Русская версия

Search document title:
Content search 2 (exact):
ENGLISH DOCS FOR THIS DATE- Modernized Training Drills Using Permissive Coaching (Canceled) - B630429 | Сравнить
- Routine 3, Directive Listing, Listing Liabilities (GPM) - B630429 | Сравнить

SCANS FOR THIS DATE- 630429 - HCO Bulletin - Modernized Training Drills Using Permissive Coaching [B003-019]
- 630429 - HCO Bulletin - Routine 3 - Directive Listing - Listing Liabilities [B063-019]
- 630429 - HCO Bulletin - Routine 3 - Directive Listing - Listing Liabilities [B153-013]
CONTENTS ROUTINE 3
DIRECTIVE LISTING
LISTING LIABILITIES
UNDERLISTING A CONVINCING TEST REMOVING CHARGE SUMMARY
Cохранить документ себе Скачать
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 29 APRIL 1963
Central Orgs Missions URGENT

ROUTINE 3
DIRECTIVE LISTING
LISTING LIABILITIES

Nothing has changed to alter the mechanics or laws of listing.

Now that the pattern of the GPM is exactly known, the pc can be told what RI to put on the list.

This requires only 5 or 6 variations from the pattern RI. BUT the values contained in just listing are lost.

UNDERLISTING

These things happen when underlisting is done even though the right RIs are found:

  1. Half the charge is left in the GPM;
  2. The pc’s directed RI does not RR;
  3. The pc is prevented from cogniting on the RI found because it is still charged;
  4. The pc’s body weight increases;
  5. The GPM run through once is stiff, the pc is queasy about it;
  6. The pc’s body is subjected to unusual stresses;
  7. The auditor is led to fake RRs or believe the pattern is wrong;
  8. The pc doesn’t get Clear.

All these things can be prevented by:

A. Listing every list to a clean needle;

B. Considering the RI being listed from is reacting even if when called for test it reads latently or only roughs the flowing character of the needle;

C. Don’t buy an RI unless the pc understands it and if he doesn’t understand it, make him list charge off;

D. Making the pc answer the listing question, not plunge for the „right pattern RI.“

A CONVINCING TEST

On most pcs the right RI won’t RR until the charge from other listable items has been taken off. You can make this test. Take the pc’s next RI to be listed for. Let’s say it’s “perfect catfish.” The question is “Who or what would no all catfish oppose?” Get all possible combinations of the right RI (perfect catfish) from the pattern, (catfish perfected, perfection catfish, etc.), make the pc put them on the list. Now test by calling “no all catfish.” You’ll see a roughed up needle even if no instant tick appeared. And probably no real RR, only a fall, will be seen on testing “perfect catfish.”

Now make the pc really answer the listing question without regard to the pattern RI “perfect catfish” but just what he thinks “no all catfish” would oppose. You will see several RRs probably and maybe an R/S or two on a list of only 30 items. You will observe the pc’s needle go smooth. Call “no all catfish” again to the pc. You will see that there is no slightest roughening of the smooth flow of the needle.

Now have the pc put all combinations of “perfect catfish” back on the list.

One will RR beautifully. Call it off to the pc (no other nulling done, no BMRs). It will RR again and the TA will blow down TO CLEAR READ.

Now examine your list. You will see that the right RI placed at the top of the list had a poor or absent RR or only fell when put down.

If you had accepted it at the top of the list you would not have gotten a nice RR BECAUSE ALL THE RRing AND R/Sing ITEMS YOU SAW AFTER IT WOULD HAVE REMAINED IN THE PC’S BANK!

You should make this test on your R3 pc. Then you’ll understand all about it because you will have seen it.

NINETY PERCENT OF THE GPM RIs WHEN FOUND AND CALLED TO THE PC SHOULD BRING THE TONE ARM OF THE METER TO CLEAR READ. (Note: the pc may be in the valence of the opposite sex in any GPM during its running. Therefore the pc’s Clear read will be for the opposite sex in that GPM).

The lesson here is this:

ONE AUDITS THE PC WITH ROUTINE 3, ONE DOES NOT JUST RUN A BANK.

Routine 3 is an auditing tool. One uses it to audit the pc. If audited, the pc gets better and feels better. If just “run through a bank” a pc will benefit but won’t clear.

REMOVING CHARGE

Truly skilled use of Routine 3 removes all the charge. Auditing is for the pc.

True, it is wholly the number of RIs you get. But what about those other RRing and R/Sing items. They’re the pc’s too.

The cross-section of a real R3 reliable item looks like this; if the spherical cluster were split in half:

All charge comes from the RRing RI. The remainder borrow their charge from it. The RI looks like a steel sphere covered with a heavy layer of black smoke. This black smoke is actually RRing lock items in the inner area and R/Sing (2-12) Items in the outer area.

If you get the RI discharged nearly everything blows. But a few of the RRing first ring and one or two of the outer R/Sing items will still hang on.

The pc is trying to list through the outer rings to the center core RI. This anatomy is not graphic. It is actual.

A GPM consists of less than two hundred RIs, about 6,000 RRing lock items and about 15,000 R/Ses. (The figures 6,000 and 15,000 are approximate.)

Listing by Directive Listing against the pattern of a GPM you get most of these RRing or R/Sing secondary items. But you don’t get them all even on a cleanly RRing pc.

To get them all, and on most pcs even to get a good RR on the RI, you have to list off charge as well as List by Pattern.

If you get the primary RI these secondary items never need to be opposed. They just blow. If you do oppose one or a slightly incorrect RI your TA will go high and stay high.

Many plans for doing this could exist. I would prefer this one and have used it with success. It would even apply to a pc who RRed well on pattern running

  1. Tell the pc what to put on the list, get the most ordinary variations of it. See that one falls well. None are called back to the pc.
  2. Tell the pc, “Now let’s get the secondary items off. Just answer the question any way you want: “Who or what___________?”
  3. Let the pc rattle off a lot, the auditor meanwhile just looking at the meter, watching the falls, R/Ses and RRs, but looking for the moment the needle begins to flow smoothly (none of this is written down and it should take only a couple of minutes);
  4. Stop the pc from further “random listing” and have the pc put some variations of the pattern RI on the list, working hard with the pc to get the wording exactly correct.
  5. As soon as these pattern of the GPM type items being listed cease to disturb the needle and one or more have RRed, stop.
  6. Read the RI being listed from to the pc to be sure it doesn’t react or roughen the needle (if it does, repeat step 5);
  7. Read the last RRing pattern items to the pc. One only, without any other nulling or ruds or Tiger Drill, will RR and blow down the TA;
  8. Tell the pc “Your item is. That rocket reads.”

This is only done the first time through a bank and not when simply passing through a GPM the third time to align it and pass the charge down.

The pc run this way will be bright and sparkling the whole way, lots of cognitions.

Suppress, Protest and Decide have to be cleaned on the list or the session if things don’t go well but only when all other Routine 3 means of handling things have become very impeded. Don’t use any rudiments or Tiger Drill or nulling or BMRs in Routine 3 unless totally driven to it, and only then after all R3 means have been exhausted.

Far from wasting session time, you will find this gets more RIs in a session because the pc’s confront comes up. It saves time.

SUMMARY

You can run a whole GPM on Directive Listing and the pattern of a GPM without removing a single secondary item. But the penalties of doing only that are given at the beginning of this HCO Bulletin.

Audit the pc with Routine 3.

Don’t just run Routine 3 on a pc.

PS: Don’t overlist either!

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder