things. And then other members of the group to discuss the definition, until we have gotten to agreed-upon definitions for various things. Of course, the most widely agreed-upon definition to any of these things is the original definition of it. And the group blows it, to some degree, and to that degree is free of it. In other words, they don't dream up new definitions; they really are being asked to as-is, knock out and disintegrate old definitions and old agreements they have made. You see that?

And as a matter of fact, there is another level of action there, also having to do with insane asylums. Although why they have very much to do with the mind I don't know. An insane asylum is a perverted physics laboratory these days.

Well, now, if the third dynamic is a violation of the communication formula, and if it is only an agreement - which it definitely seems to be - then it would be absolutely necessary to knock it out to some degree as an agreement before a person could be completely free. So we are forced to say something about this.

I wonder if you've heard the newest operation for schizophrenia. Schizophrenia means a split personality, according to Kraepelin's schedule. And this split personality has been giving people an awful lot of trouble. A fellow gets stuck half in and half out of two valences and therefore is a couple of personalities on the rampage, neither one of which are under control. All right. This schizophrenic condition is being answered up these days in the field of neuro-ha-ha-surgery just on this basis. They take a silver plate and they put it in, separating the two halves of the brain. I'm afraid that is the latest operation. It hasn't cured any schizophrenia yet, but it certainly keeps surgeons busy, which is, I suppose, what it's supposed to do.

I may not have been cautious at various times, but I have never been dishonest in what I know. It has been very incautious of me occasionally to come up with a new datum of some kind or another and simply present it and say, „There it is.“ And a bunch of people around me say, „Ron, for God's sakes, what you're going to do to our public presence, letting something like that out.“ Well, honesty comes first, and public presence comes second, or eightieth.

But you talk about Q-and-Aing with the preclear! They figured out that the two halves of his brain are in argument and each one has a different personality. You see, there's nothing there but brain - that's the first mistake they make.

The third dynamic, then, has to be recognized for what it is. The communication formula - if you will read it in The Creation of Human Ability or in Dianetics 55! and go over it carefully - has to do definitely with attention and intention; and when you speak to many, you speak to none. And so we get - as I said, somebody's toes were going to get stepped on - we do have people around who can „lecture to groups“ (quote, unquote) but can't run this agreement type of process, this definition type of process on a group, because they have to confront the individual members of a group. And we get the inversion on this third dynamic. It's not now just an agreement; it is used as an avoidance of communication. And there's many a world-saver who has talked to the world simply because he was trying to avoid communication to one.

And, boy, I tried to audit a brain one time. Went down and got some calf's brains and tried to audit it. It didn't work! It's probably because it was calf's brains.

And now, if we work this out carefully, we can actually use this in processing. We can find out that person to whom other people could not speak, with whom they could not communicate. Now, we take this preclear, and we ask this preclear to tell us somebody with whom it was impossible to communicate. See, that might be Mother, Father, uncles, aunts, boss, first sergeants. You see that? And we'll find something very peculiar: we'll find that being unable to communicate to one, he started to communicate to the one on a via. In other words, he told the corporal so the corporal - it might possibly get to the first sergeant. Do you see that? He couldn't talk to the first sergeant so he told the corporal in the hopes that it would get to the first sergeant. He told two or three of his buddies in the hope that the rumor would get around, don't you see? He finally tells this whole thing to his family, hoping it'll go via San Francisco and Seattle and get back to camp. He finally writes an article on it to the eight or nine readers of the Family Circle and Time magazine - their combination circulation, by the way, I think is eight now. And... Just in passing, by the way, do you know that Time magazine has never injured us in any way. We carefully kept tallies on interest and disinterest in the subject against Time magazine articles and we found out they weren't addressed to anybody. They never increased or decreased interest in Dianetics or Scientology. Isn't that fascinating? Now we're getting someplace here.

But auditing brains is not a paying proposition; doesn't accomplish very much. But Book Auditors auditing the reactive mind do accomplish quite a bit.

He told all the readers of this magazine in trying to communicate with Joe, the first sergeant. You got that? Finally he wrote a novel with fictitious characters in it, all trying to get to Joe, the first sergeant. Do you see this?

Now there's only one set of processes that were missing in Book One that are not to some degree with us yet. There's one type of process missing in all these things enumerated except the last three.

And there we have picked out the kernel of most third dynamic communication. On its upper level it is perfectly sane for an individual to want to talk to one or a lot of people but there's quite a lot of skill in this, really talking to the people who are there - not talking to them „because of.“ Now, I'm talking about an aberrated third. And these aberrated thirds, these world-savers and so forth, are simply trying to get a communication through on vias which now include all the people on earth. Do you see that?

If we'd had Havingness in 1950, we'd have had it made. Havingness: the possession of mass; the experience of mass. We'd have had it made. That was all that was missing.

Now, you can pull apart one of these third dynamic agreements just by finding some person with whom the fellow could not communicate and then asking him to mock that person up and say „Hello,“ and get the person to say „Okay.“ And this was - you remember „Hello, Mama“? Well, it as-ised too much havingness, and it could be definitely overdone; but run with some sort of a direction such as this, at an understanding of this, if Mama was the person to whom one could not communicate, then of course one would all of a sudden start dropping out the third and fourth dynamics. You see? They start dropping out the third and fourth dynamics on an obsessive level. See?

And just the other day I was running an engram and told the preclear to make it a little more solid when the preclear got stuck in the middle of the thing, and made it come loose, and kept on running the engram. I was just a few days ago running a Dianetic engram just like that.

Now, it's perfectly all right to have a third dynamic but any dynamic can become aberrated, and I'm talking about the third when it becomes very aberrated. The way you break it up is to break up the communication impasses which has caused a person to use the whole of the group as vias to reach one person he could not communicate with. You understand that? The third dynamic in that sense is a violation of the communication formula. I have to talk to you - every person present - in order to talk to this group. Now, I could stand here and talk to the group. I could do that; it'd be - huh! You wouldn't listen to it, but I could do it. See, I could talk sort of out into thin air, somehow or another, and say, „Well, there's a - I don't know.“

But we didn't have Havingness as such. And so this was a considerable missing tool. Now, we keep forgetting Havingness. And people doing CCH are liable to forget Havingness.

Very often when you put an auditor into - in auditing groups - into auditing with attention to each individual in the group, he can't make it because he's already avoiding the first by taking to the third. Do you see that? He generalizes a communication because he can't singularize it. Now, the thing to be able to do, of course, is to generalize and singularize a communication; you should be able to do all these things.

Now, I recently found out something of considerable interest to you, and that is that cases you cannot do anything for easily cannot make anything solid. Got that? The resistive case is simply that case which cannot make things more solid. And cases which can make things, even if a tiny bit, more solid, respond easily to processing. So the difference between a tough case and an easy case is solids. And that is the makebreak point of the cases. That's all there is to it. Behavior has nothing to do with it; IQ has nothing to do with it. Just the person has this ability or he doesn't have it.

Where you find somebody who is evidently able to address many but can't talk to one, you have somebody with an aberrated third dynamic. Do you see that? And that third dynamic that he has is a violation of the communication formula. It is conversation with a nonexistent terminal known as „the third.“ So that's conversation with an agreement, which is conversation with a circuit. And he doesn't talk to one single person anywhere.

Now, if he doesn't have it, we have Keep It from Going Away and Hold It Still as a gradient scale into solids. And they move a person straight into solids. You see that? But this is not a large proportion of cases.

Now, the communication lines of Scientology are individual. They fare best where these lines are individualized; you feel that definitely. I have spoken to you; you have spoken to others. And that is the way the communication lines of Scientology travel.

Now, if a Book Auditor were to run into one of these can't-make-it-more-solid cases he might feel himself stopped. But there is a way for him to un-stop it. And that is given, oddly enough, in Scientology: Fundamentals of Thought, under „Havingness.“ And there's a Havingness Process in there which says „Objective Havingness.“ And it is run exactly in this fashion. It says „Look around the room and find something you can have.“ And when that's a bit flat you would have him „Look around the room and find something (blank) cannot have.“

Now, the newspaper world believes that it is a communication channel, and let me assure you it is not. They never talk to one; they always talk to „the People!“ Communism is not communication. It only communicates individually, and this is an accidental fact because communism tries to communicate totally on a group basis - totally by groups. And whenever we talk broadly to „all the people“ (as they do in a newspaper), we wind up by saying nothing to anybody, and we might as well have shouted in a well.

And here is the great oddity on Havingness. There are many preclears, particularly those preclears who cannot make things more solid, who also cannot actually run „can have.“ See, they can't look around and find something they can have. They can't do that; it's a stopper. But they can do this: They can look around and find something somebody can't have. So we talk it over with them, not talking too much because their havingness is down anyway, and find that person immediately adjacent to their present time existence who is a can't-have sort of fellow, a fellow who is hard on his possessions, a fellow who does not receive things graciously, an individual who is... specializes in old possessions, something like that. And we have this person look around the room and find something the can't-have person can't have.

The newspapers, realizing this, go downtone. If you read what appears in the modern newspaper, you will not find a high-tone preclear talking. What occurs? Murder, mayhem, all about the government. Lord knows what the government is, if it is not some individuals who have been put in charge of certain activities. That's the government, but there's no such thing called „the Government.“ There's no such thing called „the People.“ And when you get „the Government“ and „the People“ and murder and rape and mayhem and so forth - this is a communication line? No, it is not!

Now, let's suppose with a little conversation we found out that it was Aunt Emma. And Aunt Emma was a can't-have case. And this person's been around Aunt Emma for some time. Now, we don't much care whether we get the right person or not because „can't have“ will run when „can have“ won't. But we take one of these more or less can't-have cases - we don't have to be particularly certain that it is the valence which needs cracking on the case - and we simply tell this person, „Look around the room and find something that Aunt Emma can't have.“

Just open any daily paper and read what they have to say. It is such a poor communication line that almost anything that appears in it - contrary to popular opinion - becomes vilified sooner or later. If you'll notice that every time they start to talk about a hero, they will wind up cutting his throat. The headlines of today are the obituaries of tomorrow. Now, you think I am riding a favorite hobby, but I am not. I am not.

Now, he's liable to start out very foolishly and say, „Well, Aunt Enima isn't here so she can't have anything.“

Scientology travels by word of mouth, and it has always been hindered, barriered and stopped by public press just to the degree that people could look at it and say „Well, that's appearing in the public press; it can't be any good.“

And you say, „Well, just one thing, if you please - just one.“

Now, you wonder why you don't see very much in the way of public utterances and stories in one kind or another about Scientology. Because I uniformly tell reporters, „This is a scientific organization, not a circus sideshow. You can publish anything you please as long as your attorneys are capable of sustaining a defense to a libel suit. Even if you say we're good, I'll sue.“ It's not a communication line.

And you run that a bit flat and you will find out that your preclear will develop, ordinarily, some somatics on this.

You might be interested to know, for instance, that a great many of our people have been caused unrest and upset by publicity of one kind or another. An organization such as this does not run on (quote) „publicity“ (unquote). It talks to and is about individuals. That it itself is an organization is totally accidental.

Now, if the person developed no somatics on this and you were still in an argument about this, just pick another can't-have valence.

There are a bunch of us who know more about the subject than others and if you say „a bunch of us“ then you've said about all there is to say about an organization. We finally found out that an organization consisted of terminals. It wasn't even a collection of terminals; it was terminals. And the organization is just as good as the terminals are manned and in communication with each other. We just get our business done by taking various parts of the activities, and an individual takes care of them. And thus we have an organization.

And if you got brutally savage about it - preclear still very resistive about the whole thing - we see that the preclear has some disability of some sort or another, like he has a bad leg. We tell him to look around the room and find something his leg can't have.

The most hideous thing you ever wanted to see is some big corporation that thinks the name GE (or something of the sort) is a thing. It is not a thing. It is not a thing at all. It is a number of individuals who live and breathe and bleed, a number of individuals who can work and have fun and do things. And as soon as it ceases to be, you get something like the United States Army.

Now after you run this for a while, any of these „can't haves,“ with any success at all, he can then run „can have.“

Oh, I've nothing against the United States Army, nothing for it either, because it isn't. It is a bunch of boys who have been taught to fight. And when battle is joined, believe me, that is what it breaks down to and there is nothing else! Boy, they might have sheaves of orders in their pockets that have been issued by the Pentagon, and it won't stop one single enemy bullet. It's down on the individual level when battle is joined.

And if you knew nothing else than what I've just told you about the mind, you would be successful; more successful than medicine, and more successful than psychology and psychiatry, and certainly more successful than psychoanalysis. In other words, you could simply set up shop and say - you've got somebody in your vicinity and you don't like the way they're spinning, well, you could just use what I've just told you. Talk it over and ask them if they ever knew a person they couldn't have... that couldn't have anything. „That's fine. Well, look around here and find something that person cannot have.“ Make them give you one object. Maybe you have to change your mind about the person, but that won't damage it any. And after you've run this for a little while then you say, „Now look around the room and find something that you can have.“ And that would be the safe approach to any case.

And any time you get anything done, it is on individual feet that it is done. Things are done by people.

And here is sort of a shotgun process that would always wind up with success. It's always successful. When in doubt, remedy havingness. When in doubt about what to run, if you can't make up your mind at all, run what I just told you. I would run it if I were confronted by a preclear of low reality.

One of the finest ways to make an organization flop is to appoint a committee. Don't ever appoint committees - they're a violation of the communication formula and therefore a violation of beingness, doingness and actingness - havingness. Organizations can't have, but people can. And as a result, Scientology is an individualized activity; it believes in individualism, and by heightening individualism it believes that a great many things can run right that haven't been running right. It's awfully simple and much too simple to grasp.

All this „can't have“ is, is a below solids. See, it's below solids. The individual cannot have that pillar. Why can't he have the pillar? Well, he can't have anything as solid as that pillar. That's all.

At this present instant, Scientology could undoubtedly close terminals with the (quote) „US government“ (unquote), but it'd have to do it in this fashion: You would have to get hold of some of the scientists who are designing intercontinental ballistic missiles and smarten them up so they could do a better job. It'd have to get hold of the rocket jockeys that are going to fly these things someday. I know they're all supposed to go on total automatic, but after a while the generals get impatient and send a man. That's the way that works you know.

Well, you ask him bluntly and first off, „Look around the room and find something you can have,“ and he's below solids, then he may tell you he can have a few of these things, but he can't. So the alternate and the best approach to it when in... it would simply be isolate a can't-have personality that's been in his vicinity, ask him to look around and find something that that person can't have. The next thing you know, things start to appear more solid to the preclear.

You know how balloons first worked. First they sent one up without anybody in it, and then they sent one up with chickens and goats and they found out they lived through it and then they sent one up with a man. Don't think that they didn't do any different with airplanes. Things are always in a model stage or a small stage for many hundreds of years. Leonardo da Vinci had a heavier-than-air machine that would fly around the room most beautifully - little wind-up ornithopter; still down in the Smithsonian (or a copy of it). But we didn't get flying machines right away and the first flying machines didn't violate this principle any: they flew them for a while and then they finally decided to put a man in them. Yes, now they've worked up to drones, but you notice they've never used drones, because it's the wrong order of sequence.

This is also a cure for psychosomatics. Quite interesting. I cured up some bad teeth on somebody one day just by asking him, look around the room and find something his teeth couldn't have. He found out that his teeth could tolerate nothing of any size. The door, he couldn't have the door because the door was too big. And at first we had nothing but conditions; there had to be conditions about the „can't have“ on the teeth. But after a while it simply... he could say, „Well, they can't have that and they can't have that and they can't have something or other - Ow! And they can't have something or other and they can't have - Ow! What are you doing to me? They can't have something or other, they can't have

The intercontinental ballistic missile at this time has not yet risen to sending a goat and some cows or something in one. See, they haven't gotten up to that point yet, but they will get up to that point someday. Even today, your jet planes require better pilots.

- Ow! They can't have something or other... Huh! Mouth feels different.“

Given two nations producing planes equally well, the victory would be in question. The only thing that could vary would be pilots, right? Well, boy, we could certainly vary pilots; that's for sure. We could speed up their reaction time, their reality on their airplane, get them flying in present time. You'd find out their accident levels would go down, and their action levels would go up. Why? Not because we were treating squadrons, but because we were treating pilots one at a time. You got the idea?

„All right. Now look around the room and find something you can have.“ You pick up „mouth feels different“ as the „cognition.“ Huh! Kind of a weak cognition, isn't it? Nevertheless, you could change the process at that point with no damage.

Actually Dianetics and Scientology, then, have a tremendous defense factor, and addressed on a group level could be the deciding factors in any future war - could be, definitely. And in 1938 when the Kremlin first approached me to come over to Russia and build the laboratories, they understood this. And don't think the amount of fight we have had since has been any accident.

Well, this is a successful approach. And when you can take Dianetics and Scientology and in these very few minutes at the beginning of this evening's sessions give you just that much and say, „Well, that solves cases,“ well, you're fine.

Now, you think I have turned a fast curve here. No, I haven't turned a fast curve. Still be true about newspapers, whether this were true or not. But there has been a very thoroughly organized activity. Of course, the definition the communist gives a psychotic is one who thinks the communists are after him. That plugs that one up nicely, doesn't it? And then they shoot hell out of you, and you say anything about it, they say, „Well, he's psychotic, see?“ Well, it's proven, because the definition of psychosis is somebody who believes the communists are after him. Well, the communists are not after us. Definitely not. We have lived through a long period.

Now, a Book Auditor would not run into enough outright randomity, he wouldn't run into enough difficulty to change that too much.

The name itself has taken considerable beating around because of vested interests and that sort of thing. But remember at all times, that does not make Scientology less good, did not make Dianetics less workable, did not make me a less honest man, and did not make you a less worthy citizen. Remember that. (applause) Thank you.

You understand, though, that he is not going to go all the way south with all cases everywhere. As you walk up to a psycho and say, „Who was the most can't - have person that you knew?“

Well, all that to tell you this new little item: The third dynamic is a violation of the communication formula. It's incredible. Think it over sometime, look it over, and I think you'll agree with me. Groups aren't; individuals are!

And the psycho says, „Goobley-gobblety-gooh. Drool. Drool.“ Well, that's beyond his reach.

It's very interesting that all old-time philosophers have gotten into the idea that the „all of everything“ is what you eventually join. That's true enough: As you go down scale, you eventually lose your own individuality entirely and become nothing, and you're „part of the all.“ Well, don't let me catch you getting part of the all. Even if you don't know what you are, be yourself!

He couldn't take a person all the way north. But he could certainly change the attitude and states of beingness of people quite markedly and remarkably simply with that.

Okay. Now I promised you - I promised you yesterday - and I repeated again - that we were going to give you some more demonstrations of these various Training Drills. And last night in the most cursory, slap-happy fashion imaginable, we covered the Comm Course. I'm sure that our Comm Course Instructor, I am sure that our ACC Instructors turned pale last night on that. We were actually trying not to discourage the living daylights out of you.

Now, I don't say he should just abandon everything else he's doing and use only that. I'm just telling you that that itself all by itself will work.

Now, the truth of the matter is that you keep at it awhile, you will find more out about it - if I've given you the rudiments of this character... if I've given you the details of how to go about it - you, by doing it, will find out more about it than I can tell you. So the best thing for me to do is to tell you how to go about it. That's right, isn't it? And let you wrassle around on it. Hm? It's an American sport, „wrassling“; it has nothing to do with wrestling.

Now recognize, if you please, that this isn't the same statement - such and such works uniformly - isn't the same statement as „all other things are now passé or bad.“ Because I can get as much progress on a case in a couple hours or three hours of Two-way Communication as you'd get with about a fifty-hour intensive on Havingness. You got the idea?

Now, it comes very much in question on what we're going to do in this next halfhour. Because we're all set here to go forward and show you 8-C and how it develops into High School Indoc.

So the question is, something is good and something is workable and something is uniformly successful, well, we've got another factor entering in here which is quite amazing and that is: How fast is it successful? See, there's a speed factor. Also the north and south factor. How high could this person be placed by reason of auditing? And how low a case could you audit successfully?

& And Nibs and I are going to give you a demonstration of 8C and high school indoc. And we haven't rehearsed this, it is not something you rehearse. But by the way, I was the first one that ran it on him and he was the first one that ran it on me. So you're right down to source here. The original team.

Well, the Book Auditor certainly ought to be able to do those things. And I personally respect him for the auditing he has done. And remember that in the beginning, I was a Book Auditor!

And High School Indoc of course is dependent on 8-C, so what you'll first see is 8-C the way it is done today. The commands of 8-C have changed. But we're just going to run - I'm going to run on him some sloppy 8-C. Okay? We call it „sloppy 8-C“ - it'll sound quite precise to you, but it's sloppy; we'll try to make it look a little sloppy up here.

I also want to mention in passing that every now and then we say validated certificates or something of that sort - we say upper processes - we aren't saying, everything you know is bad and false. We're not saying that. We're saying simply this: We've hit a new level of action. We've hit a new level of action. Well, that is not the same statement as: You mustn't practice all those successful things you have been doing up till now. And don't confuse those two statements.

Now, don't use us for your eventual model. You're supposed to do this until you become perfect. And we're just going to show you how to get into it. Okay?

If you do confuse them thoroughly, you would just be barring a bit of progress. You would resent the progress which is being made. And that progress is, it is actual and so on.

Audience: Yes. Okay. All right. Good.

Now, we've been exploring all the way south. And if they go any further south than we can reach right now, they aren't. As far as we're concerned, they're totally, completely out of communication of all kinds. Because processing the dead is not unsuccessful today - and I don't wish to bring up this necromantic note, but necromancy is a solved science. They've been trying to solve it for a number of thousands of years and finally went into apathy on it and went into religion.

& OK, Nibs.

You're aware of the fact that more than one Scientologist have sat down alongside of the cadaver and said, „Hey boy, come back here and pick up this body“ - and the thetan has. You realize that? You know that this has happened. But it doesn't happen very publicly because everybody says, „Well, he must have still been alive.“ There was one case where the doctor actually had pronounced the person stone dead. However, a Scientologist says, „Come back here. Come on, pick up this body. What do you mean, running off like that? You can patch it up - come on.“ And all of a sudden, why, wham!

Now, don't let this disturb you. Actually, I don't want anybody jumping over the footlights here & and trying to save Nibs or save me just because we look like we're in trouble, see?

It was a little girl, by the way, and she had run into a concrete wall or something and hit her head and she fell dead. And the doctor was called, applied the mist test with the mirror, you know, and stethoscope to the heart and all that - very, very, very dead. A Scientologist happened to be on the other side of the park and saw all this and went over and got the medico out of the road and got the doctor... got the cops out of the road and so forth and sat down alongside the little girl and took her hand and said, „Come on. Come on back here and pick up the mock-up - come on, pick up the body. Let's not have this now; come on.“ The little girl: „Da-da-da-da.“

The facts of the case are, the auditing commands will probably not come over this mike very well, so I'll sing them out real loud. And we're now going to do some „sloppy 8-C“ ... That's really its name! We call it „old-time 8-C,“ or „sloppy 8-C“ or something of the sort. But „old-time 8-C“ isn't right because it used other commands than these.

The Scientologist had a conversation with her. She said, very clearly, „My mother does not care what happens to me; my father does not care what happens to me - why should I go on living?“

Now, I'm going to start in on these. I'm not going to start a session and give you a model of that. We're just going to sail into this because this isn't a session. Okay?

And the Scientologist says, „Well, there's certainly some way to make them care!“ The little girl bought that and that was the end of the process.

How do you feel about this, & Nibs?

As a matter of fact, Mama and Daddy were so frightened over the incident, it subsequently worked out that they made the girl welcome.

Student [Nibs]: Fine.

Now, the various levels are talked about here in this Ability magazine, Issue number

LRH: All right. Okay. We're going to run a little demonstration here, and I'm merely going to ask you to, you know, walk around the room, look at the walls, and walk around the room and so forth. And we're just going to do plain 8-C. You got it?

50. I have no intention of going over all of this. But we won't stop going north. We're just now starting - we're starting seven years from scratch. In other words, for about seven years we've been trying to explore what are Black Fives; we've solved that. All you have to do is make them mock up blacknesses and shove it into themselves. Even if they go anaten, just keep up the process. And they have a tendency to clear up.

All right. Now, here we go. The commands of this are: „Look at that wall.“ „Walk over to that wall.“ „With your right hand, touch that wall.“ Got it?

There are ways to solve the „Invisible Field“ case. We've solved one of those of long standing. Glass objects on a table, one after the other, make them keep the objects from going away with their hands.

Student: Uh-huh.

These various far-south problems: the little baby, the comatose person, the people in spinbins - so what? We've processed them all by this time. As a matter of fact, the main surprise that I would get if I found that some auditor trained to do so had failed to get results on a case that was way down south, I would say offhand that what had happened there is the auditor had skidded in some fashion. And I would put my total attention on the auditor and patch him up so he wouldn't skid. There must have been something wrong with his training or skill. That's the way it's come about these days - it is no longer whether or not the technique works, it's whether or not the auditor can work the techniques.

LRH: „Turn around.“ „Look at that wall.“ So. Got it now?

That's very true of CCH. CCH results are as variable as the auditor who does them. Hence this validation program. There are people around that are not trained in them that if just suddenly started doing CCH without any of the Training Drills at all would just lay the most colossal egg they ever laid. They better just sort out the valence of „can't have“ and run „can't have“ on it. Because they'll get no place with CCH, see? It's the intention. The preclear stays in-session just as long as the intention is there, and various other things.

Student: Uh-huh.

Now, CCH itself is compounded, by the way, of practically every successful process that we have had since 1950. Or every item we have had since 1950 in a successful process that handles it. And that is basically what CCH is. It is not new. It is a new organization. What is new is this Tone 40 stuff. That is new. But CCH itself and its basic organization contain such things as the process I just gave you about havingness. That's one of the CCH processes. There's a whole rack of them on the subject of havingness. There's also Subjective Havingness, Remedy of Havingness - years old.

LRH: All right. Is it all right if I run this?

This thing about Then and Now Solids, which is an upper CCH, is quite remarkable for being nothing more than Dianetics run Scientology-wise. You get the same phenomena. Except you run more confounded engrams in less time than you ever could have counted back in 1950. Whir-clank! There's speed on running them if they're run properly.

Student: Yeah.

But indoctrination on a Comm Course level is necessary really to any auditing that is going to be uniformly successful. And on an Upper Indoc level we have a necessity of drill there, if we're going to make any of these Tone 40 processes work. They don't work without Upper Indoctrination.

LRH: Okay. Look at that wall.

Now, there's a process called Give Me Your Hand; Thank You. Now, we're going to take this up later on in this congress. And it possibly could be run ten thousand ways, but only one of them is right. And you could run Give Me Your Hand on somebody - Give me your hand, give me your hand, and so on - just get nowhere. And you would say, „Well, what's the necromancy here?“ Well, the necromancy is, is we stopped the idea that the process was going to do it all and entered the faint notion that the auditor had something to do with it. Because we know the results which can be obtained by CCH, because they've been broadly tested and broadly run by a great many auditors on a great many preclears. We know what CCH is capable of doing. Because every time we have found it falling down is by reason of the auditor. And we've taken the auditor and run him back through Upper Indoc and put him back in on the same preclear and had improvement on the preclear then, as expected. You got that?

Student: All right.

So it's auditor failure. But we knew in the past that we could have such things as such auditor failure, but there was no sense in hanging it around people's necks. I would much rather carry the yoke of responsibility and make the processes better. Which was the course which was taken. Processes anybody could run was the hope. But now we've gotten these training skills. Now these training skills exist. And as they exist and because they exist it is now possible to say to an auditor, „Your auditing requires improvement.“ And it's only possible to say that to him because his auditing by the training drills can be improved rather easily. In other words, we can say something about it because we can do something about it, don't you see? So it becomes very allowable.

LRH: Okay. Walk over to that wall.

Now, nobody would look to a Book Auditor to have a very smooth approach. As a matter of fact, do you remember the old canceler way back when? Well, I had an old Book Auditor give me an auditing session one day and I was doing... we were doing some experimental work. And he was maintaining something or other, something or other - she was, rather - maintaining something or other and something or other was the case; and she was going to show me this phenomena. So I thought that was fine. And she reached over and picked up a copy of Book One and opened it up to the „Beginning of session“ and read it to me, installed a canceler and went right straight through by reading the text at me that wrote it. And I obediently went into session and we investigated the phenomena. She brought me up to present time and cancelled the canceler - also out of the book. Pretty wild. Pretty wild.

Student: Okay.

We used to have such things as stenographic auditors - stenographic auditing. We haven't heard of these things for ages and ages. The auditor didn't do anything but sit there and write down whatever the preclear said - stenographic auditing, 100 %. Preclear would just run on and on in some kind of an auto-fashion. The auditor would put him vaguely into session, head him vaguely into the beginning of an engram someplace and then sit and write down everything the preclear said from there on; and every once in a while would look up and say, „Go over it again,“ obediently, see?

LRH: Thank you. With your right hand, touch that wall. Thank you. Turn around. Thank you.

What we've conquered essentially is an earlier inability to reach that which is the motivator of the being. And we have conquered this disability. And we can communicate with that, we can change that, we can do something about that. We understand the innumerable phenomena which arise from these various things. And as such, why, we can afford to, one, oversimplify the whole thing. See, when you know all about it you can say, „Well this is what's important about it and the other things aren't.“ Don't you see? That's easy. And without at the same time invalidating the rest of the data-it's still there. And we can also do this thing: We can take somebody who is auditing over a long period of time, he's been auditing for a long time, and we can do remarkable things for his auditing - utterly fantastic things for his auditing.

Look at that wall.

You know how I know this?

Student: Uh-huh.

Well, I used to consider myself a pretty good auditor because they used to bring me in all the tough cases. Running a clinic, something like that, or some auditor that was working somewhere on some preclear. They'd come in; they'd brought the case to an unsolvable impasse. Maybe two or three other auditors, pretty good, had also drawn a blank, and they'd bring the case in to me and I'd do something with the case somehow or other. And most of them would work out and start running again and so forth, see. Well, I'd thought there was nothing but tough cases during the entire first year of Dianetics; I thought that was all there was. Up to that time I'd had nothing but easy cases and suddenly got nothing but tough cases. No wonder we kept on trying to crack tough cases - I got them all.

LRH: Thank you. Walk over to that wall. Oh, and I'm... That's right, but we're not running High School Indoc here. I almost went into auditing session here, and that's a horrible thing.

Well, there was a time when I considered it was a myth that I was a terrific auditor. I said, „Well, it must be just mythical. You know, a thing builds up, you... must be better auditors around.“ And in Phoenix we did... all the staff auditors did twenty-five-hour (over a long period of time they were doing this), they were doing twenty-five-hour intensives on preclears. And I was doing five-hour intensives on preclears and I got a little bit better results. Five hours to twenty-five.

Look at that wall.

All right. Now, my auditing wasn't bad then. It wasn't terrible. It was quite workable. Cases would untangle, start running for various reasons, whatever they were - altitude or skill or knowing more about the subject. Who knows? But the point is, I went on auditing a long time like that. And then I coached the staff at the FC after I came back from England - I'd coached the auditors in England up a little bit and hadn't finished the job over there. Came back over here and did most of the coaching which... we called it coaching then, instructing now-coach became something particular. And I was running them through these Training Drills personally, just making sure that they came up to snuff. There wasn't much anything else to do it.

Student: Yeah.

But I was teaching these people Comm Course - you know, Dear Alice, Acknowledgment, Repetitive Question, Pc Origination, Hand Mimicry, simple 8-C, High School Indoc, Tone 40 on an Object and Tone 40 on a Person - I was teaching them those drills, just one right after the other. And I was in there almost every night. After a day at work, why, we'd pitch in and we would get some more of this validation out of the road. We were trying to get ahead and validate all of the staff certificates that were on deck at the FC. And we were trying to make it before this congress and we made it. And the auditors are validated through all of these coaching steps, which is a pretty good thing. They worked real hard to do this for you. You ought to give them a hand.

LRH: Thank you. Walk over to that wall. (Look at him anticipate that.) Thank you. With your right hand, touch that wall. Thank you. Turn around. Thank you. How are you doing?

Okay. Now, in view of the fact that I was pounding their ears in with this information, I was hammering and kicking them around... And by the way, there was... for 24 hours there was nobody at the FC would hardly speak to me. I mean they'd gotten up to the blow point. I mean it was just too whhff you know. Just one more time of putting that ashtray down on the table would have been enough! And all of a sudden they blew through it and it all blew away and we were all friends again. That's the way it works.

Student: Oh, great! Yeah, I'm fine.

All right. We were doing beautifully and I said to myself I said, „You know, I wonder if you audited exactly according to these Training Drills and no other way, totally in present time, doing nothing but audit the preclear exactly according to these drills, exactly according to CCH, if you wouldn't produce an interesting result. Now, I'm going to do this just to make sure there's nothing missing - I'm going to do this, see.“ And I sat down and wogwogged through my first two sessions of a couple of hours apiece with a duplicative-type process, using nothing but Tone 40, present time, using the Comm Course responses, not varying one iota off the line anywhere - did it just exactly the way I'm telling you here at this congress, you see? And I did it.

LRH: Look at that wall.

Now, I'd had a little earlier experience of driving a car in present time which almost removed me from this Earth. I just ignored all my driving machinery and did everything in present time. Well, this was auditing in present time.

Student: Yeah.

I'd been auditing a lot of people for a very long time. And I started auditing right up there on top, right totally in present time, using nothing but Tone 40 intentions and acknowledgments, using nothing but the exact school solution. Knock me down with a feather. At about the fifth or sixth hour I was really grooving it, I was doing it well, and I thought, „Who was that lousy auditor I used to know? Who's that... What did I think I was doing in 1953?“

LRH: Good. Walk over to that wall. Thank you. With your right hand, touch that wall. Thank you. Turn around. Thank you.

In the first place, the results on the preclears were going up just like that, see? I was ending up sessions feeling fresher than I began. That was not too unusual for me, but I was feeling remarkably better! And I was riding right up on top all the way through, and the hours of the session were just going by swish. And I was doing nothing but what I am talking to you about here at this congress.

Look at that wall.

Now, I'm not trying to tell you how good an auditor I am. I'm trying to tell you that there may be some things outside the perimeter of these Training Drills. And there are, because we have some additional little drills like Fishing a Cognition and that sort of thing, how to conduct two-way communication, how to begin sessions, end sessions and that sort of thing. But the point is that I didn't use any of these things. I merely used Training 0 right straight on up to Training 9, inclusive, and the exact process, and got better results on preclears than I'd ever gotten before in my life.

Student: All right.

Therefore, I can stand up and tell you very didactically that this is a workable set of drills.

LRH: Thank you. Walk over to that wall. Thank you. With your right hand, touch that wall. Thank you. Turn around. Okay.

(applause). Thank you.

[to audience] Now you see that? You see that real good? That's just 8-C. By the way, you notice I was not directing him, correcting him, holding him back. And I was trying to hold it down and not run Tone 40 8-C on him. Get the difference?

Now, it's quite amazing, it's quite amazing to see somebody auditing who himself is restimulatable in ordinary life. But after a fellow has audited this way for a very little while, he doesn't get restimulated anymore. That's for sure.

Female voice: Yeah.

My existence as an auditor was made random because I would sometimes get preclears pitched at me, even in later days here, I didn't want anything to do with. And I finally found out why I didn't want anything to do with them. They would occasionally be so enturbulative in the auditing room that they'd sort of tire me out, you know? I'd get tired on the thing. I don't get tired anymore; it's sort of a state of „bring on your lions.“ I think that we've got this licked.

LRH: That's just plain 8-C. By the way, that works too, and that is a Training Drill. A person has to learn to do this and give those commands, and he gets that flat. And then he goes into this one.

There hasn't been too much change, as I said, on the Comm Course for a year, and there hasn't been too much change for about four or five months here on Upper Indoc. And I don't see any reason to change it.

[to student] Now, you're going to run this on me now; you're the auditor. Aw!

There's some other versions of Upper Indoc which are quite interesting. One of them we haven't shown you. It's a sort of an ACC variation. The auditor sits down and the coach sits across from him - this is a seated High School Indoc - and the coach simply carries on the most invalidative yak that he can possibly think up. Like, „Who taught you to audit? Boy, is that a comm lag! That's a communication break - you broke the Auditor's Code that time!“ Yak-yak-yak-yak-yak. And turns on misemotions - becomes very apathetic or becomes raging and so on. And the auditor is expected to go on calmly delivering the auditing command and acknowledging in spite of all this. That is another form of High School Indoc.

[to audience] Now. The purpose of this... High School Indoc is what we're going into now. We've shown you plain 8-C.

We've found out, however, that this levels out to a marked degree on Tone 40 on an Object and on Tone 40 on a Person and is not terribly necessary; it's merely very good. And it's kind of fun. If you feel mad at the world someday, why, get somebody... hold somebody and tell him you're going to teach him how to audit and...

[at this point the old reel ends. The remainder is from the clearsound version only.]

It's a wonderful feeling to give people advice about something with a totally clean conscience. And that's what I'm doing tonight, what I have done all along, but what I've done particularly with these Training Drills.

See? The purpose of this High School Indoc is to get an auditor over being stopped by preclears. Preclears stop auditors. And every time a preclear stops an auditor, he exerts control and therefore goes out of session. And in the interests of keeping a preclear in-session it is necessary that an auditor be capable of carrying on a process - without being stopped. You got that? And that's the total purpose of this.

Now, the reason I've been talking to you this long is I just wanted to make awfully sure that nobody here was under the misconception that, one, because we have found something new, that all old things were bad. That is not true. And the other thing is, is that the Training Drills form an artificiality which bypasses natural aptitude.

Now, there are two commands here that are allowed and are valid and no other commands are. One is „That's it,“ which finishes the demonstration, and the other one is „Flunk.“ You got that?

I found a horrible case of auditor intuition the other day. Preclear hadn't gained for hours and hours of processing either. But the auditor had a feeling, he had a feeling that something or other ought to be run on that case; he just had a feeling. He couldn't account for it and no data on the case would corroborate the fact that this was on the case. I got hold of the auditor and I audited out the feeling. He knew what should be audited on that case.

Now, when the coach says „Flunk,“ why, the auditor has to carry through the whole cycle from the beginning again. Do you see that? They don't just go on from that point. The auditor has to go back to the beginning of the cycle and carry it all through again. You got that? Let's say we got over to the wall and the preclear managed to stop the auditor. Then he says, „Flunk,“ then they go back over and run „Look at that wall.“ You got that? All right.

Did you ever see the experiment of the two E-Meters, by the way?

Now, the total purpose of the coach is to stop the auditor. The one thing a coach is not allowed to do is lie down. That's the one thing he can't do. But he can do anything else. Then we're going to wrassle around on this for a few minutes here, and then we're going to grab two or three people and have them audit us.

You take a co-auditing team and you put the auditor on one E-Meter and the preclear on the other and then you call off the list of things which have been audited - not because they were restimulative or had been flattened on the preclear, Lord forbid; they had not even vaguely been flattened, they'd merely been restimulated on the preclear. The auditor's E-Meter responded to what had been run on the preclear. But the preclear's E-Meter didn't respond. In other words, what was being run was wrong with the auditor. Auditor was running his own case. Well, it's all right to do that, too. It's probably real good for you!

LRH: Do it real.

However, even if you do that, why, Scientology still works. And even if you do that at Tone 40, you'll still produce results - something will happen.

Student: Do it for real, huh?

Now, you had a Group Auditing session here yesterday afternoon. And I actually audited you straight on a Tone 40 Group Process, much as I would have audited you as an individual session in an auditing room. Now, I mentioned to you afterwards that there was some difference here, that there was a different type of Group Processing than I had done before. And those of you who had been group processed by me agreed with this very thoroughly. They said, „Yes, this was a different type of auditing than you have done on us before.“

LRH: All right.

Well, it was nothing more nor less, what I did, than these Training Drills exactly combined into a production of a Group Auditing session. And that was exactly what happened. I think you would agree with me because I gave you the command and made sure the command hit all parts of the hall - each person in the hall - before I went on and gave the acknowledgment. I didn't give the acknowledgment until some execution had been performed. And then after I said the acknowledgment, got the intention of bringing that cycle to a full stop, at which time this occurred, and then let it off the full stop and slid on to the next auditing command for a new cycle. And that was exactly what was happening. We were running each cycle, each command, followed by an acknowledgment, making a full cycle of action which stopped with the acknowledgment. And then we went on to a new cycle, and then we went on and did a new cycle and a new cycle. In other words, we weren't doing one auditing session or two auditing sessions in the two hours. We did a great many auditing sessions. Each command was an auditing session, don't you see.

Student: All right. Step over here.

Now, I know those things got across because I've heard on the grapevine and so on, through messages passed through and so on, that there were a great many people present who got their first reality on processing - even some old-timers - on those two group sessions yesterday. Is that true? Or is this just rumor?

Look at that wall. Thank you. (That was Tone 40, excuse me.) Walk over to that wall.

Well, we had several exteriorizations, which hadn't happened before. That's right, isn't it? All right. In other words, here was an interesting thing. We ran a Tone 40 group session, and I will confess to you that it was nothing but calculated. It was totally calculated. It was a calculated process. First I gave you the realest havingness you could meet - pressure, remember? - and then blew you out of your heads, of course. I didn't try to do anything else but that. Now, if I didn't blow you out, I loosened you up. That's right, isn't it?

LRH: Flunk! You corrected yourself. Go on.

Audience: Right.

Student: All right. Now, walk over to that wall.

All right. Now, here's the interplay of Scientology is carried in just vignette in those two hours of Group Auditing. First hour was devoted to a havingness-type process which I knew very well people could do and from which they would get havingness. See, that was the first hour. And the second hour we had to assume that havingness had been increased to some degree. And in view of the fact that it had been increased, then there was a possibility of giving a few people a higher reality on exteriorization simply in the course of holding the body on Earth, because what else are they doing, you see?

LRH: Just a minute. Just a minute, I..

Furthermore, by pressing the floor down against the ground, you have a tendency to go up, see? And you found yourselves doing that, many of you. Didn't you?

Student: Good. With your right hand, touch that wall. Thank you. Turn around. Good. Look at that wall. Good. Walk over to that wall.

Audience: Yes.

LRH: Just a minute. I got to adjust the mike. Your shoe is untied.

The least that would have happened to you is you would have felt lighter.

Student: Good. With your right hand, touch that wall.

All right. Havingness versus separateness. And this is really the limit of action necessary in auditing. You can't run separateness very well; you have to continue to run put-togetherness. But you can run put-togetherness - Hold the floor against the Earth - in such a way as to make a Separateness Process out of it. Don't you see?

LRH: Your shoe is untied.

You make a fellow push hard enough against the wall and you're going to accomplish a considerable reaction as far as he's concerned, see. See how that would be? In other words, you're still running togetherness - you're making him push the walls together - but the action of pushing the walls together will push him out.

Student: Thank you. Turn around.

Now, running separateness all by itself is a very difficult thing to do. It can be done. But it evidently requires terrifically smooth auditing. It requires a tremendous repair of havingness. It requires all sorts of things. Separateness is quite a lot of process. I can get away with separateness. A lot of auditors around can get away with separateness, but generally it can't be gotten away with.

LRH: Aren't you afraid you'll trip over your shoe?

And yet, what do we have?

Student: Good. Look at that wall.

We have possession and separateness from the possession. And of course, the more vista the thetan has, the more havingness he has. The more he can see or experience, the more havingness he has. Isn't that right? So havingness is dependent upon communication and having a broad view. Now, a thetan becomes so anxious about things, he says, „Look, I'll stick in this head and at least I'll have that! At least I'll have that. And I'll just say, 'Well, I don't want those other things; at least I'll have this skull.“

LRH: Where?

Well, the only reason he is doing that is because he is worried about having a head. He thinks if he no longer has the head, why, he won't have anything else either. In other words, he fixes his attention much too closely.

Student: Good. Walk over to that wall.

So what is life?

LRH: Just a second. I've got to adjust this mike.

Life is getting into things and getting out of them. Isn't that right? About all there is to it. I mean, you get into something and then you get out of it.

Student: Thank you. With your right hand, touch that wall. Thank you. Turn around. Good.

To audit this it is necessary to run getting into things. Don't run getting out of them. Got that? It was getting into things that gave him havingness, he thought. So you're going to have to run more getting into things so that he has enough getting into things. And after a while he says, „You know, I'm into so many things I can drop one or two things.“ It's just more or less on the order of a business executive, something of the sort, and he's been awfully fixed on his job, let's say. He's been doing nothing but his job, nothing but his job. One day, why, he finds how to do his job a little bit better so he picks up a hobby and then he picks up another hobby and he picks up another hobby. And he finds out how to do these pretty well and he's still got these possessions and life goes on this way. And one day, why, his business picks up and requires more attention than he was giving it previously. „Well,“ he says, „well, I've got enough hobbies that I can drop stamp collecting.“ See, he could do that one thing: he could drop stamp collecting. But let me assure you that if he didn't have that many, why, he'd just fix down into the business. He doesn't let up somewhere, he just sort of mires in.

Look at that wall. Thank you. Walk over to that wall.

When a person has only one fixed interest, like their lumbago or sciatica or something, ask them to give this up is almost impossible. But you can certainly take somebody's interest off his sciatica by coming along and giving him a kick in the shins. He won't think sciatica for some minutes. Well now that's violently done, and it is not by power of choice and therefore he is upset about it.

LRH: I won't!

So auditing is not good when done simply on the kick-in-the-shins basis. See, that's not good auditing, that's good coaching. All right. Therefore, kicking people in the shins takes their mind off... well, you by auditing can give them a number of possible kicks in the shins. And pretty soon they say, „Well you know, I've got twelve kicks in the shins now. You know, I think I could possibly get along with eleven.“ So you give him fifteen. And he says, „You know, I think I could get along with ten.“ So you give him twenty-five. And he says, „You know, I could get along with five of these.“ I'm talking about have to have them, you know. Finally, why, he's quite content; you give him eighty-five synthetic kicks in the shins, not actual ones, you see, and he says, „I don't have to have any kicks in the shins; I can make them up. It's okay.“ So he's willing to let go of this and he doesn't need a kick in the shins. And at that moment the bruise will heal. Do you see that?

Student: Thank you. With your right hand, touch that wall.

It's just getting into things. You give him the opportunity to get into a lot more things than he ever had before and he'll get out on a couple. Got it?

LRH: You're asking for it!

So that's what auditing works as. It works on the basis of getting into things. Therefore, havingness; therefore, pressure. See this?

Student: Thank you. Turn around.

Now, in the present level of CCH and in the Training Drills there is really - but you did it yesterday but in the school solution - there is no proviso for this one interesting factor. And I'd like to wind up this data lecture on the subject of these drills before we get on with more of them, which we will all ... entirely in the second hour. I just want to give you this one more piece of data that's of great interest, is: escape from pressure is the retreat into small-size degradation, mired down, blindness or anything else. It's the retreat from pressure. Now, that is an accurate, technical statement. A person is afraid of pressures; he doesn't want that much pressure; he feels that pressures are too much for him.

Look at that wall. Good. Walk over to that wall. Good. With your right hand, touch that wall.

You can take somebody who's having a rough time and all you've got to do is pound your fist on the table once and he gets terribly upset - that was too much pressure.

LRH: Just look what I've done now.

Now, the suddenness of pressure is as important as the amount of pressure. You got that? I mean, there are two different things. There's the suddenness of the pressure as in an automobile crash, bang! You see? And the amount of pressure is merely the foot-pounds in the thing. And it's quite a mechanical thing. People who are having trouble bodywise are escaping from an imagined pressure in that area of their body and they withdraw from that area. They say, „I can't stand that much impact. I can't stand that much pressure.“

Student: Thank you. Turn around.

And an interesting field of research which is going on right now is the way north. And that is the research that's going on. I'm reporting to you on a fait accompli. I'm telling you, of all things, that I audit differently than I used to - that's quite an announcement all by itself - and more successfully, which is a confession, a confession that I couldn't have been auditing perfectly. I didn't know it. I thought I was auditing perfectly. I thought I was perfect, didn't you?

LRH: You turned me around the wrong way.

But this way north, the direction out, would lie along some facet of havingness. And the one which is being explored at this moment is pressure. Trying to get somebody after he's leveled out and he's under good subjective control - you know exactly what he's doing, he's got his mock-ups in good shape and so forth-mocking up pressures which do not depend upon the physical universe. That is one method of going out.

Student: Look at that wall. Good. Walk over to that wall.

Now, a person becomes so dependent upon the physical universe to give him these pressures that he has a tendency to hang around and get stuck in various parts of the physical universe, you see?

LRH: All right. That's fine. I've got an announcement to make; that's real... Flunk!

So the area of auditing which is experimental today is, how do you get a thetan to overcome his fear of; his back up from, his need for and all the other things of pressures? Now, that is the primary field up.

{to audience} Boy, when you could do that to him you had to be a genius.

Now, by that we then hope to get a thetan to be willing to experience or let other things experience a very high level of impact. You know, a high enough level of impact so that an individual would have no dependency. He would think of two cars coming together as being a rather uninteresting brush on a powder puff with a feather. Two cars traveling 120 each hit head-on: that's a brush with a feather on a powder puff. You got it? This is changing somebody's reality on this.

Student: Look at that wall. Good. Walk over to that wall. Thank you. With your right hand, touch that wall. Thank you. Turn around. Fine.

As far as I can tell at this moment this is the - many contributing factors - but this is the sole central factor of a trap. An individual cannot tolerate the pressure which he imagines to be outside the trap or which would be experienced if he tried to get out of the trap, see? A fellow stays in a jail simply because he can't tolerate the idea of ramming his body through the jail bars or wall, see. That would be too much pressure. See that? That's the only thing that would keep anybody in jail. The only thing that would keep a thetan trapped is this condensation-by-pressure mechanism, as far as I can tell.

Look at that wall. Fine. Walk over to that wall.

All right. Now, that is apparently a major factor on the way north. And I'm not reporting to you on this anything except that it's just very experimental.

LRH: If you do this just one more time I'm going to scream! Help!

Now, would this reach all the way south?

Student: Thank you. With your right hand, touch that wall. Good. Turn around. Fine. Look at that wall. Good. Walk over to that wall.

Well, an acceptable pressure will reach pretty far south. But let me assure you, you have to be able to control to a marked degree people's thinkingness before you can run a thinkingness process on them. And the trouble with most people that are having a hard time is that their thinkingness is out of their control and everybody else's. You see? So this is not really a far-south process at all. It just appears to be. And all these thinkingness processes don't go far south.

LRH: Just a minute, I've got an announcement to make.

Just because you could run acceptable pressure and just because I could run acceptable pressures on you and you could get results from this is no reason that the process would work at all on the average Homo sap. Your expectancy on it shouldn't be that good. It's evidently something that would come after you had pretty well flattened something like CCH.

Student: Thank you. With your right hand, touch that wall. Good. Turn around. Good.

So we're up to the level of Homo novis. And we're about to take off into the thetasphere. And this is possibly the most data - just theoretical data and discussion - which I care to give you at this congress. And I hope it's been acceptable to you.

Look at that wall. Good. Walk over to that wall. Thank you. With your right hand, touch that wall. Good. Turn around.

Thank you.

LRH: What's that? Just a minute. What's that? What's that?

Student: Good. Look at that wall. Good. Walk over to that wall.

LRH: Hey, you know you're doing this all right now. It's okay.

Student: Good. With your right hand, touch that wall. Fine. Turn around. Good. Look at that wall. Good. Walk over to that wall.

Fine. With your right hand, touch that wall. Thank you. Turn around.

LRH: What's on the other side of that?

Student: Good.

LRH: What's on the other side of that?

Student: Look at that wall. Thank you. Walk over to that wall.

LRH: Just a minute.

Student: Good.

LRH: Aren't you getting pretty hot?

Student: With your right hand, touch that wall. Good. Turn around. Good.

LRH: You didn't tell me when to stop turning around.

Student: Look at that wall. Good. Walk over to that wall. Good. With your right hand, touch that wall. Good. Turn around. Okay.

Look at that wall. Good. Walk over to that wall. Good. With your right hand, touch that wall. Good. Turn around. Good.

LRH: Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.

Student: Good. Walk over to that wall. Good. With your right hand, touch that wall.

LRH: ... hand touch that wall.

Student: Fine. Turn around.

LRH: Turn around.

Student: Good.

LRH: Good.

Student: Look at that wall.

LRH: Look at that wall. Good.

Student: Fine.

LRH: Fine.

Student: Walk over to that wall.

LRH: Good. Turn around.

Student: Good.

LRH: Good.

Student: Turn around.

LRH: Look at that wall.

Student: Fine.

LRH: Look at that wall. Look at that wall.

Student: Look at that wall. Thank you. Walk over to that wall.

LRH: Good. Turn around.

Student: Thank you.

LRH: Thank you.

Student: With your right hand, touch that wall.

LRH: Touch that wall.

Student: Good.

LRH: No!

Student: Turn around.

LRH: No!

Student: Thank you.

LRH: Good!

Student Look at that wall.

LRH: Look at that wall.

Student: Thank you.

LRH: Thank you.

Student: Walk over to that wall.

LRH: Walk over to that wall. What is all this about „Look over at that wall! Walk over to that wall. Look over at that wall?“

Student: Thank you.

LRH: Look over at that wall yourself!

Student: With your right hand, touch that wall!

LRH: Touch that wall. Look over at that wall.

Student: Turn around.

LRH: Turn around.

Student: Good.

LRH: Good!

Student: Look at that wall.

LRH: Look at that wall!

Student: Good.

LRH: Good!

Student: Walk over to that wall.

LRH: Thank you! Turn around! Look at that wall. Look at that wall. Turn around. Walk over to that wall.

Student: Thank you.

LRH: Good!

Student: With your right hand, touch that wall. Thank you. Turn around.

LRH: Hey, you're getting pretty good now.

Student: Thank you. Look at that wall.

LRH: Thank you.

Student: Thank you. Walk over to that wall.

LRH: Pretty good.

Student: Good. With your right hand, touch that wall.

LRH: Look all those people out there.

Student: Thank you.

LRH: Doesn't it make you nervous looking at all those people out there?

Student: Turn around. Good.

LRH: Good.

Student: Look at that wall.

LRH: Look at that wall!

Student: Thank you.

LRH: Thank you.

Student: Walk over to that wall.

LRH: Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.

Student: Thank you.

LRH: I stepped on your toe. Excuse me.

Student: With your right hand, touch that wall.

LRH. Oh, excuse me. I stepped on your toe.

Student: Thank you. Turn around.

LRH: Who, me?

Student: Good. Look at that wall.

LRH: Good.

Student: Thank you. Walk over to that wall.

LRH: What's that? What's that?

Student: Thank you.

LRH: You didn't tell me that was in here.

Student: With your right hand, touch that wall.

LRH: I won't. I won't!

Student: Thank you. Turn around. Good. Look at that wall. Thank you.

LRH: Say...

Student: Walk over to that wall.

LRH: ... there isn't anything I can think of that upsets you. You're doing good now. You're doing real good now.

Student: Good.

LRH: This is good.

Student: With your right hand, touch that wall.

LRH: Touch that wall.

Student: Fine.

LRH: Good.

Student: Turn around.

LRH: He's really doing well now, aren't you?

Student: Good. :

LRH: Boy! I haven't been able to stop you here.

Student: Look at that wall.

LRH: Good. Well, you've got me in-session. I mean, it's ...

Student: Thank you. Walk over to that wall.

LRH: You've got me in-session now.

Student: Thank you. With your right hand, touch that wall. Good. Turn around. Good.

LRH: Good!

Student: Look at that wall. Thank you. Walk over to that wall. Thank you. With your right hand, touch that wall. Good. Turn around. Good.

Look at that wall. Good. Walk over to that wall. Good. With your right hand, touch that wall. Good. Turn around. Thank you.

Look at that wall. Thank you. Walk over to that wall. Thank you. With your right hand, touch that wall. Good. Turn around. Thank you.

Look at that wall. Good. Walk over to that wall. Good. With your right hand, touch that wall. Thank you. Turn around. Good.

Look at that wall. Good. Walk over to that wall. With your right hand, touch that wall. Fine. Turn around. Good.

Look at that wall. Good. Walk over to that wall. Thank you. With your right hand, touch that wall. Good. Turn around. Good.

Look at that wall. Fine. Walk over to that wall. Good. With your right hand, touch that wall. Good. Turn around. Good.

Look at that wall. Good. Walk over to that wall.

LRH: No!

Student: Thank you. With your right hand, touch that wall. Good. Turn around. Thank you.

LRH: Oh, you're getting smart. You're getting onto that one now, huh?

Student: Look at that wall.

LRH: Okay.

Student: Thank you. Walk over to that wall.

LRH: Well, there you are. He's too good.

Student: Good. With your right hand, touch that wall. Good. Turn around.

LRH: You do that just one more time and I'll ...

Student: Good.

LRH: ... slug you. I'll just slug you. Just one more time and I'll slug you. Just one more time.

Student: Look at that wall. Good. Walk over to that wall.

LRH: You make me so mad! You make me so mad!!

Student: Good. With your right hand, touch that wall.

LRH: You got me upset now!

Student: Good.

LRH: All right, I'll go through with it. I'll go along with it.

Student: Look at that wall. Good.

LRH: I'll go through with it.

Student: Walk over to that wall.

LRH: (sighs)

Student: Fine. With your right hand, touch that wall. Good. Turn around.

LRH: I'll go through with it.

Student: Good.

LRH: You needn't do it anymore. You've got me licked.

Student: Look at that wall. Thank you.

LRH: You needn't do it anymore. I get the point. I know. I got it. You needn't do it anymore. I mean, I got it. I'm in the groove. I'm in-session now.

Student: With your right hand, touch that wall.

LRH: But I'm in-session.

Student: Thank you.

LRH. What are you auditing me for?

Student: Turn around.

LRH: The process is flat!

Student: Good. Look at that wall.

LRH: I don't see the point in the process.

Student: Good. Walk over to that wall.

LRH: I don't see any point in it at all. The process is flat; it's flat! I don't get it.

Student: Good. With your right hand, touch that wall.

LRH: The process ...

Student: Thank you.

LRH: ... is flat! I know I'm walking over...

Student: Turn around.

LRH: ... to the wall.

Student: Good. Look at that wall.

LRH: You're just trying to convince me you're the auditor.

Student: Good. Walk over to that wall.

LRH: Your shoe is untied.

Student: Good. With your right hand, touch that wall. Fine. Turn around.

LRH: Say, your shirt is ripped back here. How'd your shirt get ripped?

Student: Good.

LRH: How'd your shirt get ripped?

Student: Look at that wall. Fine. Walk over to that wall. Good. With your right hand, touch that wall. Good. Turn around.

LRH: What's that? What's that?

Student: Good. Look at that wall. Fine. Walk over to that wail.

LRH: Well, I guess I'm in-session now. It's okay. Well, we can end that session.

Student: Good.

LRH: You put on a pretty good demonstration.

Student: With your right hand, touch that wall.

LRH: That was a pretty good demonstration you put on.

Student: Fine.

LRH: That was pretty good.

Student: Turn around.

LRH: You know, it's just a demonstration. It's a pretty good demonstration that you did.

Student: Good.

LRH: They all liked me.

Student: Look at that wall.

LRH: You're doing much better now.

Student: Good. Walk over to that wall.

LRH: All right. You're doing all right. Well, I guess we can call that a day. We can call that a day now.

Student: Good. With your right hand, touch that wall. Good. Turn around. Thank you.

Look at that wall. Good. Walk over to that wall. Good. With your right hand, touch that wall. Fine. Turn around. Good.

Look at that wall.

LRH: Okay.

Student: Good. Walk over to that wall.

LRH: Yeah, you got me in-session now. Well, you're a pretty good Instructor. You're pretty good.

Student: Good.

LRH: You're a pretty good Instructor.

Student: With your right hand, touch that wall.

LRH: You're a pretty good Instructor.

Student: Fine. Turn around.

LRH: You're pretty good. I mean, you've really got it grooved, now.

Student: Good.

LRH: You got me in-session. I mean, it's all fine.

Student: Look at that wall.

LRH: Up.

Student: Good.

LRH: Oh, I'll go ahead with the rest of the parts.

Student: Walk over to that wall.

LRH: I'll go ahead just to make you look good.

Student: Good. With your right hand, touch that wall.

LRH: Good.

Student: Fine. Turn around. Good.

LRH: Well, you've done fine. You know, the hour is almost up there.

LRH: Look at that wall.

LRH: Hey, the hour is almost up.

Student: Good. Walk over to that wall.

LRH: The hour is almost up!

Student: Good. With your right hand, touch that wall. Good. Turn around. Fine.

Look at that wall. Good. Walk over to that wall. Good. With your right hand, touch that wall. Good. Turn around. Good.

LRH: That's it.

Okay, that's High School Indoc. That's all there is to it. It's very simple. There's nothing to it. And any of you could do it. Any. In the next hour you'll have a chance to prove it. Now you know what it is, now you can do it; you're all letter-perfect in it.

Thank you.