The following despatches to the Assn Sec London and HCO Area London, are of general interest:
HCO LONDON HCO STHIL EGSTD
JOHN FROM RON INFO HCO OCT 3 2242
In order to care for your special condition wherein the newcomers cannot run old processes then temporarily modify the Pol Ltr as follows:
Class such auditors as “Class Two Under Training”. Let them go right ahead and continue with security checking only. HCO should get very ambitious about making these auditors pass all the necessary Bulletin tape exams on Class Two, and then confirm their status when they have passed.
Make available a tape recorder with headphones and let auditors standing in for exams listen to tapes and have HCO give them exams on these tapes.
On the two auditors that have very little reality on auditing, this would stem of course from their never having gotten any benefit from auditing or having any subjective reality on it. Therefore they would be rather dangerous to let near a PC. Suggest you turn them loose on each other with Sec Checking and make them complete a thorough Form Three and other checks on each other.
You are going to get your wildest changes on cases at this time by doing excellent Sec Checking.
There is a current rundown down here which is part of Class Two, which is Sec Checking against a chronic somatic. The tape of Oct 3 goes into it very thoroughly. It gets rid of hidden standards and chronic somatics and has gotten to, under and into every pokey case we have around there. This is assessing for the prior confusion to the condition, and then Sec Checking the PC on personnel found in that assessed area. It is easy to do and hell to teach but when an auditor gets a reality on it — Wow here we go.
I would be very happy to see a lot of wins coming out of Sec Checking only. This requires model session meter rudiments and TRs, and knowing never to leave a question as long as there are withholds on it. (Surest way in the world to blow a PC out of the HGC is to leave a question with charge still on it.)
I'm real keen to see you hit the easy trail now that it's taped so well. I have every confidence that if you work like mad in the HGC to make every auditor a top grade Security Checker and run nothing but Security Checks (Standard Form and those you specially prepare for a particular PC) you will be getting quite startling case gains. This data includes assessing for the prior confusion and doing special Sec Checks on it as per tape here Oct 3.
With just this you would be curing people left and right.
When you got that jolly well anchored in the hurricane and all staked down we can then start educating auditors for Routine Three complete. But that's away — a few months perhaps — up the line.
I feel that if we just settle down on this one programme and saw wood we'll get a lot of wins and a lot of happy PCs and the bugs out of procurement and case gains. Then we can move on.
How about it?? Best,
RON
JOAN FROM RON 3R2
I am counting on you to exam staff routinely on the various HCOBs and tapes relating to:
I think we would err in spreading our attention too far on what we expect them to get down pat. If the TRs are obviously way out, blame the Academy and return the auditor to there on a weekend basis.
Don't classify any auditor as Class Two until he or she never stutters an instant on any Exam question on the above items.
The tape of Oct 3 was tailored up to be of assistance in explaining the data about prior confusion that gets rid of somatics. This is part of Class Two.
Security Checking includes the ability to locate the area of prior confusion. As this clears up most of the things a PC is worried about you are in for a lot of wins.
The people you get in the HGC have Psychosomatics, lots of PTPs of long duration and hidden standards. It is now very easy to relieve these things at the level of Class Two by Sec Checking areas before the PC noticed the somatic.
I think auditors can easily learn these things and I know you will get very appreciative PCs as a result.
I want you to bear down hard on Examination. The way you examine is very brief. You bring in the auditor or having studied the auditor comes in. You have a complete Check Sheet for the auditors, all he or she is supposed to know about this, Bulletin by Bulletin, Tape by Tape. You have a prepared Exam. It is very intensive and minute. You keep asking questions from it until the student misses. The first time the student misses is a flunk and that is the end of the Exam. This saves you lots of time and it brings the student up to reading the Bulletin or hearing the tape time after time, and they get really familiar with the Exam data. A seventy percent pass is no good. We only want one hundred percent passes.
Well that's it. Best,
RON