When you go past the postulate or insist on an earlier similar when there isn’t one the pc can go later or jump chains and put into action other phenomena. This, and bad assessment is when you get tangled cases and repair.

Дианетика новой эры или любая другая Дианетика НЕ должна проводиться с людьми, достигшими состояния клир или выше, и не должна проводиться с Дианетическими клирами.

Это применяется даже тогда, когда такие люди говорят, что видят какие-то картинки.

When you get a blowdown and the pc tells you the postulate and then you tell him to return to the beginning of the incident again, you can overrun the incident and turn the analytical concept of it back into a solid picture which will just get more and more solid and you’ll think there was nothing erased.

Любой, кто получил*приобрел одитинг по НЭДу, будучи клиром или выше, должен быть направлен в организацию повышенного уровня или во Флаг для получения специального рандауна*рандаун, серия шагов, которые представляют собой действия и процессы одитинга, составленные для того, чтобы справиться с отдельным аспектом кейса, и у которых есть известное конечное явление. Пример: рандаун замкнутости. (Заметки к определениям от ЛРХ) НЭД для ОТ. С такими людьми НЕ проводится обычная Дианетика новой эры.

What you’re erasing, actually, is the basic postulate that made the chain occur in the first place.

Любой, кто является клиром, но ещё не является ОТ III, должен немедленно пройти одитинг до ОТ III включительно для того, чтобы получить возможность пройти этот специальный рандаун.

КЯ этого рандауна это ПРИЧИНА НАД ЖИЗНЬЮ.

In engram running by chains, when you demand a pc go through the incident more than twice, and it is not basic that incident will grow more solid. A good Dianetic auditor watches his TA and the moment that TA starts to rise while running an incident on the chain he knows there is an earlier similar incident. It is told to him by the TA, which is saying this incident is getting more solid.

When he sees this, he immediately asks for an earlier incident after either Step 9 or Step C of R3RA.

When you ask for earlier beginnings and then run the incident again and keep doing this you can run a non-basic through several times and it will inevitably become more solid. The degree that this can exert pressure on a pc is very great and is extremely uncomfortable.

A really smooth Dianetic auditor never increases the solidity of the bank. It is a non-determined point whether an earlier beginning alone will, if found, decrease the solidity of a non-basic.

A Scientology auditor works for amount of TA out of a process.

A Dianetic auditor works for the eradication of a chain. The Dianetic auditor could get lots of TA if he overran every non-basic engram, but it is this that he does not want.

The Dianetic auditor is not concerned with the amount of TA that he gets. A TA has to go up before it goes down. In running an engram chain if you let a non-basic engram raise the TA more than a thousandth of an inch at Step 9 or Step C and do not immediately ask for an earlier incident, you goofed as you will make the pc’s bank more solid.

Scientology audits by the amount of TA. The most expert Dianetic auditor audits with a minimum of TA.

A lousy job of assessment, trying to run unreading items, will find the pc going into chains that are not ready to be run and will cause trouble, which consists of many unwanted phenomena such as pc unable to find incidents, jumping chains, etc.