Русская версия

Search document title:
Content search 2 (exact):
ENGLISH DOCS FOR THIS DATE- Route 1 Step 12 (8ACC-COHA 35) - L541018 | Сравнить
- Route 1 Step 13 (8ACC-COHA 36) - L541018 | Сравнить
- Route 1 Step 14 (8ACC-COHA 37) - L541018 | Сравнить
- Route 1 Step 15 (8ACC-COHA 38) - L541018 | Сравнить

CONTENTS ROUTE 1, STEP 13 Cохранить документ себе Скачать

ROUTE 1, STEP 13

ROUTE 1, STEP 12

A lecture given on 18 October 1954A lecture given on 18 October 1954

Now, we have Route 1-13.

I want to continue some of this material on Route 1.

Route 1-13 is, to many auditors and to many preclears, one of the goldangest, gee whizzinest things that you ever ran into in your life. It is utterly, utterly phenomenal.

We've been going over this material on Route 1 and we have covered a great deal about exteriorization.

We could probably start a university which would do nothing but fool around with R1-13. That's typical of so many parts of Dianetics and Scientology — you could just go on and concentrate and specialize on these things forever and aye.

Now, everything I've covered with you at this time is Route 1, Step 4 to Route 1, Step 11.

R1-13: "Have preclear adjust genetic entity anchor points." That's an interesting process. It's a fabulous process.

Now we get into a more doubtful area of Route 1 when we get into Route 1-12. I want you to understand clearly that everything from 4 to 11, inclusively, is not simply something that's nice to do, but what you do do. And from Route 1-12 on up to Route 1-15, throughout, are things that are nice to do. See, this is not one of these things that the preclear will absolutely perish if you don't do these things.

In order to start in with this process, we actually have to go into the actual structure of the body.

Now, Intensive Procedure has a great many steps which you could omit or forget about. But certainly you wouldn't forget about R1-4 to R1-11 — but you could start getting a foggy memory along about R1-12. Because this step is only a minor step which usually takes place in the preclear. But nevertheless, it's a good thing to do with a preclear.

Now, to tell you about this in fifteen minutes is really not difficult. You would think this is quite something. The genetic entity anchor points. What do we call the genetic entity? Genetic entity simply means that entity which is carrying along through time, that is making the body through the time stream, through the action of sex and so forth: sperm — ovum, embryo, infant, man.

Sometimes you'll get a preclear who, while exteriorized, still is banked-up by facsimiles. He's got facsimileosis. And everything he looks at ... You tell him to "Go out and look at that dog," and he'll see a facsimile of a dog, not a real dog, you know. You tell him to go through the stomach of that goat and he doesn't appear a bit alarmed. Whereas, as a matter of fact, the first time you tell somebody to sail through the stomach of a goat, and he's actually exteriorized, he's liable to be quite alarmed with you. That seems to be a fairly strange place to go.

What is the single or many intelligences which go into the actual structure which eventually results in a grown body? Well, that we call a "genetic entity." It isn't a him; it isn't a her. It would simply be the combined intelligences which eventually result in this result.

Actually, he's used to being eaten, you know. And being eaten by a goat is quite degrading. And he'll balk somewhat.

Now, this could or could not, or may not, include the thetan or awareness of awareness unit. Actually, the awareness of awareness unit probably would not admit his responsibility for making this body from beginning to end, anyhow.

So we have this person with facsimileosis. It's merely the fact that this person has not yet gotten into a state where he can create or destroy energy.

So, the genetic entity might even be the awareness of awareness unit — the thetan. Might even be. We're not interested in whether it is or isn't. We're interested here in structure and with the adjustment of anchor points. Dianetics and Scientology went into structure and disbarred all holds. We're perfectly willing to address the field of structure today, which we were not in 1950. And the reason why we are willing to address structure today is because we know something about structure today. And we were unwilling before because we didn't know anything about it.

Of course, this whole universe is dead set against either creation or destruction. These two things you mustn't do. "Survive" is the motto of this universe. "Creation, destruction" — these definitely are not the mottoes of this universe.

And if medicine and psychiatry, and so forth, were to present that conservative attitude toward existence, they would be far better off. They are continually invading the field of structure without having one brain cell to knock against another one on the subject. They don't know anything about it and their courage and adventurousness is something that should be saluted by some of the greater adventurers of history.

If you want to believe this more thoroughly, just go around and ask a nuclear physicist sometime. Ask him what he thinks of this new idea of yours. And do you know, usually, long before you have any chance to state the idea, he will have told you just this (which is a real funny one): "There isn't anything new; it's all been done before." He's certain of this. This is a big conviction on his part: "It's all been done before." Oh, the devil it has!

We are actually today not being adventurous in Dianetics and Scientology, really. We are holding the conservative line. And we're not like medicine and psychiatry, which are wild, incapable, improbable and so on. If you take that attitude, you fare much better.

Writers who are all written out, fogged down and have finally become editors will tell you that there is no such thing as a new idea.

They test one case and say, "We've run a series." They test two cases — "We've run a series." And they are perfectly willing — now, get this — they are perfectly willing to treat structure, without knowing a single thing about structure.

One of the first things that they teach in some of those decadent places known as "the university," in the creative-writing class they will tell you there are some ... I don't know. What is it, eight jokes? No, that's over in public speaking — eight basic jokes and no others.

Oddly enough, it took electronics and nuclear physics to scout out this thing called structure. What is structure? It depends primarily upon view-point of dimension — the definition of space.

They'll tell you that there are something like thirty-six dramatic situations and fifty-five associations (or maybe that's Heinz products, or is that fifty-seven?) — something like this — but there's just exactly a finite number of plots.

Then if we have viewpoint of dimension, what is it that so arduously holds in position the very structure of the body? It would be something, then, which held in position a certain series of anchor points. Isn't that right? And these anchor points would then give the space of the body, and would demonstrate what part of the body was to be dense and what part of the body was not to be dense. And it would be a problem in anchor points, wouldn't it? — because you have a body walking around and it's occupying a certain amount of space. But it has to create that space for every new position it goes into. So we're looking at a miracle here. But we're also looking at electronics.

Well, there was a fellow one time, wrote a book called "Plotto" or "The Plot Jinni" — and he went mad doing it by the way. But it's all possible combinations based upon these thirty-six standard situations. I wonder why he went mad. It doesn't seem to me like you'd go mad doing this.

Anchor points consist of electronic energy masses, and they are measurable on very, very fine electronic machines. They are measurable. I mean, we're not dealing now with something like a theory. I mean we can reach out with a magic wand and swat these things.

Well, he had to assume basically that there were just so many plots and then just so many combinations of these plots. And having assumed that, he was dead. That's the way you kill a writer: You tell him there's thirty-six dramatic situations.

As a thetan, we can go down the street and somebody is tooling along, you know, walking along in perfectly good order, and we just take the upper-right-hand anchor point and let's move it. And he will walk in a circle. He'll wonder what on earth's happened to him. He'll start walking like Leon Arrow. We can do this to anybody.

Actually there aren't. There aren't any dramatic situations as far as the instructor is concerned. He has lost all sense of drama. The world is dead as far as he's concerned. It's all deduced down to a certain mechanic.

Dizziness is just a displacement of these things, that's all. How many are there in a body? Millions. How many principal ones? There are about six big ones.

Do you mean to tell me that an individual cannot simply invent a dramatic situation, just whole cloth? Well, you'll have to run a preclear on that basic two-way communication question, "How many problems could you be to yourself? How many problems could you be to yourself?" and all of a sudden, he's getting more and more and more and more and more.

How do you locate them? Well, they vary from the tiniest, tiniest microscopic point of electricity, to huge spheres which look like the gold balls outside of a pawn shop. And these are not visible to the naked eye unless you process somebody in their direction. He begins to go around looking at people's anchor points. This begins to worry him, because he stops seeing bodies and starts seeing anchor points. You very seldom process anybody in this direction.

He runs out entirely at first. You know? He just drains the bank of how many problems he could be to himself, and then long comm lags, and then he gets more of them and more of them and more of them. He finally gets up to infinity.

All right. Where are these anchor points? At every place the body has mobility, you can depend upon it that there are small or large anchor points — those places which we called, in Advanced Procedures and Axioms, "the sub-brains of the body." Remember Advanced Procedures and Axioms, hmm? "Control centers," "epicenters" — remember all that? We're talking about anchor points.

What do you suppose a dramatic situation is, but how many problems you could be to yourself or others?

Now, here at the bend of the elbow is an anchor point. Here at the bend of the wrist is an anchor point. Here at the ball of the shoulder is an anchor point. Now, are they the bone? No, they are not. They are an electronic de-posit which permits the bend of that much space. Well, this stuff that's hanging and visible to the naked eye is only there as long as those anchor points are in position.

Well, how many ways can you bend a piece of copper wire? That's how many vias there would be. How many ways, directions, could you bend how many combined kinds of copper wire? That's one of these nebulous questions, isn't it?

And if you were to suddenly knock out of existence all the anchor points in an arm, you would create either a complete immobility of the arm or the arm itself would vanish.

Supposing you had an infinity of copper wire, an infinity of sizes of cop-per wire. Now, how many ways could you bend this? — and you'd have the number of problems. Because a problem is always occasioned by via. Any time you bend that line between cause and effect, you have started a problem. Any time you go into a relay system of any kind, you have started into problems.

Now, let's look this over as nothing esoteric. We're dealing with some-thing like hooking up circuits and putting meters on, and resistors and things like that.

Now, how many problems could he be to himself — this is basically a dramatic situation, isn't it?

Then, if somebody had a sprain of his elbow, the first thing we would suspect would be that the space of the elbow had been disarranged. We would not suspect there was something wrong with the bones and ligaments of the elbow.

All right. If he believes there's a finite number of dramatic situations, then there are a finite number of reasons to live — just like that. He just doesn't have very many reasons to live. He'd have only thirty-six, wouldn't he?

It would be a mistake for you as an auditor, really, to suppose that some-thing was wrong with the bones and ligaments and meat of the elbow simply because an elbow was sprained or broken.

Well, I'd blow my brains out if I only thought there was thirty-six situations by which I could get into trouble in this universe.

Now, we've invaded the field of the medical doctor, and we've many times said the medical doctor should be permitted to practice in structure and set bones and so forth. Well sure he should. But not being an electronics man, he has no business, having no concept of the actual structure of energy, such as you have — viewpoint of dimension, anchor points, and so forth — having no idea of basic electronics, he has no darned business, really, shortening or lengthening bones or trying to do something to disarrange the structure of the body.

Now, creation and destruction on the level of ideas, of course, is immediately mirrored by creation to destruction on the level of energy. And then creation to destruct on the level of energy is mirrored in terms of solidity — havingness.

It's perfectly all right, as long as he tries to put back into existence the body as it was meant to be. But now, if he starts to get experimental, knowing nothing about electronics, boy, is he out of his field!

What is havingness but too many vias jammed up too tight. That's havingness. You want a picture of havingness, it's too many vias jammed up too tight. And, of course, all havingness is a problem.

The only way you can lengthen an arm would be, really, by rearranging the anchor points which demarked the distance and length of the arm. And what do you know, by processing, you ordinarily, routinely do this. By doing what?

You want to know what gives the millionaire ulcers, he just has to be surrounded by that many pieces of mass, and he's got that many vias, immediately.

We know about black energy masses, right? And this fellow's arm is very short. Well, let's say he's hung up in birth. Here he is, hung up in birth, and he's packing around this huge energy mass. Well, he's got a foreshortened arm. We audit him out of birth, we audit him out of that energy mass, and for the first time, the anchor point can snap into its proper position — and so his arm can grow.

All right. We take energy — creation to destruction of energy — creation to destruction of matter would be its lowest realm, wouldn't it?

Up to that time, a mass of anchor points — wrong anchor points, the fac-similes of birth, and so forth — were being paid attention to by the arm.

Now, I'll go into this very briefly and tightly here, exactly what this step is. R1-12, by design, is an exteriorized process which would convince the per-son that he could then generate and unmock energy — see, generate and destroy energy.

In other words, that was what was making the space of that arm, not the designed anchor points. You audit out birth, that energy goes by the board, the original anchor points can then carry on their process of growth and extension according to their plans, orders and dictates. Do you follow me?

If he can generate and destroy energy ... You see, "How many problems could you be to yourself?" and "How many problems could you be to others?" would generate and destroy dramatic ideas, wouldn't it? That would create and destroy dramatic ideas. Well, we'd have to get into the field of energy.

So therefore, a facsimile, being a mass of energy, can attract out of position, these anchor points. There is magnetic interrelationship between the facsimile and the anchor points of the body. So when this fellow has a sprained elbow, the first thing you would think of with regard to this sprained elbow is that the anchor point is out of position.

Your nuclear physicist knows that this universe is here. It will be here forever. There is no destroying any single particle in the entire universe. The conservation of the energy reigns everywhere — particularly in the police department. And he knows you couldn't do this. That's why he's mad. That's why he's actually crazy enough to go out here and set off atom bombs.

Now, if he were exteriorized and you'd done all the Route 1 drills to bring him right on up to a line where he could see energy, mock things up, real sharp, real clever — you know, in good shape — all you'd have to do is tell him, "Take a look at the elbow. Do you find any kind of a ball or anything there in the elbow?" He'd say, "Yes, there's a little black ball." You'd say, "Mock up a whole bunch of black balls." He would. "Keep stuffing them into the elbow." All of a sudden he will say, "You know, the little ball has turned gold." Why was it black? That was because the energy was being drained out of it by some other anchor point. You remedied the havingness of that particular anchor point. It got gold.

He has reached the extremity, the utter extremity, of "We just can't have that much mass there! We've got to do something about it! We've got to make nothing out of it!" You have people run around trying to make nothing out of big masses by saying, "Well, it doesn't amount to much, and it isn't important, and it isn't pretty, and so forth." What's happened is, is they're drawn in toward that mass so far and so deep that it is a matter of great problem to them. See, they're drawn into it. And they're trying to fend off of it by saying, "It's nothing, it's nothing, it's nothing." And if they feel they can't get away from it, they just go on a steady, running-fire of chatter of how it doesn't amount to much — whether that's criticism or trying to talk it down or invalidate it one way or the other.

You say, "All right. Now put it into position." And he would try, and it wouldn't go into position. You'd say, "Well, you know what its proper position is." They do, by the way. That's the mysterious thing — that the thetan knows where the proper positions are.

They only have to invalidate obsessively when they can't unmock it directly. Have we got that?

You say, "Mock up a gold ball in the proper position and throw it away; and another one and throw it away; and another one and throw it away." You've got an energy suction going where that anchor point belongs. It's being repelled out of its proper position.

The way you unmock it directly is by perfect duplication. Duplicate it in its own time, its own space, with its own particles, and believe me, it'll cease to exist.

You remedy the havingness of the position. First, remedy the havingness of energy in the area, then remedy the havingness of position of the anchor point, and then have him shove the body's anchor point back into the proper position, click — no sprain, no break. This is fabulous. It's what makes the body's structure exist.

I almost frightened Sutton out of his wits one day. He was sitting there minding his own business and I all of a sudden said, "Take a look at the atoms over there in that brick. Now put an attention unit along with each atom that you see in that little section there, and have it go back to, and pick up at its inception, and make a perfect duplicate of, that atom. Have each one of these attention points do that." And pshooh! He had an empty space right there where he was looking at, see. Gone!

Now, very often you'll find an anchor point just shot to pieces, completely shattered. This fellow is having an awful lot of trouble with the right side of his body; we find out this wing anchor point, which is way out here in front of him and so forth, is shattered.

The only thing that makes this matter stay around is to come through too many courses and routes, you see. And it's finally gotten lost from its original creation point. All you'd have to do is locate its original creation point and unmock it and it would cease to exist right where it is.

Have him collect the pieces — they're still around. Have him mock up the havingness of the area. Have him discharge out of it, in other words, the facsimiles that are being held on to in the area, simply by remedying the havingness. Have him pour black balls, gold balls, whatever you want, into the area where that shattered anchor point is. He will tell you.

You would actually have to unmock it twice if you were going to do a complete job of it, because you'd have to unmock the fact that you'd unmocked it. Otherwise, you'd still have a ghost of it around. Got that?

You say, "Look around. Do you see any black balls? Any gold balls? Any-thing like that?"

So, here we have R1-12 as an entire series of processes which create and destroy energy. You could do it directly or otherwise. And when you say R1-12, this process here may not be the best process there is to do this, but it is a process that does this.

"Yes, I do. Well, there's one lying there in pieces." You say, "Okay. Remedy the havingness of the area it belongs in. Put the pieces together. The position it should be in — push it into place." It'll go click, and all of a sudden this person's physical imbalance will vanish.

It's "Have preclear mock up generators, power plants and suns to give him energy, on that gradient scale, until he's totally convinced that he does not have to receive energy from an outside source." Why does this individual never create energy? Why is he still playing around with facsimiles? Well, he believes he has to have all of his energy from an outside source. He believes he himself cannot create energy, that he has to have it from elsewhere. So, this is just a nice route by which you change his consideration with this set of mock-ups, up to a point where he says, "Why, heck, I can make that energy. I'm making that generator and I'm creating that sun, and so forth, anyhow." The steps of doing this, the patter which will go along with it, is the easiest thing in the world. You simply have him mock up generators. Have him mock up a little tiny generator to give him energy enough to flick his eyelid. You see? And have him mock up something else — straight generators. Or have him mock up food supplies which would supply him with energy in order to flick his eyelid. Anything you want to do, you see, and then mock up enough to blow him up in the air finally — you know, power plants and motors and so on. Just have him go on mocking up things to give him energy.

Now, where are these anchor points? There's a whole gold sheen of them underneath each eye. People who have dark hollows under their eyes ordinarily have had these anchor points badly shattered and have never gone on and remedied the havingness of the area and put them all into place again.

He will mock them up more or less on a gradient scale, so you could say the auditing command would be "Mock up something that will give you energy in order to act," and "You just mock up something else to give you energy," and "Mock up something else that'll furnish you with energy." And you just keep saying this, and he'll all of a sudden fall wise to the fact that he's mocking it all up. You just run it until he does. And at that moment he will no longer be confounded by all these facsimiles.

There are anchor points, as I said, at each bend. At each point in the body where you have an arterial pass, and so forth, you generally have some anchor points sitting around there demarking the area where it should be, there. In the eyes themselves, there's one in each corner of the eye — the principal anchor points.

This is one of the basic problems he has. One of the basic problems he has anyhow is that he has set up a problem, saying that he himself can't furnish energy to it, somebody else has to. And that's one of his basic problems.

Once in a while you process somebody, you get piercing pains in each corner of each eye, and, ooh! he won't like that. What you've done is simply suck the energy out of the existing anchor point in the area, you see, temporarily, and this — it hurt.

So, Remedy of Problems actually will sometimes turn up that computation. You simply: "How many problems could you be to yourself?" He'll finally say, "Well, I have to have something else mock up all the energy I'm using." And that'll be one of the most basic problems he has.

Now, we sometimes see a misalignment of structure or a loss of beauty on a face or a body — it always has something to do with anchor points.

If R1-12 does not bring about the condition of full release of his ideas and attitudes concerning this, and if it doesn't bring about an alteration of consideration so he knows he can mock up energy for his own use, why, you know then you have run into problems.

Now, you can get a body into a position of no return. It's been banged around so much, it's been in so many accidents, it's been shot so often, and so on, that all the thetan can do is simply string these anchor points together as good as he can and keep them in position.

So we would just start back on the basis of "How many problems couldyou be to yourself?" or we'd go back to this Remedy of Havingness back here.We would simply step back to R1-11, see: "How many problems couldyou be to yourself in havingness?" or "How many problems can you be in havingness?" Well, how many problems could he be in doingness? How many problems could he be in beingness?

Why? Because the body does not operate on the anchor point mocked up in the position by the thetan; the body only operates on its own anchor points.

Be, have and do, remember, are the component parts which are opposite space, energy and mass. See: space, be; do, energy; have, mass. Also time — have is time. You don't have any time problems until you have havingness problems — unless it's the problem of not having any time at all, by the way. That's quite a problem: being a complete space, without even a visible anchor point — which is to say, this universe.

A thetan cannot, for some reason or other, come along and put an anchor point in the position. I don't lay this down as a rule that can't be thrown aside, but so far all experiments have demonstrated that this is the rule: The body has to have its own anchor points to have its own space.

So R1-12, auditing command, is simply "Mock up something which will furnish you energy. Mock up something else which will furnish you energy. Mock up something else which will furnish you energy. Mock up something else which will furnish you energy. Mock up something else which will furnish you energy. Mock up something else which will furnish you energy," just on and on and on till he finally falls wise to the fact that he is creating all the energy that's being used by him anyhow. And that is the total step.

And when the thetan comes along and slides in a mock-up anchor point in position for the body's anchor point, he may be very happy about it, it may be a much brighter anchor point, but it will give the person aches, pains and so on.

Now, R1-12 is, of course, a mock-up process. And you see that as a mock-up process. Therefore, it has some limitation in itself. Actually, a process which'd chase somebody around the universe, such as a Grand Tour, can be senior to a straight mock-up process.

I've had somebody adjust all the anchor points in his head and had him get piercing headaches, and find out: "What were you doing?" And "Well, huh, my anchor points, you see, are much brighter than the body's anchor points, and so I just left them in position." And I made him go through, then, the head, and pick out all those anchor points which he himself put in and patch up the body's anchor points any old way he could, and shove them back into position, and the fellow was suddenly rid of his headache again.

The only reason he is using facsimiles, of course: He's afraid to look directly, so he makes a facsimile of something and then looks at the facsimile. Well, that's silly too. Look, he had to see the object he was making a facsimile of, didn't he? In order to make a facsimile of it, he had to see the object he was making a facsimile of, copy it, then pretend he hadn't seen the object and look at the facsimile. That's vias. They'll get a guy in trouble every time.

In other words, as you run this process, there is one bug — that is, the thetan mustn't put in anchor points of his own. He can mock up anchor points in the position to remedy the havingness, but when he finally puts the structure back again, make sure he uses the body's own anchor points. Got that?

What is this pattern? It is a tremendously complex pattern of space, and that's what it is. It makes a man look something like a Tinkertoy, all put together on rods and gold balls.

But that is the true structure of the body, and the structure of the body which can be changed easily by the auditor. He exteriorizes somebody and then, after he's done all the rest of the Route is right up to this point of remedying these anchor points, he has this person adjust the anchor points of the body.

How does he do it? I have already told you and it's given to you in The Auditor's Handbook.